Skip to main content
Log in

Preliminary Investigation of the Advertising and Availability of PREPs, the New “Safe” Tobacco Products

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tobacco industry recently introduced a new set of “safe” cigarettes and nicotine delivery devices that purportedly entail reduced tobacco-related disease risk due to their lower level of some carcinogens and toxins. Little is know about the biological impact of these potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) and nothing is known about their advertising and availability. Hence, two pilot studies were conducted to examine the latter issues for the first time. In Study 1, we examined tobacco ads in 10 popular magazines 1998–2002 and found that only 1% of ads were for PREPs. In Study 2, we attempted to purchase PREPs in a random sample of 113 small stores and found that only 4.4% sold any PREP. These preliminary findings tentatively suggest that the industry might not yet be heavily invested in products that have the potential to increase tobacco use by decreasing its perceived harm. Studies with larger samples are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Amos, A. (1990). How women are targeted by the tobacco industry. World Health Forum 11: 416–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amos, A., and Haglund, M. (2000). From social taboo to “torch of freedom”: The marketing of cigarettes to women. Tob. Control 9: 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breland, A. B., Evans, S. E., Buchhalter, A. R., and Eissenberg, T. (2002). Acute effects of Advanc?: A potential reduced exposure product for smokers. Tob. Control 11: 376–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butching, F. (2002). Tobacco and the LGBT community. Burn. Issues: Tob. Relat. Dis. Res. Program Newslett. 5(1): 1–3, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, P. (1990). Tobacco foes attack ads that target women, minorities, teens and the poor. JAMA 264: 1505–1507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, K. M., Giovino, G., and Mendicino, A. J. (1987). Cigarette advertising and Black-White differences in brand preference. Public Health Rep. 102: 698–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, K. M., Morley, C. P., Horan, J. K., Steger, C., and Leavell, N. R. (2002). Marketing to America's youth. Tob. Control 11 Suppl 1: 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernster, V. (1989). Advertising and promotion of smokeless tobacco products. NCI Monogr. 8: 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerstrom, K. O., Hughes, J. R., Rasmussen, T., and Callas, P. W. (2000). Randomized trial investigating effect of a novel nicotine delivery device (EclipseTM) and a nicotine oral inhaler on smoking behavior, nicotine and carbon monoxide exposure, and motivation to quit. Tob. Control 9: 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittelsohn, J., McCormick, L. K., Allen, P., Grieser, M., et al. (1999). Inter-ethnic differences in youth tobacco language and cigarette brand preferences. Ethn. Health 4(4): 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, K. (1994). Lesbians and gays face tobacco targeting. Tob. Control 3: 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackbarth, D. P., Schnopp-Wyatt, D., Katz, D., Williams, J., Silvestri, B., and Pfleger, M.(2001). Collaborative research and action to control the geographic placement of outdoor advertising of alcohol and tobacco products in Chicago. Public Health Rep. 116: 558–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman-Goetz, L., Gerlach, K. K., Marino, C., and Mills, S. L. (1997). Cancer coverage and tobacco advertising in African-American women's popular magazines. J. Community Health 22: 261–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, P. P., Burton, D., Howe, H. L., and Sosin, D. M. (1992). Black-White differences in appeal of cigarette advertisements among adolescents. Tob. Control 1: 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (2001). Clearing the smoke: Assessing the science base for tobacco harm reduction. Retrieved from the National Academies Press Web site: www.nap.edu

  • King, C., Siegel, M., Celebucki, C., and Connolly, G. N. (1998). Adolescent exposure to cigarette advertising in magazines. JAMA 279: 516–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, C., Siegel, M., and Pucci, L. G. (2000). Exposure of Black youths to cigarette advertising in magazines. Tob. Control 9: 64–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muggli, M. E., Pollay, R. W., Lew, R., and Joseph, A. M. (2002). Targeting of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders by the tobacco industry. Tob. Control 11: 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Cancer Institute (2002). Plans and priorities. Retrieved from http://plan.cancer.gov

  • O'Keefe, A. M., and Pollay, R. W. (1996). Deadly targeting of women in promoting cigarettes. J. Am. Med. Women's Assoc. 51: 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. P., Choi, W. S., Gilpin, E. A., Farkas, A. J., and Berry, C. C. (1998). Tobacco industry promotion of cigarettes and adolescent smoking. JAMA 279: 511–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. P., Gilpin, E., Burns, D. M., Whalen, E., Rosbrook, B., Shopland, D., and Johnson, M. (1991). Does tobacco advertising target young people to start smoking? Evidence from California. JAMA 266(22): 3154–3158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. P., Gilpin, E. Z., and Choi, W. S. (1999). Sharing the blame: Smoking experimentation and future smoking-attributable mortality due to Joe Camel and Marlboro advertising and promotions. Tob. Control 8: 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollay, R. W., and Dewhirst, T. (2002). The dark side of marketing seemingly “light” cigarettes: Successful images and failed fact. Tob. Control 11: i18–i31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shield, M. (2002). New tobacco products: Truth and consequences. Burn. Issues: TRDRP Newslett. 5(1): 7, 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffman, S., Pillitteri, J. L., Burton, S. L., Rohay J. M., and Gitchell J. G. (2001a). Smokers' beliefs about “light” and “ultra light” cigarettes. Tob. Control 10 Suppl 1: i17–i23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffman, S., Pillitteri, J. L., Burton, S. L., Rohay J. M., and Gitchell J. G. (2001b). Effect of health messages about “light” and “ultra light” cigarettes on beliefs and quitting intent. Tob. Control 10 Suppl 1: i24–i32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, J., Connolly, G. N., and Lymperis, D. (2002). Eclips?: Does it live up to its health claims? Tob. Control 11 Suppl 2: ii64–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S., Chaloupka, F. J., and Wakefield, M. (2001). State variation in retail promotions and advertising for Marlboro cigarettes. Tob. Control 10: 337–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, J. L., Johnson, C. A., Boley-Cruz, T., and Sussman, S. (1997). Targeted tobacco markets: Outdoor advertising in Los Angeles minority neighborhoods. Am. J. Public Health 87: 1232–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thun, M. J., and Burns, D. M. (2001). Health impact of “reduced yield” cigarettes: A critical assessment of the epidemiological evidence. Tob. Control 10: i4–i11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, G. D., and Connolly, G. N. (2002). How cigarette design can affect youth initiation into smoking. Tob. Control 11: 32i-39i.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hickman, N., Klonoff, E.A., Landrine, H. et al. Preliminary Investigation of the Advertising and Availability of PREPs, the New “Safe” Tobacco Products. J Behav Med 27, 413–424 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBM.0000042413.69425.aa

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBM.0000042413.69425.aa

Navigation