Research Article
Gambling with Our Health: Smoke-Free Policy Would Not Reduce Tribal Casino Patronage

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.04.006Get rights and content

Background

Tribal sovereignty exempts tribal casinos from statewide smoking bans.

Purpose

To conduct a tribally-led assessment to identify the characteristics of casino patrons at Lake of the Torches Resort Casino in Lac du Flambeau WI and their preferences for a smoke-free casino.

Methods

A survey was administered from April to August 2011 to a stratified random sample of 957 members of the casino players club to assess their preferences for a smoke-free casino. These members were categorized into three groups: those who reported being likely to (1) visit more; (2) visit less; or (3) visit the same if the casino prohibited smoking. They were characterized by age, education, sex, race/ethnicity, annual income, players club level, and reasons for visiting the casino. Statistical analyses were conducted on weighted data in October to December 2011. Weighted logistic regression was calculated to control for potential confounding of patron characteristics.

Results

Of the 957 surveyed patrons, 520 (54%) patrons were likely to visit more; 173 (18%) patrons to visit less; and 264 (28%) patrons were indifferent to the smoke-free status. Patrons more likely to prefer a smoke-free casino tended to be white, elderly, middle class and above, and visit the casino restaurants. Patrons within the lower tiers of the players club, almost half of the players club members, also showed a higher preference for a smoke-free casino.

Conclusions

This tribal casino would likely realize increased patronage associated with smoke-free status while also contributing to improved health for casino workers and patrons.

Introduction

Tribal casinos can intervene on the social determinants of health, reducing poverty and improving SES,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 in American Indian (AI) communities experiencing significant health disparities.8, 9, 10 The smoking prevalence among AIs is 40%—the highest of any racial/ethnic group—and more than double that of the general U.S. population.8, 9, 10 The incidence of heart disease among AIs is twice that of the general U.S. population,11, 12 and mortality rates for both heart disease and stroke are 20% and 14% greater for AIs than all U.S. races.13, 14 Although the cancer incidence rate is decreasing among whites, it is increasing among AIs.15, 16 With poverty rates as high as 85%17 and unemployment rates nearly 80%,3 it is hardly surprising that, in AI communities where casinos are located, health outcomes are improving.1, 5, 7, 18, 19

Nevertheless, despite the potential benefits casinos provide, both casino workers and patrons continue to be exposed to secondhand smoke in the face of the Surgeon General’s warning that there is no safe level of tobacco smoke exposure.20, 21 Indeed, even brief exposure increases the risk of heart attack or cancer.22, 23, 24, 25 Consequently, 26 states have banned smoking in public places.26 Because the tobacco industry has lobbied hard against smoke-free laws, particularly in casinos,27 only eight of these states have banned smoking in casinos.26

Tribal casinos are exempt from statewide bans because of tribal sovereignty. As smoking has declined among the non-Hispanic white population, the tobacco industry has increasingly targeted tribal casinos. As a result, only six of the 237 tribes operating casinos have voluntarily implemented casino-wide smoking bans.28 This statistic is particularly troubling given that one in four casino employees is an AI,29 as AIs are the least likely of any racial/ethnic group to have smoke-free worksites or homes30 and are more likely than any other racial/ethnic group to be exposed to secondhand smoke.31

Although there is broad support for banning smoking in public places,32 only one published study by Timberlake et al.33 in 2012 assessed the views of tribal casino patrons with regard to a proposed casino smoking ban, as well as the characteristics of those patrons who might prefer or oppose a smoke-free casino. Using secondary data from the 2008 California Tobacco Survey, the study assessed smoking prevalence by casino visitation, predictors of casino visitation, avoidance of secondhand smoke among casino patrons, and willingness to extend one’s stay and visit again if smoking were prohibited. The study found that smoke-free tribal casinos would increase patronage by Californians, including first-time and repeat visits.33

This article reports on a community-led assessment conducted with the Lake of the Torches Resort Casino in northern Wisconsin, which surveyed current casino patrons. The characteristics of the patrons and their preferences for a smoke-free casino environment were assessed, and the results were reported back to the tribal leadership and community for health infrastructure planning. This assessment is, to our knowledge, the first of its kind to be led by Native American tribal members and work in partnership with a tribally owned casino to directly survey active casino patrons.

