<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com">
<title>TC Online First</title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com</link>
<description>TC RSS Feed -- Online First</description>
<prism:publicationName>Tobacco Control</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0964-4563</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050824v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050949v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050838v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050854v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050796v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050645v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050877v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050727v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050715v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050852v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050912v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050661v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050817v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050746v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050814v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050672v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050650v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050496v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050723v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050857v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050765v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050736v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050726v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050815v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050740v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050831v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050728v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050604v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050545v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050524v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050691v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050724v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050788v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050807v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050670v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050673v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050385v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050719v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050777v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050593v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050407v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050762v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050465v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050700v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050648v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050738v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050684v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050644v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050600v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050483v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050520v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050598v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050569v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050531v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050602v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050849v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050681v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050534v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050391v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050256v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050591v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050427v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050517v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050518v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050739v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050614v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050599v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050473v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050575v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050541v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050666v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050567v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050562v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050539v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050470v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050582v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050401v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050572v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050548v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050413v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050475v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050500v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050613v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050436v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050488v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050554v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050479v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050450v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050383v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050261v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050110v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050282v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050306v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050194v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050398v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050384v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050249v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050341v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050279v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050248v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050125v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050158v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050058v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050344v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050212v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050283v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050254v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050324v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050120v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050297v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050350v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050199v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050148v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050253v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050176v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050134v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050131v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050169v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050203v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050128v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050209v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050130v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050124v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050050v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050133v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050038v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050008v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050106v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/site/homepage/TC_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/site/homepage/TC_95x60.gif">
<title>Tobacco Control</title>
<url>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/site/homepage/TC_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050824v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Thirdhand smoke and exposure in California hotels: non-smoking rooms fail to protect non-smoking hotel guests from tobacco smoke exposure]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050824v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>This study examined tobacco smoke pollution (also known as thirdhand smoke, THS) in hotels with and without complete smoking bans and investigated whether non-smoking guests staying overnight in these hotels were exposed to tobacco smoke pollutants.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A stratified random sample of hotels with (n=10) and without (n=30) complete smoking bans was examined. Surfaces and air were analysed for tobacco smoke pollutants (ie, nicotine and 3-ethynylpyridine, 3EP). Non-smoking confederates who stayed overnight in guestrooms provided urine and finger wipe samples to determine exposure to nicotine and the tobacco-specific carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone as measured by their metabolites cotinine and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL), respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Findings</st><p>Compared with hotels with complete smoking bans, surface nicotine and air 3EP were elevated in non-smoking and smoking rooms of hotels that allowed smoking. Air nicotine levels in smoking rooms were significantly higher than those in non-smoking rooms of hotels with and without complete smoking bans. Hallway surfaces outside of smoking rooms also showed higher levels of nicotine than those outside of non-smoking rooms. Non-smoking confederates staying in hotels without complete smoking bans showed higher levels of finger nicotine and urine cotinine than those staying in hotels with complete smoking bans. Confederates showed significant elevations in urinary NNAL after staying in the 10 most polluted rooms.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Partial smoking bans in hotels do not protect non-smoking guests from exposure to tobacco smoke and tobacco-specific carcinogens. Non-smokers are advised to stay in hotels with complete smoking bans. Existing policies exempting hotels from complete smoking bans are ineffective.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt, G. E., Quintana, P. J. E., Fortmann, A. L., Zakarian, J. M., Galaviz, V. E., Chatfield, D. A., Hoh, E., Hovell, M. F., Winston, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-13T16:30:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050824</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050824</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Thirdhand smoke and exposure in California hotels: non-smoking rooms fail to protect non-smoking hotel guests from tobacco smoke exposure]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050949v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing the effectiveness of antismoking television advertisements: do audience ratings of perceived effectiveness predict changes in quitting intentions and smoking behaviours?]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050949v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Decisions about which antismoking advertisements should be aired are often guided by audience ratings of perceived effectiveness (PE). Given that the usefulness of PE measures depends on their ability to predict the likelihood that a message will have a positive impact on outcomes such as behaviour change, in the current study we used pre-exposure, postexposure and follow-up measures to test the association between PE and subsequent changes in quitting intentions and smoking behaviours.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Daily smokers (N=231; 18&nbsp;years and older) completed baseline measures of quitting intentions before watching an antismoking advertisement. Immediately following exposure, intentions were measured again and PE was measured using six items that factored into two scales: ad-directed PE (ADPE) and personalised PE (PPE). A follow-up telephone survey conducted within 3&nbsp;weeks of exposure measured behaviour change (reduced cigarette consumption or quit attempts).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From pre-exposure to postexposure, 18% of smokers showed a positive change in their intentions. Controlling for baseline intentions, PPE independently predicted intention change (OR=2.57, p=0.004). At follow-up, 26% of smokers reported that they had changed their behaviour. PPE scores also predicted the likelihood of behaviour change (OR=1.93, p=0.009).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Audience ratings of PPE, but not ADPE, were found to predict subsequent intention and behaviour change. These findings increase confidence in the use of PE measures to pretest and evaluate antismoking television advertisements, particularly when these measures tap the extent to which a smoker has been personally affected by the message.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brennan, E., Durkin, S. J., Wakefield, M. A., Kashima, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-09T00:00:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050949</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050949</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing the effectiveness of antismoking television advertisements: do audience ratings of perceived effectiveness predict changes in quitting intentions and smoking behaviours?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-05-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050838v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic and country variations in cross-border cigarette purchasing as tobacco tax avoidance strategy. Findings from the ITC Europe Surveys]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050838v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Legal tobacco tax avoidance strategies such as cross-border cigarette purchasing may attenuate the impact of tax increases on tobacco consumption. Little is known about socioeconomic and country variations in cross-border purchasing.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To describe socioeconomic and country variations in cross-border cigarette purchasing in six European countries.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Cross-sectional data from adult smokers (n=7873) from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Surveys in France (2006/2007), Germany (2007), Ireland (2006), The Netherlands (2008), Scotland (2006) and the rest of the UK (2007/2008) were used. Respondents were asked whether they had bought cigarettes outside their country in the last 6&nbsp;months and how often.</p></sec><sec><st>Findings</st><p>In French and German provinces/states bordering countries with lower cigarette prices, 24% and 13% of smokers, respectively, reported purchasing cigarettes frequently outside their country. In non-border regions of France and Germany, and in Ireland, Scotland, the rest of the UK and The Netherlands, frequent purchasing of cigarettes outside the country was reported by 2&ndash;7% of smokers. Smokers with higher levels of education or income, younger smokers, daily smokers, heavier smokers and smokers not planning to quit smoking were more likely to purchase cigarettes outside their country.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Cross-border cigarette purchasing is more common in European regions bordering countries with lower cigarette prices and is more often reported by smokers with higher education and income. Increasing taxes in countries with lower cigarette prices, and reducing the number of cigarettes that can be legally imported across borders could help to avoid cross-border purchasing.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nagelhout, G. E., van den Putte, B., Allwright, S., Mons, U., McNeill, A., Guignard, R., Beck, F., Siahpush, M., Joossens, L., Fong, G. T., de Vries, H., Willemsen, M. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-08T00:00:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050838</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050838</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic and country variations in cross-border cigarette purchasing as tobacco tax avoidance strategy. Findings from the ITC Europe Surveys]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Supplement</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050854v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tracking the relevance of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in legislation and litigation through the online resource, Tobacco Control Laws]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050854v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control is increasingly referenced and incorporated into the objectives, definitions and provisions of domestic legislation worldwide. It is also relied upon by courts in interpreting and upholding strong tobacco control measures challenged by the tobacco industry. In this special communication, we describe these trends and explore the important new online resource&mdash;Tobacco Control Laws (<A HREF="http://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org">http://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org</A>)&mdash;that has been used to track them.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muggli, M. E., Zheng, A., Liberman, J., Coxon, N., Candler, L., Donley, K., Lambert, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-04T00:00:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050854</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050854</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tracking the relevance of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in legislation and litigation through the online resource, Tobacco Control Laws]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Special communications</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050796v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The transnational tobacco companies' strategy to promote Codentify, their inadequate tracking and tracing standard]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050796v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><st>Introduction</st><p>In 2011 INTERPOL, the world's largest police organisation, accepted a donation from Philip Morris International (PMI) of 15 million,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> an 8% increase to its total annual budget (60 million in 2011) for each of the next 3&nbsp;years.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> Its 2011 budget was 60 million, of which 84% was contributed by member countries. With only 13% of INTERPOL's total income coming from externally funded projects, private foundations and/or commercial enterprises, this represents a substantial donation.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref></p><p>Shortly afterwards, in July 2012, INTERPOL announced the creation of the INTERPOL Global Register (IGR)<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> which, focusing on products under threat from illicit trade,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5">5</cross-ref> aims to provide tools to help law enforcement and the public determine a product's authenticity. INTERPOL simultaneously stated it would be working with British American Tobacco (BAT), Imperial Tobacco Group (ITG), Japan Tobacco International (JTI) and PMI (specifically with their...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joossens, L., Gilmore, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-04-27T10:03:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050796</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050796</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The transnational tobacco companies' strategy to promote Codentify, their inadequate tracking and tracing standard]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Industry watch</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050645v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Responses of young adults to graphic warning labels for cigarette packages]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050645v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed a series of 36 graphic warning labels for cigarette packages. We sought to evaluate the effects of the labels on fear-related emotions about health consequences of smoking and smoking motivations of young adults.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted an experimental study in 2010&ndash;2011 with 325 smokers and non-smokers ages 18&ndash;30 years whom we recruited through community distribution lists in North Carolina and through a national survey company. Each participant viewed 27 labels (18 of the proposed labels with graphic images and text warnings and 9 with text-only warnings) in a random order, evaluating each label on understandability and its effects on fear-related reactions and discouragement from wanting to smoke.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Respondents found most of the proposed labels easy to understand. Of the 36 labels, 64% induced greater fear-related reactions and 58% discouraged respondents from wanting to smoke more than the corresponding text-only labels did. Labels with the greatest effects had photographs (as compared with drawings or other art graphics) or depicted diseased body parts or suffering or dead people. In almost every comparison, smokers reported lower fear-related reactions and feeling less discouraged from wanting to smoke relative to non-smokers.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Most of the proposed labels enhanced fear-related reactions about health consequences of smoking and reduced motivations to smoke relative to text-only labels, although some had larger effects than others. All but one of the nine warning labels recently adopted by the FDA enhanced fear-related reactions and reduced smoking motivations.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cameron, L. D., Pepper, J. K., Brewer, N. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-04-26T00:00:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050645</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050645</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Responses of young adults to graphic warning labels for cigarette packages]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-04-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050877v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Do smoke-free policies in work and public places increase smoking in private venues?]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050877v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate the correlation between the implementation of tobacco control policies, particularly smoke-free bans at work and in public places, and smoking prevalence in private venues in the 27 countries of the European Union.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Ecological study with the country as the unit of analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Data sources</st><p>Data analysis of tobacco control activities in European countries in 2007 as compiled in the Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) and information on the level of smoking permissiveness in houses and cars from the Special Eurobarometer on Tobacco conducted in 2009.</p></sec><sec><st>Analysis</st><p>Spearman rank-correlation coefficients (r<SUB>sp</SUB>) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The correlation between the TCS score and the prevalence of smoking in private venues (houses and cars) where smoking inside was always allowed was close to zero. A similar lack of association was observed between the TCS score of specific bans at work and in public places and smoking rules inside houses and cars. There was a non-significant direct correlation between the TCS score and the prevalence of smoke-free houses (r<SUB>sp</SUB>=0.21, 95% CI &ndash;0.19 to 0.55) and a non-significant inverse correlation with smoking allowed in certain rooms inside the house (r<SUB>sp</SUB>=&ndash;0.34; 95% CI &ndash;0.64 to 0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Smoke-free legislation in workplaces and public places is not correlated with increased smoking prevalence in private venues (houses and cars) at an ecological level.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez-Sanchez, J. M., Blanch, C., Fu, M., Gallus, S., La Vecchia, C., Fernandez, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-04-25T00:00:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050877</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050877</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Do smoke-free policies in work and public places increase smoking in private venues?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-04-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050727v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A dual-frame sampling methodology to address landline replacement in tobacco control research]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050727v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>We assessed the comparability of self-reported smoking prevalence estimates from a dual-frame survey with those from two large-scale, national surveys.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The Social Climate Survey of Tobacco Control (SCS-TC) obtained self-reported current smoking status via a dual-frame methodology in the fall of 2010. One frame used random digit dialling procedures and consisted of households with a landline telephone; the other frame consisted of a population-based probability-based online panel. Current smoking prevalence was compared with national estimates from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the 2009&ndash;2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>18.3% (95% CI 17.0% to 19.6%) of SCS-TC respondents reported current smoking. NHIS and NHANES estimates found 19.4% (95% CI 18.8% to 20.1%) and 20.3% (95% CI 18.7% to 22.1%), respectively, reporting current smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Prevalence estimates for cigarette smoking obtained from the dual-frame SCS-TC are comparable to those from other national surveys. A mixed-mode approach may be a useful strategy to transition cross-sectional surveys with established trend data to newer dual-frame designs to maintain compatibility with surveys from previous years and to include the growing number of households that do not have landline telephones.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McMillen, R. C., Winickoff, J. P., Wilson, K., Tanski, S., Klein, J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-04-17T00:01:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050727</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050727</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A dual-frame sampling methodology to address landline replacement in tobacco control research]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050715v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protection from secondhand smoke in countries belonging to the WHO European Region: an assessment of legislation]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050715v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Comprehensive smokefree laws, as recommended by the WHO Framework Convention of Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC), are the most effective tool to protect the population from secondhand smoke (SHS) and to ensure healthy environments. Studies evaluating how laws govern SHS protection are scarce. This study assessed the level of protection from SHS of laws from countries belonging to the WHO European Region.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A new methodology system was developed to evaluate the smokefree legislation according to the principles provided by the WHO guidelines for the correct implementation of Article 8 of the FCTC. For each law, six main sectors and 28 facilities were evaluated.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Overall 68 laws from 48 countries from the WHO European Region were reviewed. &lsquo;Education&rsquo; and &lsquo;Public transport&rsquo; were the most protected sectors from SHS. Many WHO European laws do not provide protection from SHS across all public sectors. For example, 48.5% of general health facilities and 71.2% of restaurants are unprotected from SHS. The level of protection provided in the 28 facilities studied was low; many WHO European laws still allow smoking under certain conditions, permitting smoking in designated and/or ventilated areas.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Nine years after the adoption of the WHO FCTC there are still legal formulas in which smoking is allowed in several facilities, through the inclusion of separated areas, ventilated areas and other conditions. Tobacco control efforts still face the challenge of eradicating the legal clauses that prevent 100% smokefree environments.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez, C., Martinez-Sanchez, J. M., Robinson, G., Bethke, C., Fernandez, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-04-17T00:01:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050715</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050715</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protection from secondhand smoke in countries belonging to the WHO European Region: an assessment of legislation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050852v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tobacco control challenges in East Asia: proposals for change in the world's largest epidemic region]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050852v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>East Asia is one of the world's largest tobacco epidemic regions. Although several international studies have evaluated the status of tobacco control in this region, the findings have not been integrated with knowledge on domestic activities at the national and municipal levels. We analysed the current tobacco control situation in three East Asian countries, Japan, China and the Republic of Korea, using both international and domestic data sources. We collected data between 2008 and 2011 in each country according to the framework of WHO's MPOWER (Monitoring, Protect, Offer, Warn, Enforcement and Raise) approach for guiding implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Analysis revealed that 37&ndash;53% of adult men were current smokers and that smoking prevalence among middle-aged men reached 63%. Less than 20% of male smokers plan to quit and the use of nicotine replacement drugs was 14% at maximum. Forty-six percent or more of men and 20% or more of women were exposed to passive smoking at workplaces and at home, respectively. Many tobacco industry activities remain unrestricted and prevalent. Our findings indicate an urgent need for the following set of policies: raise cigarette prices to increase the quit attempt rate, particularly among adult men; develop a multi-component quitting assistance system to provide adequate assistance for smoking cessation; implement effective smoke-free policies in workplaces and public places to reduce exposure to passive smoking; and rebuild the administrative structure to denormalise tobacco industry activities. The importance of these standard approaches should be reaffirmed by all tobacco control policymakers in East Asia.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katanoda, K., Jiang, Y., Park, S., Lim, M. K., Qiao, Y.-L., Inoue, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-04-17T00:01:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050852</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050852</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tobacco control challenges in East Asia: proposals for change in the world's largest epidemic region]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Special communications</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050912v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[It is better to be a fat ex-smoker than a thin smoker: findings from the 1997-2004 National Health Interview Survey-National Death Index linkage study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050912v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>The aim of this research was to compare the risk of all-cause mortality and mortality from all cancers combined, lung cancer, respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus between normal-weight smokers and overweight or obese ex-smokers.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Data were from 1997 to 2004 National Health Interview Survey (with response rates ranging from 70% to 80%) which were linked to records in the National Death Index. Mortality follow-up was through 31 December 2006. The sample was limited to normal-weight smokers and overweight/obese ex-smokers 25&nbsp;years of age and older (n=52&nbsp;819). HR from Cox regression was computed to represent mortality effect.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Results showed that in both women and men, normal-weight smokers, relative to overweight or obese ex-smokers, had a higher risk of mortality from all causes combined, all cancers combined, lung cancer, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. Among women, there was no difference in mortality risk from diabetes mellitus between normal-weight smokers and overweight or obese ex-smokers. Among men, there was some evidence that the risk of mortality was higher in obese ex-smokers than normal-weight smokers.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This article concludes that, overall, mortality risk is smaller in overweight or obese ex-smokers than normal-weight smokers. Smoking cessation interventions can tailor messages that highlight the greater reduction in mortality associated with quitting, compared with potential weight gain.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siahpush, M., Singh, G. K., Tibbits, M., Pinard, C. A., Shaikh, R. A., Yaroch, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-04-10T00:00:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050912</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050912</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[It is better to be a fat ex-smoker than a thin smoker: findings from the 1997-2004 National Health Interview Survey-National Death Index linkage study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-04-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050661v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Zhonghua' tobacco advertisement in Shanghai: a descriptive study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050661v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To document tobacco advertising practices of a popular, high-grade, domestic cigarette in China across a broad spectrum of channels.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Media monitoring and direct observations were conducted to assess tobacco advertisements for Zhonghua cigarettes in Shanghai, China, through the following channels: newspapers, TV, internet, outdoor advertisements and point-of-sale advertisements.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Consistent with the national ban, no direct tobacco advertisements were found in newspapers or on TV. However, statements about counterfeit &lsquo;Zhonghua&rsquo; cigarettes indirectly promoted Zhonghua tobacco through newspapers. Although no tobacco advertisements were found in Shanghai mainstream websites or in channels of national mainstream sites, a great amount of information was communicated about Zhonghua cigarettes via websites, using patriotic themes and associations with Chinese culture. Large outdoor tobacco advertisements of &lsquo;Loving my China&rsquo; were found in downtown Shanghai. Zhonghua tobacco advertisements were present in almost all of the points-of-sale observed (95%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Zhonghua cigarettes are promoted directly and indirectly through a variety of channels. This study suggests there is an urgent need to establish comprehensive bans that prohibit all types of tobacco advertisements in China.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zheng, P., Ge, X., Qian, H., Wang, F., Fu, H., Berg, C. J., Kegler, M. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-04-05T00:00:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050661</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050661</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Zhonghua' tobacco advertisement in Shanghai: a descriptive study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-04-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050817v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between smoke-free workplace and second-hand smoke exposure at home in India]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050817v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The implementation of comprehensive smoke-free laws has been associated with reductions in second-hand smoke exposure at home in several high income countries. There is little information on whether these benefits extend to low income and middle income countries with a growing tobacco-related disease burden such as India.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>State and individual-level analysis of cross-sectional data from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey India, 2009/2010. Associations between working in a smoke-free indoor environment and living in a smoke-free home were examined using correlation at the state level, and multivariate logistic regression at the individual level.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The percentage of respondents employed indoors (outside the home) working in smoke-free environments who lived in a smoke-free home was 64.0% compared with 41.7% of those who worked where smoking occurred. Indian states with higher proportions of smoke-free workplaces had higher proportions of smoke-free homes (r<SUB>s</SUB>=0.54, p&lt;0.005). In the individual-level analysis, working in a smoke-free workplace was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of living in a smoke-free home (adjusted OR=2.07; 95% CI 1.64 to 2.52) after adjustment for potential confounders.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Implementation of smoke-free legislation in India was associated with a higher proportion of adults reporting a smoke-free home. These findings further strengthen the case for accelerated implementation of Article 8 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in low and middle income countries.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, J. T., Agrawal, S., Basu, S., Glantz, S. A., Millett, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-03-23T00:01:02-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050817</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050817</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between smoke-free workplace and second-hand smoke exposure at home in India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050746v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Has the tobacco industry evaded the FDA's ban on 'Light' cigarette descriptors?]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050746v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned the use of "Lights" descriptors or similar terms on tobacco products that convey messages of reduced risk. Manufacturers eliminated terms explicitly stated and substituted colour name descriptors corresponding to the banned terms. This paper examines whether the tobacco industry complied with or circumvented the law and potential FDA regulatory actions.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Philip Morris retailer manuals, manufacturers' annual reports filed with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, a national public opinion survey, and market-wide cigarette sales data were examined.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Manufacturers substituted "Gold" for "Light" and "Silver" for "Ultra-light" in the names of Marlboro sub-brands, and "Blue", "Gold", and "Silver" for banned descriptors in sub-brand names. Percent filter ventilation levels, used to generate the smoke yield ranges associated with "Lights" categories, appear to have been reassigned to the new colour brand name descriptors. Following the ban, 92% of smokers reported they could easily identify their usual brands, and 68% correctly named the package colour associated with their usual brand, while sales for "Lights" cigarettes remained unchanged.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Tobacco manufacturers appear to have evaded a critical element of the FSPTCA, the ban on misleading descriptors that convey reduced health risk messages. The FPSTCA provides regulatory mechanisms, including banning these products as adulterated (Section 902). Manufacturers could then apply for pre-market approval as new products and produce evidence for FDA evaluation and determination whether or not sales of these products are in the public health interest.