Nicotine patch use in pregnant smokers: Nicotine and cotinine levels and fetal effects☆,☆☆,★,★★
Section snippets
Subjects
After study approval by the Mayo Institutional Review Board, pregnant cigarette smokers who were in their third trimester of pregnancy were recruited from the Department of Obstetrics at the Mayo Clinic. All potential participants underwent obstetric ultrasonography to confirm the gestational age and to screen for detectable fetal anomalies. Those who met the following inclusion criteria were invited to participate in this study: age ≥18 years; general good health as determined by the study
Results
There were a total of 23 subjects enrolled in the study, but 2 subjects discontinued study participation before the inpatient phase. These 2 subjects have been excluded from all analyses. Demographic and baseline characteristics of the 21 pregnant subjects included in the study are given in Table I.
Characteristic No. Mean ± SD Range Age (y) — 26.5 ± 5.7 19-41 Gestational age (wk) — 27.4 ± 2.7 24-33 Married 11 — — No. of prior live births — 1.0 ± 1.0 0-3 Current cigarettes/d
Comment
In this report on nicotine patch therapy in pregnant smokers, we found no evidence of serious detrimental short-term effects to the fetus as measured by nonstress tests, biophysical profiles, and umbilical artery Doppler studies. We observed, compared with baseline levels during maternal smoking, that mean fetal heart rate decreased on the mornings of days 2, 3, and 4 of the nicotine patch therapy. Although statistically significant, the differences in fetal heart rates were small and may not
Acknowledgements
We thank the following people for their hard work and assistance in completing this project: Jaci Stensland, RN, Judy Trautman, RN, Karen Hurtis, Richard Morris, and Rhonda Baumberger.
References (28)
- et al.
A meta-analysis of randomized trials of prenatal smoking cessation interventions
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1994) - et al.
Loss of neonatal hypoxia tolerance after perinatal nicotine exposure: implications for sudden infant death syndrome
Brain Res Bull
(1995) - et al.
Transdermal nicotine replacement in pregnancy: maternal pharmacokinetics and fetal effects
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1997) - et al.
Effects of transdermal nicotine or smoking on nicotine concentrations and maternal-fetal hemodynamics
Obstet Gynecol
(1997) - et al.
Fetal hemodynamic response to maternal intravenous nicotine administration
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1992) - et al.
Maternal cigarette smoking: the effects on umbilical and uterine blood flow velocity
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1988) - et al.
The effects of maternal smoking on fetal and infant mortality
Am J Epidemiol
(1988) - et al.
Smoking and reproduction
Fertil Steril
(1986) The health benefits of smoking cessation: a report of the Surgeon General, 1990
(1990)- et al.
Smoking before, during, and after pregnancy
Am J Public Health
(1990)
Medical-care expenditures attributable to cigarette smoking during pregnancy—United States, 1995
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
Nicotine patch therapy for smoking cessation combined with physician advice and nurse follow-up—one-year outcome and percentage nicotine replacement
JAMA
Nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy
JAMA
Behavioral effects of prenatal exposure to nicotine in guinea pigs
Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol
Cited by (70)
Nicotine replacement therapy and e-cigarettes in pregnancy and infant respiratory outcomes
2022, Early Human DevelopmentCitation Excerpt :Nicotine replacement therapy is available in multiple formats to pregnant women, including patches, inhalators, chewing gum and lozenges [10]. Patches provide long-acting nicotine exposure, whereas chewing gum and lozenges act more quickly with a shorter duration of action [16]. There is no evidence that a specific type of NRT is superior in pregnancy [10].
Drugs and Environmental Agents in Pregnancy and Lactation: Teratology, Epidemiology
2016, Obstetrics: Normal and Problem PregnanciesPharmacotherapeutic Management of Nicotine Dependence in Pregnancy
2011, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :When compared with the other forms of NRT, transdermal patches produce lower, longer-lasting, steadier concentrations of nicotine rather than high concentrations for shorter periods. Limited pharmacokinetic studies have reported that NRT results in plasma cotinine and nicotine levels that are no higher than that observed with smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day, which is considered moderate to heavy smoking.37,38 In contrast, nicotine gum and nasal spray can provide nicotine exposure similar to that of smoking when used regularly throughout the day.39
Prenatal nicotine exposure in rhesus monkeys compromises development of brainstem and cardiac monoamine pathways involved in perinatal adaptation and sudden infant death syndrome: Amelioration by Vitamin C
2011, Neurotoxicology and TeratologyCitation Excerpt :Pumps were implanted under ketamine anesthesia and were changed every three weeks to maintain a steady-state infusion throughout pregnancy; minipump changes were carried out under the direction of a veterinary surgeon following strict sterile protocols. This regimen produces maternal plasma levels of about 30 ng/ml for nicotine and 120 for cotinine (Slotkin et al., 2005), both well within the range of values typical of maternal smoking in pregnant smokers consuming 10–20 cigarettes per day (Ogburn et al., 1999; Slotkin et al., 2005), importantly, total nicotine delivery and average daily nicotine plasma levels are similar in pregnant smokers and in users of transdermal nicotine patches (Oncken et al., 1997). Concurrently with the nicotine or vehicle infusion, animals received daily oral supplementation with Vitamin C in the form of a chewable vitamin pill; there were four different Vitamin C dose levels (0, 50, 100, and 250 mg per day).
Predictors of adverse events among pregnant smokers exposed in a nicotine replacement therapy trial
2009, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- ☆
From the Department of Obstetrics,a the Nicotine Research Center,b the Section of Biostatistics,c and the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology,d Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation.
- ☆☆
Supported by a grant from Elán Pharmaceutical Corporation, Athlone, Ireland.
- ★
Reprint requests: Paul L. Ogburn, Jr, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
- ★★
0002-9378/99 $8.00 + 06/1/100253