Section snippets

Community Profile

The project team included the Great Lakes Inter-tribal Council (GLITC), a non-profit consortium created to expand the self-determination of 12 federally recognized member tribes located in Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, and the Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians (LDF) tribal nation—a member of the GLITC consortium—located in a reservation in northern Wisconsin.

The smoking rate in the LDF reservation is 44%,8, 34 similar to other tribes in the Great Lakes region where AIs have

Results

The characteristics of the surveyed patrons (respondents and non-respondents) and known characteristics of the players club patrons who met the initial selection criteria are shown in Table 1. The majority of survey respondents were white (92%); had at least passed high school or the General Educational Development test (96%); and had an annual household income greater than $40,000 (51%). The majority were nonsmokers (77%); were bothered to some extent by smoke in the casino (69%); and believed

Discussion

Overall, the majority of survey respondents in this study reported being more likely to visit the casino if it banned smoking, whereas fewer patrons were likely to visit less. The patrons who were more likely to prefer a smoke-free casino tended to be white, elderly, middle class and above, and patrons of the casino restaurants. Patrons within the lower tiers of the players club (smaller gamblers), almost half of the players club members, also showed a higher preference for a smoke-free casino.

Acknowledgments

The project was supported in part by a contract with the CDC (No. U158DP002617). Portions of this project’s work involve the Communities Putting Prevention to Work initiative supported by CDC funding. However, the findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC. The authors would like to thank the Lake of the Torches Resort Casino and casino patrons, Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, Lac du

References (49)

  • B. Wolfe et al.

    The income and health effects of tribal casino gaming on American Indians

    Demography

    (2012)
  • V.B.B. Jernigan et al.

    Changing patterns in health behaviors and risk factors related to cardiovascular disease among American Indians and Alaska Natives

    Am J Public Health

    (2010)
  • C.H. Denny et al.

    Disparities in chronic disease risk factors and health status between American Indian/Alaska Native and white elders: findings from a telephone survey, 2001 and 2002

    Am J Public Health

    (2005)
  • Prevalence of cigarette use among 14 racial/ethnic populations—U.S., 1999–2001

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2004)
  • Trends in Indian health, 2000–2001

    (2004)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    Incidence and risk factors for stroke in American Indians

    Circulation

    (2008)
  • A. Jemal et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2008, featuring cancer in American Indians and Alaska Natives

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2008)
  • J. Swan et al.

    Cancer screening and risk factor rates among American Indians

    Am J Public Health

    (2006)
  • Census Bureau. Fact sheet: American Indians and Alaska Natives

    (2011)
  • A. Bullock et al.

    Family income supplements and development of psychiatric and substance use disorders among an American Indian population

    JAMA

    (2010)
  • E.J. Costello et al.

    Association of family income supplements in adolescence with development of psychiatric and substance use disorders in adulthood among an American Indian population

    JAMA

    (2010)
  • The health consequences of smoking: a report of the surgeon general

    (2004)
  • Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and economic costs—U.S., 1995–1999

    Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2002)
  • Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—U.S., 2000–2004

    Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2008)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Holding no-one back: The Nutrition Equity Framework in theory and practice

      2022, Global Food Security
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indigenous reservations, most of which are rural, have been the target of environmental destruction and degradation (Dhillon and Young, 2010) and are more likely than urban settler-concentrated areas to bear the burden of climate change(Ford, 2012). National policies aimed to reduce or eliminate racial/ethnic health disparities may not impact Indigenous peoples if they are not applicable on Indigenous lands and can even exacerbate disparities, as is the case of tobacco regulations in the United States (Brokenleg et al., 2014; Hafez et al., 2019). Further, these policies are based on Western notions of health and health equity and don't account for Indigenous relational concepts of health.

    • Responsible investing in the gaming industry

      2020, Journal of Corporate Finance
      Citation Excerpt :

      The significant and positive coefficient on SMOKE suggests that more stringent bans on smoking attract more institutional investors to hold casino shares. This result echoes the findings of Brokenleg et al. (2014) who argue that prohibiting smoking would encourage nonsmoking patrons to visit casino restaurants. It is also in line with the result of the 2015 Macao Visitor Profile Survey conducted by the IFT, which shows that approximately 77% of visitors to Macao favor the smoking ban and that 33% would like to return to Macao after the ban while only approximately 5% respond negatively (IFT, 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text