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connolly, G. N., Alpert, H. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-03-13T14:00:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050746</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050746</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Has the tobacco industry evaded the FDA's ban on 'Light' cigarette descriptors?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-03-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050814v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Public education about the relative harm of tobacco products: an intervention for tobacco control professionals]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050814v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In the USA, new regulations require the collection of information on tobacco constituents by brand and variety and publication of this information in a way not likely to be misconstrued by consumers. Understanding of such information becomes increasingly important as new tobacco products are marketed and modifications are made to reduce the toxicity of some products. This pilot study assessed the current knowledge of tobacco control professionals regarding the relative harmfulness of several tobacco products, and evaluated an online educational intervention aimed at improving understanding of variations in nicotine and tobacco-specific <I>N</I>-nitrosamines (TSNAs).</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Fifty-two tobacco control professionals participated in an online intervention which presented and discussed the results of constituent analyses of Camel Snus and Marlboro Snus compared to several conventional smokeless tobacco products. Comparisons with cigarettes were also discussed. Pre- and post-intervention questions assessed understanding of the concepts.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Pre-intervention responses demonstrated that 31% did not know that cigarettes are more harmful than smokeless tobacco, 67% did not know that smokeless products higher in nicotine are likely to be more effective substitutes for cigarettes, 52% did not know TSNAs are the major carcinogens in tobacco and 81% did not know new snus products tend to be lower in TSNAs than conventional spit tobacco. After intervention participation, knowledge increased on all points except one where pretest results were 100% correct.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Public education campaigns are urgently needed for tobacco control professionals and consumers to increase awareness and understanding of the continuum of risk among tobacco products.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biener, L., Nyman, A. L., Stepanov, I., Hatsukami, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-03-12T00:01:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050814</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050814</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Public education about the relative harm of tobacco products: an intervention for tobacco control professionals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050672v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The carbon footprint of behavioural support services for smoking cessation]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050672v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To estimate the carbon footprint of behavioural support services for smoking cessation: text message support, telephone counselling, group counselling and individual counselling.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Carbon footprint analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Data source</st><p>Publicly available data on National Health Service Stop Smoking Services and per unit carbon emissions; published effectiveness data from the txt2stop trial and systematic reviews of smoking cessation services.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>Carbon dioxide equivalents (CO<SUB>2</SUB>e) per 1000 smokers, per lifetime quitter, and per quality-adjusted life year gained, and cost-effectiveness, including social cost of carbon, of smoking cessation services.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Emissions per 1000 participants were 8143&nbsp;kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e for text message support, 8619&nbsp;kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e for telephone counselling, 16&nbsp;114&nbsp;kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e for group counselling and 16&nbsp;372&nbsp;kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e for individual counselling. Emissions per intervention lifetime quitter were 636 (95% CI 455 to 958) kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e for text message support, 1051 (95% CI 560 to 2873) kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e for telephone counselling, 1143 (95% CI 695 to 2270) kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e for group counselling and 2823 (95% CI 1688 to 6549) kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e for individual counselling. Text message, telephone and group counselling remained cost-effective when cost-effectiveness analysis was revised to include the environmental and economic cost of damage from carbon emissions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>All smoking cessation services had low emissions compared to the health gains produced. Text message support had the lowest emissions of the services evaluated. Smoking cessation services have small carbon footprints and were cost-effective after accounting for the societal costs of greenhouse gas emissions.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, A. J. B., Tennison, I., Roberts, I., Cairns, J., Free, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-03-12T00:01:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050672</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050672</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The carbon footprint of behavioural support services for smoking cessation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050650v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tobacco imagery on prime time UK television]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050650v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Smoking in films is a common and well documented cause of youth smoking experimentation and uptake and hence a significant health hazard. The extent of exposure of young people to tobacco imagery in television programming has to date been far less investigated. We have therefore measured the extent to which tobacco content occurs in prime time UK television, and estimated exposure of UK youth.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The occurrence of tobacco, categorised as actual tobacco use, implied tobacco use, tobacco paraphernalia, other reference to tobacco, tobacco brand appearances or any of these, occurring in all prime time broadcasting on the five most popularly viewed UK television stations during 3 separate weeks in 2010 were measured by 1-minute interval coding. Youth exposure to tobacco content in the UK was estimated using media viewing figures.</p></sec><sec><st>Findings</st><p>Actual tobacco use, predominantly cigarette smoking, occurred in 73 of 613 (12%) programmes, particularly in feature films and reality TV. Brand appearances were rare, occurring in only 18 programmes, of which 12 were news or other factual genres, and 6 were episodes of the same British soap opera. Tobacco occurred with similar frequency before as after 21:00, the UK watershed for programmes suitable for youth. The estimated number of incidences of exposure of the audience aged less than 18&nbsp;years for any tobacco, actual tobacco use and tobacco branding were 59 million, 16 million and 3 million, respectively on average per week.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Television programming is a source of significant exposure of youth to tobacco imagery, before and after the watershed. Tobacco branding is particularly common in <I>Coronation Street</I>, a soap opera popular among youth audiences. More stringent controls on tobacco in prime time television therefore have the potential to reduce the uptake of youth smoking in the UK.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lyons, A., McNeill, A., Britton, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-03-11T16:31:02-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050650</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050650</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tobacco imagery on prime time UK television]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050496v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The impact of tobacco prices on smoking onset: a methodological review]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050496v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The benefits of preventing smoking onset are well known. Existing reviews clearly demonstrate that increasing the prices of tobacco products reduces smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption. However, only a small number of studies included in existing reviews have examined smoking onset (the transition between never smoking and smoking). Moreover, existing reviews provide limited quality assessment of the data and methods utilised. This paper systematically searches for and critically reviews studies that examine the impact of tobacco prices or taxes on smoking onset. Most studies reviewed have important methodological limitations, including recall bias; a general failure to apply diagnostic tests, to discuss the choice of estimators and distributional assumptions and to conduct sensitivity analysis; and a reliance on empirical approaches that are methodologically weak. On the whole, existing studies do not provide strong evidence that tobacco prices or taxes affect smoking onset.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guindon, G. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-03-08T00:00:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050496</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050496</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The impact of tobacco prices on smoking onset: a methodological review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-03-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Significance</st><p>Electronic cigarettes, also known as e-cigarettes, are devices designed to imitate regular cigarettes and deliver nicotine via inhalation without combusting tobacco. They are purported to deliver nicotine without other toxicants and to be a safer alternative to regular cigarettes. However, little toxicity testing has been performed to evaluate the chemical nature of vapour generated from e&ndash;cigarettes. The aim of this study was to screen e-cigarette vapours for content of four groups of potentially toxic and carcinogenic compounds: carbonyls, volatile organic compounds, nitrosamines and heavy metals.</p></sec><sec><st>Materials and methods</st><p>Vapours were generated from 12 brands of e-cigarettes and the reference product, the medicinal nicotine inhaler, in controlled conditions using a modified smoking machine. The selected toxic compounds were extracted from vapours into a solid or liquid phase and analysed with chromatographic and spectroscopy methods.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We found that the e-cigarette vapours contained some toxic substances. The levels of the toxicants were 9&ndash;450 times lower than in cigarette smoke and were, in many cases, comparable with trace amounts found in the reference product.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Our findings are consistent with the idea that substituting tobacco cigarettes with e-cigarettes may substantially reduce exposure to selected tobacco-specific toxicants. E-cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy among smokers unwilling to quit, warrants further study. (To view this abstract in Polish and German, please see the supplementary files online.)</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goniewicz, M. L., Knysak, J., Gawron, M., Kosmider, L., Sobczak, A., Kurek, J., Prokopowicz, A., Jablonska-Czapla, M., Rosik-Dulewska, C., Havel, C., Jacob, P., Benowitz, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-03-06T00:01:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050859</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050723v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Testing messages to reduce smokers' openness to using novel smokeless tobacco products]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050723v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Tobacco manufacturers&rsquo; aggressive promotion of new smokeless tobacco products such as snus warrants a timely and effective public health response. This study tested potential countermarketing messages to discourage current and former smokers from becoming dual users of smokeless tobacco and cigarettes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In a pretest-post-test experiment, 1836 adult current and recently former smokers from a national sample were randomised to view one of six antismokeless tobacco ads followed by a snus ad, to view a control ad followed by a snus ad; or to view two control ads. Perceived effectiveness of ads and actual changes in attitudes and openness to snus were compared across groups using analyses of variance.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Some ads that were perceived as most effective did not change attitudes or openness to trying snus, and conversely, some ads not perceived as effective changed attitudes and openness to snus. Ads portraying the negative health effects of smokeless tobacco were perceived as most effective, but ads with antitobacco industry themes significantly decreased favourable attitudes toward snus. Responses to ads were different for smokers who had ever used smokeless tobacco: for this group health effects and humorous/testimonial ads were effective.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Measures of perceived effectiveness of antitobacco ads need to be augmented with measures of actual effectiveness to assess countermarketing messages. Some of the developed ads, such as ads with anti-industry themes, were effective for the overall population of smokers whereas humorous/testimonial and health effects ads were particularly effective in changing attitudes of past users of smokeless tobacco.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Popova, L., Neilands, T. B., Ling, P. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-03-06T00:01:13-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050723</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050723</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Testing messages to reduce smokers' openness to using novel smokeless tobacco products]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050857v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The recent and projected public health and economic benefits of cigarette taxation in Greece]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050857v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Greece is in an economic crisis compounded by the costs caused by smoking. The present investigation estimates the economic and public health benefits ensuing from the recent cigarette excise tax increase in 2011 and projects the potential benefits from an additional 2.00 per pack cigarette tax increase.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The effects of the recent cigarette excise tax increase were calculated on outcome measures: total price per pack, including specific excise, ad valorem tax, and value-added tax consumption; tax revenue; and per capita consumption of cigarettes. Additionally, smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses were estimated. Projected effects of an additional 2.00 per pack tax increase on consumption and tax revenue were also assessed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The cigarette excise tax increase in 2011 created 558 million in new tax revenue. Cigarette consumption reached a recent low of 24.9 billion sticks sold or 2197 sticks per person in 2011, indicating a 16% decrease in per capita cigarette consumption from the previous year. An additional 2.00 per pack increase in Greek cigarette taxes is projected to result in reduced cigarette sales by an additional 20% and lead to an increase in total cigarette tax revenues by nearly 1.2 billion and the prevention of 192&nbsp;000 premature deaths.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Nations such as Greece, should employ taxation as a crucial measure to promote public health and economic development in such dire times. International economic organisations should aggressively pursue programmes and policies that champion the economic benefits of tobacco taxation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alpert, H. R., Vardavas, C. I., Chaloupka, F. J., Vozikis, A., Athanasakis, K., Kyriopoulos, I., Bertic, M., Behrakis, P. K., Connolly, G. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-03-06T00:01:13-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050857</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050857</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The recent and projected public health and economic benefits of cigarette taxation in Greece]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050765v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tobacco display and brand communication at the point of sale: implications for adolescent smoking behaviour]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050765v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In England, point-of-sale (PoS) displays in larger shops were prohibited in April 2012, with an exemption for smaller retailers until 2015. The aim of this study was to examine the association between tobacco displays and brand communication at the PoS and adolescent smoking behaviour, and to assess the potential benefits likely to accrue from this legislation.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Self-completion questionnaire survey in students aged 11&ndash;15&nbsp;years in March 2011.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The odds of ever-smoking doubled for those visiting shops almost daily relative to less than once a week (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.55), and susceptibility increased by around 60% (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.10). Noticing tobacco on display every time during store visits increased the odds of susceptibility more than threefold compared with never noticing tobacco (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.52 to 6.54). For each additional tobacco brand recognised at the PoS, the adjusted odds of being an ever-smoker increased by 5% (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.06) and of susceptibility by 4% (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.05). The association between frequency of visiting stores and susceptibility was predominantly due to exposure in small shops.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Exposure to and awareness of PoS displays and brands in displays were associated with smoking susceptibility. The association between PoS display exposure and smoking susceptibility was predominantly due to exposure in small shops. These findings suggest that a one-off, comprehensive tobacco display ban is the recommended approach for countries considering a display ban.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spanopoulos, D., Britton, J., McNeill, A., Ratschen, E., Szatkowski, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-28T00:00:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050765</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050765</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tobacco display and brand communication at the point of sale: implications for adolescent smoking behaviour]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-02-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050736v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The effects of variant descriptors on the potential effectiveness of plain packaging]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050736v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To examine the effects that variant descriptor labels on cigarette packs have on smokers&rsquo; perceptions of those packs and the cigarettes contained within.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>As part of two larger web-based studies (each involved 160 young adult ever-smokers 18&ndash;29 years old), respondents were shown a computer image of a plain cigarette pack and sets of related variant descriptors. The sets included terms that varied in terms of descriptors of colours as names, flavour strength, degrees of filter venting, filter types, quality, type of cigarette and numbers. For each set, respondents rated the highest and lowest of two or three of the following four characteristics: quality, strongest or weakest in taste, delivers most or least tar/nicotine, and most or least level of harm.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>There were significant differences on all four ratings. Quality ratings were the least differentiated. Except for colour descriptors, where &lsquo;Gold&rsquo; rated high in quality but medium in other ratings, ratings of quality, harm, strength and delivery were all positively associated when rated on the same descriptors.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Descriptor labels on cigarette packs, can affect smokers&rsquo; perceptions of the characteristics of the cigarettes contained within. Therefore, they are a potential means by which product differentiation can occur. In particular, having variants differing in perceived strength while not differing in deliveries of harmful ingredients is particularly problematic. Any packaging policy should take into account the possibility that variant descriptors can mislead smokers into making inappropriate product attributions.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borland, R., Savvas, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-22T00:00:53-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050736</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050736</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The effects of variant descriptors on the potential effectiveness of plain packaging]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050726v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Proximity to a tobacco store and smoking cessation: a cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050726v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>It is not clear whether the availability of tobacco affects the likelihood of smoking cessation. We examined whether the proximity to a tobacco store and the number of stores were associated with smoking cessation, and compared results for proximity variables based on walking and straight-line (as the crow flies) distance.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The study population consisted of 8751 baseline smokers from the Finnish Public Sector study in 1997&ndash;2005. Smoking intensity (cigarettes/day) was determined at baseline and smoking cessation was determined from a follow-up survey in 2008&ndash;2009. Proximity was measured using straight-line and walking distance from home to the nearest tobacco store, and another exposure variable was the number of stores within 0.50&nbsp;km from home. We calculated associations with log-binomial regression models, adjusting for individual-level and area-level confounders.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the participants, 3482 (39.8%) quit smoking during the follow-up (mean follow-up 5.5&nbsp;years, SD 2.3 years). Among men who were moderate/heavy smokers at baseline and lived &lt;0.50&nbsp;km walking distance from the nearest tobacco store, the likelihood of smoking cessation was 27% (95% CI 12% to 40%) lower compared with those living &ge;0.50&nbsp;km from a store. Having even one store within 0.50&nbsp;km walking distance from home decreased cessation in men who were moderate/heavy smokers by 37% (95% CI 19% to 51%). No decrease was found for men who were light smokers at baseline or for women.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Living within walking distance of a tobacco store reduced the likelihood of smoking cessation among men who were moderate/heavy smokers.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Halonen, J. I., Kivimaki, M., Kouvonen, A., Pentti, J., Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V., Vahtera, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-22T00:00:53-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050726</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050726</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Proximity to a tobacco store and smoking cessation: a cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050815v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['To quarterback behind the scenes, third-party efforts': the tobacco industry and the Tea Party]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050815v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The Tea Party, which gained prominence in the USA in 2009, advocates limited government and low taxes. Tea Party organisations, particularly Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks, oppose smoke-free laws and tobacco taxes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We used the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, the Wayback Machine, Google, LexisNexis, the Center for Media and Democracy and the Center for Responsive Politics (<A HREF="opensecrets.org">opensecrets.org</A>) to examine the tobacco companies&rsquo; connections to the Tea Party.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Starting in the 1980s, tobacco companies worked to create the appearance of broad opposition to tobacco control policies by attempting to create a grassroots smokers&rsquo; rights movement. Simultaneously, they funded and worked through third-party groups, such as Citizens for a Sound Economy, the predecessor of AFP and FreedomWorks, to accomplish their economic and political agenda. There has been continuity of some key players, strategies and messages from these groups to Tea Party organisations. As of 2012, the Tea Party was beginning to spread internationally.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Rather than being a purely grassroots movement that spontaneously developed in 2009, the Tea Party has developed over time, in part through decades of work by the tobacco industry and other corporate interests. It is important for tobacco control advocates in the USA and internationally, to anticipate and counter Tea Party opposition to tobacco control policies and ensure that policymakers, the media and the public understand the longstanding connection between the tobacco industry, the Tea Party and its associated organisations.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fallin, A., Grana, R., Glantz, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-20T21:28:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050815</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050815</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['To quarterback behind the scenes, third-party efforts': the tobacco industry and the Tea Party]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-02-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050740v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The silent salesman: an observational study of personal tobacco pack display at outdoor cafe strips in Australia]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050740v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>We sought to determine the relative frequency and nature of personal display of cigarette packs by smokers in two Australian cities where 30% front-of-pack and 90% back-of-pack health warnings have been used since 2006 and comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions apply.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>An observational study counted patrons, active smokers and tobacco packs at caf&eacute;s, restaurants and bars with outdoor seating. Pack orientation and use of cigarette cases were also noted.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Overall, 18&nbsp;954 patrons, 1576 active smokers and 2153 packs were observed, meaning that one out of every 12.0 patrons was actively smoking, and one of every 8.8 patrons displayed a pack. Packs were more frequently observed in lower socio-economic neighbourhoods, reflecting the higher prevalence of smoking in those regions. Packs were displayed less often in venues where children were present, suggesting a greater tendency not to smoke around children. Most packs (81.4%) were oriented face-up, permitting prominent brand display. Only 1.5% of observed packs were cigarette cases, and 4.2% of packs were concealed by another item, such as a phone or wallet.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Tobacco packs are frequently seen on table-tops in caf&eacute; strips, providing many opportunities for other patrons and passers-by to be incidentally exposed to cigarette brand names and imagery. Use of cigarette cases is rare, suggesting that smokers eventually habituate to pictorial warnings on branded packs and/or find repeated decanting of each newly purchased branded pack into a case to be inconvenient.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wakefield, M. A., Zacher, M., Bayly, M., Brennan, E., Dono, J., Miller, C., Durkin, S. J., Scollo, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-20T00:00:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050740</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050740</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The silent salesman: an observational study of personal tobacco pack display at outdoor cafe strips in Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-02-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050831v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of risk for asthma initiation and cancer and heart disease deaths among patrons and servers due to secondhand smoke exposure in restaurants and bars]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050831v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Despite efforts to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS), only 5% of the world's population enjoy smoke-free restaurants and bars.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Lifetime excess risk (LER) of cancer death, ischaemic heart disease (IHD) death and asthma initiation among non-smoking restaurant and bar servers and patrons in Minnesota and the US were estimated using weighted field measurements of SHS constituents in Minnesota, existing data on tobacco use and multiple dose-response models.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A continuous approach estimated a LER of lung cancer death (LCD) of 18<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>&ndash;6</sup>(95% CI 13 to 23<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>&ndash;6</sup>) for patrons visiting only designated non-smoking sections, 80<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>&ndash;6</sup>(95% CI 66 to 95<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>&ndash;6</sup>) for patrons visiting only smoking venues/sections and 802<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>&ndash;6</sup>(95% CI 658 to 936<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>&ndash;6</sup>) for servers in smoking-permitted venues. An attributable-risk (exposed/non-exposed) approach estimated a similar LER of LCD, a LER of IHD death about 10<sup>&ndash;2</sup> for non-smokers with average SHS exposure from all sources and a LER of asthma initiation about 5% for servers with SHS exposure at work only. These risks correspond to 214 LCDs and 3001 IHD deaths among the general non-smoking population and 1420 new asthma cases among non-smoking servers in the US each year due to SHS exposure in restaurants and bars alone.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Health risks for patrons and servers from SHS exposure in restaurants and bars alone are well above the acceptable level. Restaurants and bars should be a priority for governments&rsquo; effort to create smoke-free environments and should not be exempt from smoking bans.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, R., Bohac, D. L., Gundel, L. A., Hewett, M. J., Apte, M. G., Hammond, S. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-13T00:01:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050831</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050831</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of risk for asthma initiation and cancer and heart disease deaths among patrons and servers due to secondhand smoke exposure in restaurants and bars]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-02-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050728v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lessons learned from cigarette tax harmonisation in the European Union]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050728v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><p>The European Union (EU) can serve as an example of a successful regional cigarette tax harmonisation and integration regime. This level of integration was motivated by an effort to ensure the proper functioning of the EU internal market, which required a reduction in inter-country variation in tobacco product prices.</p><p>Yet, despite the effort to harmonise, the variation in cigarette taxes and prices between the EU member states is greater than, for example, that across states in the USA. The USA is a large internal market, but has little tobacco tax harmonisation and integration. The coefficient of variation (CV) for cigarette prices in the USA is 0.20 versus 0.44 in the EU, in 2010.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> This is likely due to US states being much more homogenous than the EU member states, particularly with respect to incomes. These differences may drive the price strategies of the tobacco industry, which have implications...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blecher, E., Ross, H., Stoklosa, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-13T00:01:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050728</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050728</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lessons learned from cigarette tax harmonisation in the European Union]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-02-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050604v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Variable and potentially fatal amounts of nicotine in e-cigarette nicotine solutions]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050604v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><p>Experimental research on electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is sparse. Regulated as <I>tobacco products</I> by the US Food and Drug Administration, e-cigarette safety has not been determined. This enables the sale of e-cigarettes and tobacco-derived nicotine solution to consumers without rigorous safety regulations that would be required if the products were regulated as <I>drug delivery devices</I>.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> As such, despite the recent popularity of e-cigarettes as an alternative to cigarette smoking, consumers currently do not have industry-regulated information on the concentration of e-cigarette solutions or their safety.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> The present study reports the nicotine concentration of several of these solutions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><st>Methods</st><p>A convenience sample of seven e-cigarette nicotine solutions was analysed. Samples ranged from prepackaged and sealed with concentration levels printed on the labels to blank bottles with hand-written labels with no concentration level, warning statements or directions for use. Samples A and G were marked as 24&nbsp;mg/ml and unmarked...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cameron, J. M., Howell, D. N., White, J. R., Andrenyak, D. M., Layton, M. E., Roll, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-13T00:01:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050604</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050604</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Variable and potentially fatal amounts of nicotine in e-cigarette nicotine solutions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-02-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050545v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Newspaper coverage of tobacco issues: an analysis of print news in Chinese cities, 2008-2011]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050545v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent Chinese media coverage of tobacco issues in 17 Chinese cities comprises messaging known to motivate healthy behaviour.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study involved a content analysis of 4821 articles that contained at least one full paragraph focused on tobacco issues from newspapers published in cities that participated in the Tobacco-Free City&mdash;Gates Tobacco Control Project in China between 1 January 2008 and 30 June 2011.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The number of tobacco-focused articles increased over the study period. The number of articles varied considerably among different newspapers and cities. Education, prevention and cessation programs (35%) were the most frequent theme. There was also considerable variation in the volume of coverage each month. News articles were the most frequent article type (70%). The majority of the articles (72%) were positive for tobacco control. There were significant differences between party newspapers and local newspapers in prominence, article type, slant and fear appeal. One quarter (n=729) of the articles mentioned the severity of tobacco use, while only 10% of the articles referred to susceptibility to the threat.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The coverage of events was predominantly positive toward tobacco control. However, media reports could better support tobacco control efforts if they did a better job at provoking an emotional response to the harms of tobacco use and promoting a sense among smokers that they can succeed in quitting smoking.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[He, S., Shen, Q., Yin, X., Xu, L., Lan, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-02T08:38:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050545</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050545</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Newspaper coverage of tobacco issues: an analysis of print news in Chinese cities, 2008-2011]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050524v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of cigarette smoking with skin colour in Japanese women]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050524v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Having a lighter skin tone is highly valued among many Asian women. If skin colour is affected by smoking, women may be motivated to avoid tobacco or quit smoking. The present study examined the association of tobacco smoking with skin colour in Japanese women.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Information on smoking habits was obtained through a self-administered questionnaire completed by 939 Japanese women aged 20&ndash;74 in Gifu, Japan, during 2003&ndash;2006. Skin colour was examined on the inner side of the upper and lower arm and on the forehead using a Mexameter device (a narrow-band reflective spectrophotometer), which expressed results as a melanin index and erythema index.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Current smokers had higher melanin indices than never-smokers and former smokers for all measured sites. The number of cigarettes smoked per day, the years of smoking and pack-years were significantly positively associated with melanin indices for all measured sites after adjustments for age, body mass index, lifetime sun exposure, and room temperature and humidity. Smoking was also significantly associated with erythema indices on the inner upper and lower arms.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>These data suggest that smoking is associated with a darker skin colour. If our findings are confirmed by further studies, they could be used in antismoking campaigns or by smoking cessation services.