Taste dimensions in cigarette discrimination: A multidimensional scaling approach☆
References (17)
- et al.
Nicotine fading, self-monitoring and cigarette fading to produce cigarette abstinence or controlled smoking
Behaviour Research and Theraphy
(1983) - et al.
A carbon-monoxide analyzer for measurement of smoking behavior
Behavior Therapy
(1978) TORSCA-9, a Fortran-IV program for nonmetric multidimensional scaling
Behavioral Science
(1968)Nicotine content of cigarettes and the smoking habit: Their relevance to subjective ratings of preferences in smokers
Psychopharmavologia
(1972)“Tar,” nicotine and carbon monoxide of the smoke of 208 varieties of domestic cigarettes
(1983)The effect of varying the nicotine content of cigarettes on human smoking behavior
Psychopharmacologia
(1971)- et al.
Reactions to cigarettes as a function of nicotine and “tar”
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
(1976) - et al.
Cigarette nicotine content as a determinant of human smoking behavior
Psychopharmacologia
(1970)
Cited by (20)
Quantifying brand loyalty: Evidence from the cigarette market
2021, Journal of Health EconomicsCitation Excerpt :Although the product-specific intercepts may reflect utility from unobservable (to the econometrician) product attributes, evidence from blind taste tests suggests a small role for true (as opposed to perceived) differences. This long-standing research literature finds that smokers can less-than-perfectly distinguish their own brands from others (Husband and Godfrey, 1934; Ramond et al., 1950; Littman and Manning, 1954; Prothro, 1953; Jaffe and Glaros, 1986). While some of these studies find that smokers can discern their regular brand from others at a rate greater than implied by chance, all imply substantially less than perfect discrimination.
An inventory of methods suitable to assess additive-induced characterising flavours of tobacco products
2016, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :Smokers identify taste and aroma as important factors in the pleasure derived from smoking and for their choice of cigarette brand (DiFranza et al., 1994; Leatherdale et al., 2009; Levin et al., 1990; Talhout et al., 2009). For instance, the sweetness of cigarette smoke appeared closely related to satisfaction and pleasantness (Jaffe and Glaros, 1986). Flavours are reported to mask the bitter taste of cigarette smoke, and provide a more appealing flavour (Bates et al., 1999; Fowles, 2001; SCENIHR, 2010; Sokol et al., 2014).
Variations in cigarette brand characteristics: can consumers tell the difference?
2023, Tobacco ControlImpacts of Nicotine and Flavoring on the Sensory Perception of E-Cigarette Aerosol
2020, Nicotine and Tobacco Research
- ☆
This study is a portion of a thesis conducted by the first author under the direction of the second. Portions of this study were presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, August, 1985.