<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com">
<title>TC Online First</title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com</link>
<description>TC RSS Feed -- Online First</description>
<prism:publicationName>Tobacco Control</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0964-4563</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050236v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050147v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050314v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050283v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050303v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050254v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050324v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050315v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050120v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050353v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050297v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050350v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050129v3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050035v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050221v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050199v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050148v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050253v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050176v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050134v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050231v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050131v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050169v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050203v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050128v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050209v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050130v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050144v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050124v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050217v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050149v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050197v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050139v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050070v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050050v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050133v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050038v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050135v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050008v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050146v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050106v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050181v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050157v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050078v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050010v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050152v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050119v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050007v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050048v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050044v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050226v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050185v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050107v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050153v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050079v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050171v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050145v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050108v3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050027v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050022v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050012v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050208v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050040v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050087v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050023v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050029v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043687v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043356v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.044099v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043448v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043539v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042507v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.044040v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043810v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042309v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043190v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043380v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.041327v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.040071v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042630v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042275v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.039362v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.041657v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042325v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/site/homepage/TC_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/site/homepage/TC_95x60.gif">
<title>Tobacco Control</title>
<url>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/site/homepage/TC_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050236v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How effective are physical appearance interventions in changing smoking perceptions, attitudes and behaviours? A systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050236v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>A systematic review was conducted in order to identify physical appearance interventions related to smoking cessation and to evaluate their effectiveness in order to inform smoking cessation practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Articles were only included if they focused on an appearance intervention related to changing smoking attitudes, intentions or behaviour. A total of 17 online databases were searched using date restrictions (1980 to 2011), yielding 4356 articles. After screening, 11 articles were identified that met the review criteria. Seven articles investigated the impacts of facial age-progression software on smoking cessation. Three articles focused on reducing weight concerns in order to improve smoking abstinence rates. One oral health article was identified which focused on physical appearance in order to prevent or reduce smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Few studies have focused on physical appearance interventions in smoking cessation however the identified studies report positive impacts on smoking-related cognitions and cessation behaviours. Two different methods of quality analysis were conducted for quantitative and qualitative papers. The consensus was that the quality of the articles was generally weak. Of the 10 quantitative articles, 9 were rated weak and 1 was rated moderate. The one qualitative study provided clear, in-depth information.