Abstract
Summary
The abuse liability of nicotine replacement therapies is an important clinical consideration in the pharmacological treatment of nicotine dependence associated with cigarette smoking.
Abuse liability is defined as: (i) the likelihood oftaking a substance repeatedly, taking into account both factors that are likely to increase use (e.g. faster onset of pharmacodynamic effect) and factors that are likely to decrease use (e.g. adverse effects); and (ii) the likelihood of adverse consequences (both long and short term).
It can be concluded that most of the nicotine replacement therapies have lower abuse liability than tobacco cigarettes. Among the alternative therapies available, it would appear that those with a slower onset (e.g. chewing gum and transdermal systems) are less likely to be abused than those with a faster onset.
Experience with existing nicotine replacement therapies may be useful for future research into the development of new therapies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benowitz N. Pharmacologic aspects of cigarette smoking and nicotine addiction. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 1318–30
Stolerman IP, Jarvis MJ. The scientific case that nicotine is addictive. Psychopharmacology 1995; 117: 2–10
Hughes J. Risk-benefit assessment of nicotine preparations in smoking cessation. Drug Saf 1993; 8: 49–56
Busto U, Sellers E. Pharmacokinetic detenninants of drug abuse and dependence. C1in Pharmacokinet 1986; 11: 144–53
de Wit H, Dudish S, Ambre J. Subjective and behavioral effects of diazepam depend on its rate of onset. Psychopharmacology 1993; 112: 324–30
Henningfield J, Keenan R. Nicotine delivery kinetics and abuse liability. J Consult C1in Psychol 1993; 61: 1–8
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994
Jasinski DR. History of abuse liability testing in humans. Br J Addict 1991; 86: 1559–62
McNair D, Lorr M, Droppleman L. Profile of mood states [manual]. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1971
Martin W, Sloan J, Sapira J, et al. Physiological, subjective and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine and methylphenidate in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1971; 12: 245–58
Hindmarch I. Psychomotor function and psychoactive drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1980; 10: 189–209
Foltin RW, Evans SM. Performance effects of drugs of abuse. Hum Psychopharmacol 1993; 8: 9–19
Henningfield J, Goldberg S. Cigarette smokers self-administer intravenous nicotine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1983; 19: 887–90
Pomerleau C, Pomerleau O. Euphoriant effects of nicotine in smokers. Psychopharmacology 1992; 108: 460–5
Foltin R, Fischman M. Assessment of abuse liability of stimulant drugs in humans: a methodological survey. Drug Alcohol Depend 1991; 28: 3–48
de Wit H, Griffiths RR. Testing the abuse liability of anxiolytic and hypnotic drugs in humans. Drug Alcohol Depend 1991; 28: 83–111
Benowitz N, Jacob P, Savanapridi C. Determinants of nicotine intake while chewing nicotine polacri1ex gum. CIin Pharmacol Ther 1987; 41: 467–73
Svensson CK. Clinical pharmacokinetics of nicotine. Clin Pharmacokinet 1987; 12: 30–40
Benowitz N, Porchet H, Sheiner L, et al. Nicotine absorption and cardiovascular effects with smokeless tobacco use: comparison with cigarettes and nicotine gum. CIin Pharmacol Ther 1988; 44 (1): 23–8
Sutherland G, Russell M, Stapleton J, et al. Nasal nicotine spray: a rapid nicotine delivery system. Psychopharmacology 1992; 108: 512–8
Jarvis M, Raw M, Russell M, et al. Randomized control trial of nicotine chewing gum. BMJ 1982; 285: 537–40
Hughes J, Hatsukami D, Pickens R, et al. Effect of nicotine on the tobacco withdrawal syndrome. Psychopharmacology 1984; 83: 82–7
Schneider N, Jarvik M, Forsythe A. Nicotine vs. placebo gum in the alleviation of withdrawal during smoking cessation. Addict Behav 1984; 9: 149–56
West R, Jarvis M, Russell M, et al. Effect of nicotine replacement on the cigarette withdrawal syndrome. Br J Addict 1984; 79: 215–9
Heishman S, Snyder F, Henningfield J. Performance, subjective, and physiological effects of nicotine in non-smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend 1993; 34: 11–8
