Nicotine patch use in pregnant smokers: Nicotine and cotinine levels and fetal effects,☆☆,,★★

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70521-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were (1) to determine whether nicotine patch therapy for pregnant women smokers acutely compromises fetal well-being and (2) to determine the serum and urine nicotine and cotinine levels in pregnant women while smoking, while abstinent from smoking, and while receiving nicotine patch therapy compared with levels in a historical control group of nonpregnant women smokers who abstained from smoking while receiving comparable doses of nicotine patch therapy. Study Design: Pregnant cigarette smokers (n = 21) aged ≥18 years whose fetuses were beyond 24 weeks’ gestational age were recruited for this 1-sample, repeated-measures study. Serial measurements of the mother and fetus were made at baseline while the mother was smoking, while abstaining from smoking, and while using nicotine patch therapy for 4 days in a special care hospital unit. Nonpregnant women smokers of similar age were used for comparison. Morning and afternoon serum and 24-hour urine levels of nicotine and cotinine were obtained during hospitalization. Indicators of fetal well-being assessed were fetal heart rate and reactivity, systolic/diastolic ratio of blood flow in the umbilical artery, and fetal activity seen on ultrasonography and quantitated as biophysical profiles. Results: No evidence of fetal compromise was seen during the inpatient phase while nicotine patch therapy was administered. Steady state (inpatient day 4) serum levels of nicotine were similar to smoking levels and to those seen in historical control subjects (ie, nonpregnant women of child-bearing age who were abstinent from smoking and who used the same nicotine patch). Morning serum cotinine levels were significantly higher (P = .038) in the nonpregnant subjects than in the pregnant subjects, whereas afternoon levels were not significantly different. Steady state urinary levels of nicotine and cotinine were also not significantly different in pregnant versus nonpregnant patients. On inpatient days 2, 3, and 4, when the women were not smoking and were wearing the nicotine patch, the morning fetal heart rates were significantly reduced relative to baseline when the subjects were smoking. Conclusions: Nicotine patch therapy was not found to be associated with indications of fetal compromise during the in-hospital phase of nicotine patch therapy in pregnant smokers who were abstaining. Although not conclusive because of the small sample sizes, serum nicotine levels (morning and afternoon) appear similar in pregnant and nonpregnant subjects and similar for both groups when smoking (baseline) as compared to the steady state of nicotine patch use. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:736-43.)

Section snippets

Subjects

After study approval by the Mayo Institutional Review Board, pregnant cigarette smokers who were in their third trimester of pregnancy were recruited from the Department of Obstetrics at the Mayo Clinic. All potential participants underwent obstetric ultrasonography to confirm the gestational age and to screen for detectable fetal anomalies. Those who met the following inclusion criteria were invited to participate in this study: age ≥18 years; general good health as determined by the study

Results

There were a total of 23 subjects enrolled in the study, but 2 subjects discontinued study participation before the inpatient phase. These 2 subjects have been excluded from all analyses. Demographic and baseline characteristics of the 21 pregnant subjects included in the study are given in Table I.

. Baseline subject characteristics (n = 21)

CharacteristicNo.Mean ± SDRange
Age (y)26.5 ± 5.719-41
Gestational age (wk)27.4 ± 2.724-33
Married11
No. of prior live births1.0 ± 1.00-3
Current cigarettes/d

Comment

In this report on nicotine patch therapy in pregnant smokers, we found no evidence of serious detrimental short-term effects to the fetus as measured by nonstress tests, biophysical profiles, and umbilical artery Doppler studies. We observed, compared with baseline levels during maternal smoking, that mean fetal heart rate decreased on the mornings of days 2, 3, and 4 of the nicotine patch therapy. Although statistically significant, the differences in fetal heart rates were small and may not

Acknowledgements

We thank the following people for their hard work and assistance in completing this project: Jaci Stensland, RN, Judy Trautman, RN, Karen Hurtis, Richard Morris, and Rhonda Baumberger.

References (28)

  • Center for Disease Control and Prevention

    Medical-care expenditures attributable to cigarette smoking during pregnancy—United States, 1995

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (1997)
  • RD Hurt et al.

    Nicotine patch therapy for smoking cessation combined with physician advice and nurse follow-up—one-year outcome and percentage nicotine replacement

    JAMA

    (1994)
  • NL Benowitz

    Nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy

    JAMA

    (1991)
  • JM Johns et al.

    Behavioral effects of prenatal exposure to nicotine in guinea pigs

    Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol

    (1982)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Nicotine replacement therapy and e-cigarettes in pregnancy and infant respiratory outcomes

      2022, Early Human Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nicotine replacement therapy is available in multiple formats to pregnant women, including patches, inhalators, chewing gum and lozenges [10]. Patches provide long-acting nicotine exposure, whereas chewing gum and lozenges act more quickly with a shorter duration of action [16]. There is no evidence that a specific type of NRT is superior in pregnancy [10].

    • Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Nicotine Dependence in Pregnancy

      2011, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      When compared with the other forms of NRT, transdermal patches produce lower, longer-lasting, steadier concentrations of nicotine rather than high concentrations for shorter periods. Limited pharmacokinetic studies have reported that NRT results in plasma cotinine and nicotine levels that are no higher than that observed with smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day, which is considered moderate to heavy smoking.37,38 In contrast, nicotine gum and nasal spray can provide nicotine exposure similar to that of smoking when used regularly throughout the day.39

    • Prenatal nicotine exposure in rhesus monkeys compromises development of brainstem and cardiac monoamine pathways involved in perinatal adaptation and sudden infant death syndrome: Amelioration by Vitamin C

      2011, Neurotoxicology and Teratology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Pumps were implanted under ketamine anesthesia and were changed every three weeks to maintain a steady-state infusion throughout pregnancy; minipump changes were carried out under the direction of a veterinary surgeon following strict sterile protocols. This regimen produces maternal plasma levels of about 30 ng/ml for nicotine and 120 for cotinine (Slotkin et al., 2005), both well within the range of values typical of maternal smoking in pregnant smokers consuming 10–20 cigarettes per day (Ogburn et al., 1999; Slotkin et al., 2005), importantly, total nicotine delivery and average daily nicotine plasma levels are similar in pregnant smokers and in users of transdermal nicotine patches (Oncken et al., 1997). Concurrently with the nicotine or vehicle infusion, animals received daily oral supplementation with Vitamin C in the form of a chewable vitamin pill; there were four different Vitamin C dose levels (0, 50, 100, and 250 mg per day).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    From the Department of Obstetrics,a the Nicotine Research Center,b the Section of Biostatistics,c and the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology,d Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation.

    ☆☆

    Supported by a grant from Elán Pharmaceutical Corporation, Athlone, Ireland.

    Reprint requests: Paul L. Ogburn, Jr, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

    ★★

    0002-9378/99 $8.00 + 06/1/100253

    View full text