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Questions still remain as to whether physical appearance interventions have an impact on smoking attitudes, intentions or behaviours, particularly in British samples. To inform practice, additional, well-designed, studies are needed. They should include control groups, use robust randomised allocation to conditions, measures with established reliability and validity and take measures pre and post intervention.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flett, K., Clark-Carter, D., Grogan, S., Davey, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-05-09T02:01:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050236</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050236</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How effective are physical appearance interventions in changing smoking perceptions, attitudes and behaviours? A systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050147v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The potential impact of smoking control policies on future global smoking trends]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050147v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The authors develop projections for global smoking prevalence for the years 2020 and 2030 with and without the implementation, starting in 2010, of the WHO's recommended multipronged approach to tobacco control known as the MPOWER policy package.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Using data from the WHO's Global InfoBase Database and the WHO's Global Adult Tobacco Survey, the authors construct adult cigarette smoking prevalence time series for 60 countries that account for 90% of the world's smokers and 85% of the world's population. The authors then use a stock/flow model to project those countries' smoking prevalence for the years 2020 and 2030, with and without the implementation of MPOWER. The authors aggregate the results and report regional and global figures.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The authors estimate global adult cigarette smoking prevalence in 2010 to be 23.7%. If no additional policies are set in place and the initiation and cessation rates existing in 2010 persist, the authors estimate that global prevalence will be 22.7% by 2020 and 22.0% by 2030 (872 million smokers). If MPOWER had been implemented globally starting in 2010 with a 100% price increase for cigarettes, the authors estimate that global cigarette smoking prevalence would be 15.4% in 2020 and 13.2% in 2030 (523 million smokers).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The estimates indicate the magnitude and trajectory of the global tobacco pandemic and of the impact the authors could expect if evidence-based tobacco control policies were applied immediately and universally throughout the world. As half of lifetime smokers die of tobacco-related diseases, if MPOWER were applied globally, within a few decades, many millions of premature tobacco-related deaths would be avoided.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mendez, D., Alshanqeety, O., Warner, K. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-05-09T02:00:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050147</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050147</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The potential impact of smoking control policies on future global smoking trends]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050314v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Video games and the next tobacco frontier: smoking in the Starcraft universe]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050314v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Video games provide rich, interactive environments suitable for tobacco promotion.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> The WHO-Framework Convention for Tobacco Control (WHO-FCTC) recommends comprehensive bans on &lsquo;...<I>all forms of commercial communication...with the aim, effect or likely effect of promoting a tobacco product or tobacco use</I>.&rsquo; WHO-FCTC implementation guidelines cover entertainment media,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b3">3</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="b4">4</cross-ref> yet surprisingly little is known about the importance of video games for promoting tobacco use.</p><p>Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty, produced by Activision Blizzard, Inc., Santa Monica, California, USA, was the most popular PC military game of 2010, selling 3&nbsp;million copies worldwide in the first month.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b5">5</cross-ref> The game presents 29 battles between humans and aliens, separated by brief scenes or cinematic &lsquo;shorts&rsquo;, which build a cohesive story, give gamers a pause and represent a reward for advancing in the game.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> During the game, the player has an eagle-eye perspective of the...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barrientos-Gutierrez, T., Barrientos-Gutierrez, I., Thrasher, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-05-01T02:01:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050314</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050314</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Video games and the next tobacco frontier: smoking in the Starcraft universe]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ad watch</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050283v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The influence of a smoking ban on the profitability of Belgian restaurants]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050283v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To examine whether the nationwide smoking ban, imposed in 2007, had an impact on the profitability of Belgian restaurants.</p></sec><sec><st>Data and methods</st><p>Objective financial reporting data on 1613 restaurants were analysed with return on assets as the outcome measure. The data were collected from the Belfirst database and cover the period 2004&ndash;2009. To assess the impact of the smoking ban, a differences-in-differences estimation method was used, with bars serving as the control group. The regression model was estimated, while controlling for firm-specific characteristics and unobserved firm-level heterogeneity.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The variable of interest is the interaction between the smoking ban dummy and the dummy for the treatment group. The coefficient of this variable is insignificant.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The adoption of the nationwide smoking ban did not affect the profitability of Belgian restaurants.