Haertzen C. Development of scales based on patterns of drug effects using the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI). Psycho I Rep 1966; 18: 163–94
Jasinski D, Martin W, Sapira J. Antagonism of the subjective, behavioral, pupillary, and respiratory depressant effects of cyclazocine by naloxone. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1968; 9: 215–22
Coslett-Nemeth R, Benowitz N, Robinson N, et al. Nicotine gum: chew rate, subjective effects and plasma nicotine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1988; 29: 747–51
Pickworth W, Heming R, Henningfield J. Electroencephalographic effects of nicotine chewing gum in humans. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1986; 25: 879–82
Wewers M, Tejwani G, Anderson J. Plasma nicotine, plasma beta-endorphin and mood states during periods of chronic smoking, abstinence and nicotine replacement. Psychopharmacology 1994; 116: 98–102
Shiffman S, Jarvik M. Smoking withdrawal. Symptoms in two weeks of abstinence. Psychopharmacology 1976; 50: 35–9
Gross J, Stitzer M. Nicotine replacement: ten-week effects on tobacco withdrawal symptoms. Psychopharmacology 1989; 98: 334–41
West R, Schneider N. Craving for cigarettes. Br J Addict 1985; 82: 407–15
Hughes J, Gust S, Keenan R, et al. Long-term use of nicotine vs placebo gum. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 1993–8
Hughes J, Strickler G, King D, et al. Smoking history, instructions and the effects of nicotine: two pilot studies. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1989; 34: 149–55
Hughes J, Pickens R, Spring W, et al. Instructions control whether nicotine will serve as a reinforcer. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1985; 235: 106–12
Hughes J, Gulliver S, Amoria G, et al. Effect of instructions and nicotine on smoking cessation, withdrawal symptoms and selfadministration of nicotine gum. Psychopharmacology 1989; 99: 486–91
Sherwood N. Effects of nicotine on human psychomotor performance. Hum Psychopharmacol 1993; 8: 155–84
Hughes J, Gust S, Keenan R, et al. Nicotine vs placebo gum in general medical practice. JAMA 1989; 261: 1300–5
Hughes J, Miller S. Nicotine gum to help stop smoking. JAMA 1984; 252: 2855–8
Schneider N, Jarvik M, Forsythe A, et al. Nicotine gum in smoking cessation: a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Addict Beh 1983; 8: 253–61
Hughes J. Long term use of nicotine replacement therapy. In: Henningfield J, Stitzer M, editors. New developments in nicotine delivery systems: proceedings of a conference; 1990 Sept 24: Johns Hopkins University. Ossining (NY): Cortlandt Communications, 1991
Palmer KJ, Buckley MM, Faulds D. Transdermal nicotine: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy as an aid to smoking cessation. Drugs 1992; 44: 498–529
Benowitz N, Jacob P, Olsson P, et al. Intravenous nicotine retards transdermal absorption of nicotine: evidence of blood flow-limited percutaneous absorption. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992; 52: 223–30
Bannon Y, Corish J, Corrigan O, et al. Transdermal delivery of nicotine in normal human volunteers: a single dose and multiple dose study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 37: 285–90
Gupta S, Benowitz N, Jacob P, et al. Bioavailability and absorption kinetics of nicotine following application of a transdermal system. Br J CIin Pharmacol 1993; 36: 221–7
Dubois J, Sioufi A, Muller P, et al. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of nicotine in healthy volunteers following single and repeated administration of different doses of transdermal nicotine systems. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1989; 11: 187–95
Caspary S, Keller-Stanislawski B, Huber T, et al. Pharmacokinetics of nicotine after application of a 30 cm2 nicotine patch under steady-state conditions. Int J CIin Psychopharmacol 1991; 29: 92–5
Kochak G, Sun J, Choi R, et al. Pharmacokinetic disposition of multiple-dose transdermal nicotine in healthy adult smokers. Pharm Res 1992; 9: 1451–5
Srivastava E, Russell M, Feyerabend C, et al. Sensitivity and tolerance to nicotine in smokers and nonsmokers. Psychopharmacology 1991; 105: 63–8