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tamai, Y., Tsuji, M., Wada, K., Nakamura, K., Hayashi, M., Takeda, N., Yasuda, K., Nagata, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-01-26T00:00:55-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050524</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050524</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of cigarette smoking with skin colour in Japanese women]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-01-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050691v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Marketing 'less harmful, low-tar' cigarettes is a key strategy of the industry to counter tobacco control in China]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050691v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>While the &lsquo;low-tar&rsquo; scheme has been widely recognised as a misleading tactic used by the tobacco industry to deceive the public about the true risks of cigarette smoking, a similar campaign using the slogan of &lsquo;less harmful, low tar&rsquo; was launched by the Chinese tobacco industry, that is, State Tobacco Monopoly Administration/China National Tobacco Corporation and began to gain traction during the last decade. Despite the fact that no sufficient research evidence supports the claims made by the industry that these cigarettes are safer, the Chinese tobacco industry has continued to promote them using various health claims. As a result, the production and sales of &lsquo;less harmful, low-tar&rsquo; cigarettes have increased dramatically since 2000. Recently, a tobacco industry senior researcher, whose main research area is &lsquo;less harmful, low-tar&rsquo; cigarettes, was elected as an Academician to the prestigious Chinese Academy of Engineering for his contribution to developing &lsquo;less harmful, low-tar&rsquo; cigarettes. The tobacco researcher's election caused an outcry from the tobacco control community and the general public in China. This paper discusses the Chinese tobacco industry's &lsquo;less harmful, low-tar&rsquo; initiatives and calls for the Chinese government to stop the execution of this deceptive strategy for tobacco marketing.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-01-24T00:06:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050691</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050691</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Marketing 'less harmful, low-tar' cigarettes is a key strategy of the industry to counter tobacco control in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-01-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Special communications</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050724v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biomarkers of secondhand smoke exposure in automobiles]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050724v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>The objectives of this study were: (1) to characterise the exposure of non-smokers exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS) in a vehicle using biomarkers, (2) to describe the time course of the biomarkers over 24&nbsp;h, and (3) to examine the relationship between tobacco biomarkers and airborne concentrations of SHS markers.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Eight non-smokers were individually exposed to SHS in cars with fully open front windows and closed back windows over an hour from a smoker who smoked three cigarettes at 20&nbsp;min intervals. The non-smokers sat in the back seat on the passenger side, while the smoker sat in the driver's seat. Plasma cotinine and urine cotinine, 3-hydroxycotinine (3HC) and 4-(methylnitrosoamino)-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) were compared in samples taken at baseline (BL) and several time-points after exposure. Nicotine, particulate matter (PM<SUB>2.5</SUB>) and carbon monoxide (CO) were measured inside and outside the vehicle and ventilation rates in the cars were measured.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Average plasma cotinine and the molar sum of urine cotinine and 3HC (COT+3HC) increased four-fold, urine cotinine increased six-fold and urine NNAL increased ~27 times compared to BL biomarker levels. Plasma cotinine, urine COT+3HC and NNAL peaked at 4&ndash;8&nbsp;h post-exposure while urine cotinine peaked within 4&nbsp;h. Plasma cotinine was significantly correlated to PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> (Spearman correlation r<SUB>s</SUB>=0.94) and CO (r<SUB>s</SUB>=0.76) but not to air nicotine. The correlations between urine biomarkers, cotinine, COT+3HC and NNAL, and air nicotine, PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> and CO were moderate but non-significant (r<SUB>s</SUB> range =  0.31&ndash;0.60).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Brief SHS exposure in cars resulted in substantial increases in levels of tobacco biomarkers in non-smokers. For optimal characterisation of SHS exposure, tobacco biomarkers should be measured within 4&ndash;8&nbsp;h post-exposure. Additional studies are needed to better describe the relationship between tobacco biomarkers and environmental markers of SHS.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, I. A., St.Helen, G., Meyers, M. J., Dempsey, D. A., Havel, C., Jacob, P., Northcross, A., Hammond, S. K., Benowitz, N. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-01-24T00:06:03-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050724</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050724</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biomarkers of secondhand smoke exposure in automobiles]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-01-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050788v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Illicit trade, tobacco industry-funded studies and policy influence in the EU and UK]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050788v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>In the course of the last decade, the tobacco industry has attempted to increase the political salience of the illicit trade in tobacco products (illicit trade) (<cross-ref type="box" refid="bx">box 1</cross-ref>).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> Tobacco companies have claimed that sharp rises in tobacco taxation and innovative regulation, such as standardised packaging and product display bans, are drivers of the illicit trade, and have advocated programmes of engagement with policymakers and other social actors in an effort to ensure that the issue is given greater consideration in health policymaking.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2&ndash;5</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5"></cross-ref></p><p><textbox id="bx"><no>Box 1</no><caption><p>Major activities comprising the illicit trade in tobacco products.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R6">6&ndash;8</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R7"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R8"></cross-ref></p></caption><p>Transcrime adopts the definition of illicit trade outlined in the World Health Organisation, Framework Convention of Tobacco Control, namely, &lsquo;any practice or conduct prohibited by law and which relates to production, shipment, receipt, possession, distribution, sale or purchase...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fooks, G. J., Peeters, S., Evans-Reeves, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-01-15T00:01:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050788</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050788</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Illicit trade, tobacco industry-funded studies and policy influence in the EU and UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-01-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Industry watch</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050807v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A systematic review of store audit methods for assessing tobacco marketing and products at the point of sale]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050807v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Over four-fifths of reported expenditures for marketing tobacco products occur at the retail point of sale (POS). To date, no systematic review has synthesised the methods used for surveillance of POS marketing. This review sought to describe the audit objectives, methods and measures used to study retail tobacco environments.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We systematically searched 11 academic databases for papers indexed on or before 14 March 2012, identifying 2906 papers. Two coders independently reviewed each abstract or full text to identify papers with the following criteria: (1) data collectors visited and assessed (2) retail environments using (3) a data collection instrument for (4) tobacco products or marketing. We excluded papers where limited measures of products and/or marketing were incidental. Two abstractors independently coded included papers for research aims, locale, methods, measures used and measurement properties. We calculated descriptive statistics regarding the use of four P's of marketing (product, price, placement, promotion) and for measures of study design, sampling strategy and sample size.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We identified 88 store audit studies. Most studies focus on enumerating the number of signs or other promotions. Several strengths, particularly in sampling, are noted, but substantial improvements are indicated in the reporting of reliability, validity and audit procedures.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Audits of POS tobacco marketing have made important contributions to understanding industry behaviour, the uses of marketing and resulting health behaviours. Increased emphasis on standardisation and the use of theory are needed in the field. We propose key components of audit methodology that should be routinely reported.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, J. G. L., Henriksen, L., Myers, A. E., Dauphinee, A. L., Ribisl, K. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-01-15T00:01:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050807</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050807</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A systematic review of store audit methods for assessing tobacco marketing and products at the point of sale]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-01-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050670v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Priming effect of antismoking PSAs on smoking behaviour: a pilot study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050670v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Social marketing is commonly proposed to counteract advertising and other messages that promote unhealthy products. However, public service campaigns can also &lsquo;boomerang&rsquo; or ironically increase the unhealthy behaviours they are designed to discourage. The present study examined whether antismoking public service announcements (PSAs) could increase smoking behaviour immediately following exposure.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In an experimental study, 56 smokers were randomly assigned to watch a short television segment with a commercial break that included either (1) a Philip Morris &lsquo;QuitAssist&rsquo; PSA; (2) a Legacy &lsquo;truth&rsquo; antismoking PSA; or (3) a control PSA. Smoking behaviour was assessed during a short break immediately following television viewing.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Participants who saw the Philip Morris antismoking PSA were significantly more likely to smoke during a break (42%) compared with participants in the control condition (11%), and participants in the &lsquo;truth&rsquo; condition were marginally more likely to smoke (33%). These differences could not be explained by factors such as mood or level of addiction, and effects occurred outside of participants&rsquo; conscious awareness.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>These findings provide preliminary evidence that antismoking campaigns could ironically increase immediate smoking behaviours among smokers. The long-term benefits of proven public health campaigns, including &lsquo;truth,&rsquo; are likely to outweigh any short-term boomerang effects. However, industry-sponsored messages in which companies have an economic incentive to increase consumption behaviours should be treated with scepticism and evaluated independently.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harris, J. L., Pierce, M., Bargh, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-01-15T00:01:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050670</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050670</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Priming effect of antismoking PSAs on smoking behaviour: a pilot study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-01-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050673v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effective smoke-free policies in achieving a high level of compliance with smoke-free law: experiences from a district of North India]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050673v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Compliance survey of smoke-free law is an effective means of measuring progress towards a smoke-free society. They also help policy makers to take action where strengthening measures are required. India has a comprehensive tobacco control law known as Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA 2003) which prohibits smoking in public places and requires display of &lsquo;No smoking&rsquo; signages with proper specifications at conspicuous points. However, its implementation and enforcement are still a matter of concern.</p></sec><sec><st>Aims and objectives</st><p>To ascertain the level of compliance with smoke-free law in public places of a district of North India.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>A cross sectional study was conducted in the months of November&ndash;December 2011 in district SAS Nagar Mohali of North India. The public places including hotels/restaurants/bars/shopping malls, government offices, educational institutions, healthcare facilities and transit stations were surveyed. The study tool was adapted from the guide on &lsquo;Assessing compliance with smoke-free law&rsquo; developed jointly by the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The overall compliance rate towards section 4 of COTPA was 92.3%. No active smoking was observed in 94.2% of the public places. In 90% of the public places &lsquo;No Smoking&rsquo; signage were displayed as per COTPA. Health and educational institutions had maximum compliance with the smoke-free law while transit sites showed the least compliance.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Compliance to the smoke-free law was high in the study.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goel, S., Ravindra, K., Singh, R. J., Sharma, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-01-15T00:01:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050673</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050673</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effective smoke-free policies in achieving a high level of compliance with smoke-free law: experiences from a district of North India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-01-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050385v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The case for Ofsmoke: the potential for price cap regulation of tobacco to raise {pound}500 million per year in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050385v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>A system of price-cap regulation has previously been suggested to address the market failure inherent to the tobacco industry. This would benefit public health directly (eg, by making it extremely difficult for the industry to sell cut-price cigarettes, or use price as a marketing strategy) and indirectly (eg, by reducing the available money the industry has for spending on marketing and lobbying). This paper explores the feasibility of applying such a scheme in the UK.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The impact of price-capping is modelled using optimistic and conservative scenarios, each with different assumptions, and using 2009 and 2010 profit data for the major companies selling tobacco in the UK. The models are used to calculate by how much would profit be reduced through the imposition of price caps, and thus, how much revenue could be raised in additional taxes, assuming the end price the consumer pays does not change.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Tobacco companies enjoy massive profit margins, up to 67%, in the UK. The optimistic scenario suggests a potential increase in UK tobacco tax revenue of &pound;585.7 million in 2010 (&pound;548.4 million in 2009), while the conservative model suggests an increase in revenue of &pound;433.6 million in 2010 (&pound;399.2 million in 2009). This would be approximately enough to fund, <I>twice over</I>, UK-wide antitobacco smuggling measures, and smoking cessation services in England, including the associated pharmacotherapies, to help people stop smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Applying a system of price-cap regulation in the UK would raise around &pound;500 million per annum (US$750 million). This is likely to be an underestimate because of cautious assumptions used in the model. These significant financial benefits, in addition to the public health benefits that would be generated, suggest this is a policy that should be given serious consideration.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Branston, J. R., Gilmore, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-01-14T19:05:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050385</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050385</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The case for Ofsmoke: the potential for price cap regulation of tobacco to raise {pound}500 million per year in the UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050719v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Availability of snus and its sale to minors in a large Minnesota city]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050719v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Previous studies examining tobacco retailers&rsquo; compliance with youth tobacco access policies have mostly evaluated retailers&rsquo; likelihood of selling cigarettes to minors, and none have evaluated the likelihood of selling snus (a new smokeless tobacco product) to minors. We assessed the availability of snus and the likelihood of selling snus to adolescents in tobacco retailers in a large city in Minnesota.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We randomly selected 71 eligible retailers located in a large city in Minnesota, and assessed the availability of snus through Camel snus retailer listings and phone inquiry. Purchase attempts by an underage buyer were used to assess the likelihood of selling snus to minors. <sup>2</sup> tests were used to examine the store and neighbourhood characteristics associated with availability of snus.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We found that 31 retailers (43.7%) carried snus in the store, and 4 (12.9%) sold snus to the underage buyer. Retailers who sold gasoline were more likely to carry snus in the store (p&lt;0.01). Neighbourhood demographic characteristics were not associated with availability of snus (p&gt;0.10).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Prevalence of snus sales to minors appeared to be higher than that of cigarette sales to minors according to the 2011 Synar report. Futures studies are needed to determine whether tobacco retailers are more likely to sell snus than cigarettes to minors. Interventions such as public and retailer policies are needed to reduce the likelihood of tobacco retailers selling snus to minors.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choi, K., Fabian, L. E. A., Brock, B., Engman, K. H., Jansen, J., Forster, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-01-08T23:51:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050719</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050719</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Availability of snus and its sale to minors in a large Minnesota city]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050777v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Public opinion about ending the sale of tobacco in Australia]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050777v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><p>The recent success of the Australian Government in defending its plain packaging law in the High Court<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> has prompted speculation about what might be a logical next step in tobacco control and several options for limiting accessibility to tobacco products have been debated in the Australian media. These possibilities include the introduction of a smoker licensing scheme,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> restrictions to the types or locations of outlets from which tobacco can be sold<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> and a proposal that any person born since 2000 should be banned from buying tobacco products.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref></p><p>Limited public opinion data on the phasing out of tobacco sales exist. In 2003, 56% of adults in Ontario, Canada, agreed that &lsquo;cigarettes are too dangerous to be sold at all&rsquo;<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5">5</cross-ref> and in 2004, 57% of adults from New South Wales, Australia, supported a ban on tobacco sales within 10&nbsp;years.<cross-ref...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hayes, L., Wakefield, M. A., Scollo, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-01-08T23:50:50-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050777</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050777</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Public opinion about ending the sale of tobacco in Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050593v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tobacco advertising/promotions and adolescents' smoking risk in Northern Africa]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050593v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Comprehensive tobacco advertising/promotion bans are effective against adolescent smoking but many developing countries have implemented only partial bans. This study examines the association between advertising/promotions exposure and adolescent cigarette smoking risk in North Africa, and possible mediation of this association by parent and peer smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Adolescent data (n=12 329) from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey were analyzed (Libya, 2007; Egypt, 2005; Morocco, 2006; Tunisia 2007; and Sudan, 2005). Current smoking (any cigarette use in the past 30 days) and never-smokers' initiation susceptibility (composite of openness to accepting a cigarette from a friend and intention to start smoking in the next year) outcomes were examined. Advertising/promotion exposures included media and in-person contacts. Weighted univariate, bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Current smoking prevalence ranged from 5.6% (Egypt) to 15.3% (Tunisia) among boys, and 1.1% (Libya and Egypt) to 2.0% (Morocco and Sudan) among girls. Initiation susceptibility ranged from 14.1% (Sudan) to 25.0% (Tunisia) among boys, and from 13.3% (Sudan) to 15.0% (Libya) among girls. Ninety-eight percent of adolescents reported exposure to at least one type of advertising/promotion. In multivariable analyses adjusting for demographics, each type of advertising/promotion was significantly and positively associated with boys' current smoking status; most advertising/promotion exposure types were also positively associated with initiation susceptibility among boys and girls. Peer smoking only partially mediated these associations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Tobacco advertising/promotion exposure was highly prevalent and associated with adolescents' smoking risk in these countries. The comprehensiveness and enforcement of advertising/promotion bans needs to be enhanced.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madkour, A. S., Ledford, E. C., Andersen, L., Johnson, C. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-01-08T23:50:50-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050593</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050593</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tobacco advertising/promotions and adolescents' smoking risk in Northern Africa]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050407v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic, demographic and smoking-related correlates of the use of potentially reduced exposure to tobacco products in a national sample]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050407v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and aim</st><p>In recent years, new non-traditional, potentially reduced exposure products (PREPs), claiming to contain fewer harmful chemicals than the traditional products, have been introduced in the market. Little is known about socioeconomic, demographic and smoking-related determinants of the likelihood of using these products among smokers. The aim of this study was to examine these determinants.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Data from the 2006&ndash;2007 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey was used. We limited the analysis to current smokers (n=40&nbsp;724). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the association between covariates and the probability of the use of PREPs.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We found that younger age, lower education, higher nicotine addiction and having an intention to quit are associated with higher likelihood of the use of PREPs. The likelihood of using these products was found to be higher among respondents who are unemployed or have a service, production, sales or farming occupation than those with a professional occupation. Smokers living in the midwest, south or west, were found to have a greater likelihood of the use of PREPs than those living in the northeast.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Because there is little evidence to suggest that PREPs are less harmful that other tobacco products, their marketing as harm-minimising products should be regulated. Smokers, in particular those who are younger, have a lower socioeconomic status, and are more nicotine-dependent, should be the target of educational programmes that reveal the actual harm of PREPs.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaikh, R. A., Siahpush, M., Singh, G. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-01-04T23:55:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050407</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050407</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic, demographic and smoking-related correlates of the use of potentially reduced exposure to tobacco products in a national sample]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-01-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050762v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Growth in Tobacco Control publications by authors from low- and middle-income countries]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050762v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Research has contributed significantly to tobacco control in high-income nations, but has not yet played a comparable role in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). In recent years, efforts have been devoted to building research capacity in LMICs. Using publication in <I>Tobacco Control</I> as a proxy for all tobacco control research, we examine whether research articles authored by scholars from LMICs and about LMIC issues have increased over the Journal's history.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We examined every issue of <I>Tobacco Control</I> from 1992 to 2011, coding contributions as to their authorship (LMIC, high-income country, or both), and whether they covered tobacco control issues in LMICs. We included all the following journal categories: Original/Research articles, Brief reports, Reviews, Letters to the editor, Special communications, Commentaries, and Editorials.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We divided the Journal's first 20&nbsp;years into four 5-year periods. There was no statistically significant change in LMIC authorship or LMIC issue coverage during the first three periods. From those three periods combined (1992&ndash;2006), to the most recent 5-year period (2007&ndash;2011), articles including any LMIC authors increased from 7.2% to 22.7% (p&lt;0.05) of all original research articles; lead authorship by LMIC scholars increased from 4.0% to 13.7% (p&lt;0.05); and coverage of LMIC issues rose from 10.1% to 30.9% (p&lt;0.05). Similar findings resulted when combining all the journal categories.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Efforts to expand research by LMIC authors and about LMIC issues have begun to bear fruit, with a recent substantial increase. Still, the centrality of LMICs in the global tobacco pandemic implies that this progress only begins to address the enormous need.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warner, K. E., Tam, J., Koltun, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-01-03T23:55:53-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050762</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050762</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Growth in Tobacco Control publications by authors from low- and middle-income countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-01-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050465v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation: an economic evaluation of The iQUITT Study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050465v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Internet and telephone treatments for smoking cessation can reach large numbers of smokers. There is little research on their costs and the impact of adherence on costs and effects.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To conduct an economic evaluation of The iQUITT Study, a randomised trial comparing Basic Internet, Enhanced Internet and Enhanced Internet plus telephone counselling (&lsquo;Phone&rsquo;) at 3, 6, 12 and 18&nbsp;months.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We used a payer perspective to evaluate the average and incremental cost per quitter of the three interventions using intention-to-treat analysis of 30-day single-point prevalence and multiple-point prevalence (MPP) abstinence rates. We also examined results based on adherence. Costs included commercial charges for each intervention. Discounting was not included given the short time horizon.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Basic Internet had the lowest cost per quitter at all time points. In the analysis of incremental costs per additional quitter, Enhanced Internet+Phone was the most cost-effective using both single and MPP abstinence metrics. As adherence increased, the cost per quitter dropped across all arms. Costs per quitter were lowest among participants who used the &lsquo;optimal&rsquo; level of each intervention, with an average cost per quitter at 3&nbsp;months of US$7 for Basic Internet, US$164 for Enhanced Internet and US$346 for Enhanced Internet+Phone.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>&lsquo;Optimal&rsquo; adherence to internet and combined internet and telephone interventions yields the highest number of quitters at the lowest cost. Cost-effective means of ensuring adherence to such evidence-based programmes could maximise their population-level impact on smoking prevalence.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graham, A. L., Chang, Y., Fang, Y., Cobb, N. K., Tinkelman, D. S., Niaura, R. S., Abrams, D. B., Mandelblatt, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-12-21T00:01:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050465</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050465</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation: an economic evaluation of The iQUITT Study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-12-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050700v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Smoking while driving and public support for car smoking bans in Italy]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050700v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To analyse the prevalence and correlates of smoking in cars as well as attitudes towards the extension of smoking bans in private vehicles among Italian adults.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We used data from two surveys conducted in 2011 and 2012 on an overall sample of 6167 individuals representative of the Italian population aged &ge;15&nbsp;years.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The prevalence of smoking while driving was 65.5% among adult smokers. There was a negative trend with age and a positive one with education level. Smoking while driving was more prevalent among men, heavy smokers and smokers who believe there is little or no increased risk of accidents from smoking while driving. Among smokers who smoke while driving, 20.9% smoke in cars carrying children. Overall, 79.6% of Italians (88.2% non-smokers and 48.8% current smokers) support a ban on smoking in cars, and 92.5% (95.0% non-smokers and 83.5% current smokers) support such a ban in cars carrying children.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Despite the high percentage of smokers who smoke in private vehicles, the majority of the Italian population (including smokers) support the introduction of a smoking ban in cars, particularly in cars carrying children. Smoke-free laws should therefore be extended to private vehicles, particularly if they are carrying children. Moreover, warning labels on cigarette packages should include information on the increased risk of accidents when smoking while driving. Mass media campaigns should also consider targeting this topic.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez-Sanchez, J. M., Gallus, S., Lugo, A., Fernandez, E., Invernizzi, G., Colombo, P., Pacifici, R., La Vecchia, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-12-21T00:01:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050700</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050700</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Smoking while driving and public support for car smoking bans in Italy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-12-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050648v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tobacco outlet density and social disadvantage in New South Wales, Australia]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050648v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>There is evidence to suggest a possible association between ease of access to tobacco and uptake of smoking,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> and the likelihood of cessation.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> A recent analysis of tobacco outlet density (TOD) in the USA found that TOD was higher in areas where a higher proportion of Hispanics and African&ndash;Americans live, and in areas where a higher proportion of families live in poverty.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> The authors concluded that higher TOD may contribute to disparities in smoking prevalence. This sort of evidence has led to proposals that control of TOD be considered in tobacco control efforts.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5">5</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="R6">6</cross-ref></p><p>In the Australian state of New South Wales (NSW), a requirement to notify the state government of intention to sell tobacco products became mandatory under the Public Health (Tobacco) Act 2008. The notification data was then acquired by the Cancer Council NSW under a...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kite, J., Rissel, C., Greenaway, M., Willliams, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-12-14T00:01:08-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050648</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050648</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tobacco outlet density and social disadvantage in New South Wales, Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-12-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050738v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tobacco smoke pollution in the 'non-smoking' sections of selected popular restaurants in Pretoria, South Africa]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050738v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke (SHS) has been associated with several adverse health effects including increased risk of lung cancer, heart disease and also asthma in children.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Hence, the WHO's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) obligates parties to the Convention, to implement measures to protect all people from the exposure to SHS.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> Even prior to signing the WHO FCTC in 2005, the South African government in 2001 implemented a regulation to restrict smoking in public places, including restaurants.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> However, the current regulation in South Africa allows for a designated &lsquo;smoking area&rsquo;. It is pertinent to note that the enabling legislation provided for a ban in smoking in public places, but also gave the Minister of Health powers to permit smoking in a prescribed portion of a public place. The Minister at that time exercised these powers.</p><p>It has been suggested that currently there are...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ayo-Yusuf, O. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-12-12T00:01:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050738</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050738</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tobacco smoke pollution in the 'non-smoking' sections of selected popular restaurants in Pretoria, South Africa]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-12-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050684v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Consequences of clean indoor air exemptions in Oregon: the hookah story]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050684v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p>The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control has stimulated the passage of comprehensive clean indoor air laws throughout the world.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Although WHO guidelines stress the importance of universal protection from secondhand smoke in such laws,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> many states in the USA exempt certain locations such as tobacco retail establishments and tobacco bars/cigar lounges.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> Tobacco waterpipe (ie, hookah) establishments are often exempt from these laws, are growing in popularity and may change social norms regarding hookah use.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> Indeed, hookah use among young people in the USA appears to be increasing,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5">5</cross-ref> as it is elsewhere,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R6">6</cross-ref> and the limited research available suggests it may be associated with negative health effects (eg, nicotine dependence, cancer).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5">5</cross-ref> In this letter, we describe the exemptions in Oregon's Indoor Clean Air Act (ICAA), subsequent proliferation of hookah lounges and...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maher, J. E., Morris, D. S., Girard, K. E., Pizacani, B. