Assessment of air quality in barcelona by personal monitoring of nonsmokers for respirable suspended particles and environmental tobacco smoke

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(97)00004-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Personal monitoring over a 24-h period was performed using over 190 subjects divided into two distinct groups, one for housewives and one for office workers. Questionnaire surveys were conducted in addition to determinations for respirable suspended particles (RSP), environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) particles, nicotine, 3-ethenylpyridine, and saliva cotinine. The highest median levels of RSP, ETS particles, and nicotine were measured for subjects working in smoking workplaces. However, workers living in smoking households were more exposed outside working hours since more time was spent outside the workplace. These subjects, based upon median levels (90th percentile in parentheses), would be exposed each year to between 5.2 and 8.4 (26 and 40) cigarette equivalents (CE) outside the workplace compared with approximately 3.5 (13) CE at work. The lowest median levels were recorded for housewives living in nonsmoking households, equivalent to an exposure of approximately 1 CE per y. Subjective assessments of ETS exposure over the monitoring periods made by subjects on two separate occasions were considered to be consistent with measured concentrations. Subjects were not considered to have taken the length of time spent in any one environment into consideration, the ETS concentration rather than “overall exposure” having been assessed. Saliva cotinine measurements were used during the course of this investigation as a tool for determining misclassification of smoking status rather than a marker for ETS exposure. Using a cutoff level of 25 ng mL−1, between 10.5% and 17.8% of the subjects were found to have misclassified themselves as nonsmokers, depending upon the criteria used.

References (23)

  • S.K. Hammond et al.

    Occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke

    JAMA

    (1995)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study

      2000, Lancet
      Citation Excerpt :

      The first type of study monitored nonsmokers' secondhand smoke exposure using personal air samples. Pilot studies were done by the US Oak Ridge National Laboratory26–27 and UK Hazleton Laboratory;28 Hazleton subsequently did studies in the same countries as IARC,26–36 as well as in Asia and Latin America. Despite the reluctance of Hazleton's parent company, PM was eager to promote an interpretation of the studies' findings; later, the Aug 16, 1998, Sunday Telegraph reported that the studies demonstrated that “real-life levels” of secondhand smoke probably do not cause fatal diseases.37

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text