Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 40, Issue 6, June 2005, Pages 756-764
Preventive Medicine

Inequalities in the prevalence of smoking in the European Union: comparing education and income

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to determine whether education or income was more strongly related to smoking in the European Union at large, and within the individual countries of the EU, at the end of the 1990s.

Methods

We related smoking prevalence to education and income level by analyzing cross-sectional data on a total of 48,694 men and 52,618 women aged 16 and over from 11 countries of the European Union in 1998.

Results

Both education and income were related to smoking within the European Union at large. After adjustment of the other socioeconomic indicator, education remained related to smoking in the EU at large, but income only remained so among men. Educational inequalities were larger than income-related inequalities among younger and middle-aged men and women. Educational inequalities were larger than income-related inequalities among men in all individual countries, and among women in Northern Europe. For women from Southern European countries, the magnitude of education- and income-related inequalities was similar.

Conclusions

Education is a strong predictor of smoking in Europe. Interventions should aim to prevent addiction to smoking among the lower educated, by price policies, school-based programs, and smoking cessation support for young adults.

Introduction

Several studies have demonstrated that the prevalence of smoking in populations of developed countries is related to socioeconomic status [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Smoking is an important risk factor for some diseases and causes of death and it has been shown that a substantial part of socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality can be linked to smoking [7], [8], [9]. Studies that describe socioeconomic inequalities in smoking therefore contribute to an understanding of the determinants of smoking and, indirectly, to determinants of health inequalities. Furthermore, they serve to identify the subgroups of the population who need most attention in policies aiming to reduce smoking.

In most research in European countries, socioeconomic inequalities in smoking have been described according to level of education. Smoking is often initiated during adolescence, a time in which school environment plays an important role in daily life. School performance [10], [11] and peer pressure [12], [13], [14] are related to smoking initiation, and are likely to be related to lower educational level. However, after leaving school and moving into the workforce, other socioeconomic determinants, such as income, may have a stronger influence on smoking initiation and continuation. After completion of education, its stability in life thereafter fails to reflect changes in personal circumstances that may be relevant to the initiation and continuation of smoking behavior. Income is an indicator that more accurately than education reflects an adult's current social position. Some researchers have indeed shown that income is also related to health behaviors, including smoking, after adjustment for education [15], [16], [17], although it has also been reported otherwise [18]. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, a direct comparison of educational and income inequalities in smoking has not been reported.

The effects of education and income on smoking can be expected to differ between countries because the diffusion of smoking within the national population differs between European countries [3], [4]. Toward the later stages of the diffusion of the smoking epidemic, when the overall prevalence of smoking is declining, smoking is more and more associated with lower socioeconomic status [1], [3], [19]. At these stages, smoking as a habit may perhaps be more related to material circumstances and deprivation. Smoking in Britain for instance is concentrated in the lower income groups [20] and smoking serves to cope with the stress of living in disadvantaged circumstances [21]. In the earlier stages of the epidemic, as smoking is not as widespread in the population, smoking may be more strongly related to education, and smoking as a habit may signal innovation and emancipation among higher educated men and women. This means that results of studies on data from the US, or Northern European countries may not be generalized to express the situation in central and southern parts of Europe.

The aim of this study is to compare educational and income inequalities in smoking in the European Union, including countries from northern, central and southern parts of Europe, at the end of the 1990s. We compare these inequalities for the pooled population of 11 countries of the European Union, and for each of these countries separately. Our specific interest was in determining whether education or income was more strongly related to smoking, and to assess whether each has an independent effect.

Section snippets

Data and methods

Data from the fifth wave (1998) of the European Community Household Survey (ECHP) were analyzed. The ECHP is a social survey designed for the member states of the European Union, which uses a uniform random sampling design and common blueprint questionnaires for use in all the countries included. For all countries, the target population of the panel survey is the national household population. Data are collected by national statistical institutes or research centers. Data checks, imputation,

Results

Smoking prevalence rates and relative inequalities according to education are given in Table 3. An inverse educational gradient was found among men of all ages combined, with the prevalence of smoking being higher among the lower educated compared to the higher educated (OR = 1.73; CI = 1.66–1.81). Relative inequalities in smoking could be demonstrated with statistical significance for all age groups, with the ages 75+ years as the only exception. The educational inequalities were largest in

Discussion

Both education and income were related to smoking in the European Union. Both remained related to smoking after adjustment for the other socioeconomic indicator. Education remained related both among men and among women of the EU at large, whereas income only remained related to smoking among men. The independent effect of education was larger as compared to income, among men up to the ages 54 years, and among women up to the ages 44 years. Inequalities in smoking related to education were

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this study comes from the project “Socio-Economic determinants of Healthy Ageing” (SEdHA), which is subsidised as part of the Fifth Framework Programme on ‘Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources' of the European Commission. This paper is also supported by the project “Tackling socioeconomic inequalities smoking in Europe” which is financed by the European Commission (SANCO) through the European Network on Smoking Prevention (ENSP).

References (32)

  • C.T.M. Schrijvers et al.

    Explaining educational differences in mortality: the role of behavioural and material factors

    Am. J. Public Health

    (1999)
  • T.W. Hu et al.

    Teenage smoking, attempts to quit, and school performance

    Am. J. Public Health

    (1998)
  • A. Azevedo et al.

    Tobacco smoking among Portuguese high-school students

    Bull. World Health Organ.

    (1999)
  • D.M. Fergusson et al.

    The role of peer affiliations, social, family and individual factors in continuities in cigarette smoking between childhood and adolescence

    Addiction

    (1995)
  • B. Simons-Morton et al.

    Peer and parent influences on smoking and drinking among early adolescents

    Health Educ. Behav.

    (2001)
  • K. Holm et al.

    Why do Danish adolescents take up smoking?

    Eur. J. Public Health

    (2003)
  • Cited by (229)

    • Mortality Relative Risks by Smoking, Race/Ethnicity, and Education

      2023, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text