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-12-12T00:01:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050684</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050684</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Consequences of clean indoor air exemptions in Oregon: the hookah story]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-12-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050644v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Illicit cigarettes and hand-rolled tobacco in 18 European countries: a cross-sectional survey]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050644v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Little evidence, other than that commissioned by the tobacco industry, exists on the size of the illicit tobacco trade. This study addresses this gap by examining the level and nature of illicit cigarettes and hand-rolled tobacco in 18 European countries.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Face-to-face cross-sectional survey on smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>18 European countries.</p></sec><sec><st>Participants</st><p>For each country, around 1000 subjects representative of the population aged 15 and over were enrolled. Current cigarette smokers were asked to show their latest purchased pack of cigarettes or hand-rolled tobacco.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measure</st><p>A comprehensive measure called an Identification of an Illicit Pack (IIP) was used to study the extent of illicit trade, defining a pack as illicit if it had at least one of the following tax evasion indicators: (1) it was bought from illicit sources, as reported by smokers, (2) it had an inappropriate tax stamp, (3) it had an inappropriate health warning or (4) its price was substantially below the known price in their market.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Overall, the proportion of illicit packs was 6.5%. The highest prevalence of IIP was observed in Latvia (37.8%). Illicit packs were more frequent among less educated smokers and among those living in a country which shared a land or sea border with Ukraine, Russia, Moldova or Belarus. No significant association was found with price of cigarettes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This study indicates that IIP is less than 7% in Europe and suggests that the supply of illicit tobacco, rather than its price, is a key factor contributing to tax evasion.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joossens, L., Lugo, A., La Vecchia, C., Gilmore, A. B., Clancy, L., Gallus, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-12-10T16:30:55-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050644</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050644</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Illicit cigarettes and hand-rolled tobacco in 18 European countries: a cross-sectional survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-12-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050600v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Change in tobacco excise policy in Bulgaria: the role of tobacco industry lobbying and smuggling]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050600v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To examine how transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) tried to penetrate the Bulgarian cigarette market and influence tobacco excise tax policy after the fall of communism and during Bulgaria's accession to the European Union (EU).</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Analysis of internal tobacco industry documents supplemented by analysis of press coverage, tobacco industry journals, market reports and key informant interviews.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>TTCs have been involved in cigarette smuggling to and through Bulgaria since at least 1975 and used smuggling as a market-entry strategy. National tobacco company Bulgartabac appears to have been involved in smuggling its own cigarettes from and reimporting them to Bulgaria. Since Bulgaria's accession to the EU opened the market to the TTCs, TTCs have exaggerated the scale of the illicit trade to successfully convince politicians and public health experts that tax increases lead to cigarette smuggling. Yet, sources point to TTCs&rsquo; continued complicity in cigarette smuggling to and through Bulgaria between 2000 and 2010. TTCs aimed to influence the Bulgarian tobacco excise tax regime, import duties and pricing mechanism, but appear to have been less successful than in other former communist countries in part due to the co-existence of a state-owned tobacco company. Undisclosed meetings between the tobacco industry and government ministers and officials are ongoing despite Bulgaria being a party to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The TTCs continued involvement in smuggling suggests that deals in 2004, 2007 and 2010 which the European Commission has reached with TTCs to address cigarette smuggling are inadequate. The TTCs&rsquo; continued access to policymakers suggests that the FCTC is not being properly implemented.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skafida, V., Silver, K. E., Rechel, B. P. D., Gilmore, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-12-03T00:01:06-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050600</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050600</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Change in tobacco excise policy in Bulgaria: the role of tobacco industry lobbying and smuggling]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-12-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050483v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Electronic nicotine delivery systems: regulatory and safety challenges: Singapore perspective]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050483v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Many electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are marketed as safer tobacco alternative products or effective cessation therapies. ENDS samples were evaluated for design features, including nicotine and glycols content. This could be useful in developing a legal framework to handle ENDS.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Identification of the nicotine, glycerol and propylene glycol (PPG) contents was conducted using gas chromatography mass spectrometry with quantification performed using flame ionisation techniques.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Varying nicotine amounts were found in ENDS cartridges which were labelled with the same concentration. Chemicals such as PPG and glycerol were found to be present in the nicotine-containing liquid of the cartridges. ENDS varied in their contents and packaging information. Limited information was available on the contents of nicotine and other chemicals present in a variety of ENDS sampled.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Based on samples tested in this study, many contain misleading information on product ingredients. The results show poor consistency between actual nicotine content analysed on ENDS cartridges and the amount labelled. These findings raise safety and efficacy concerns for current and would-be recreational users or those trying to quit smoking.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheah, N. P., Chong, N. W. L., Tan, J., Morsed, F. A., Yee, S. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-12-01T00:00:56-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050483</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050483</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Electronic nicotine delivery systems: regulatory and safety challenges: Singapore perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050520v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost effectiveness of full coverage of the medical management of smoking cessation in France]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050520v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To estimate the incremental cost effectiveness of full coverage of the medical management of smoking cessation from the perspective of statutory health insurance (SHI) in France.</p></sec><sec><st>Design and population</st><p>Cost-effectiveness analysis based on a Markov state-transition decision analytic model was used to compare full SHI coverage of smoking cessation and actual coverage based on an annual 50 lump sum per insured person among current French smokers aged 15&ndash;75&nbsp;years. We used a scenario approach to take into account the many different behaviours of smokers and the likely variability of SHI policy choices in terms of participation rate and number and frequency of attempts covered.</p></sec><sec><st>Interventions</st><p>Drug treatments for smoking cessation combined with six medical consultations including individual counselling.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcomes measures</st><p>The cost effectiveness of full coverage was expressed by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in 2009 euros per life-year gained (LYG) at the lifetime horizon.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The cost effectiveness per LYG for smokers ranged from 1786 to 2012, with an average value of 1911. The minimum value was very close to the maximum value with a difference of only 226. The cost-effectiveness ratio was only minimally sensitive to the participation rate, the number of attempts covered and the cessation rate.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Compared to other health measures in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease already covered by SHI, full coverage of smoking cessation is the most cost-effective approach.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chevreul, K., Cadier, B., Durand-Zaleski, I., Chan, E., Thomas, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-29T00:01:08-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050520</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050520</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost effectiveness of full coverage of the medical management of smoking cessation in France]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050598v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pro-smoking apps for smartphones: the latest vehicle for the tobacco industry?]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050598v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Smartphone use is growing exponentially and will soon become the only mobile phone handset for about 6 billion users. Smartphones are ideal marketing targets as consumers can be reached anytime, anywhere. Smartphone application (app) stores are global shops that sell apps to users all around the world. Although smartphone stores have a wide collection of health-related apps they also have a wide set of harmful apps. In this study, the availability of &lsquo;pro-smoking&rsquo; apps in two of the largest smartphone app stores (Apple App store and Android Market) was examined.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>In February 2012, we searched the Apple App Store and Android Market for pro-smoking apps, using the keywords Smoke, Cigarette, Cigar, Smoking and Tobacco. We excluded apps that were not tobacco-related and then assessed the tobacco-related apps against our inclusion criteria.</p></sec><sec><st>Result</st><p>107 pro-smoking apps were identified and classified into six categories based on functionality. 42 of these apps were from the Android Market and downloaded by over 6 million users. Some apps have explicit images of cigarette brands.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Tobacco products are being promoted in the new &lsquo;smartphone app&rsquo; medium which has global reach, a huge consumer base of various age groups and underdeveloped regulation. The paper also provides two examples of app store responses to country-specific laws and regulations that could be used to control the harmful contents in the app stores for individual countries.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[BinDhim, N. F., Freeman, B., Trevena, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-26T00:01:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050598</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050598</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pro-smoking apps for smartphones: the latest vehicle for the tobacco industry?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050569v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tobacco industry argues domestic trademark laws and international treaties preclude cigarette health warning labels, despite consistent legal advice that the argument is invalid]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050569v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To analyse the tobacco industry's use of international trade agreements to oppose policies to strengthen health warning labels (HWLs).</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>A review of tobacco industry documents, tobacco control legislation and international treaties.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the early 1990s, the tobacco industry became increasingly alarmed about the advancement of HWLs on cigarettes packages. In response, it requested legal opinions from British American Tobacco's law firms in Australia and England, Britain's Department of Trade and Industry and the World Intellectual Property Organisation on the legality of restricting and prohibiting the use of their trademarks, as embodied in cigarette packages. The consistent legal advice, privately submitted to the companies, was that international treaties do not shield trademark owners from government limitations (including prohibition) on the use of their trademarks. Despite receiving this legal advice, the companies publicly argued that requiring large HWLs compromised their trademark rights under international treaties. The companies successfully used these arguments as part of their successful effort to deter Canadian and Australian governments from enacting laws requiring the plan packaging of cigarettes, which helped delay large graphic HWLs, including &lsquo;plain&rsquo; packaging, for over a decade.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Governments should not be intimidated by tobacco company threats and unsubstantiated claims, and carefully craft HWL laws to withstand the inevitable tobacco industry lawsuits with the knowledge that the companies&rsquo; own lawyers as well as authoritative bodies have told the companies that the rights they claim do not exist.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crosbie, E., Glantz, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-24T00:00:59-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050569</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050569</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tobacco industry argues domestic trademark laws and international treaties preclude cigarette health warning labels, despite consistent legal advice that the argument is invalid]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050531v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Particulate mass and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons exposure from secondhand smoke in the back seat of a vehicle]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050531v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Context</st><p>Exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) has been reduced in the USA by banning smoking in public places. These restrictions have not had the same effect on children's exposure to SHS as adults suggesting that children are exposed to SHS in locations not covered by bans, such as private homes and cars.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Assess exposure to SHS in the backseat of a stationary vehicle where a child would sit, quantify exposures to fine particulates (PM2.5), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), carbon monoxide (CO) and nicotine. Estimate the impact on a child's mean daily exposure to PM2.5.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>SHS exposures in stationary vehicles with two different window configurations were monitored. A volunteer smoked three cigarettes in a one-hour period for twenty-two experiments. PM2.5, CO, nicotine and PAH where measured in the backseat of the vehicle. 16 PAH compounds were measured for in gas and particle phases as well as real-time particle phase concentrations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The mean PAH concentration, 1325.1 ng/m<sup>3</sup>, was larger than concentrations measured in bars and restaurants were smoking is banned in many countries. We estimate that a child spending only ten minutes in the car with a smoker at the mean PM2.5 concentration measured in the first window configuration &ndash;1697 mg/m<sup>3</sup> &ndash; will cause a 30% increase to the daily mean PM2.5 personal average of a child.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Estimates made using the measured data and previously reported PM2.5 daily mean concentrations for children in California showing that even short exposure periods are capable of creating large exposure to smoke.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Northcross, A. L., Trinh, M., Kim, J., Jones, I. A., Meyers, M. J., Dempsey, D. D., Benowitz, N. L., Hammond, S. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-21T16:30:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050531</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050531</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Particulate mass and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons exposure from secondhand smoke in the back seat of a vehicle]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050602v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Public perceptions of the ban on tobacco sales in San Francisco pharmacies]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050602v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In October, 2008, legislation was implemented in the city and county of San Francisco, California, prohibiting the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To characterise public awareness and perceptions of the ban on tobacco sales in San Francisco community pharmacies.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A brief, anonymous survey was used to assess public awareness and perceptions of a ban on tobacco sales approximately 1&nbsp;year after implementation. Individuals were approached by researchers outside of chain pharmacies in San Francisco. Smokers and non-smokers were included, and participants did not have to be patrons of the pharmacy.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 198 participants, 56% were in favor of the ban, 27% opposed it and 17% were undecided. A greater proportion of current tobacco users (81%) than former/never users (48%) were aware of the ban (p&lt;0.001), and a lesser proportion were supportive of the ban (21% of current users vs 66% of former/never users; p&lt;0.001). Most current tobacco users (88% of n=43) had not considered quitting smoking as a result of the ban. The majority of consumers indicated that the ban on cigarette sales did not influence their shopping behaviour at retail pharmacies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>In the city and county of San Francisco, public support exists for prohibiting the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kroon, L. A., Corelli, R. L., Roth, A. P., Hudmon, K. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-21T00:01:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050602</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050602</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Public perceptions of the ban on tobacco sales in San Francisco pharmacies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050849v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The 'diverse, dynamic new world of global tobacco control'? An analysis of participation in the Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050849v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The increasingly inequitable impacts of tobacco use highlight the importance of ensuring developing countries&rsquo; ongoing participation in global tobacco control. The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) has been widely regarded as reflecting the high engagement and effective influence of developing countries.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We examined participation in FCTC governance based on records from the first four meetings of the Conference of the Parties (COP), comparing representation and delegate diversity across income levels and WHO regions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>While attendance at the COP sessions is high, there are substantial disparities in the relative representation of different income levels and regions, with lower middle and low income countries contributing only 18% and 10% of total meeting delegates, respectively. In regional terms, Europe provided the single largest share of delegates at all except the Durban (2008) meeting. Thirty-nine percent of low income countries and 27% of those from Africa were only ever represented by a single person delegation compared with 10% for high income countries and 11% for Europe. Rotation of the COP meeting location outside of Europe is associated with better representation of other regions and a stronger presence of delegates from national ministries of health and focal points for tobacco control.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Developing countries face particular barriers to participating in the COP process, and their engagement in global tobacco control is likely to diminish in the absence of specific measures to support their effective participation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plotnikova, E., Hill, S. E., Collin, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-20T00:01:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050849</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050849</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The 'diverse, dynamic new world of global tobacco control'? An analysis of participation in the Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050681v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The importance of cigarette packaging in a 'dark' market: the 'Silk Cut' experience]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050681v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In a growing number of countries tobacco companies are severely restricted in how they can legally market their products. In these &lsquo;dark&rsquo; markets the role of packaging as a promotional and communications tool becomes more pronounced. How packaging is used for the most expensive cigarette brands in dark markets has received limited attention however, even though these &lsquo;premium&rsquo; cigarette brands significantly impact upon the profitability of tobacco companies. We outline, using retail trade press journals, how packaging was used for premium brand &lsquo;Silk Cut&rsquo; in the UK from 2004 to 2011, following a comprehensive ban on tobacco advertising, promotions and sponsorship. From 2004 to 2008 packaging was used to help launch two new variants and during this period Silk Cut market share of the premium sector grew by 1.1%. Overall share of the cigarette market for the Silk Cut house (brand family) fell however due to the continuing decline of the premium sector. From 2008 to 2011 changes to the packaging were much more frequent, including the repeated use of limited-edition designs, and modifications to pack shape, texture, style of opening, cellophane, foil and inner frame. Silk Cut's share of the premium sector grew a further 2.9% from 2008 to 2011, and overall cigarette market share increased. That a premium brand can report any level of growth within such a hostile market, where most advertising, promotion and sponsorship is banned, taxation is among the highest in the world, and in the midst of a recession, is testament to the value of packaging.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moodie, C., Angus, K., Ford, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-14T06:18:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050681</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050681</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The importance of cigarette packaging in a 'dark' market: the 'Silk Cut' experience]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Special communications</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050534v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Creating demand for foreign brands in a 'home run' market: tobacco company tactics in South Korea following market liberalisation]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050534v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To analyse the tactics transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) used to increase market share in South Korea after market liberalisation in 1988, and the subsequent impact of TTCs&rsquo; activities on the domestic industry and ultimately public health.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Internal tobacco industry documents were searched iteratively and analysed by keyword related to strategies for increasing market share in Korea since liberalisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Following market liberalisation, TTCs faced entrenched cultural and institutional barriers in Korea which hindered increased sales of cigarette imports. TTCs identified population groups more favourably inclined towards imported brands, developed new distribution channels and used promotional activities targeting these groups. The growth in market share by TTCs suggests that these activities were successful at challenging the Korea Tobacco &amp; Ginseng Corporation (KTGC) monopoly. In response, KTGC shifted to a proactive marketing approach and adopted strategies similar to TTCs. This, in turn, made the Korean market highly competitive. Findings show that, after market liberalisation, there was an upward trend in cigarette consumption and smoking prevalence among the targeted population groups, notably youth and young women.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Governments engaging in trade negotiations that may lead to the opening of domestic tobacco markets need a fuller understanding of previous industry activities for expanding into emerging markets as well as how the domestic industry can change accordingly. To protect public health, the adoption of comprehensive tobacco control measures, guided by WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, are needed as part of such negotiations.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, S., Lee, K., Holden, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-14T06:18:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050534</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050534</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Creating demand for foreign brands in a 'home run' market: tobacco company tactics in South Korea following market liberalisation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050391v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of tobacco control policy on quitting and nicotine dependence among women in five European countries]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050391v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To describe differences in and factors associated with former smoking and nicotine dependence among women in Ireland, Sweden, France, Italy and the Czech Republic.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional, random digit dial telephone survey of 5000 women, aged 18&nbsp;years and older, conducted in 2008. Analyses were conducted using logistic regression models.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Respondents from Ireland and Sweden had statistically significantly higher odds of having quit smoking within the 5&nbsp;years before survey administration compared with respondents from the Czech Republic. Current smokers from Ireland, Sweden, France and Italy are more nicotine dependent than those from the Czech Republic.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Respondents from countries with stronger tobacco control policies were more likely to have quit smoking compared with those living in the Czech Republic. However, respondents in countries with some of the strongest policies (Ireland, Sweden, France and Italy) had higher odds of smoking within 30&nbsp;min of waking, an established indicator of nicotine dependence. More research in this area is warranted, but this study suggests that now that the Czech Republic is beginning to implement strong tobacco control policy, they will probably achieve a rapid decline in population-level smoking. Ireland, Sweden, France, Italy and other countries with established, strong tobacco control policies would do well to consider what additional programmes they can put in place to help their highly nicotine-dependent population of smokers successfully quit.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allen, J. A., Gritz, E. R., Xiao, H., Rubenstein, R., Kralikova, E., Haglund, M., Heck, J., Niaura, R., Vallone, D. M., the WELAS Team]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-14T06:18:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050391</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050391</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of tobacco control policy on quitting and nicotine dependence among women in five European countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050256v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The natural history of antismoking advertising recall: the influence of broadcasting parameters, emotional intensity and executional features]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050256v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The necessary first steps for televised media campaign effects are population exposure and recall. To maximise the impact of campaign funding, it is critical to identify modifiable factors that increase the efficiency of an advertisement reaching the target audience and of their recalling that advertisement.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Data come from a serial cross-sectional telephone survey with weekly interviews of adult smokers and recent quitters from the state of New South Wales, Australia, collected between April 2005 and December 2010 (total n=13&nbsp;301). Survey data were merged with commercial TV ratings data (Gross Rating Points (GRPs)) to estimate individuals&rsquo; exposure to antismoking campaigns.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that GRPs and broadcasting recency were positively associated with advertisement recall, such that advertisements broadcast more at higher levels or in more recent weeks were more likely to be recalled. Advertisements were more likely to be recalled in their launch phase than in following periods. Controlling for broadcasting parameters, advertisements higher in emotional intensity were more likely to be recalled than those low in emotion; and emotionally intense advertisements required fewer GRPs to achieve high levels of recall than lower emotion advertisements. There was some evidence for a diminishing effect of increased GRPs on recall.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>In order to achieve sufficient levels of population recall of antismoking campaigns, advertisements need to be broadcast at adequate levels in relatively frequent cycles. Advertisements with highly emotional content may offer the most efficient means by which to increase population recall.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dunlop, S. M., Perez, D., Cotter, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-10T00:01:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050256</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050256</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The natural history of antismoking advertising recall: the influence of broadcasting parameters, emotional intensity and executional features]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050591v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Availability and range of tobacco products for sale in Massachusetts pharmacies]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050591v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>New tobacco control policies have been introduced in Massachusetts which restrict tobacco product sales in pharmacies. The purpose of this investigation was to outline the scope of pharmacy involvement in the tobacco market by assessing the availability and range of tobacco products sold in Massachusetts pharmacies.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Public listings of licenced pharmacies and tobacco retailers in Massachusetts were examined to determine the proportion of pharmacies licenced to sell tobacco, and the proportion of tobacco retailers possessing a pharmacy licence. Telephone interviews were conducted with a random sample (n=70) of pharmacies possessing a tobacco licence to assess the availability and range of tobacco products for sale. The availability of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) products was assessed as a comparison.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The majority of pharmacies in Massachusetts possessed a tobacco licence (69%), and pharmacies made up 9% of licenced tobacco retailers. Among pharmacies surveyed that reported selling tobacco (90%), cigarettes were the most available tobacco product for sale (100%), followed by cigars (69%), little cigars/cigarillos (66%), moist snuff (53%), pipe tobacco (49%), roll-your-own tobacco (34%), snus (14%), dissolvable tobacco (11%) and electronic cigarettes (2%). Nearly all pharmacies selling tobacco offered the nicotine patch (100%), gum (100%) and lozenge (98%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Tobacco-free pharmacy policies would affect a majority of Massachusetts pharmacies and remove a variety of tobacco products from their store shelves. Further, nearly one in ten tobacco retailers would be eliminated by prohibiting tobacco sales in Massachusetts pharmacies statewide.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seidenberg, A. B., Hong, W., Liu, J., Noel, J. K., Rees, V. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-08T00:01:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050591</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050591</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Availability and range of tobacco products for sale in Massachusetts pharmacies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050427v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unplanned cigarette purchases and tobacco point of sale advertising: a potential barrier to smoking cessation]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050427v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In the USA, tobacco marketing expenditure is increasingly concentrated at the point of sale (POS). Previous studies have demonstrated an association between exposure to tobacco POS advertising and increased smoking initiation, but limited evidence is available on adult smokers&rsquo; decisions and behaviours.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>An immediate post-cigarette purchase survey was administered to 301 cigarette purchasers outside of two grocery stores in Vermont to assess the prevalence of unplanned purchases and opinions about POS tobacco advertising and displays.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In total, 11.3% of purchases were reported as unplanned. Certain groups were more likely to make unplanned purchases including: 18&ndash;24-year-olds (OR: 2.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 4.4), less than daily smokers (OR: 5.6, 95% CI 1.9 to 16.9), smokers who made 3+ quit attempts in the previous year (OR: 2.4, 95% CI 0.9 to 6.0), those who plan to quit in the next month (OR: 3.7, 95% CI 1.6 to 9.0), and those who agreed that tobacco POS advertising makes quitting smoking harder (OR: 2.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.8). Overall, 31.2% of participants agreed that tobacco POS advertising makes quitting smoking harder. Individuals who intended to quit within the next month, made 3+ quit attempts in the last year, or made an unplanned cigarette purchase were the most likely to agree.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Young adults and individuals making multiple quit attempts or planning to quit in the next month are more likely to make unplanned cigarette purchases. Reducing unplanned purchases prompted by tobacco POS advertising could improve the likelihood of successful cessation among smokers.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clattenburg, E. J., Elf, J. L., Apelberg, B. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-08T00:01:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050427</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050427</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unplanned cigarette purchases and tobacco point of sale advertising: a potential barrier to smoking cessation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050517v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Differential effects of cigarette price changes on adult smoking behaviours]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050517v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Raising cigarette prices through taxation is an important policy approach to reduce smoking. Yet, cigarette price increases may not be equally effective in all subpopulations of smokers.</p></sec><sec><st>Purpose</st><p>To examine differing effects of state cigarette price changes with individual changes in smoking among smokers of different intensity levels.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Data were derived from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions, a nationally representative sample of US adults originally interviewed in 2001&ndash;2002 (Wave 1) and re-interviewed in 2004&ndash;2005 (Wave 2): 34&nbsp;653 were re-interviewed in Wave 2, and 7068 <I>smokers</I> defined at Wave 1 were included in our study. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to assess whether the effects of changes in state cigarette prices on changes in daily smoking behaviour differed by level of daily smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the multivariable model, there was a significant interaction between change in price per pack of cigarettes from Wave 1 to Wave 2 and the number of cigarettes smoked per day (p=0.044). The more cigarettes smoked per day at baseline, the more responsive the smokers were to increases in price per pack of cigarettes (ie, number of cigarettes smoked per day was reduced in response to price increases).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Our findings that heavier smokers successfully and substantially reduced their cigarette smoking behaviours in response to state cigarette price increases provide fresh insight to the evidence on the effectiveness of higher cigarette prices in reducing smoking.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cavazos-Rehg, P. A., Krauss, M. J., Spitznagel, E. L., Chaloupka, F. J., Luke, D. A., Waterman, B., Grucza, R. A., Bierut, L. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-07T00:01:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050517</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050517</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Differential effects of cigarette price changes on adult smoking behaviours]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050518v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Changes in tobacco industry advertising around high schools in Greece following an outdoor advertising ban: a follow-up study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050518v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>As tobacco advertising bans are enacted in accordance with the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, it is essential to assess enforcement and how the industry may circumvent such measures.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective design</st><p>During this longitudinal study, we compared the characteristics of points-of-sale (POS) advertising within 300&nbsp;m of all high schools in Heraklion, Greece before (n=101 POS and 44 billboards in 2007) and after (n=106 POS in 2011) an outdoor advertising ban was implemented in 2009. Cigarette advertisements in all retailers near all high schools were assessed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Following the ban, tobacco industry billboards around schools were eradicated (from 44 to 0). The proportion of POS that had external advertisements dropped from 98% to 66% (p&lt;0.001), more so in regulated convenience stores (from 97% to 35%, p&lt;0.001) than in kiosks (98% to 92%, p=0.192), which were exempt from the ban. The proportion of convenience stores that had advertisements on the door (79.5% to 20.4%, p&lt;0.001), ads that could be seen from the street (92.3% to 22.4%, p&lt;0.001) or illuminated exterior ads (46.2% to 10.2%, p&lt;0.001) was also significantly reduced. Overall, the average number of exterior advertisements per POS fell from 7.4 to 3.9 (p&lt;0.05). This reduction was noted in regulated convenience stores (4.8&plusmn;3.0 vs 0.9&plusmn;2.1, p&lt;0.001) and in unregulated kiosks (9.0&plusmn;6.7 vs 6.5&plusmn;4.5, p=0.019).