Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of Chemical Compounds Generated from Second-generation E-cigarettes Using a Sorbent Cartridge Followed by a Two-step Elution Method

  • Published:
Analytical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We developed an analytical method for analyzing electronic cigarette (E-cigarette) smoke, and measured the carbonyl compounds and volatile organic compounds generated by 10 brands of second-generation E-cigarettes. A glass filter (Cambridge filter pad) for particulate matter and a solid sorbent tube packed with Carboxen-572 for gaseous compounds were used to collect E-cigarette smoke. These were then analyzed using a two-step elution method with carbon disulfide and methanol, followed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Formaldehyde (FA), acetaldehyde (AA), acetone (AC), acrolein (ACR), propanal (PA), acetol (AT), glyoxal (GO), and methyl glyoxal (MGO) were detected by HPLC in some E-cigarettes. Propylene glycol (PG), glycerol (GLY), and some esters were detected by GC/MS. GO and MGO exist mainly as particulate matter. AA, AC, ACR, PA, and AT exist mainly as gaseous compounds. FA exists as both particulate matter and gaseous compounds. These carbonyl compounds have carbon numbers C1–C3. The main components of E-liquid are PG (C3) and GLY (C3). Therefore, the oxidation of liquids, such as PG and GLY in E-cigarettes upon incidental contact with the heating element in E-cigarette, is suggested as being a possible cause for carbonyl generation. When the puff number exceeds a critical point, carbonyl generation rapidly increases and then remains constant. The results of this study are now being used to determine the following E-cigarette smoking protocol: puff volume, 55 mL; puff duration, 2 s; and puff number, 30. E-cigarette analysis revealed very large variation in carbonyl concentration among not only different brands, but also different samples of the same product. Typical distributions of carbonyl concentration were not observed in any of the E-cigarettes tested, and the mean values greatly differed from median values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Cressey, Nature, 2013, 501, 473.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. H. A. Gilbert, Patent US3200819 Smokeless non-tobacco cigarette, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Schripp, D. Markewitz, E. Uhde, and T. Salthammer, Indoor Air, 2013, 23, 25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Uchiyama, K. Ohta, Y. Inaba, and N. Kunugita, Anal. Sci., 2013, 29, 1219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Laugesen, “Safety Report on the Ruyan® E-cigarette Cartridge and Inhaled Aerosol”, 2008, Health New Zealand Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  6. U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), “FDA Warns of Health Risks Posed by E-cigarettes”, Consumer Health Information, 2009, http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/UCM173430.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Kosmider, A. Sobczak, M. Fik, J. Knysak, M. Zaciera, J. Kurek, and M. L. Goniewicz, Nicotine Tob. Res., 2014, 16, 1319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Ohta, S. Uchiyama, Y. Inaba, H. Nakagome, and N. Kunugita, Bunseki Kagaku, 2011, 60, 791.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Uchiyama, Y. Inaba, and N. Kunugita, J. Chromatogr. A, 2010, 1217, 4383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Uchiyama, T. Tomizawa, Y. Inaba, and N. Kunugita, J. Chromatogr. A, 2013, 1314, 31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Health Canada, Official Method T-115, “Determination of “Tar”, Nicotine and Carbon Monoxide in Mainstream Tobacco Smoke”, December 1999, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0K9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Uchiyama, H. Hayashida, R. Izu, Y. Inaba, H. Nakagome, and N. Kunugita, J. Chromatogr. A, 2015, 1426, 48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Bekki, S. Uchiyama, K. Ohta, Y. Inaba, H. Nakagome, and N. Kunugita, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2014, 11, 11192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. M. E. Counts, M. J. Morton, S. W. Laffoon, R. H. Cox, and P. J. Lipowicz, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2005, 41, 185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA), Recommended Method No. 74, “Determination of Selected Carbonyls in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)”, March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is partially supported by the Health and Labour Science Research Grants from Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of the Japanese Government, and the Practical Research Project for Life-Style Related Diseases Including Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes Mellitus from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED. We also gratefully acknowledge Sigma-Aldrich for technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigehisa Uchiyama.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uchiyama, S., Senoo, Y., Hayashida, H. et al. Determination of Chemical Compounds Generated from Second-generation E-cigarettes Using a Sorbent Cartridge Followed by a Two-step Elution Method. ANAL. SCI. 32, 549–555 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.32.549

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.32.549

Keywords

Navigation