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Schoenmaker, S., Van Cauwenberge, P., Vander Bauwhede, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-29T02:01:08-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050283</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050283</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The influence of a smoking ban on the profitability of Belgian restaurants]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050303v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reach and effectiveness of mailed nicotine replacement therapy for smokers: 6-month outcomes in a naturalistic exploratory study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050303v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>There are important inequities in smoker access to clinic-based smoking cessation services. Low barrier high-reach interventions are proposed as solutions to these inequities. Although effective, telephone quitlines, which provide multi-session counselling but no medication, have low utilization with high attrition. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), brief advice and self-help materials on quit attempts and 6-month quit rates in motivated smokers.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In this open-label naturalistic study, 14 000 treatments of 5&nbsp;weeks in duration of either nicotine patch (n=10 000) or nicotine gum (n=4000) were made available to all eligible adult smokers in Ontario, Canada, who called a toll-free number to register with the STOP (Smoking Treatment for Ontario Patients) Study and receive a single brief intervention. The primary outcome measure was self-reported abstinence rates at 6&nbsp;months post-treatment among STOP participants. These data were compared with quit rates that were reported in a concurrent no-intervention cohort of Ontario smokers matched for eligibility.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>16 405 callers were assessed and 13143 eligible participants were mailed a treatment package with 5&nbsp;weeks of NRT (choice of patch or gum), self-help and community resource materials. Among the 6261 participants who consented to follow-up, 2601 (42%) had complete follow-up data. Of those with complete follow-up data, the percentage reporting abstinence after 6&nbsp;months in the treatment cohort was 21.4%, relative to 11.6% in the no-intervention cohort (rate ratio of 1.84; 95% CI 1.79 to 1.89), with the 30-day point prevalence of 17.8% and 9.8% for the intervention and no-intervention cohorts, respectively (rate ratio 1.81; CI 1.75 to 1.87).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Provision of free NRT by mail following a brief telephone intervention is an effective strategy to reach and assist a large number of smokers making a quit attempt.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zawertailo, L., Dragonetti, R., Bondy, S. J., Victor, J. C., Selby, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-26T02:02:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050303</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050303</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reach and effectiveness of mailed nicotine replacement therapy for smokers: 6-month outcomes in a naturalistic exploratory study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050254v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cigarette packet warning labels can prevent relapse: findings from the International Tobacco Control 4-Country policy evaluation cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050254v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To investigate the links between health warning labels (WLs) on cigarette packets and relapse among recently quit smokers.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Prospective longitudinal cohort survey.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>Australia, Canada, the UK and the USA.</p></sec><sec><st>Participants</st><p>1936 recent ex-smokers (44.4% male) from one of the first six waves (2002&ndash;2007) of the International Tobacco Control 4-Country policy evaluation survey, who were followed up in the next wave.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>Whether participants had relapsed at follow-up (approximately 1&nbsp;year later).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In multivariate analysis, very frequent noticing of WLs among ex-smokers was associated with greater relapse 1&nbsp;year later (OR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.09, p&lt;0.01), but this effect disappeared after controlling for urges to smoke and self-efficacy (OR: 1.29, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.80, p=0.135). In contrast, reporting that WLs make staying quit &lsquo;a lot&rsquo; more likely (compared with &lsquo;not at all&rsquo; likely) was associated with a lower likelihood of relapse 1&nbsp;year later (OR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.86, p&lt;0.01) and this effect remained robust across all models tested, increasing in some.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This study provides the first longitudinal evidence that health warnings can help ex-smokers stay quit. Once the authors control for greater exposure to cigarettes, which is understandably predictive of relapse, WL effects are positive. However, it may be that ex-smokers need to actively use the health consequences that WLs highlight to remind them of their reasons for quitting, rather than it being something that happens automatically. Ex-smokers should be encouraged to use pack warnings to counter urges to resume smoking. Novel warnings may be more likely to facilitate this.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Partos, T. R., Borland, R., Yong, H.-H., Thrasher, J., Hammond, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-25T16:30:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050254</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050254</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cigarette packet warning labels can prevent relapse: findings from the International Tobacco Control 4-Country policy evaluation cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050324v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Support for a tobacco endgame and increased regulation of the tobacco industry among New Zealand smokers: results from a National Survey]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050324v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Aim</st><p>To examine the prevalence of smoker support for a ban on cigarette sales in 10&nbsp;years time and increased regulation of the tobacco industry and to investigate the independent associations of support for these measures.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The authors surveyed opinions among adult smokers in two survey waves (N=1376 and N=923) from the New Zealand arm of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey during 2007&ndash;2009. The authors report prevalence of support stratified by age, gender and ethnicity. The authors carried out multivariate analyses to identify significant associations among potential determinants (demographics, socioeconomic status, mental health and smoking-related beliefs and behaviours) of support.