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The outdoor advertising restriction in Greece has led to a reduced number of tobacco advertisements per POS, and the eradication of billboard advertising. Nevertheless, there is a need to regulate kiosks, which were identified as a key vector for tobacco advertising, and to increase compliance among regulated convenience stores.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vardavas, C. I., Girvalaki, C., Lazuras, L., Triantafylli, D., Lionis, C., Connolly, G. N., Behrakis, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-06T00:00:59-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050518</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050518</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Changes in tobacco industry advertising around high schools in Greece following an outdoor advertising ban: a follow-up study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050739v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Examining market trends in the United States smokeless tobacco use: 2005-2011]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050739v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>While cigarette consumption in the USA continues to decline, promotion for and consumption of smokeless tobacco (SLT) is growing. However, little research has explored what product features are driving SLT growth, despite awareness that product-level factors may be important in SLT use. This study analyses national sales data to better understand the impact of product features on SLT sales.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Data on sales of SLT in US convenience stores from 2005 to 2011 were obtained from Nielsen Research Company. Each listed product was coded for attributes such as type, brand, flavouring and form to calculate their respective total sales, market share and contribution to overall SLT growth.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Sales of moist snuff products (including snus) increased by 65.6% between 2005 and 2011. Sales of pouched and flavoured forms of moist snuff increased by 333.8% and 72.1%, respectively, and contributed to 28% and 59.4% of the total growth in the moist snuff category, respectively. Value/discount brands accounted for 42% of moist snuff sales in 2011 among the top 10 selling brands, largely driven by Grizzly. After 2&nbsp;years on the national market, Camel Snus was also one of the top 10 selling moist snuff brands.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Sales of moist snuff, both overall and for particular styles, are increasing. Growing pouch use may be attributed to new SLT users, which may include cigarette smokers using them as starter SLT products. Increased sales of flavoured and discounted snuff raise concerns about use and appeal to youth. Continued surveillance of SLT sales trends is warranted.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delnevo, C. D., Wackowski, O. A., Giovenco, D. P., Manderski, M. T. B., Hrywna, M., Ling, P. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-10-31T00:01:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050739</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050739</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Examining market trends in the United States smokeless tobacco use: 2005-2011]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-10-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050614v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Smoking uptake is associated with increased psychological distress: results of a national longitudinal study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050614v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>There is evidence that smoking is associated with poorer mental health. However, the underlying mechanisms for this remain unclear. We used longitudinal data to assess whether smoking uptake, or failed quit attempts, are associated with increased psychological distress.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Data were used from Waves 3 (2004/05), 5 (2006/07) and 7 (2008/09) of the longitudinal New Zealand Survey of Family, Income and Employment. Fixed-effects linear regression analyses were performed to model the impact of changes in smoking status and quit status (exposure variables) on changes in psychological distress (Kessler 10 (K10)).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After adjusting for time-varying demographic and socioeconomic covariates, smoking uptake was associated with an increase in psychological distress (K10: 0.22, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.43). The associations around quitting and distress were in the expected directions, but were not statistically significant. That is, smokers who successfully quit between waves had no meaningful change in psychological distress (K10: &ndash;0.05, 95% CI &ndash;0.34 to 0.23), whereas those who tried but failed to quit, experienced an increase in psychological distress (K10: 0.18, 95% CI &ndash;0.05 to 0.40).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The findings provide some support for a modest association between smoking uptake and a subsequent increase in psychological distress, but more research is needed before such information is considered for inclusion in public health messages.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carter, K. N., van der Deen, F. S., Wilson, N., Blakely, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-10-30T00:01:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050614</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050614</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Smoking uptake is associated with increased psychological distress: results of a national longitudinal study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-10-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050599v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact on cardiovascular disease events of the implementation of Argentina's national tobacco control law]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050599v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Argentina's congress passed a tobacco control law that would enforce 100% smoke-free environments for the entire country, strong and pictorial health warnings on tobacco products and a comprehensive advertising ban. However, the Executive Branch continues to review the law and it has not been fully implemented. Our objective was to project the potential impact of full implementation of this tobacco control legislation on cardiovascular disease.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Policy Model was used to project future cardiovascular events. Data sources for the model included vital statistics, morbidity and mortality data, and tobacco use estimates from the National Risk Factor Survey. Estimated effectiveness of interventions was based on a literature review. Results were expressed as life-years, myocardial infarctions and strokes saved in an 8-year-period between 2012 and 2020. In addition we projected the incremental effectiveness on the same outcomes of a tobacco price increase not included in the law.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the period 2012&ndash;2020, 7500 CHD deaths, 16&nbsp;900 myocardial infarctions and 4300 strokes could be avoided with the full implementation and enforcement of this law. Annual per cent reduction would be 3% for CHD deaths, 3% for myocardial infarctions and 1% for stroke. If a tobacco price increase is implemented the projected avoided CHD deaths, myocardial infarctions and strokes would be 15&nbsp;500, 34&nbsp;600 and 11&nbsp;900, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Implementation of the tobacco control law would produce significant public health benefits in Argentina. Strong advocacy is needed at national and international levels to get this law implemented throughout Argentina.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Konfino, J., Ferrante, D., Mejia, R., Coxson, P., Moran, A., Goldman, L., Perez-Stable, E. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-10-29T00:01:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050599</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050599</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact on cardiovascular disease events of the implementation of Argentina's national tobacco control law]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-10-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050473v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Contextual and community factors associated with youth access to cigarettes through commercial sources]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050473v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>This study examines contextual and community-level characteristics associated with youth access to tobacco through commercial sources in 50 non-contiguous mid-sized California communities.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The study is based on data from access surveys conducted by four confederate buyers (two men and two women) in 997 tobacco outlets. City demographics, adult smoking prevalence, and measures of tobacco outlet density, local tobacco retailer licencing and cigarette tax were included.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Multilevel regression analyses indicated that buyer's actual age, a male clerk and asking young buyers about their age were related to successful cigarette purchases. Buyer's actual age and minimum age signs increased the likelihood that clerks will request an identification (ID). At the community level, a higher percentage of minors, higher education, and a greater percentage of African&ndash;Americans were associated with an increased likelihood of a successful purchase. Lower percentage of minors, lower education, lower percentage of African&ndash;Americans, and having a local tobacco retailer licencing were associated with the retailer asking for an ID. Additionally, supermarkets charged significantly more for a pack of cigarettes than small markets, whereas, smoke/tobacco shops and drug stores/pharmacies charged less. Higher prices were associated with higher median household income and greater percentage of Hispanics. Findings about community characteristics, however, differed by cigarette brand.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This study enhances our understanding of the associations between contextual and community characteristics and youth access to tobacco through commercial sources which can help policymakers to identify and target at-risk communities and outlets to decrease youth access to tobacco.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lipperman-Kreda, S., Grube, J. W., Friend, K. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-10-23T00:03:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050473</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050473</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contextual and community factors associated with youth access to cigarettes through commercial sources]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-10-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050575v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cigarette affordability in Europe]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050575v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To analyze trends in excise taxes, real price and the affordability of cigarettes in Europe, and to examine the impact of EU wide tax policies on new member states.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>We use a sample of 37 European countries with data from 2004 to 2010. 27 countries are EU member states of which 12 joined in 2004 or 2007 (new members), while 10 non-EU countries are included as a comparison. Data is sourced from the European Commission and the Economist Intelligence Unit.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The excise tax burden increased in all new member states between 2004 and 2010 while remaining relatively unchanged in existing member states. In 2010, the excise tax burden was higher in new (mean 63.8%) than in existing member states (mean 59.4%). Although cigarettes were significant cheaper in new member states the difference in affordability was narrower between the two groups. Excise taxes and prices rose aggressively in new member states while the increases in existing member states were smaller. While cigarettes became less affordable in most EU member states there was little difference between new and existing member states. The average annual percentage change in per-capita cigarette consumption was negative in all existing member states and in 9 of 12 new member states between 2004 and 2010, indicating declining per-capita cigarette consumption.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Joining the EU results in significant increases in excise taxes and prices, and declines in affordability. Additionally, the structure of taxes, specifically the high excise tax floor resulted in higher taxes and prices.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blecher, E., Ross, H., Leon, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-10-23T00:03:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050575</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050575</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cigarette affordability in Europe]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-10-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050541v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The evolution of health warning labels on cigarette packs: the role of precedents, and tobacco industry strategies to block diffusion]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050541v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To analyse the evolution and diffusion of health warnings on cigarette packs around the world, including tobacco industry attempts to block this diffusion.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We analysed tobacco industry documents and public sources to construct a database on the global evolution and diffusion of health warning labels from 1966 to 2012, and also analysed industry strategies.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Health warning labels, especially labels with graphic elements, threaten the tobacco industry because they are a low-cost, effective measure to reduce smoking. Multinational tobacco companies did not object to voluntary innocuous warnings with ambiguous health messages, in part because they saw them as offering protection from lawsuits and local packaging regulations. The companies worked systematically at the international level to block or weaken warnings once stronger more specific warnings began to appear in the 1970s. Since 1985 in Iceland, the tobacco industry has been aware of the effectiveness of graphic health warning labels (GWHL). The industry launched an all-out attack in the early 1990s to prevent GHWLs, and was successful in delaying GHWLs internationally for nearly 10 years.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Beginning in 2005, as a result of the World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), GHWLs began to spread. Effective implementation of FCTC labelling provisions has stimulated diffusion of strong health warning labels despite industry opposition.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hiilamo, H., Crosbie, E., Glantz, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-10-23T00:03:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050541</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050541</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The evolution of health warning labels on cigarette packs: the role of precedents, and tobacco industry strategies to block diffusion]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-10-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050666v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Associations between self-reported in-home smoking behaviours and surface nicotine concentrations in multiunit subsidised housing]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050666v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Smoke-free policies are being increasingly promoted and adopted in subsidised multiunit housing to address disparities in residential secondhand smoke exposure. In order to inform the planning and evaluation of these policies, this study examined associations between self-reported in-home smoking and surface nicotine concentrations.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A face-to-face, cross-sectional survey was conducted from August to October 2011 with leaseholders in a probability sample of private subsidised housing units in Columbus, Ohio, without an existing smoke-free housing policy (n=301, 64% response rate). After the survey, a wipe sample was collected from a wood surface in the living room to measure surface nicotine concentrations (n=279).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In-home smoking was reported by 56.6% of respondents. Geometric mean surface nicotine concentrations differed between non-smoking and smoking homes (11.4 vs 90.9 &mu;g/m<sup>2</sup>; p&lt;0.001), and between homes with complete, partial and no voluntary home smoking restrictions (8.9 vs 56.3 vs 145.6&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>2</sup>; p&lt;0.001). Surface nicotine concentrations were moderately correlated (r=.52) with the total number of cigarettes smoked indoors per week. Smoking behaviours of respondents, other household members and visitors, and length of stay were independently associated with surface nicotine concentrations in a multivariable model, explaining 52% of the variance.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Surface nicotine concentrations were significantly associated with a range of self-reported in-home smoking behaviours. This measure should be considered for evaluating changes in in-home smoking behaviours after implementation of smoke-free policies by subsidised housing providers. More research is needed about how surface nicotine concentrations differ over space, time and various indoor surfaces.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hood, N. E., Ferketich, A. K., Klein, E. G., Pirie, P., Wewers, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-10-23T00:03:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050666</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050666</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations between self-reported in-home smoking behaviours and surface nicotine concentrations in multiunit subsidised housing]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-10-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050567v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysing compliance of cigarette packaging with the FCTC and national legislation in eight former Soviet Countries]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050567v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Aim</st><p>To analyse compliance of cigarette packets with the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and national legislation and the policy actions that are required in eight former Soviet Union countries.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We obtained cigarette packets of each of the 10 most smoked cigarette brands in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine. The packets were then analysed using a standardised data collection instrument. The analysis included the placing, size and content of health warning labels and deceptive labels (eg, &lsquo;Lights&rsquo;). Findings were assessed for compliance with the FCTC and national legislation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Health warnings were on all packets from all countries and met the FCTC minimum recommendations on size and position except Azerbaijan and Georgia. All countries used a variety of warnings except Azerbaijan. No country had pictorial health warnings, despite them being mandatory in Georgia and Moldova. All of the countries had deceptive labels despite being banned in all countries except Russia and Azerbaijan where still no such legislation exists.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Despite progress in the use of health warning messages, gaps still remain&mdash;particularly with the use of deceptive labels. Stronger surveillance and enforcement mechanisms are required to improve compliance with the FCTC and national legislation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mir, H., Roberts, B., Richardson, E., Chow, C., McKee, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-10-09T00:01:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050567</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050567</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysing compliance of cigarette packaging with the FCTC and national legislation in eight former Soviet Countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-10-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050562v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[YouTube: a promotional vehicle for little cigars and cigarillos?]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050562v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>As the third most popular website in the world, messages embedded in the video-sharing site, YouTube, have the potential to influence tobacco-related attitudes, beliefs and behaviours. Despite the growing number of videos depicting little cigars/cigarillos (LCCs), there has been no examination of the portrayal of these products on YouTube.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Researchers identified up to the top 20 search results on YouTube by relevance and view count for the following search terms: &lsquo;little cigars&rsquo;, &lsquo;cigarillos&rsquo;, &lsquo;Black and Mild&rsquo;, &lsquo;Swisher Sweets&rsquo;, &lsquo;White owl&rsquo;, &lsquo;Garcia y Vega&rsquo;, and &lsquo;Winchester&rsquo;. Reviewers rated whether videos were &lsquo;pro&rsquo;, &lsquo;anti&rsquo; or &lsquo;neutral&rsquo; to the use of LCCs, and documented statistics on the reach and viewer demographics. Several main themes around LCCs were noted, as was video quality (amateur vs professional) and demographics of video participants.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the 196 videos retrieved, only 56 were unique, eligible videos. The majority of these (n=43) were &lsquo;pro&rsquo; LCCs, 11 were &lsquo;neutral&rsquo;, and only two were &lsquo;anti&rsquo; LCCs. Videos were primarily viewed by males in the USA and Canada and most were amateur. Common themes included where to purchase LCCs, their candy flavours, and that they are cheap or cheaper than cigarettes, and &lsquo;smooth&rsquo;.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The vast majority of information on YouTube about LCCs promotes their use. It is critical to monitor content on LCCs posted on YouTube, and develop appropriate health messages to counter pro-LCC content, and appropriately inform potential consumers of the harms associated with their use.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richardson, A., Vallone, D. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-10-09T00:00:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050562</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050562</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[YouTube: a promotional vehicle for little cigars and cigarillos?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-10-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050539v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Receipt and redemption of cigarette coupons, perceptions of cigarette companies and smoking cessation]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050539v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Although it is known that cigarette companies use cigarette coupons to market their products, little is known about the characteristics of those who receive these coupons. The influence of receipt and redemption of these coupons is also unknown.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Participants of the Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey Cohort Study who were smokers in 2008, completed surveys in 2008 and 2009, and had smoked for at least 6&nbsp;months between those surveys, were included. In 2009, participants reported whether they had received cigarette coupons in the past 12&nbsp;months, and whether they had used the coupons. They also reported their perceptions of cigarette companies and their smoking status. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to assess associations between receiving and redeeming coupons, perceptions of cigarette companies, and smoking status.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Overall, 49.4% of the sample reported receiving cigarette coupons, and 39.9% redeemed them (80.1% of those who received these coupons). Female, younger and heavier smokers were more likely to report receiving these coupons (p&lt;0.05). Smokers who received these coupons were more likely to agree that cigarette companies care about their health and do the best they can to make cigarettes safe, and less likely to agree that cigarette companies lie (p&lt;0.05). Smokers who used these coupons were less likely to quit smoking (p&lt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Our findings suggest a negative association between cigarette coupons and smoking cessation. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish whether cigarette coupons influence smoking behaviour to inform the necessity for policies to prohibit the use of these coupons to assist smokers to quit smoking.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choi, K., Hennrikus, D. J., Forster, J. L., Moilanen, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-10-09T00:00:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050539</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050539</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Receipt and redemption of cigarette coupons, perceptions of cigarette companies and smoking cessation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-10-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050470v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adolescent and adult perceptions of traditional and novel smokeless tobacco products and packaging in rural Ohio]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050470v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>As smokeless tobacco (ST) marketing increases and new products emerge on the market, very little is known about consumer perceptions of ST products. To inform development of future ST counter-marketing approaches, this qualitative study examined consumer perceptions of traditional and novel ST products and packaging.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Focus groups and qualitative interviews were held with adolescent (n=23; mean age of 17&nbsp;years) and adult (n=38; mean age of 29&nbsp;years) male ST users from rural Ohio counties. Participants were shown a variety of traditional (eg, Copenhagen, Timber Wolf) and novel (eg, Camel Snus, Orbs) ST products and asked about perceptions of these products and their packaging. Transcriptions were coded independently for common themes by two individuals.</p></sec><sec><st>Findings</st><p>Adolescents and adults generally had similar beliefs and reactions about ST products. While participants were familiar with a variety of traditional ST products, Copenhagen was the most frequently used product. Perceptions of quality and price of traditional products were closely tied to product taste and packaging material. Colours, design and size of ST packaging appealed to participants and influenced decisions to purchase. Adults believed novel ST products had a weak taste and were targeted at untraditional ST users. While the vast majority was unfamiliar with dissolvable tobacco, adolescents noted that they would be more convenient to use during school than traditional ST.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Packaging has a significant role in shaping perceptions of ST and consumer behaviour. Regulation of product packaging such as shape, size and images should be part of comprehensive tobacco control.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, S. T., Nemeth, J. M., Klein, E. G., Ferketich, A. K., Kwan, M.-P., Wewers, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-10-09T00:00:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050470</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050470</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adolescent and adult perceptions of traditional and novel smokeless tobacco products and packaging in rural Ohio]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-10-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050582v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A cross-country comparison of secondhand smoke exposure among adults: findings from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS)]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050582v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) from burning tobacco products causes disease and premature death among non-smoking adults and children. The objective of this study was to determine the nature, extent and demographic correlates of SHS exposure among adults in low- and middle-income countries with a high burden of tobacco use.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Data were obtained from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS), a nationally representative household survey of individuals 15&nbsp;years of age or older. Interviews were conducted during 2008&ndash;2010 in Bangladesh, Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Mexico, the Philippines, Poland, Russia, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, Uruguay and Vietnam. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence and correlates of SHS exposure in homes, workplaces, government buildings, restaurants, public transportation and healthcare facilities.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Exposure to SHS in the home ranged from 17.3% (Mexico) to 73.1% (Vietnam). Among those who work in an indoor area outside the home, SHS exposure in the workplace ranged from 16.5% (Uruguay) to 63.3% (China). Exposure to SHS ranged from 6.9% (Uruguay) to 72.7% (Egypt) in government buildings, 4.4% (Uruguay) to 88.5% (China) in restaurants, 5.4% (Uruguay) to 79.6% (Egypt) on public transportation, and 3.8% (Uruguay) to 49.2% (Egypt) in healthcare facilities.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>A large proportion of adults living in low- and middle-income countries are exposed to SHS in their homes, workplaces, and other public places. Countries can enact and enforce legislation requiring 100% smoke-free public places and workplaces, and can also conduct educational initiatives to reduce SHS exposure in homes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[King, B. A., Mirza, S. A., Babb, S. D., for the GATS Collaborating Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-09-27T00:01:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050582</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050582</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A cross-country comparison of secondhand smoke exposure among adults: findings from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-09-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050401v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An inexpensive particle monitor for smoker behaviour modification in homes]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050401v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To compare the response of a new particle counting instrument (Dylos DC1700) with that produced by a device (TSI Sidepak Personal Aerosol Monitor AM510) commonly used to measure PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> in settings where secondhand smoke (SHS) is encountered.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Controlled chamber experiments with different SHS concentrations were generated by burning a cigarette for varying time periods and running both devices simultaneously.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The Dylos and Sidepak devices produced similar responses to changes in SHS concentrations up to 1000&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>. Using 591&nbsp;min of contemporaneous measurements from 13 chamber experiments, an equation was developed to allow conversion of particle number concentration data from the Dylos to estimated mass concentration data for SHS aerosol.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The Dylos DC1700 can provide real-time data that may be converted to an estimate of SHS levels in smoky environments. Given the low cost, low noise and simplicity of use, this device is likely to be a useful tool for interventions to provide feedback of SHS concentrations to help motivate changes in smoking behaviour at home.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semple, S., Apsley, A., MacCalman, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-09-26T00:01:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050401</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050401</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An inexpensive particle monitor for smoker behaviour modification in homes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-09-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050572v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using rate advancement periods for communicating the benefits of quitting smoking to older smokers]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050572v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and aims</st><p>Standard epidemiological measures of the risk of premature death from smoking might be unsuitable for risk communication in actual counselling situations. The rate advancement period (RAP) is an epidemiologic metric that could be useful for conveying information on the benefits of quitting. More effective risk communication could motivate older smokers to make an attempt at quitting. We provide empirical evidence on the impact of smoking, and the benefits of quitting on all-cause mortality and RAPs for people aged 60&nbsp;years and older in a large cohort of older adults.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Smoking information was obtained from 6545 participants aged 60&ndash;74&nbsp;years of ESTHER, a population-based German cohort. Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to estimate associations of smoking status, amount of smoking and time since smoking cessation with all-cause mortality. Premature mortality was quantified by RAPs.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Current smokers had a 2.5-fold increased risk for all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 2.53, 95% CI 2.10 to 3.03) and an RAP of 10.7&nbsp;years when compared with never smokers. Strong dose-response relationships were seen with both current and life-time amount of smoking. Compared with current smokers, significant mortality reductions by 30%, 39% and 59%, and rate advancement reductions of 4.0, 5.6 and 10.0&nbsp;years within &lt;10&nbsp;years, 10&ndash;19&nbsp;years and &ge;20&nbsp;years after cessation were found for former smokers, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Smoking remains a strong risk factor for premature mortality, and smoking cessation remains highly beneficial also at older ages.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gellert, C., Schottker, B., Holleczek, B., Stegmaier, C., Muller, H., Brenner, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-09-22T00:02:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050572</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050572</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using rate advancement periods for communicating the benefits of quitting smoking to older smokers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-09-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050548v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Second-hand smoke exposure and psychological distress in adolescents. A population-based study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050548v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To examine the association between duration and place of second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure and psychological distress in adolescents.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional study conducted in 2008 and 2009 in a representative sample of 4th-year students of secondary education (mean age 15.7&nbsp;years) in the region of Madrid, Spain. The 2215 students who were not smokers were selected for the analysis. Duration of SHS exposure within and outside the home was obtained by self-report. Psychological distress was defined as a score &ge;3 points in the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). The analyses were made using logistic regression adjusted for demographic variables, lifestyles and family characteristics.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among non-smoking adolescents, 27.8% (95% CI 25.5 to 30.0) were exposed to SHS in the home, and 33.6% (95% CI 31.3 to 36.0) outside the home. Compared with those with no SHS exposure in the home, the multivariate OR for psychological distress was 1.23 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.64) in individuals with SHS exposure &lt;1&nbsp;h/day, 2.07 (95% CI 1.30 to 3.28) for exposure 1&ndash;3&nbsp;h/day, and 2.24 (95% CI 1.45 to 3.47) for exposure &gt;3&nbsp;h/day (p for linear trend &lt;0.001). No association was observed between SHS exposure outside the home and psychological distress.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>In non-smoking adolescents, duration of exposure to SHS in the home had a positive dose-response relationship with the frequency of psychological distress. However SHS exposure outside the home did not show an association with mental health.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Padron, A., Galan, I., Rodriguez-Artalejo, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-09-22T00:02:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050548</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050548</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Second-hand smoke exposure and psychological distress in adolescents. A population-based study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-09-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050413v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A cross-country study of cigarette prices and affordability: evidence from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050413v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To describe the characteristics of two primary determinants of cigarette consumption: cigarette affordability and the range of prices paid for cigarettes (and bidis, where applicable) in a set of 15 countries. From this cross-country comparison, identify places where opportunities may exist for reducing consumption through tax adjustments.</p></sec><sec><st>Data</st><p>Self-response data from 45,838 smokers from 15 countries, obtained from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) 2008&ndash;2011.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Using self-response data on individual cigarette expenditure and consumption, we construct a measure of the average cigarette price smokers pay for manufactured cigarettes (and bidis, where applicable) in 15 countries. We use these prices to evaluate cigarette affordability and the range of prices available in each country. These survey-derived measures of cigarette price and affordability are uniquely suited for cross-country comparison because they represent each country's distinctive mix of individual consumption characteristics such as brand choice, intensity of consumption, and purchasing behavior.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In this sample of countries, cigarettes are most affordable in Russia, which has the most room for tobacco tax increase. Affordability is also relatively high in Brazil and China for cigarettes, and in India and Bangladesh for bidis. Although the affordability of cigarettes in India is relatively low, the range of cigarette prices paid is relatively high, providing additional evidence to support the call for simplifying the existing tax structure and reducing the width of price options. China has both high affordability and wide price ranges, suggesting multiple opportunities for reducing consumption through tax adjustments.