Elsevier

Addictive Behaviors

Volume 20, Issue 2, March–April 1995, Pages 189-203
Addictive Behaviors

Applying the transtheoretical model to a representative sample of smokers

https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(94)00062-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Interrelationships among key constructs of the Transtheoretical Model are examined for the first time on a large (N = 4,144) representative sample of smokers. The posited relationships between the early Stages of Change (Precontemplation, Contemplation, Preparation) and the Processes of Change, Decisional Balance, and Situational Temptation are generally supported. Precontemplators are found to use the Processes of Change the least and those in Preparation use them the most. Precontemplators also have the least negative attitudes toward their smoking behavior. Precontemplators and Contemplators are tempted to smoke in more situations than those in Preparation. Precontemplators are also the most addicted to smoking, followed by those in Contemplation and Preparation, respectively, when examined on traditional measures of smoking behavior. The implications for smoking cessation efforts are also discussed.

References (39)

  • C.C. DiClemente et al.

    Self-efficacy and the states of self-change of smoking

    Cognitive Therapy and Research

    (1985)
  • J.L. Fava et al.

    Structural Confirmation of Short Form Instruments for the Transtheoretical Model

  • P. Greenwald et al.

    The new emphasis in cancer control

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute

    (1985)
  • I.L. Janis et al.

    Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment

    (1977)
  • K.G. Jöreskog et al.
  • R.M. Kaplan et al.

    Stages of smoking cessation: The 1990 California Tobacco Survey

    Tobacco Control

    (1993)
  • J.M. Lepkowski

    Telephone sampling methods in the United States

  • S.E. Maxwell et al.

    Measures of strength of association: A comparative examination

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1981)
  • A. Piani et al.

    Health promotion and disease prevention: United States, 1990

  • Cited by (0)

    This research was supported by Grants CA 27821 and CA 50087 from the National Cancer Institute.

    View full text