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Most New Zealand smokers supported greater regulation of the tobacco industry (65%) and more government action on tobacco (59%). Around half (46%) supported banning sales of cigarettes in 10&nbsp;years time, provided effective nicotine substitutes were available. In a fully adjusted model, significant associations with support for greater tobacco company regulation included Maori ethnicity, experience of financial stress and greater awareness about the harms of smoking. Significant associations with support for a ban on tobacco sales in 10&nbsp;years time included increasing area-based deprivation level, increasing intention to quit and greater concern about the health effects of smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The findings suggest that most smokers will support stronger government action to control the tobacco industry and that many support radical &lsquo;endgame&rsquo; approaches. Greater support among Maori, more deprived and possibly Pacific smokers, is an important finding, which could inform the design and implementation of new policies given the very high smoking prevalence among these groups and hence high priority for targeted tobacco control interventions. Perceived difficulties in gaining public support should not impede the introduction of rigorous tobacco control measures needed to achieve a tobacco-free New Zealand.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edwards, R., Wilson, N., Peace, J., Weerasekera, D., Thomson, G. W., Gifford, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-25T02:03:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050324</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050324</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Support for a tobacco endgame and increased regulation of the tobacco industry among New Zealand smokers: results from a National Survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050315v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cigarette advertising in the Republic of Korea: a case illustration of The One]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050315v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Korea is regarded as the world's eighth largest cigarette market, which reflects a sizeable population of the country and roughly 40% of Korean men being smokers.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> Moreover, Korea has been identified as one of the lowest (machine-measured) tar delivery markets in the world. According to internal corporate documentation from Philip Morris, Korean smokers prefer lower (machine-measured) tar and nicotine products that are complemented with promotional appeals relating to luxury.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b3">3</cross-ref> The primary marketing communication channels utilised by tobacco firms in Korea appear to be the print media (ie, business and fashion magazines with a predominantly male readership, given legislation, the National Health Promotion Act, which stipulates that cigarette advertisements cannot be directed overtly towards women), retail merchandising (eg, &lsquo;power-wall&rsquo; and sales-counter signage in convenience stores) and packaging.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref></p><p>The Korean tobacco industry is dominated by four firms: Korean Tomorrow and Global (KT&amp;G), Philip Morris...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dewhirst, T., Lee, W. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-19T02:02:43-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050315</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050315</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cigarette advertising in the Republic of Korea: a case illustration of The One]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ad watch</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050120v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictors of tobacco outlet density nationwide: a geographic analysis]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050120v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To elucidate how demographics of US Census tracts are related to tobacco outlet density (TOD).</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>The authors conducted a nationwide assessment of the association between socio-demographic US Census indicators and the density of tobacco outlets across all 64 909 census tracts in the continental USA. Retail tobacco outlet addresses were determined through North American Industry Classification System codes, and density per 1000 population was estimated for each census tract. Independent variables included urban/rural; proportion of the population that was black, Hispanic and women with low levels of education; proportion of families living in poverty and median household size.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In a multivariate analysis, there was a higher TOD per 1000 population in urban than in rural locations. Furthermore, higher TOD was associated with larger proportions of blacks, Hispanics, women with low levels of education and with smaller household size. Urban&ndash;rural differences in the relation between demographics and TOD were found in all socio-demographic categories, with the exception of poverty, but were particularly striking for Hispanics, for whom the relation with TOD was 10 times larger in urban compared with rural census tracts.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The findings suggest that tobacco outlets are more concentrated in areas where people with higher risk for negative health outcomes reside. Future studies should examine the relation between TOD and smoking, smoking cessation, as well as disease rates.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez, D., Carlos, H. A., Adachi-Mejia, A. M., Berke, E. M., Sargent, J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-04T02:04:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050120</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050120</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictors of tobacco outlet density nationwide: a geographic analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050353v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[South Korea: 'KT&G Sangsang Univ.' employs education for marketing]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050353v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Ever since Korea opened its market to the transnational tobacco companies in 1988, KT&amp;G (Korea Tomorrow &amp; Global), the now-privatised state tobacco monopoly, has steadily lost market share. Using aggressive and creative marketing tactics, the transnational tobacco companies have increased their market share in Korea from 2.9% in 1988 to 41.7% in 2009.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> Korea restricts cigarette advertising and marketing, prohibiting outdoor signage, free sampling outdoors, and advertisements on TV and radio and in newspapers, while allowing cigarette promotions in cigarette retail shops and magazines (except magazines directed at women or youth) and sponsorship of social, cultural, musical, athletic and other specific events (except events directed at women or youth).