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kostova, D., Chaloupka, F. J., Yurekli, A., Ross, H., Cherukupalli, R., Andes, L., Asma, S., on behalf of the GATS Collaborative Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-09-04T02:00:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050413</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050413</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A cross-country study of cigarette prices and affordability: evidence from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-09-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050475v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nearly 85% of tobacco smoke is invisible--a confirmation of previous claims]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050475v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Tobacco control campaigns frequently make use of statistical and scientific information to inform the public and policy makers about the dangers of tobacco smoke. It is clearly crucial for the credibility of tobacco control programmes that accurate scientifically valid information is used in these campaign materials, and Siegel<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> highlights the importance of ensuring that the evidence base of these materials is scientifically sound.</p><p>In 2002, the British Medical Association produced a report on passive smoking that indicated:<qd><p>"Almost 85 per cent of secondhand smoke is in the form of invisible, odourless gases."<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref></p></qd></p><p>This referenced a US National Research Council report<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b3">3</cross-ref> as the source of this information, but this report does not directly explain the 85% figure. At no point does the US report suggest that 85% of secondhand smoke or environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is invisible.</p><p>However, despite the lack of unambiguous scientific evidence, the suggestion that 85%...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gee, I. L., Semple, S., Watson, A., Crossfield, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-08-25T02:00:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050475</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050475</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nearly 85% of tobacco smoke is invisible--a confirmation of previous claims]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-08-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050500v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tobacco dependence curricula in Middle Eastern and North African medical education]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050500v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Tobacco is the leading preventable cause of death worldwide.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> Nearly 63% of men and 10% of women in Middle Eastern countries use tobacco.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> In North Africa, approximately 19% of all adults smoke tobacco.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> Public health efforts and the involvement of medical and health personnel have decreased smoking rates in most developed countries.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b3">3</cross-ref> The WHO MPOWER package of policies and interventions recommended the involvement of physicians and other healthcare professionals in reducing the tobacco burden.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b4">4</cross-ref> The package provides a reference model to implement tobacco control strategies that have been shown to reduce tobacco use.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b4">4</cross-ref></p><p>Several studies have been conducted in Europe and the USA to investigate the proficiency of medical students in treating tobacco dependence.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b5">5&ndash;10</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="b6"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="b7"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="b8"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="b9"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="b10"></cross-ref> Findings from two European medical schools indicated that teaching of smoking cessation methods...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jradi, H., Wewers, M. E., Pirie, P. L., Binkley, P. F., Ferketich, A. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-08-25T02:00:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050500</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050500</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tobacco dependence curricula in Middle Eastern and North African medical education]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-08-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050613v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cigarette prices, cigarette expenditure and smoking-induced deprivation: findings from the International Tobacco Control Mexico survey]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050613v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Aim</st><p>Mexico implemented annual tax increases between 2009 and 2011. We examined among current smokers the association of price paid per cigarette and daily cigarette expenditure with smoking-induced deprivation (SID) and whether the association of price or expenditure with SID varies by income.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We used data (n=2410) from three waves of the International Tobacco Control Mexico survey (ie, 2008, 2010, 2011) and employed logistic regression to estimate the association of price paid per cigarette and daily cigarette expenditure with the probability of SID (&lsquo;In the last 6&nbsp;months, have you spent money on cigarettes that you knew would be better spent on household essentials like food?&rsquo;).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Price paid per cigarette increased from Mex$1.24 in 2008, to Mex$1.36 in 2010, to Mex$1.64 in 2011. Daily cigarette expenditure increased from Mex$6.9, to Mex$7.6 and to Mex$8.4 in the 3&nbsp;years. There was no evidence of an association between price and SID. However, higher expenditure was associated with a higher probability of SID. There was no evidence that the association of price or expenditure with SID varied by income.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Tax increases in Mexico have resulted in smokers paying more and spending more for their cigarettes. Those with higher cigarette expenditure experience more SID, with no evidence that poorer smokers are more affected.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siahpush, M., Thrasher, J. F., Yong, H. H., Cummings, K. M., Fong, G. T., Saenz de Miera, B., Borland, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-08-25T02:00:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050613</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050613</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cigarette prices, cigarette expenditure and smoking-induced deprivation: findings from the International Tobacco Control Mexico survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-08-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050436v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Should anti-tobacco media messages be culturally targeted for Indigenous populations? A systematic review and narrative synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050436v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To summarise published empirical research on culturally targeted anti-tobacco media messages for Indigenous or First Nations people and examine the evidence for the effectiveness of targeted and non-targeted campaigns.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Studies were sought describing mass media and new media interventions for tobacco control or smoking cessation in Indigenous or First Nations populations. Studies of any design were included reporting outcomes of media-based interventions including: cognitions, awareness, recall, intention to quit and quit rates. Then, 2 reviewers independently applied inclusion criteria, which were met by 21 (5.8%) of the studies found. One author extracted data with crosschecking by a second. Both independently assessed papers using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN; quantitative studies) and Daly <I>et al</I> (qualitative studies).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 21 studies were found (4 level 1 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 11 level 2 studies and 6 qualitative studies) and combined with narrative synthesis. Eight evaluated anti-tobacco TV or radio campaigns; two assessed US websites; three New Zealand studies examined mobile phone interventions; five evaluated print media; three evaluated a CD-ROM, a video and an edutainment intervention.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Although Indigenous people had good recall of generic anti-tobacco messages, culturally targeted messages were preferred. New Zealand Maori may be less responsive to holistic targeted campaigns, despite their additional benefits, compared to generic fear campaigns. Culturally targeted internet or mobile phone messages appear to be as effective in American Indians and Maori as generic messages in the general population. There is little research comparing the effect of culturally targeted versus generic messages with similar message content in Indigenous people.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gould, G. S., McEwen, A., Watters, T., Clough, A. R., van der Zwan, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-08-22T02:01:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050436</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050436</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Should anti-tobacco media messages be culturally targeted for Indigenous populations? A systematic review and narrative synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-08-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050488v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the effectiveness of the US Navy and Marine Corps Tobacco Policy: an assessment of secondhand smoke exposure in US Navy submariners]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050488v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of the US Navy and Marine Corps tobacco policy in protecting submariners from secondhand smoke (SHS) by determining if non-tobacco users experienced a significant increase in urinary cotinine levels at sea when compared with in port levels.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>From February to August 2009, 634 volunteers recruited from nine US Navy submarines completed a survey to collect demographic data, information on tobacco use and pre-deployment exposure to SHS. Non-tobacco users (n=239) were requested to provide two urine samples (pre-deployment and while at sea) to quantify exposure to SHS using urinary cotinine as a biomarker. Matched samples were analysed using liquid chromatography&ndash;tandem mass spectrometry.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Overall, deployed cotinine levels were 2.1 times the in port levels in non-tobacco using submariners (95% CI 1.8 to 2.4, p&lt;0.001, n=197). A significant increase in deployed urinary cotinine levels was found aboard six of nine submarines (p&lt;0.05). A subgroup of submariners (n=91) who reported no SHS exposure within 10&nbsp;days prior to in port cotinine sampling had deployed cotinine levels 2.7 times the in port levels (95% CI 2.2 to 3.3, p&lt;0.001). Applying a 4.5:1 urine cotinine to serum cotinine correction factor, submariners' deployed geometric means are similar to recent US male population values at the 75th percentile.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This study provides evidence that non-tobacco using submariners were exposed to SHS. Exposure was seen in all submarine classes and was not limited to personnel working in proximity to the smoking area. The existing policy was inadequate to protect non-smokers from exposure to SHS and required revision. As a result of a policy review, informed by this study, smoking below decks was banned aboard all US Navy submarines effective 31 December 2010.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yarnall, N. J., Hughes, L. M., Turnbull, P. S., Michaud, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-08-07T02:01:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050488</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050488</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the effectiveness of the US Navy and Marine Corps Tobacco Policy: an assessment of secondhand smoke exposure in US Navy submariners]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-08-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050554v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of cigarette minimum price laws on the retail price of cigarettes in the USA]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050554v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Cigarette price increases prevent youth initiation, reduce cigarette consumption and increase the number of smokers who quit. Cigarette minimum price laws (MPLs), which typically require cigarette wholesalers and retailers to charge a minimum percentage mark-up for cigarette sales, have been identified as an intervention that can potentially increase cigarette prices. 24 states and the District of Columbia have cigarette MPLs.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Using data extracted from SCANTRACK retail scanner data from the Nielsen company, average cigarette prices were calculated for designated market areas in states with and without MPLs in three retail channels: grocery stores, drug stores and convenience stores. Regression models were estimated using the average cigarette pack price in each designated market area and calendar quarter in 2009 as the outcome variable.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The average difference in cigarette pack prices are 46 cents in the grocery channel, 29 cents in the drug channel and 13 cents in the convenience channel, with prices being lower in states with MPLs for all three channels.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The findings that MPLs do not raise cigarette prices could be the result of a lack of compliance and enforcement by the state or could be attributed to the minimum state mark-up being lower than the free-market mark-up for cigarettes. Rather than require a minimum mark-up, which can be nullified by promotional incentives and discounts, states and countries could strengthen MPLs by setting a simple &lsquo;floor price&rsquo; that is the true minimum price for all cigarettes or could prohibit discounts to consumers and retailers.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tynan, M. A., Ribisl, K. M., Loomis, B. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-08-03T02:01:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050554</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050554</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of cigarette minimum price laws on the retail price of cigarettes in the USA]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050479v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Menthol use among smokers with psychological distress: findings from the 2008 and 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050479v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>The Food and Drug Administration is considering regulation of menthol cigarettes. While persons with mental distress are known to smoke cigarettes at high rates, little is known about their use of menthol. The authors examined the association of psychological distress and menthol use in a national sample of adult smokers.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Data were from the 2008 and 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Past month smokers (N=24 157) were categorised for menthol or non-menthol use. Psychological distress was categorised as none/mild, moderate or severe on the Kessler six-item scale.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The prevalence of menthol use was higher among individuals with severe psychological distress, women, young adults, African&ndash;Americans, Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders, persons with fewer years of education and lower income, and the unmarried and uninsured. In a multivariate model controlling for socio-demographic factors, smoking intensity and time to first cigarette, smokers with severe (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.23, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.46, p=0.02) but not moderate (AOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.15, p=0.58) psychological distress were significantly more likely to smoke menthols compared with smokers with none/mild distress.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>An elevated prevalence of menthol use was found among persons with severe psychological distress, suggesting another group that could potentially benefit from the regulation of menthol cigarettes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hickman, N. J., Delucchi, K. L., Prochaska, J. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-07-21T02:01:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050479</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050479</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Menthol use among smokers with psychological distress: findings from the 2008 and 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-07-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050450v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The analysis of mainstream smoke emissions of Canadian 'super slim' cigarettes]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2012-050450v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Super slim cigarettes are a relatively new type of cigarette in Canada, and an analysis of select toxicants in the mainstream smoke emissions of the super slim cigarette was conducted.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>The yields of selected toxicants in the mainstream smoke emissions of six brands of super slim cigarettes were compared with the Canadian Benchmark, which represents the cigarette designs most commonly found in Canada. A super slim cigarette was also compared with a &lsquo;Reference Cigarette&rsquo; to study the impact of the significantly reduced circumference on mainstream smoke emissions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Compared with the Canadian Benchmark, the yields of carbon monoxide, the carbonyls, volatiles and the aromatic amines were significantly lower for the super slim cigarette, but the yields of formaldehyde and ammonia were significantly higher. For brands containing a mixed tobacco blend, the yields of tobacco-specific nitrosamines were increased significantly. The reduced circumference of the super slim cigarette resulted in a lower tobacco weight, which together with filter ventilation resulted in lower yields of many toxicants. However, the reduced circumference increased significantly the yields of formaldehyde and phenols in mainstream smoke emissions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The notably slimmer design of the super slim cigarette resulted in lower yields of some toxicants in the mainstream smoke emissions. However, there were also significant increases in some toxicant levels in the mainstream smoke emissions including formaldehyde, ammonia and the phenols. There are no changes in emission levels that have been shown to reduce exposure or risk in a way that is meaningful, and therefore, the super slim cigarette should not be considered a &lsquo;less harmful&rsquo; cigarette.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siu, M., Mladjenovic, N., Soo, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-07-20T02:01:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050450</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2012-050450</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The analysis of mainstream smoke emissions of Canadian 'super slim' cigarettes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-07-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050383v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Awareness, perceptions and use of snus among young adults from the upper Midwest region of the USA]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050383v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Since its introduction in 2006, snus has been aggressively marketed by tobacco companies. However, little is known about the awareness, perceptions and use of snus among young adults after Camel and Marlboro snus were sold nationwide in 2010.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Data were collected from 2607 young adults (ages 20&ndash;28) who participated in the Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort Study in 2010&ndash;2011. Data include awareness of snus, ever and past 30-day use, perceived potential of snus as a quit aid, and perceived harmfulness and addictiveness of snus relative to cigarettes. The authors assessed the associations between these outcome variables and socio-demographic characteristics.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Overall, 64.8% of participants were aware of snus, 14.5% ever used snus and 3.2% used snus in the past 30&nbsp;days. Men and participants who smoked &gt;100 cigarettes in their lifetime were associated with these three outcomes (p&lt;0.05). Among those who were aware of snus, 16.3% agreed snus can help people quit smoking, 17.3% agreed snus is less harmful than cigarettes and 11.3% agreed snus is less addictive than cigarettes. These perceptions were associated with ever use and the past 30-day use of snus (p&lt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>In this regional sample of US young adults, the majority of young adults were aware of snus, and over one in 10 had used snus. More young adults in the sample than the overall US adult population believed that snus is less harmful than cigarettes. Perceptions of snus are associated with snus use. Strategic health communication interventions targeting young adults to confront the positive perceptions associated with snus may be needed to curb the interest in snus.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choi, K., Forster, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-07-20T02:01:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050383</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050383</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Awareness, perceptions and use of snus among young adults from the upper Midwest region of the USA]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-07-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050261v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Awareness and impact of New York City's graphic point-of-sale tobacco health warning signs]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050261v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>To increase knowledge of smoking-related health risks and provide smoking cessation information at the point of sale, in 2009, New York City required the posting of graphic point-of-sale tobacco health warnings in tobacco retailers. This study is the first to evaluate the impact of such a policy in the USA.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Cross-sectional street-intercept surveys conducted among adult current smokers and recent quitters before and after signage implementation assessed the awareness and impact of the signs. Approximately 10 street-intercept surveys were conducted at each of 50 tobacco retailers in New York City before and after policy implementation. A total of 1007 adults who were either current smokers or recent quitters were surveyed about the awareness and impact of tobacco health warning signs. Multivariate risk ratios (RR) were calculated to estimate awareness and impact of the signs.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Most participants (86%) were current smokers, and the sample was 28% African&ndash;American, 32% Hispanic/Latino and 27% non-Hispanic white. Awareness of tobacco health warning signs more than doubled after the policy implementation (adjusted RR =2.01, 95% CI 1.74 to 2.33). Signage posting was associated with an 11% increase in the extent to which signs made respondents think about quitting smoking (adjusted RR =1.11, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.22).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>A policy requiring tobacco retailers to display graphic health warning signs increased awareness of health risks of smoking and stimulated thoughts about quitting smoking. Additional research aimed at evaluating the effect of tobacco control measures in the retail environment is necessary to provide further rationale for implementing these changes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coady, M. H., Chan, C. A., Auer, K., Farley, S. M., Kilgore, E. A., Kansagra, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-07-05T02:01:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050261</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050261</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Awareness and impact of New York City's graphic point-of-sale tobacco health warning signs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-07-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050110v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost and effectiveness of the nationwide government-supported Smoking Cessation Clinics in the Republic of Korea]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050110v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>In the Republic of Korea, nationwide government-supported Smoking Cessation Clinics have been operating in 253 public health centres since 2004, but the cost and effectiveness of the service have yet to be evaluated.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The cost of the service (staff salary, medication, education and promotion and overhead) was calculated from the Smoking Cessation Clinic's 2009 financial report. The number of service users, self-reported 4-week and 6-month quit rates and the proportion of nicotine replacement therapy users were collected from the service's performance monitoring data. Long-term quit rate and life-years saved by quitting were estimated and used in addition to monitoring data to evaluate the effectiveness of the service.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 354 554 smokers used the Smoking Cessation Clinics in 2009. The self-reported 4-week and 6-month quit rates were 78% and 40%, respectively. Estimated 1-year and 8-year quit rates were 28.1% and 12.9%, respectively. The cost of the service in 2009 was US$21 127 thousand. Cost per service user who set a quit date was US$60. Cost per service user who maintained cessation at 4&nbsp;weeks, 6&nbsp;months and 1&nbsp;year was US$76, US$149 and US$212, respectively. When considering 8-year quit rates, the cost per life-year saved was estimated at US$128 in the base scenario and increased to US$230 in the worst-case scenario.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The nationwide government-supported public health centre-based Smoking Cessation Clinics provided highly cost-effective service at a level of 0.46% of the per capita gross domestic product.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oh, J.-K., Lim, M. K., Yun, E. H., Shin, S. H., Park, E. Y., Park, E.-C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-06-29T02:01:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050110</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050110</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost and effectiveness of the nationwide government-supported Smoking Cessation Clinics in the Republic of Korea]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050282v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Linking mass media campaigns to pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages: a cross-sectional study to evaluate effects among Mexican smokers]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050282v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>This study assessed the effects of pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) and a linked media campaign in Mexico.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Cross-sectional data were collected from a population-based sample of 1756 adult smokers, aged 18&ndash;55&nbsp;years, during the initial implementation of pictorial HWLs, which some smokers had seen on cigarette packages while others had seen only the text-based HWLs. Exposure to the campaign and pictorial HWLs was assessed with aided recall methods, and other questions addressed attention and cognitive impact of HWLs, knowledge related to HWL and campaign content, and quit-related thoughts and behaviours. Logistic and linear regression models were estimated to determine associations between key outcomes and intervention exposure.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In bivariate and multivariate adjusted models, recall of pictorial HWLs and of the campaign were positively associated with greater attention to and cognitive impact of HWLs, whereas only pictorial HWL exposure was associated with having refrained from smoking due to HWLs. Both recall of pictorial HWLs and of the campaign were independently associated with greater knowledge of secondhand smoke harms and toxic tobacco constituents. Smokers who recalled only the pictorial HWLs were more likely to try to quit than smokers who recalled neither the pictorial HWLs nor the campaign (17% vs 6%, p&lt;0.001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Consistent with other studies, adult smokers' exposure to new pictorial HWLs in Mexico was associated with psychosocial and behavioural responses related to quit behaviour. Exposure to the complementary media campaign was associated with independent additive effects on campaign-related knowledge, and it enhanced psychosocial responses to pictorial HWLs.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thrasher, J. F., Murukutla, N., Perez-Hernandez, R., Alday, J., Arillo-Santillan, E., Cedillo, C., Gutierrez, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-06-29T02:01:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050282</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050282</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Linking mass media campaigns to pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages: a cross-sectional study to evaluate effects among Mexican smokers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050306v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Motivations for genetic testing for lung cancer risk among young smokers]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050306v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To examine why young people might want to undergo genetic susceptibility testing for lung cancer despite knowing that tested gene variants are associated with small increases in disease risk.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The authors used a mixed-method approach to evaluate motives for and against genetic testing and the association between these motivations and testing intentions in 128 college students who smoke.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Exploratory factor analysis yielded four reliable factors: <I>Test Scepticism</I>, <I>Test Optimism</I>, <I>Knowledge Enhancement</I> and <I>Smoking Optimism</I>. Test Optimism and Knowledge Enhancement correlated positively with intentions to test in bivariate and multivariate analyses (ps&lt;0.001). Test Scepticism correlated negatively with testing intentions in multivariate analyses (p&lt;0.05). Open-ended questions assessing testing motivations generally replicated themes of the quantitative survey.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>In addition to learning about health risks, young people may be motivated to seek genetic testing for reasons, such as gaining knowledge about new genetic technologies more broadly.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[O'Neill, S. C., Lipkus, I. M., Sanderson, S. C., Shepperd, J., Docherty, S., McBride, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-06-28T02:01:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050306</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050306</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Motivations for genetic testing for lung cancer risk among young smokers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-06-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050194v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Gold Standard Programme: smoking cessation interventions for disadvantaged smokers are effective in a real-life setting]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050194v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To evaluate the real-life effect of an evidence-based Gold Standard Programme (GSP) for smoking cessation interventions in disadvantaged patients and to identify modifiable factors that consistently produce the highest abstinence rates.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Observational prospective cohort study.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>GSPs in pharmacies, hospitals and communities in Denmark, reporting to the national Smoking Cessation Database.</p></sec><sec><st>Participants</st><p>Disadvantaged patients, defined as patients with a lower level of education and those receiving unemployment benefits.</p></sec><sec><st>Interventions</st><p>6-week manualised GSP smoking cessation interventions performed by certified staff.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>6&nbsp;months of continuous abstinence, response rate: 80%.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Continuous abstinence of the 16 377 responders was 34% (of all 20 588 smokers: 27%). Continuous abstinence was lower in 5738 smokers with a lower educational level (30% of responders and 23% of all) and in 840 unemployed (27% of responders and 19% of all). In respect to modifiable factors, continuous abstinence was found more often after programmes in one-on-one formats (vs group formats) among patients with a lower educational level, 34% (vs 25%, p=0.037), or among unemployed, 35% (vs 24%, p=0.099). The variable &lsquo;format&rsquo; stayed in the final model of multivariable analyses in patients with a lower educational level, OR=1.31 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.63).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Although continuous abstinence was lower among disadvantaged smokers, the absolute difference was small. If the programme had been as effective in disadvantaged as in non-disadvantaged groups, there would have been an extra 46 or 8 quitters annually, respectively. Promoting individual interventions among those with a low education may increase the effectiveness of GSP.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neumann, T., Rasmussen, M., Ghith, N., Heitmann, B. L., Tonnesen, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-06-16T02:01:24-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050194</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050194</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Gold Standard Programme: smoking cessation interventions for disadvantaged smokers are effective in a real-life setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-06-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050398v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['The times are changing': New Zealand smokers' perceptions of the tobacco endgame]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050398v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The New Zealand government's goal of achieving a smoke-free society by 2025 reflects growing interest in &lsquo;endgame&rsquo; solutions to tobacco smoking. However, tobacco companies have framed &lsquo;endgame&rsquo; strategies as contrary to individual freedoms and &lsquo;choice&rsquo;; these claims heighten politicians' sensitivity to &lsquo;nanny state&rsquo; allegations and may undermine tobacco control policies. Public support for stronger policies could strengthen political will; however, little is known about how smokers perceive endgame scenarios or the factors underlying their support or opposition to these.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The authors conducted 47 in-depth interviews with four priority groups: Maori, Pacific, young adults and pregnant women; all were smokers or very recent quitters. The authors used thematic analysis to interpret the transcripts.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Most participants strongly supported the 2025 smoke-free goal, recognised the broader social good that would result and accepted the personal inconvenience of quitting. Yet they wanted to retain control over when and how they would quit and asserted their &lsquo;freedom&rsquo; to smoke. Participants identified interventions that would extend current policy and maintain the autonomy they valued; the authors classified these into four themes: restricting supply, diminishing visibility, decreasing availability and affordability, and increasing quit support.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Politicians may have a stronger mandate to implement endgame policies than they appreciate. Participants' use of industry arguments when asserting their freedom to &lsquo;choose&rsquo; to smoke and quit suggests a need for denormalisation strategies that challenge industry propaganda, demonstrate how endgame measures would empower smokers and re-iterate the community benefits a smoke-free society will deliver.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maubach, N., Hoek, J. A., Edwards, R., Gifford, H., Erick, S., Newcombe, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-06-16T02:01:24-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050398</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050398</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA['The times are changing': New Zealand smokers' perceptions of the tobacco endgame]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-06-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050384v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Partner cigarette smoking and risk of neural tube defects among infants of non-smoking women in northern China]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050384v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To investigate the effect of secondhand smoke exposure from a partner on the risk of having a newborn baby with neural tube defects (NTDs) in Chinese non-smoking women.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Data were derived from an on-going population-based case&ndash;control study of external malformations in northern China. The case group included 580 infants or fetuses with NTDs identified between November 2002 and December 2007. Controls were 795 newborn infants without major external malformations. Data were collected by trained health workers through face-to-face interviews within 1&nbsp;week after delivery.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 81.4% of partners of case women and 71.8% of partners of control women smoked during the women's peri-conceptional period. The adjusted OR for NTDs associated with partner smoking was 1.6 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.1). Compared with non-smoking women with non-smoking partners, fetal NTD risk among women with smoking partners was 1.7 (1.3 to 2.4) and 1.1 (0.7 to 1.7) for women exposed and not exposed to partner smoking, respectively. Among women who were exposed to partner smoking, the risk of NTDs was 1.4 (0.9 to 2.0), 1.8 (1.2 to 2.6), 1.9 (1.2 to 3.0) and 2.7 (1.6 to 4.7) for partner smoking of &lt;1, 1&ndash;9, 10&ndash;19 and &ge;20/day, respectively (p for trend &lt;0.001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Peri-conceptional exposure to partner smoking may increase the risk of NTDs in the offspring of Chinese non-smoking women.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, Z., Zhang, L., Ye, R., Liu, J., Pei, L., Zheng, X., Ren, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-06-15T02:02:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050384</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050384</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Partner cigarette smoking and risk of neural tube defects among infants of non-smoking women in northern China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-06-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050249v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knowledge of the health impacts of smoking and public attitudes towards tobacco control in the former Soviet Union]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050249v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Aims</st><p>To describe levels of knowledge on the harmful effects of tobacco and public support for tobacco control measures in nine countries of the former Soviet Union and to examine the characteristics associated with this knowledge and support.