Daughton D, Heatley S, Prendergast J. Effect of transdermal nicotine delivery as an adjunct to low-intervention smoking cessation therapy — a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc 1991; 65: 1529–37
Tonnesen P, Norregaard J, Simonsen K, et al. A double-blind trial of a 16-hour transdermal nicotine patch in smoking cessation. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 311–5
Hurt R, Dale L, Offord K, et al. Serum nicotine and cotinine levels during nicotine-patch therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 54: 98–106
Rose J, Levin E, Behm F, et al. Transdermal nicotine facilitates smoking cessation. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1990; 47: 323–30
Group TNS. Transderrnal nicotine for smoking cessation: sixmonth results from two multicenter controlled clinical trials. JAMA 1991; 266: 3133–8
Group ICRFGPR. Effectiveness of a nicotine patch in helping people to stop smoking: results of a randomized trial in general practice. BMJ 1993; 306: 1304–8
Russell M, Stapleton J, Feyerabend C, et al. Targeting heavy smokers in general practice: randomized controlled trial of transderrnal nicotine patches. BMJ 1993; 306: 1308–12
Fagerstrom K, Schneider N, Lunell E. Effectiveness of nicotine patch and nicotine gum as individual versus combined treatments for tobacco withdrawal symptoms. Psychopharmacology 1993; 111: 271–7
Abelin T, Ehrsam R, Buhler-Reichert A, et al. Effectiveness of a transdermal nicotine system in smoking cessation studies. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1989; 11: 205–14
Muller P, Abelin T, Ehrsam R, et al. The use of transdermal nicotine in smoking cessation. Lung Supp 1990; 1: 445–3
Levin E, Westman E, Stein R, et al. Nicotine skin patch treatment increases abstinence, decreases withdrawal symptoms, and attenuates rewarding effects of smoking. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1994; 14: 41–9
Bunker E, Pickworth W, Henningfield J. Nicotine patch: effect on spontaneous smoking. In: Harris L, editor. National Institute on Drug Abuse research monograph series 119, problems of drug dependence 1991. Rockville (MD): USPHS, 1992
Pickworth WB, Butschky MF, Henningfield JE. A nicotine patch reduces subjective and objective measures of tobacco withdrawal. In: Harris L, editor. National Institute on Drug Abuse research monograph series 153. Rockville (MD): USPHS, 1995: 194
Schneider N. Nicotine therapy in smoking cessation: pharrnacokinetic considerations. Clin Pharmacokinet 1992; 23: 169–72
Henningfield J, London E, Benowitz N. Arterial-venous differences in plasma concentrations of nicotine after cigarette smoking. JAMA 1990; 263: 2049–50
Jaffe J. Drug addiction and drug abuse. In: Gilman A, Raul T, Nies A, et al., editors. The pharmacological basis oftherapeutics. New York: Pergamon Press, 1990: 522–73
Perkins KA, Sexton J, Reynolds W, et al. Comparison of acute subjective and heart rate effects of nicotine intake via tobacco smoking versus nasal spray. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1994; 47: 295–9
Hjalmarson A, Franzon M, Westin A, et al. Effect of nicotine nasal spray on smoking cessation. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 2567–72
Belcher M, Jarvis M, Sutherland G. Nicotine absorption and dependence in an over the counter aid to stopping smoking. BMJ 1989; 298: 570
Hasenfratz M, Battig K. Nicotine absorption and the subjective and physiologic effects of nicotine toothpicks. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991; 50: 456–61
Jarvis M, Hajek P, Russell M, et al. Nasal nicotine solution as an aid to cigarette withdrawal: a pilot clinical trial. Br J Addict 1987; 82: 983–8
Burch S, Erbland M, Gann L, et al. Plasma nicotine levels after inhalation of aerosolized nicotine. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 140: 955–7
Leischow SJ. The nicotine vaporizer. Health Values 1994; 18: 4/9/2012
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Wit, H., Zacny, J. Abuse Potential of Nicotine Replacement Therapies. CNS Drugs 4, 456–468 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-199504060-00008
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-199504060-00008