Regular article
Cancer risk assessment: The science that is not

https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2300(92)90019-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Regulators have adopted the assumption of low dose linearity in cancer risk assessment, variously justified as scientifically correct and as responsible public health policy. Corollary assumptions are the one-molecule-one-hit hypothesis, the exclusion of no-effect thresholds, and the equivalency of response in experimental rodents and man. While our understanding of the carcinogenesis process remains tentative, these generalizations are not sustained by the limited scientific evidence available, not even as interim working hypotheses. In this light, they reflect a facile bureaucratic response to pragmatic demands borne of political perceptions, rather than the recognition of a complex and still opaque reality.

References (71)

  • B. Altshuler

    Quantitative models for lung cancer induced by cigarette smoke

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (1989)
  • J.C. Barrett et al.

    Role of genetic instability in carcinogenesis

  • I. Berenblum et al.

    The persistence of latent tumor cells induced in the mouse skin by a single application of 9:10-dimethyl-1:2-benzanthacene

    Br. J. Cancer

    (1949)
  • H.F. Blum
  • H.F. Blum

    Hyperplasia induced by ultraviolet light: Possible relationship to cancer induction

  • C. Borek

    The induction and regulation of radiogenic transformation in vitro: cellular and molecular mechanisms

  • H. Boxenbaum et al.

    Hormesis, Gomperts functions, and risk assessment

    Drug Metab. Rev.

    (1988)
  • D. Brouty-Boye et al.

    Reversion of the transformed phenotype to the parental phenotype by subcultivation of X-ray transformed C3H-1012 cells at low cell density

    Int. J. Cancer

    (1979)
  • P.A. Cerutti et al.

    Inflammation and oxidative stress in carcinogenesis

    Cancer Cells

    (1991)
  • L. Chiang

    Competing risks in mortality analysis

    Annu. Rev. Public Health

    (1991)
  • N.H. Colburn

    The genetics of tumor promotion

  • D. Dix

    The role of aging in cancer incidence: An epidemiological study

    J. Gerontol.

    (1989)
  • R. Doll et al.

    Cigarette smoking and bronchial carcinoma: Dose and time relationships among regular smokers and lifelong non-smokers

    J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health

    (1978)
  • R. Doll et al.

    The causes of cancer: Quantitative estimates of avoidable risk of cancer in the United States today

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    (1981)
  • R. Dulbecco et al.

    Distribution of developmental markers in rat mammary tumors induced by N-nitrosomethylurea

    Cancer Res.

    (1986)
  • R. Dulbecco et al.

    Stochastic development of invasive potential in rat mammary tumors induced by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea

  • R. Dulbecco et al.

    Reversion toward an earlier stage of differentiation and loss of polarity during progression of N-methy-N-nitrosourea-induced rat mammary tumors

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  • A. Fernandez et al.

    Probabilistic view of the transformation of cultured C3H 1012 mouse embryo fibroblasts by 3-methylcholanthrene

  • C.A. Finch
  • E.C. Hoffman et al.

    Cloning of a factor required for activity of the Ah (dioxin) receptor

    Science

    (1991)
  • M. Hollstein et al.

    p53 mutations in human cancers

    Science

    (1991)
  • R.B. Howe et al.
  • A.R. Kennedy

    The conditions for the modification of radiation transformation in vitro by a promoter and protease inhibitors

    Carcinogenesis (London)

    (1985)
  • A.R. Kennedy et al.

    Investigation of the mechanism for enhancement of radiation transformation in vitro by 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate

    Carcinogenesis (London)

    (1980)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text