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref></p><p>In 2003, KT&amp;G created &lsquo;KT&amp;G Sangsang Univ.&rsquo; (KT&amp;G &#xC0C1;&#xC0C1; Univ.). The word &lsquo;Sangsang&rsquo; (&#xC0C1;&#xC0C1;) means &lsquo;imagination&rsquo;. Although it is called a &lsquo;Univ.&rsquo;, KT&amp;G Sangsang Univ. is not a university; it appears to be a part of KT&amp;G. There...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, S., Glantz, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-30T02:01:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050353</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050353</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[South Korea: 'KT&G Sangsang Univ.' employs education for marketing]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Industry watch</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050297v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is the socioeconomic gap in childhood exposure to secondhand smoke widening or narrowing?]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050297v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>The social gradient in smoking contributes substantially to the health gap between the rich and poor. Passive smoking by children is associated with increased risk of more severe asthma, respiratory diseases and infections, middle ear disease and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. This study examined trends in the social gradient of children's exposure to secondhand smoke in Australian households between 2001 and 2010.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Series of cross-sectional national household surveys.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Between 2001 and 2010, the proportion of Australian households containing a child aged under 15&nbsp;years and a smoker declined by 22%. However, there was no change in the most disadvantaged households, with half of these households still containing at least one smoker in 2010. There was a social gradient in outdoor smoking in all survey years but the prevalence of outdoor-only smoking increased in all socioeconomic groups by around 50% between 2001 and 2010. The presence of a child aged 5&nbsp;years or younger in the household increased the chances that smokers only smoked outdoors.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Children's exposure to indoor smoking in households that contain a smoker is declining in all socioeconomic groups but the social class differentials in such exposure remain. The proportion of children who live with a smoker declined in all social groups except the most disadvantaged households, with half of these households still containing a smoker in 2010. More needs to be done to reduce secondhand smoke exposure of children in socially disadvantaged households.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gartner, C. E., Hall, W. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-30T02:01:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050297</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050297</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is the socioeconomic gap in childhood exposure to secondhand smoke widening or narrowing?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050350v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Indoor air quality in Virginia waterpipe cafes]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050350v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>A revised indoor air quality law has been implemented in Virginia to protect the public from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke exposure. This legislation contains exemptions that include allowances for smoking in a room that is structurally separated and separately ventilated. The objective of the current study was to examine the impact of this law on air quality in waterpipe caf&eacute;s, as well as to compare the air quality in these caf&eacute;s to restaurants that allow cigarette smoking and those where no smoking is permitted.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Indoor air quality in 28 venues (17 waterpipe caf&eacute;s, five cigarette smoking-permitted restaurants and six smoke-free restaurants (five with valid data)) in Virginia was assessed during 4 March to 27 May 2011. Real-time measurements of particulate matter (PM) with 2.5&nbsp;&mu;m aerodynamic diameter or smaller (PM<SUB>2.5</SUB>) were obtained and occupant behaviour/venue characteristics were assessed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The highest mean PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentration was observed for waterpipe caf&eacute; smoking rooms (374&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, n=17) followed by waterpipe caf&eacute; non-smoking rooms (123&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, n=11), cigarette smoking-permitted restaurant smoking rooms (119&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, n=5), cigarette smoking-permitted restaurant non-smoking rooms (26&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, n=5) and smoke-free restaurants (9&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, n=5). Smoking density was positively correlated with PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> across smoking rooms and the smoke-free restaurants. In addition, PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> was positively correlated between smoking and non-smoking rooms of venues.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations observed among the waterpipe caf&eacute;s sampled here indicated air quality in the waterpipe caf&eacute; smoking rooms was worse than restaurant rooms in which cigarette smoking was permitted, and state-required non-smoking rooms in waterpipe caf&eacute;s may expose patrons and employees to PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations above national and international air quality standards. Reducing the health risks of secondhand smoke may require smoke-free establishments in which tobacco smoking sources such as water pipes are, like cigarettes, prohibited.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cobb, C. O., Vansickel, A. R., Blank, M. D., Jentink, K., Travers, M. J., Eissenberg, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-24T02:01:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050350</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050350</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Indoor air quality in Virginia waterpipe cafes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050129v3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A prospective cohort study challenging the effectiveness of population-based medical intervention for smoking cessation]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050129v3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To examine the population effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs), either with or without professional counselling, and provide evidence needed to better inform healthcare coverage decisions.