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Standardised, cross-sectional nationally representative surveys conducted in 2010/2011 with 18 000 men and women aged 18&nbsp;years and older in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine. Respondents were asked a range of questions on their knowledge of the health effects of tobacco and their support for a variety of tobacco control measures. Descriptive analysis was conducted on levels of knowledge and support, along with multivariate logistic regression analysis of characteristics associated with overall knowledge and support scores.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Large gaps exist in public understanding of the negative health effects of tobacco use, particularly in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Moldova. There are also extremely high levels of misunderstanding about the potential effects of &lsquo;light&rsquo; cigarettes. However, there is popular support for tobacco control measures. Over three quarters of the respondents felt that their governments could be more effective in pursuing tobacco control. Higher levels of education, social capital (membership of an organisation) and being a former or never-smoker were associated with higher knowledge on the health effects of tobacco and/or being more supportive of tobacco control measures.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Increasing public awareness of tobacco's health effects is essential for informed decision-making by individuals and for further increasing public support for tobacco control measures.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberts, B., Stickley, A., Gilmore, A. B., Danishevski, K., Kizilova, K., Bryden, A., Rotman, D., Haerpfer, C., McKee, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-06-15T02:02:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050249</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050249</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knowledge of the health impacts of smoking and public attitudes towards tobacco control in the former Soviet Union]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-06-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050341v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Out of sight, out of mind? Removal of point-of-sale tobacco displays in Norway]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050341v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Aim</st><p>To evaluate retailer's compliance and consumer's perceptions of and experiences with the point-of-sale (POS) tobacco display ban in Norway, implemented 1 January 2010.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Retailer compliance was measured using audit surveys. Consumer's perceptions of the ban were assessed in three web surveys: one conducted before and two after implementation of the ban. The sample for each of these consisted of about 900 people aged 15&ndash;54&nbsp;years and an extra sample of smokers and snus users. 10 focus group interviews with male and female daily, occasional and former smokers aged 16&ndash;50&nbsp;years (N=62) were also conducted, before and after implementation of the ban.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Immediately following implementation of the POS display ban, compliance was 97% for cigarettes and rolling tobacco and 98% for snus. Preimplementation, young people were tempted by tobacco products when seeing them in the shop more often than older people. Postimplementation, young people also more often found it difficult to choose brand. The POS tobacco display ban was supported by a majority of the population, and by one out of three daily smokers. The removal of POS tobacco displays was perceived as a barrier for young people's access to tobacco products, as affecting attachment to cigarette brands and as contributing to tobacco denormalisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Retailer's compliance with the POS display ban in Norway was high, and the ban was well supported in the population. Consumers believed that the ban could contribute to preventing smoking initiation among young people and to some extent also support cessation efforts.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scheffels, J., Lavik, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-06-07T02:01:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050341</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050341</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Out of sight, out of mind? Removal of point-of-sale tobacco displays in Norway]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-06-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050279v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dispelling myths about gender differences in smoking cessation: population data from the USA, Canada and Britain]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050279v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Based mainly on findings from clinical settings, it has been claimed that women are less likely than men to quit smoking successfully. If true, this would have important implications for tobacco control interventions. The authors aimed to test this possibility using data from general population surveys.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The authors used data from major national surveys conducted in 2006&ndash;2007 in the USA (Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey), Canada (Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey) and the UK (General Household Survey) to estimate rates of smoking cessation by age in men and women.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The authors found a pattern of gender differences in smoking cessation which was consistent across countries. Below age 50, women were more likely to have given up smoking completely than men, while among older age groups, men were more likely to have quit than women. Across all age groups, there was relatively little difference in cessation between the sexes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Conclusions about gender differences in smoking cessation should be based on evidence from the general population rather than from atypical clinical samples. This study has found convincing evidence that men in general are not more likely to quit smoking successfully than women.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jarvis, M. J., Cohen, J. E., Delnevo, C. D., Giovino, G. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-05-30T16:31:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050279</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050279</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dispelling myths about gender differences in smoking cessation: population data from the USA, Canada and Britain]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050248v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The effect of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in Ireland using the IrelandSS simulation model]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050248v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>This study estimates the relative contribution of policies implemented between 1998 and 2010 to reductions in smoking prevalence by 2010. It then models the impact of implementing stronger policies, relative to a scenario of inaction, on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable mortality in Ireland.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p><I>IrelandSS</I> is an adapted version of <I>SimSmoke</I>, a dynamic simulation model used to examine the effect of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence, through initiation and cessation, and associated future premature mortality.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Model predictions for smoking prevalence are reasonably close to those from surveys. As a result of tobacco control policies implemented between 1998 and 2010, there was a 22% relative reduction in smoking prevalence and 1716 fewer smoking-attributable deaths (SADs) by 2010 increasing to a 29% relative reduction in prevalence and 50 215 fewer SADs by 2040. With the introduction of stricter FCTC-compliant policies in 2011, the smoking prevalence can be decreased by as much as 13% initially, increasing to 28% by 30&nbsp;years. With these stronger policies, a total of 24 768 SADs will be averted by 2040.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Predictions from the <I>IrelandSS</I> model suggest that policies implemented between 1998 and 2010 have had considerable effect; however, appreciable reductions in smoking prevalence and SADs can still be achieved through increasing taxes, maintaining a high-intensity tobacco control media campaign, introducing graphic health warnings and improving smoking cessation services.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Currie, L. M., Blackman, K., Clancy, L., Levy, D. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-05-26T02:02:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050248</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050248</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The effect of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in Ireland using the IrelandSS simulation model]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050125v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Receptivity to tobacco marketing and susceptibility to smoking among non-smoking male students in an urban setting in Lao PDR]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050125v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Tobacco marketing is a contributing factor to adolescent smoking, and now targeting adolescents in low- and middle-income countries. Especially, promotional items with tobacco brand logos have a great impact on adolescent smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>The authors evaluated whether receptivity to tobacco marketing is associated with susceptibility to smoking among non-smoking male students in Lao PDR.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The authors conducted a cross-sectional study with self-administered questionnaires among 526 non-smoking male students in grades 8th and 11th (aged 12&ndash;19&nbsp;years) in Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR. The authors investigated receptivity to tobacco marketing by three measurements: awareness of tobacco marketing, recognition of tobacco marketing messages and owning/being willing to use promotional items. The authors then conducted multiple logistic regression analysis to determine whether marketing receptivity had an independent association with smoking susceptibility, which is defined as the absence of a firm decision not to smoke.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>About 20% of the participants were susceptible to smoking. Recognition of marketing messages was significantly associated with susceptibility to smoking (OR=1.76, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.08), as was any owning/being willing to use promotional items with recognition of marketing messages (OR=2.39, 95% CI 1.34 to 4.24). In contrast, any owning/being willing to use promotional items without any recognition of marketing messages was not significantly associated with susceptibility.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>A significant association was detected between smoking susceptibility and marketing receptivity, which has been little explored in previous research in low-income countries. Owning/being willing to use promotional items was associated with smoking susceptibility only when there is also recognition of marketing messages.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saito, J., Yasuoka, J., Poudel, K. C., Foung, L., Vilaysom, S., Jimba, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-05-26T02:02:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050125</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050125</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Receptivity to tobacco marketing and susceptibility to smoking among non-smoking male students in an urban setting in Lao PDR]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050158v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patterns of snus and cigarette use: a study of Norwegian men followed from age 16 to 19]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050158v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The use of moist snuff (snus) in young Norwegians is increasing, while smoking rates are declining. It is not clear whether snus facilitates smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To assess whether 16-year-old men who were never-smokers, but snus users in 2001, had an increased risk of smoking 3&nbsp;years later.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In a prospective school-based cohort study, 1440 men, who responded to questionnaires in 2001 and 2004, were included in the analyses. The participation rate was 89% in 2001 and 50% in 2004. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess the OR of snus users, smokers and dual users of cigarettes and snus, compared with non-tobacco users at baseline, to be smokers at follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Snus use at baseline was associated with increased odds of dual use at follow-up when the outcome was (1) current dual use versus no tobacco (OR 3.49, 95% CI 1.8 to 6.8) and when the outcome was (2) current dual use versus no smoking but including snus-only use (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.3). Baseline snus users who were dual users at follow-up seemed to prefer using snus daily and cigarettes occasionally. Use of snus only at baseline was not associated with increased odds of smoking only at follow-up, after adjusting for known risk factors.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Young men who only used snus at baseline had an increased risk of being dual users at follow-up. Snus use may therefore facilitate smoking.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grotvedt, L., Forsen, L., Stavem, K., Graff-Iversen, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-05-26T02:02:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050158</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050158</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patterns of snus and cigarette use: a study of Norwegian men followed from age 16 to 19]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050058v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using findings from a public opinion poll to build political support for tobacco control policy in Kenya]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050058v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To assess the level of public support for tobacco control policies and to discuss how these findings could be used to influence the legislative process in the passing of tobacco control law in the country.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional study conducted in Kenya between March and May 2007 on a random sample of 2021 (991 men and 1030 women) respondents aged 18&nbsp;years and above. Interviews were done using a structured questionnaire by a research consultancy firm with long-standing experience in public polling.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The majority of respondents supported tobacco control policies as proposed by WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. For example, 95% of the respondents supported smoking restrictions in all enclosed public places and workplaces, 94% supported visible health warnings on tobacco product packages, 83% supported a ban on advertisements of cigarettes and tobacco products and 69% supported a ban on sponsorship of events by tobacco companies. However, 60% perceived that there was very little commitment by legislators to tobacco control.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>There was overwhelming public support for tobacco control policies and a general view that government was not doing enough in implementing policies to protect the public from tobacco harm. This public opinion poll was used as an advocacy tool to generate support among legislators for national tobacco control law.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maina, W. K., Kitonyo, R., Ogwell, A. E. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-05-23T02:01:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050058</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050058</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using findings from a public opinion poll to build political support for tobacco control policy in Kenya]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050344v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Spanish tobacco tax loopholes and their consequences]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050344v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>The Spanish government has strengthened tobacco control policies since 2005, including changes in tobacco taxes. Because these changes have targeted cigarettes mainly, the tobacco industry has marketed cheaper alternative tobacco products, offering smokers the possibility to downtrade. This paper traces the evolution of patterns of demand for cigarettes and other tobacco products in Spain over the period 2005&ndash;2011 in order to assess the impact of such tax loopholes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The authors use data on tobacco products prices and sales as well as changes in the structure and levels of tobacco taxes to relate tax changes to price changes and subsequent market share changes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Tax reforms have lifted the bottom end of the cigarette price distribution, but the industry has been successful in marketing fine-cut tobacco at cheap prices. There have been partial attempts to correct this asymmetric tax treatment, but these have not avoided a remarkable increase in the market share of fine-cut tobacco. The absence of a minimum tax on quantity for the rest of tobacco products allows the industry to place them as potential future downtrading vehicles.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>In order to address public health objectives, tax policies should aim to equalise the cost of smoking across different tobacco products. Otherwise the tobacco industry can exploit tax loopholes to market cheap alternatives to cigarettes. This requires all tobacco products to bear a minimum tax on quantity, whose levels need to be adjusted in order to reflect the equivalence between different forms of smoking.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopez-Nicolas, A., Cobacho, M. B., Fernandez, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-05-23T02:01:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050344</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050344</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Spanish tobacco tax loopholes and their consequences]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050212v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[REFRESH--reducing families' exposure to secondhand smoke in the home: a feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050212v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To study a novel intervention (REFRESH) aimed at reducing children's exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in their homes.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>A randomised feasibility study.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire.</p></sec><sec><st>Participants</st><p>A total of 59 smoking mothers with at least one child younger than 6&nbsp;years. Participation took place between July 2010 and March 2011.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>Four home visits over a 1-month period, which involved two 24-h measurements of home air quality (PM<SUB>2.5</SUB>) and a motivational interview to encourage changes to smoking behaviour within the home in order to reduce child SHS exposure. The enhanced group received their air quality data as part of their motivational interview at visit 2; the control group received that information at visit 4.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>The main outcome measures were comparisons of the data from visits 2 and 4 on the 24-h average concentration of PM<SUB>2.5</SUB>, the peak concentration of PM<SUB>2.5</SUB>, the percentage of time when household PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations exceeded a health-based threshold of 35&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> and child's salivary cotinine (in nanograms per millilitre). The views of the mothers from the enhanced group about their understanding of the intervention and the measures used were also analysed to assess the acceptability and utility of the intervention.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the recruited 54 participants, 48 completed the study: 27 from the control group and 21 from the enhanced group. Both groups experienced reductions in PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations. When testing paired samples for the enhanced group, there was a significant difference (p&lt;0.05) between visit 2 and visit 4 values for maximum PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> (p=0.006) and for percentage of time over 35&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> (p=0.017), with average PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> approaching significance (p=0.056). There was no significant difference for salivary cotinine. The qualitative findings showed that mothers were able to understand the data they were shown and were shocked by the values measured in their homes despite being aware of the effects of SHS exposure. They appreciated the intervention taking place in their homes as it allowed them to have personalised data. Many mothers described how they had changed their smoking behaviours in their home and in particular were motivated to protect their own children as a result of the knowledge they had gained.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Providing mothers who smoke with personalised results about the indoor air quality of their homes along with a motivational interview is feasible and has an effect on improving household air quality. Participants found the intervention understandable and acceptable. Taken overall, the results suggest that a future large-scale trial using measurements of indoor air quality as part of a complex intervention to reduce children's SHS exposure should be explored.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson, I., Semple, S., Mills, L. M., Ritchie, D., Shaw, A., O'Donnell, R., Bonella, P., Turner, S., Amos, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-05-21T02:01:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050212</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050212</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[REFRESH--reducing families' exposure to secondhand smoke in the home: a feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050283v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The influence of a smoking ban on the profitability of Belgian restaurants]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050283v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To examine whether the nationwide smoking ban, imposed in 2007, had an impact on the profitability of Belgian restaurants.</p></sec><sec><st>Data and methods</st><p>Objective financial reporting data on 1613 restaurants were analysed with return on assets as the outcome measure. The data were collected from the Belfirst database and cover the period 2004&ndash;2009. To assess the impact of the smoking ban, a differences-in-differences estimation method was used, with bars serving as the control group. The regression model was estimated, while controlling for firm-specific characteristics and unobserved firm-level heterogeneity.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The variable of interest is the interaction between the smoking ban dummy and the dummy for the treatment group. The coefficient of this variable is insignificant.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The adoption of the nationwide smoking ban did not affect the profitability of Belgian restaurants.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Schoenmaker, S., Van Cauwenberge, P., Vander Bauwhede, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-29T02:01:08-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050283</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050283</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The influence of a smoking ban on the profitability of Belgian restaurants]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050254v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cigarette packet warning labels can prevent relapse: findings from the International Tobacco Control 4-Country policy evaluation cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050254v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To investigate the links between health warning labels (WLs) on cigarette packets and relapse among recently quit smokers.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Prospective longitudinal cohort survey.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>Australia, Canada, the UK and the USA.</p></sec><sec><st>Participants</st><p>1936 recent ex-smokers (44.4% male) from one of the first six waves (2002&ndash;2007) of the International Tobacco Control 4-Country policy evaluation survey, who were followed up in the next wave.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>Whether participants had relapsed at follow-up (approximately 1&nbsp;year later).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In multivariate analysis, very frequent noticing of WLs among ex-smokers was associated with greater relapse 1&nbsp;year later (OR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.09, p&lt;0.01), but this effect disappeared after controlling for urges to smoke and self-efficacy (OR: 1.29, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.80, p=0.135). In contrast, reporting that WLs make staying quit &lsquo;a lot&rsquo; more likely (compared with &lsquo;not at all&rsquo; likely) was associated with a lower likelihood of relapse 1&nbsp;year later (OR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.86, p&lt;0.01) and this effect remained robust across all models tested, increasing in some.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This study provides the first longitudinal evidence that health warnings can help ex-smokers stay quit. Once the authors control for greater exposure to cigarettes, which is understandably predictive of relapse, WL effects are positive. However, it may be that ex-smokers need to actively use the health consequences that WLs highlight to remind them of their reasons for quitting, rather than it being something that happens automatically. Ex-smokers should be encouraged to use pack warnings to counter urges to resume smoking. Novel warnings may be more likely to facilitate this.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Partos, T. R., Borland, R., Yong, H.-H., Thrasher, J., Hammond, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-25T16:30:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050254</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050254</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cigarette packet warning labels can prevent relapse: findings from the International Tobacco Control 4-Country policy evaluation cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050324v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Support for a tobacco endgame and increased regulation of the tobacco industry among New Zealand smokers: results from a National Survey]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050324v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Aim</st><p>To examine the prevalence of smoker support for a ban on cigarette sales in 10&nbsp;years time and increased regulation of the tobacco industry and to investigate the independent associations of support for these measures.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The authors surveyed opinions among adult smokers in two survey waves (N=1376 and N=923) from the New Zealand arm of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey during 2007&ndash;2009. The authors report prevalence of support stratified by age, gender and ethnicity. The authors carried out multivariate analyses to identify significant associations among potential determinants (demographics, socioeconomic status, mental health and smoking-related beliefs and behaviours) of support.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Most New Zealand smokers supported greater regulation of the tobacco industry (65%) and more government action on tobacco (59%). Around half (46%) supported banning sales of cigarettes in 10&nbsp;years time, provided effective nicotine substitutes were available. In a fully adjusted model, significant associations with support for greater tobacco company regulation included Maori ethnicity, experience of financial stress and greater awareness about the harms of smoking. Significant associations with support for a ban on tobacco sales in 10&nbsp;years time included increasing area-based deprivation level, increasing intention to quit and greater concern about the health effects of smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The findings suggest that most smokers will support stronger government action to control the tobacco industry and that many support radical &lsquo;endgame&rsquo; approaches. Greater support among Maori, more deprived and possibly Pacific smokers, is an important finding, which could inform the design and implementation of new policies given the very high smoking prevalence among these groups and hence high priority for targeted tobacco control interventions. Perceived difficulties in gaining public support should not impede the introduction of rigorous tobacco control measures needed to achieve a tobacco-free New Zealand.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edwards, R., Wilson, N., Peace, J., Weerasekera, D., Thomson, G. W., Gifford, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-25T02:03:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050324</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050324</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Support for a tobacco endgame and increased regulation of the tobacco industry among New Zealand smokers: results from a National Survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050120v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictors of tobacco outlet density nationwide: a geographic analysis]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050120v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To elucidate how demographics of US Census tracts are related to tobacco outlet density (TOD).</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>The authors conducted a nationwide assessment of the association between socio-demographic US Census indicators and the density of tobacco outlets across all 64 909 census tracts in the continental USA. Retail tobacco outlet addresses were determined through North American Industry Classification System codes, and density per 1000 population was estimated for each census tract. Independent variables included urban/rural; proportion of the population that was black, Hispanic and women with low levels of education; proportion of families living in poverty and median household size.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In a multivariate analysis, there was a higher TOD per 1000 population in urban than in rural locations. Furthermore, higher TOD was associated with larger proportions of blacks, Hispanics, women with low levels of education and with smaller household size. Urban&ndash;rural differences in the relation between demographics and TOD were found in all socio-demographic categories, with the exception of poverty, but were particularly striking for Hispanics, for whom the relation with TOD was 10 times larger in urban compared with rural census tracts.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The findings suggest that tobacco outlets are more concentrated in areas where people with higher risk for negative health outcomes reside. Future studies should examine the relation between TOD and smoking, smoking cessation, as well as disease rates.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez, D., Carlos, H. A., Adachi-Mejia, A. M., Berke, E. M., Sargent, J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-04T02:04:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050120</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050120</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictors of tobacco outlet density nationwide: a geographic analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050297v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is the socioeconomic gap in childhood exposure to secondhand smoke widening or narrowing?]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050297v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>The social gradient in smoking contributes substantially to the health gap between the rich and poor. Passive smoking by children is associated with increased risk of more severe asthma, respiratory diseases and infections, middle ear disease and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. This study examined trends in the social gradient of children's exposure to secondhand smoke in Australian households between 2001 and 2010.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Series of cross-sectional national household surveys.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Between 2001 and 2010, the proportion of Australian households containing a child aged under 15&nbsp;years and a smoker declined by 22%. However, there was no change in the most disadvantaged households, with half of these households still containing at least one smoker in 2010. There was a social gradient in outdoor smoking in all survey years but the prevalence of outdoor-only smoking increased in all socioeconomic groups by around 50% between 2001 and 2010. The presence of a child aged 5&nbsp;years or younger in the household increased the chances that smokers only smoked outdoors.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Children's exposure to indoor smoking in households that contain a smoker is declining in all socioeconomic groups but the social class differentials in such exposure remain. The proportion of children who live with a smoker declined in all social groups except the most disadvantaged households, with half of these households still containing a smoker in 2010. More needs to be done to reduce secondhand smoke exposure of children in socially disadvantaged households.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gartner, C. E., Hall, W. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-30T02:01:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050297</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050297</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is the socioeconomic gap in childhood exposure to secondhand smoke widening or narrowing?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050350v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Indoor air quality in Virginia waterpipe cafes]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050350v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>A revised indoor air quality law has been implemented in Virginia to protect the public from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke exposure. This legislation contains exemptions that include allowances for smoking in a room that is structurally separated and separately ventilated. The objective of the current study was to examine the impact of this law on air quality in waterpipe caf&eacute;s, as well as to compare the air quality in these caf&eacute;s to restaurants that allow cigarette smoking and those where no smoking is permitted.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Indoor air quality in 28 venues (17 waterpipe caf&eacute;s, five cigarette smoking-permitted restaurants and six smoke-free restaurants (five with valid data)) in Virginia was assessed during 4 March to 27 May 2011. Real-time measurements of particulate matter (PM) with 2.5&nbsp;&mu;m aerodynamic diameter or smaller (PM<SUB>2.5</SUB>) were obtained and occupant behaviour/venue characteristics were assessed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The highest mean PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentration was observed for waterpipe caf&eacute; smoking rooms (374&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, n=17) followed by waterpipe caf&eacute; non-smoking rooms (123&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, n=11), cigarette smoking-permitted restaurant smoking rooms (119&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, n=5), cigarette smoking-permitted restaurant non-smoking rooms (26&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, n=5) and smoke-free restaurants (9&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, n=5). Smoking density was positively correlated with PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> across smoking rooms and the smoke-free restaurants. In addition, PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> was positively correlated between smoking and non-smoking rooms of venues.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations observed among the waterpipe caf&eacute;s sampled here indicated air quality in the waterpipe caf&eacute; smoking rooms was worse than restaurant rooms in which cigarette smoking was permitted, and state-required non-smoking rooms in waterpipe caf&eacute;s may expose patrons and employees to PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations above national and international air quality standards. Reducing the health risks of secondhand smoke may require smoke-free establishments in which tobacco smoking sources such as water pipes are, like cigarettes, prohibited.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cobb, C. O., Vansickel, A. R., Blank, M. D., Jentink, K., Travers, M. J., Eissenberg, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-24T02:01:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050350</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050350</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Indoor air quality in Virginia waterpipe cafes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050199v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of stick design features on perceptions of characteristics of cigarettes]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050199v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To examine the extent (if any) that cigarette stick dimension, tipping paper design and other decorative design/branding have on Australian smokers' perceptions of those cigarettes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>An internet survey of 160 young Australian adult ever-smokers who were shown computer images of three sets of cigarette sticks&mdash;five sticks of different lengths and diameters (set A), five sticks with different tipping paper design (set B) and four sticks of different decorative design (set C). Branding was a between-subjects randomised condition for set C. For each set, respondents ranked sticks on most and least attractive, highest and lowest quality and strongest and weakest taste.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Cigarette sticks were perceived as different on attractiveness, quality and strength of taste. Standard stick length/diameter was perceived as the most attractive and highest quality stick, with men more inclined to rate a slim stick as less attractive. A stick with a cork-patterned tipping paper and a gold band was seen as most attractive, of highest quality and strongest in taste compared to other tipping designs. Branded sticks were seen as more attractive, higher in quality and stronger tasting than non-branded designs, regardless of brand, although the effects were stronger for a prestige compared with a budget brand.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Characteristics of the cigarette stick affect smokers' perceptions of the attributes of those cigarettes and thus are a potential means by which product differentiation can occur. A comprehensive policy to eliminate promotional aspects of cigarette design and packaging needs to include rules about stick design.