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A prospective cohort study was conducted in three waves on a probability sample of 787 Massachusetts adult smokers who had recently quit smoking. The baseline response rate was 46%; follow-up was completed with 56% of the designated cohort at wave 2 and 68% at wave 3. The relationship between relapse to smoking at follow-up interviews and assistance used, including NRT with or without professional help, was examined.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>About one-fourth of recent quitters at each wave reported to have relapsed by the subsequent interview. Odds of relapse were unaffected by use of NRT for &gt;6&nbsp;weeks either with (p=0.117) or without (p=0.159) professional counselling and were highest among prior heavily dependent persons who reported NRT use for any length of time without professional counselling (OR 2.68).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This study finds that persons who have quit smoking relapsed at equivalent rates, whether or not they used NRT to help them in their quit attempts. Cessation medication policy should be made in the larger context of public health, and increasing individual treatment coverage should not be at the expense of population evidence-based programmes and policies.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alpert, H. R., Connolly, G. N., Biener, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-23T02:03:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050129</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050129</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A prospective cohort study challenging the effectiveness of population-based medical intervention for smoking cessation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050035v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pictorial warnings on tobacco products at the point of sale in India]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050035v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>According to the 2009 Government of India notification, all tobacco products should carry pictorial messages<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> and a revised statutory warning &lsquo;Smoking kills and tobacco causes cancer&rsquo;, on at least 40%<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> of the principal display areas. For non-compliance, the dealer or seller can be fined up to Rs 1000 (~US$20) with or without a 1-year imprisonment. If the offence is repeated, the fine amount will be raised to Rs 3000 (~US$60) with or without a 2-year imprisonment.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b3">3</cross-ref> There was no explicit mention in the law that warnings were to be visible at the point of sale. Although the law requires that the warnings cannot be severed or covered when the package is sealed or opened, there was no explicit requirement that the warnings be made visible at the point of sale.</p><p>The aim of this study was to examine the visibility of tobacco products' pictorial health...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aghi, M., Oswal, K., Pednekar, M., Cyril, A., Biswas, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-16T02:01:46-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050035</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050035</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pictorial warnings on tobacco products at the point of sale in India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050221v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Point-of-purchase tobacco access and advertisement in food stores]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050221v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A great majority of tobacco retailers are food stores, such as convenience stores,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> which provide underage youth easy access to tobacco products.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> Largely unregulated tobacco point-of-purchase advertisement in food stores can entice experimental smoking in adolescents,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b3">3</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="b4">4</cross-ref> and expose young children to crafted tobacco brand images.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b5">5</cross-ref> Food stores could offer unique opportunities for policy-based tobacco control, as multiple government agencies regulate them through sanitary inspection, taxation, licensing (eg, lottery tickets sales) and nutrition assistance programmes.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b6">6</cross-ref> This study identifies food-store characteristics associated with point-of-purchase youth tobacco access and advertisement in order to formulate food-store-specific tobacco control strategies.</p><p>All food stores in downtown Albany, New York, were identified through government lists of retailers and community canvassing. We defined a food store as a retail outlet that sold at least one of the following items: milk, bread, fruits or vegetables.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b6">6</cross-ref>...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hosler, A. S., Kammer, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-12T01:01:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050221</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050221</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Point-of-purchase tobacco access and advertisement in food stores]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050199v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of stick design features on perceptions of characteristics of cigarettes]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050199v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To examine the extent (if any) that cigarette stick dimension, tipping paper design and other decorative design/branding have on Australian smokers' perceptions of those cigarettes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>An internet survey of 160 young Australian adult ever-smokers who were shown computer images of three sets of cigarette sticks&mdash;five sticks of different lengths and diameters (set A), five sticks with different tipping paper design (set B) and four sticks of different decorative design (set C). Branding was a between-subjects randomised condition for set C. For each set, respondents ranked sticks on most and least attractive, highest and lowest quality and strongest and weakest taste.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Cigarette sticks were perceived as different on attractiveness, quality and strength of taste. Standard stick length/diameter was perceived as the most attractive and highest quality stick, with men more inclined to rate a slim stick as less attractive. A stick with a cork-patterned tipping paper and a gold band was seen as most attractive, of highest quality and strongest in taste compared to other tipping designs. Branded sticks were seen as more attractive, higher in quality and stronger tasting than non-branded designs, regardless of brand, although the effects were stronger for a prestige compared with a budget brand.