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borland, R., Savvas, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-06T02:02:52-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050199</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050199</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of stick design features on perceptions of characteristics of cigarettes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050148v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Availability, accessibility and promotion of smokeless tobacco in a low-income area of Mumbai]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050148v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To examine the role of accessibility, product availability, promotions and social norms promotion, factors contributing to the use of smokeless tobacco (ST) products in a typical low-income community of Mumbai community using Geographic Information System (GIS), observational and interview methodologies and to assess implementation of Cigatettes and other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) legislation.</p></sec><sec><st>Rationale</st><p>In India, the third largest producer of tobacco in the world, smokeless tobacco products are used by men, women and children. New forms of highly addictive packaged smokeless tobacco products such as gutkha are inexpensive and rates of use are higher in low-income urban communities. These products are known to increase rates of oral cancer and to affect reproductive health and fetal development.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The study used a mixed methods approach combining ethnographic and GIS mapping, observation and key informant interviews. Accessibility was defined as density, clustering and distance of residents and schools to tobacco outlets. Observation and interview data with shop owners and community residents produced an archive of products, information on shop histories and income and normative statements.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Spatial analysis showed high density of outlets with variations across subcommunities. All residents can reach tobacco outlets within 30&ndash;100 feet of their homes. Normative statements from 55 respondents indicate acceptance of men's, women's and children's use, and selling smokeless tobacco is reported to be an important form of income generation for some households. Multilevel tobacco control and prevention strategies including tobacco education, community norms change, licensing and surveillance and alternative income generation strategies are needed to reduce accessibility and availability of smokeless tobacco use.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schensul, J. J., Nair, S., Bilgi, S., Cromley, E., Kadam, V., Mello, S. D., Donta, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-02T02:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050148</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050148</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Availability, accessibility and promotion of smokeless tobacco in a low-income area of Mumbai]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050253v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A comparison of cigarette- and hookah-related videos on YouTube]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050253v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>YouTube is now the second most visited site on the internet. The authors aimed to compare characteristics of and messages conveyed by cigarette- and hookah-related videos on YouTube.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Systematic search procedures yielded 66 cigarette-related and 61 hookah-related videos. After three trained qualitative researchers used an iterative approach to develop and refine definitions for the coding of variables, two of them independently coded each video for content including positive and negative associations with smoking and major content type.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Median view counts were 606 884 for cigarettes-related videos and 102 307 for hookah-related videos (p&lt;0.001). However, the number of comments per 1000 views was significantly lower for cigarette-related videos than for hookah-related videos (1.6 vs 2.5, p=0.003). There was no significant difference in the number of &lsquo;like&rsquo; designations per 100 reactions (91 vs 87, p=0.39). Cigarette-related videos were less likely than hookah-related videos to portray tobacco use in a positive light (24% vs 92%, p&lt;0.001). In addition, cigarette-related videos were more likely to be of high production quality (42% vs 5%, p&lt;0.001), to mention short-term consequences (50% vs 18%, p&lt;0.001) and long-term consequences (44% vs 2%, p&lt;0.001) of tobacco use, to contain explicit antismoking messages (39% vs 0%, p&lt;0.001) and to provide specific information on how to quit tobacco use (21% vs 0%, p&lt;0.001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Although internet user-generated videos related to cigarette smoking often acknowledge harmful consequences and provide explicit antismoking messages, hookah-related videos do not. It may be valuable for public health programmes to correct common misconceptions regarding hookah use.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carroll, M. V., Shensa, A., Primack, B. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-23T02:01:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050253</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050253</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A comparison of cigarette- and hookah-related videos on YouTube]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050176v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social smokers' management of conflicted identities]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050176v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Although social smoking has increased among young adults, it remains a poorly understood behaviour. The authors explored how young adult social smokers viewed and defined smoking and the strategies they used to reconcile their conflicting smoker and non-smoker identities. The authors also examined alcohol's role in facilitating social smoking and investigated measures that would decouple drinking and smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The authors conducted 13 in-depth interviews with young adult social smokers aged between 19 and 25&nbsp;years and used thematic analysis to interpret the transcripts.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The authors identified four key themes: the demarcation strategies social smokers used to avoid classifying themselves as smokers, social smoking as a tactic that ameliorates the risk of alienation, alcohol as a catalyst of social smoking and the difficulty participants experienced in reconciling their identity as non-smokers who smoke.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Although social smokers regret smoking, their retrospective remorse was insufficient to promote behaviour change, and environmental modifications appear more likely to promote smoke-free behaviours among social smokers. Participants strongly supported extending the smoke-free areas outside bars, a measure that would help decouple their alcohol-fuelled behaviours from the identity to which they aspire.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoek, J., Maubach, N., Stevenson, R., Gendall, P., Edwards, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-20T16:30:56-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050176</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050176</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social smokers' management of conflicted identities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050134v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free policy in Uruguay]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050134v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Stimulated by the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, many countries in Latin America adopted comprehensive smoke-free policies. In March 2006, Uruguay became the first Latin American country to adopt 100% smoke-free national legislation, which ended smoking in all indoor public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars. The objective of this study was to evaluate trends in hospital admissions for cardiovascular disease 2&nbsp;years before and 2&nbsp;years after the policy was implemented in Uruguay.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Reports of hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (International Classification of Disease-10 I21) from 37 hospitals (79% of all hospital admissions in the country), representing the period 2&nbsp;years before and 2&nbsp;years after the adoption of a nationwide smoke-free policy in Uruguay (between 1 March 2004 and 29 February 2008), were reviewed. A time series analysis was undertaken to compare the average monthly number of events of hospital admission for AMI before and after the smoke-free law.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 7949 hospital admissions for AMI were identified during the 4-year study period. Two years after the smoke-free policy was enacted, hospital admissions for AMI fell by 22%. The same pattern and roughly the same magnitude of reduction in AMI admissions were observed for patients seen in public and private hospitals, men, women and people aged 40&ndash;65&nbsp;years and older than 65&nbsp;years.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The national smoke-free policy implemented in Uruguay in 2006 was associated with a significant reduction in hospital admissions for AMI.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebrie, E. M., Sandoya, E., Hyland, A., Bianco, E., Glantz, S. A., Cummings, K. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-15T02:02:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050134</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050134</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free policy in Uruguay]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050131v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of national smoke-free legislation on home smoking bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050131v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To measure changes in prevalence and predictors of home smoking bans (HSBs) among smokers in four European countries after the implementation of national smoke-free legislation.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Two waves of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys, which is a prospective panel study. Pre- and post-legislation data were used from Ireland, France, Germany and the Netherlands. Two pre-legislation waves from the UK were used as control.</p></sec><sec><st>Participants</st><p>4634 respondents from the intervention countries and 1080 from the control country completed both baseline and follow-up and were included in the present analyses.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Multiple logistic regression models to identify predictors of having or of adopting a total HSB, and Generalised Estimating Equation models to compare patterns of change after implementation of smoke-free legislation to a control country without such legislation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Most smokers had at least partial smoking restrictions in their home, but the proportions varied significantly between countries. After implementation of national smoke-free legislation, the proportion of smokers with a total HSB increased significantly in all four countries. Among continuing smokers, the number of cigarettes smoked per day either remained stable or decreased significantly. Multiple logistic regression models indicated that having a young child in the household and supporting smoking bans in bars were important correlates of having a pre-legislation HSB. Prospective predictors of imposing a HSB between survey waves were planning to quit smoking, supporting a total smoking ban in bars and the birth of a child. Generalised Estimating Equation models indicated that the change in total HSB in the intervention countries was greater than that in the control country.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The findings suggest that smoke-free legislation does not lead to more smoking in smokers' homes. On the contrary, our findings demonstrate that smoke-free legislation may stimulate smokers to establish total smoking bans in their homes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mons, U., Nagelhout, G. E., Allwright, S., Guignard, R., van den Putte, B., Willemsen, M. C., Fong, G. T., Brenner, H., Potschke-Langer, M., Breitling, L. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-13T16:31:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050131</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050131</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of national smoke-free legislation on home smoking bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050169v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The relationship between regular second-hand smoke exposure at home and indictors of lung function in healthy school boys in Khartoum]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050169v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke at home has been linked to many complications, including impaired lung ventilatory function; however, there is great variation in intensity of this complication between individuals of different countries. The aim of this study was to determine relationship between regular second-hand smoke exposure at home and the spirometric derived values forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV<SUB>1</SUB>), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow 50% and peak expiratory flow rate in healthy school boys in Khartoum.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A total of 135 male school pupils were selected randomly from three governmental primary schools for boys in Khartoum. Inclusion criteria were healthy school pupil, 9&ndash;14&nbsp;years old, not active smoker, either exposed regularly to cigarette smoke at home since birth or not exposed to cigarette smoke or any other type of smoke inside or outside the house. All spirometric measurements were performed using Clement Clarke All-flow Spirometer.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>69 school pupils were exposed regularly to second-hand smoke at home, whereas 66 pupils were not. Fathers were responsible for 67.5% of second-hand smoke at home; relatives for 30% and mothers for 2.5%. Mean FVC (&plusmn;SD) was 2.21 &plusmn;0.57 l for the exposed pupils and 2.41 &plusmn;0.35 l for the non-exposed, showing reduction by about 8%. Mean FEV<SUB>1</SUB> (mean &plusmn;SD) was 2.03 &plusmn;0.46 l for the exposed and 2.20 &plusmn;0.42 l for the non-exposed, indicating reduction by about 7%. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p&lt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Regular second-hand smoke exposure at home causes significant reduction in FVC and FEV<SUB>1</SUB> by about 7%&ndash;8% in school pupils in Khartoum.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Merghani, T. H., Saeed, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-10T02:06:06-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050169</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050169</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The relationship between regular second-hand smoke exposure at home and indictors of lung function in healthy school boys in Khartoum]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050203v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Secondhand tobacco smoke: an occupational hazard for smoking and non-smoking bar and nightclub employees]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050203v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In the absence of comprehensive smoking bans in public places, bars and nightclubs have the highest concentrations of secondhand tobacco smoke, posing a serious health risk for workers in these venues.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To assess exposure of bar and nightclub employees to secondhand smoke, including non-smoking and smoking employees.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Between 2007 and 2009, the authors recruited approximately 10 venues per city and up to five employees per venue in 24 cities in the Americas, Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa. Air nicotine concentrations were measured for 7&nbsp;days in 238 venues. To evaluate personal exposure to secondhand smoke, hair nicotine concentrations were also measured for 625 non-smoking and 311 smoking employees (N=936).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Median (IQR) air nicotine concentrations were 3.5 (1.5&ndash;8.5) &mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> and 0.2 (0.1&ndash;0.7) &mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> in smoking and smoke-free venues, respectively. Median (IQR) hair nicotine concentrations were 6.0 (1.6&ndash;16.0) ng/mg and 1.7 (0.5&ndash;5.5) ng/mg in smoking and non-smoking employees, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, education, living with a smoker, hair treatment and region, a twofold increase in air nicotine concentrations was associated with a 30% (95% CI 23% to 38%) increase in hair nicotine concentrations in non-smoking employees and with a 10% (2% to 19%) increase in smoking employees.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Occupational exposure to secondhand smoke, assessed by air nicotine, resulted in elevated concentrations of hair nicotine among non-smoking and smoking bar and nightclub employees. The high levels of airborne nicotine found in bars and nightclubs and the contribution of this exposure to employee hair nicotine concentrations support the need for legislation measures that ensure complete protection from secondhand smoke in these venues.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, M. R., Wipfli, H., Shahrir, S., Avila-Tang, E., Samet, J. M., Breysse, P. N., Navas-Acien, A., FAMRI Bar Study Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-24T00:01:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050203</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050203</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Secondhand tobacco smoke: an occupational hazard for smoking and non-smoking bar and nightclub employees]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050128v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of smoking on use of antibacterials: a 9-year follow-up study of 24 000 working-aged Finns]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050128v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Previous studies indicate an association between tobacco smoking and infectious diseases. However, large population-based follow-up studies including both accurate measurements of smoking behaviour and confounders and a reliable register-based follow-up of infections are lacking.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To examine the effect of smoking on use of antibacterials as an indicator of infections among working-aged population.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The participants of the population-based Health and Social Support Study (24 283 working-aged Finns) were followed up for 9&nbsp;years. Information on smoking behaviour and confounders was obtained from a questionnaire in 1998. Number of antibacterial purchases was obtained from the National-Drug-Prescription-Register. The association between smoking and use of antibacterials was analysed using multinomial regression models.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A graded association between lifetime smoking as measured by pack-years and use of antibacterials was found. Compared with never-smokers, the age-adjusted OR for multiple use of antibacterials among smokers with 12 or more pack-years was 2.32 (95% CI 1.91 to 2.82) in women and 1.45 (95% CI 1.23 to 1.71) in men. The associations remained after adjustment for the following confounding factors: use of alcohol, body mass index, physical activity, socioeconomic status, hard physical work, life satisfaction, disability pension and dyspnoea.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Smoking is associated with increased use of antibacterials. Infectious periods experienced by patients should be used as an opportunity to encourage smoking cessation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koskenvuo, K., Huunan-Seppala, A., Keistinen, T., Autti-Ramo, I., Laitinen, L. A., Koskenvuo, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-23T05:44:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050128</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050128</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of smoking on use of antibacterials: a 9-year follow-up study of 24 000 working-aged Finns]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050209v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How online sales and promotion of snus contravenes current European Union legislation]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050209v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Context</st><p>The European Union (EU) Tobacco Products Directive that bans sales of snus (a form of oral tobacco) in EU countries other than Sweden is currently under review. Major tobacco companies favour the ban being overturned. This study aims to explore compliance with the current ban on snus sales and examines the conduct of online snus vendors, including their compliance with two other EU Directives on excise and tobacco advertising and Swedish legislation banning sales of snus outside Sweden.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To determine who is currently distributing snus via the internet in the EU, searches were carried out in Google, followed by searches in the WHOIS and Amadeus databases. Five online test purchases of snus were made in each of 10 EU Member States using a standardised protocol. Feedback from the test purchases and further analysis of the websites accessed for test purchases were used to critically examine snus retailers' conduct.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The majority of online vendors operate from Sweden and target non-Swedish EU citizens. Test purchases were successfully made in all 10 EU Member States; of 43 orders placed, only two failed. Age verification relied only on self-report. The majority of sales applied Swedish taxes, contrary to EU requirements. Copious sales promotion activities, many price based, are incorporated in these websites contravening the EU regulation, and three test purchases were delivered with gifts.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Snus is currently being sold on the single market via the internet in contravention of Swedish legislation and three EU Directives. The apparent willingness of the tobacco industry to contravene EU and Swedish legislation and profit from unlawful sales raises questions about their status as stakeholders in consultations on future policy developments. The findings highlight how national and regional tobacco control legislation can be undermined in an increasingly globalised world.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peeters, S., Gilmore, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-21T06:25:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050209</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050209</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How online sales and promotion of snus contravenes current European Union legislation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050130v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The impact of changes in tobacco control funding on healthcare expenditures in California, 2012-2016]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050130v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>This study presents estimates of the impact of changes in California tobacco control funding on healthcare expenditures for 2012&ndash;2016 under four funding scenarios.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Smoking prevalence is projected using a cointegrated time series regression model. Smoking-attributable healthcare expenditures are estimated with econometric models that use a prevalence-based annual cost approach and an excess cost methodology.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>If tobacco control spending in California remains at the current level of 5 cents per pack (base case), smoking prevalence will increase from 12.2% in 2011 to 12.7% in 2016. If funding is cut in half, smoking prevalence will increase to 12.9% in 2016 and smoking-attributable healthcare expenditures will be $307 million higher over this time period than in the base case. If the tobacco tax is increased by $1.00 per pack with 20 cents per pack allocated to tobacco control, smoking prevalence will fall to 10.4% in 2016 and healthcare expenditures between 2012 and 2016 will be $3.3 billion less than in the base case. If funding is increased to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended level, smoking prevalence will fall to 10.6% in 2016 and there will be savings in healthcare expenditures of $4.7 billion compared to the base case due to the large reduction in heavy smoking prevalence.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>California's highly successful tobacco control program will become less effective over time because inflation is eroding the 5 cents per pack currently allocated to tobacco control activities. More aggressive action needs to be taken to reduce smoking prevalence and healthcare expenditures in the future.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max, W., Sung, H.-Y., Lightwood, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-17T11:46:17-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050130</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050130</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The impact of changes in tobacco control funding on healthcare expenditures in California, 2012-2016]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050124v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Who receives prescriptions for smoking cessation medications? An association rule mining analysis using a large primary care database]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050124v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Aims</st><p>To use association rule mining methods to investigate prescribing of smoking cessation medication in the UK primary care and to identify the characteristics of numerically important groups of patients who typically do, or do not, receive cessation therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>An association rule mining study using The Health Improvement Network Database.</p></sec><sec><st>Settings and participants</st><p>282 433 patients aged 16&nbsp;years and over from 419 UK general practices, who were registered with the practice throughout 2008 and recorded as a current smoker during that year.</p></sec><sec><st>Outcome</st><p>Prescription for any type of smoking cessation medications in 2008 (nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion or varenicline).</p></sec><sec><st>Variables</st><p>Age, gender, lifestyle indicators and co-morbidity.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the current smokers, 37 731 (13.4%) were given prescriptions for smoking cessation treatment during 2008. Prescriptions were particularly likely to be given to women, those aged 31&ndash;60&nbsp;years, and people with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and depression. On the contrary, of patients with dementia, with alcohol intake over recommended levels, atrial fibrillation or chronic kidney disease was extremely unlikely to be prescribed a smoking cessation medication. However, the largest group of patients who did not receive therapy was young and otherwise healthy individuals.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This novel approach identified sizeable and easily definable groups of patients who are systematically failing to receive support for smoking cessation in primary care. Association rule mining can be used to identify key numerically important groups at high or low risk of receiving treatment and hence potentially to improve healthcare delivery.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huang, Y., Britton, J., Hubbard, R., Lewis, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-13T07:29:58-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050124</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050124</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Who receives prescriptions for smoking cessation medications? An association rule mining analysis using a large primary care database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050050v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High youth access to movies that contain smoking in Europe compared with the USA]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050050v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Based on evidence that exposure to smoking in movies is associated with adolescent smoking, the WHO has called on countries to assign a rating that restricts youth access to such movies.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate youth access to movies that portray smoking in European countries and compare with that in the USA.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The authors identified the most commercially successful movies screened in six European countries (Germany, Iceland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and UK) and the USA between 2004 and 2009. The authors coded the 464 movies that were screened in both Europe and the USA according to whether or not they portrayed smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>87% of the movies were &lsquo;youth&rsquo; rated in Europe (ratings board classification as suitable for those younger than 16&nbsp;years) compared to only 67% in the USA (suitable for those younger than 17&nbsp;years). Smoking was portrayed in 319 (69%) movies. 85% of the movies that portrayed smoking were &lsquo;youth&rsquo; rated in Europe compared with only 59% in the USA (p&lt;0.001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Tobacco imagery is still common in popular films shown in European countries and the USA. None of the seven countries examined followed the WHO recommendations on restricting youth access to movies that portray smoking. Compared to the USA, European youths have access to substantially more movies in general, and this gives them access to more movies that portray smoking in particular.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hanewinkel, R., Sargent, J. D., Karlsdottir, S., Jonsson, S. H., Mathis, F., Faggiano, F., Poelen, E. A. P., Scholte, R., Florek, E., Sweeting, H., Hunt, K., Morgenstern, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-18T23:53:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050050</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050050</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High youth access to movies that contain smoking in Europe compared with the USA]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050133v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Second-hand smoke exposure and mitigation strategies among home visitation workers]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050133v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Protection of workers from second-hand smoke (SHS) in occupational settings is an important policy priority, yet little attention has been given to SHS protection for home visitation health workers, who number almost 2 million in the USA. Self-reported SHS exposure, SHS mitigation strategies and suggestions for further SHS exposure reduction approaches were obtained from home visitation health workers in Massachusetts.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Massachusetts Early Intervention workers (N=316) at their state-wide conference in April 2010.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Eighty-three per cent of respondents reported at least 1&nbsp;hour per month of SHS exposure, and 16% reported at least 11&nbsp;hours per month. Nevertheless, only 22% of workers counselled clients on maintaining a smoke-free home. Fewer than 30% of workers had ever voiced concerns to their employing agency, and just 12% had raised their concerns directly with clients. Only 14% stated that their agency had rules designed to protect workers from SHS.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>SHS exposure occurs frequently among home visitation health workers. The data point to a substantial population who are not protected from SHS exposure by formal policies.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keske, R. R., Rees, V. W., Behm, I., Wadler, B. M., Geller, A. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-18T23:53:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050133</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050133</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Second-hand smoke exposure and mitigation strategies among home visitation workers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050038v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Audit of tobacco retail outlets in Hangzhou, China]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050038v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To determine the prevalence of tobacco advertisements and warning messages at points of sale as well as to examine the density of tobacco retail outlets in neighbourhoods and around schools in Hangzhou, China.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Tobacco retail outlets (n=1639) in all food and tobacco specialty stores were observed objectively by trained students. Tobacco advertisements and warning messages were assessed with an audit, and stores' addresses were recorded with Global Positioning System coordinates. The distances (1) between all pairs of tobacco retail outlets (2) between each tobacco retail outlet and 15 middle schools were calculated to assess the density of tobacco retail outlets in neighbourhoods and around schools.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among the 1639 tobacco retail outlets, &lt;1% had &lsquo;no sales to minors&rsquo; signs, 1.5% had tobacco warning messages, 28% had signs indicating tobacco sale and 12.4% had tobacco advertisements. For 48.7% of tobacco retail outlets, the nearest distances to other tobacco retail outlets were &lt;50&nbsp;m. For 80% of schools, there was at least one tobacco retail outlets within a 100&nbsp;m radius.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Tobacco advertisement in retail outlets is prevalent and the density of tobacco retail outlets is high in Hangzhou, China. Signs indicating &lsquo;no sales to minors&rsquo; and tobacco warning signs are almost non-existent. These findings point to an urgent need for the enforcement of regulations on display of &lsquo;no sales to minors&rsquo; and a new density standard for tobacco retail outlets based on protecting the public's health.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gong, T., Lv, J., Liu, Q., Ren, Y., Li, L., Kawachi, I., on behalf of the Community Interventions for Health (CIH) Collaboration]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-16T02:57:59-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050038</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050038</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Audit of tobacco retail outlets in Hangzhou, China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050008v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Smoking behaviour and associated factors of illicit cigarette consumption in a border province of southern Thailand]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050008v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Illicit cigarette consumption has increased worldwide. It is important to understand this problem thoroughly.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To investigate behaviours and factors associated with illicit cigarette consumption in southern Thailand.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>A survey and qualitative study were conducted in a border province in southern Thailand next to Malaysia. A modified snowballing technique was used to recruit 300 illicit and 150 non-illicit cigarette smokers. A questionnaire was used to interview subjects. Illicit cigarette packs were obtained in order to identify their characteristics. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was used for data analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Smoking of illicit cigarettes has become accepted in the communities. They were available in supermarkets and vendor shops. Friends and other illicit smokers known by illicit cigarette smokers were an important source of information for access to illicit cigarette products. The main factors associated with smoking illicit cigarettes, compared with smoking non-illicit cigarettes, were younger age, higher education and higher average monthly expenditure on cigarettes (most illicit smokers smoked illicit cigarettes (average price per packet = 33 THB (US$1.1), while most non-illicit smokers smoked hand-rolled cigarettes (average price per packet = 7 THB (US$0.2)) and knowledge of other illicit cigarette smokers. The low price of illicit cigarettes was the main reason for their use. Selling strategies included sale of singles, sale in shops and direct sale through social networking.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Illicit cigarette consumption has become more acceptable especially among young adult smokers. Age and extent of social networks are important factors associated with smoking illicit cigarettes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ketchoo, C., Sangthong, R., Chongsuvivatwong, V., Geater, A., McNeil, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-15T11:26:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050008</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050008</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Smoking behaviour and associated factors of illicit cigarette consumption in a border province of southern Thailand]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050106v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Smoking cessation and mortality among middle-aged and elderly Chinese in Singapore: the Singapore Chinese Health Study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050106v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>This study determines if recent smoking cessation, compared with long-term cessation, can reduce mortality risk associated with smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Data from the Singapore Chinese Health Study, a cohort study of middle-aged and elderly Chinese in Singapore, were analysed (n=48 251). Smoking status was evaluated at recruitment between 1993 and 1998 and reassessed between 1999 and 2004. Participants were classified as never-smokers, long-term quitters (quit before recruitment, mean 17.0&nbsp;years), new quitters (quit between recruitment and second interview, mean 4.3&nbsp;years) and current smokers. Mortality was ascertained by linkage with the nationwide death registry.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After a mean follow-up of 8.1&nbsp;years, 6003 deaths had occurred by 31 December 2009. Compared with current smokers, the adjusted HR (95% CI) for total mortality was 0.84 (0.76 to 0.94) for new quitters, 0.61 (0.56 to 0.67) for long-term quitters and 0.49 (0.46 to 0.53) for never-smokers. New quitters had 24% reduction in lung cancer mortality (HR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.00) and long-term quitters had 56% reduction (HR: 0.44, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.57). Risk for coronary heart disease mortality was reduced in new quitters (HR: 0.84, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.08) and long-term quitters (HR: 0.63, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.77), although the result for new quitters was of borderline significance due to relatively small number of cardiovascular deaths. Risk for chronic pulmonary disease mortality was reduced in long-term quitters but increased in new quitters.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Significant reduction in risk of total mortality, specifically for lung cancer mortality, can be achieved within 5&nbsp;years of smoking cessation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lim, S. H., Tai, B. C., Yuan, J.-M., Yu, M. C., Koh, W.-P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-14T11:26:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050106</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050106</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Smoking cessation and mortality among middle-aged and elderly Chinese in Singapore: the Singapore Chinese Health Study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>