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Characteristics of the cigarette stick affect smokers' perceptions of the attributes of those cigarettes and thus are a potential means by which product differentiation can occur. A comprehensive policy to eliminate promotional aspects of cigarette design and packaging needs to include rules about stick design.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borland, R., Savvas, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-06T02:02:52-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050199</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050199</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of stick design features on perceptions of characteristics of cigarettes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050148v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Availability, accessibility and promotion of smokeless tobacco in a low-income area of Mumbai]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050148v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To examine the role of accessibility, product availability, promotions and social norms promotion, factors contributing to the use of smokeless tobacco (ST) products in a typical low-income community of Mumbai community using Geographic Information System (GIS), observational and interview methodologies and to assess implementation of Cigatettes and other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) legislation.</p></sec><sec><st>Rationale</st><p>In India, the third largest producer of tobacco in the world, smokeless tobacco products are used by men, women and children. New forms of highly addictive packaged smokeless tobacco products such as gutkha are inexpensive and rates of use are higher in low-income urban communities. These products are known to increase rates of oral cancer and to affect reproductive health and fetal development.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The study used a mixed methods approach combining ethnographic and GIS mapping, observation and key informant interviews. Accessibility was defined as density, clustering and distance of residents and schools to tobacco outlets. Observation and interview data with shop owners and community residents produced an archive of products, information on shop histories and income and normative statements.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Spatial analysis showed high density of outlets with variations across subcommunities. All residents can reach tobacco outlets within 30&ndash;100 feet of their homes. Normative statements from 55 respondents indicate acceptance of men's, women's and children's use, and selling smokeless tobacco is reported to be an important form of income generation for some households. Multilevel tobacco control and prevention strategies including tobacco education, community norms change, licensing and surveillance and alternative income generation strategies are needed to reduce accessibility and availability of smokeless tobacco use.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schensul, J. J., Nair, S., Bilgi, S., Cromley, E., Kadam, V., Mello, S. D., Donta, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-02T02:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050148</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050148</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Availability, accessibility and promotion of smokeless tobacco in a low-income area of Mumbai]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050253v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A comparison of cigarette- and hookah-related videos on YouTube]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050253v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>YouTube is now the second most visited site on the internet. The authors aimed to compare characteristics of and messages conveyed by cigarette- and hookah-related videos on YouTube.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Systematic search procedures yielded 66 cigarette-related and 61 hookah-related videos. After three trained qualitative researchers used an iterative approach to develop and refine definitions for the coding of variables, two of them independently coded each video for content including positive and negative associations with smoking and major content type.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Median view counts were 606 884 for cigarettes-related videos and 102 307 for hookah-related videos (p&lt;0.001). However, the number of comments per 1000 views was significantly lower for cigarette-related videos than for hookah-related videos (1.6 vs 2.5, p=0.003). There was no significant difference in the number of &lsquo;like&rsquo; designations per 100 reactions (91 vs 87, p=0.39). Cigarette-related videos were less likely than hookah-related videos to portray tobacco use in a positive light (24% vs 92%, p&lt;0.001). In addition, cigarette-related videos were more likely to be of high production quality (42% vs 5%, p&lt;0.001), to mention short-term consequences (50% vs 18%, p&lt;0.001) and long-term consequences (44% vs 2%, p&lt;0.001) of tobacco use, to contain explicit antismoking messages (39% vs 0%, p&lt;0.001) and to provide specific information on how to quit tobacco use (21% vs 0%, p&lt;0.001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Although internet user-generated videos related to cigarette smoking often acknowledge harmful consequences and provide explicit antismoking messages, hookah-related videos do not. It may be valuable for public health programmes to correct common misconceptions regarding hookah use.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carroll, M. V., Shensa, A., Primack, B. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-23T02:01:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050253</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050253</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A comparison of cigarette- and hookah-related videos on YouTube]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050176v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social smokers' management of conflicted identities]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050176v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Although social smoking has increased among young adults, it remains a poorly understood behaviour. The authors explored how young adult social smokers viewed and defined smoking and the strategies they used to reconcile their conflicting smoker and non-smoker identities. The authors also examined alcohol's role in facilitating social smoking and investigated measures that would decouple drinking and smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The authors conducted 13 in-depth interviews with young adult social smokers aged between 19 and 25&nbsp;years and used thematic analysis to interpret the transcripts.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The authors identified four key themes: the demarcation strategies social smokers used to avoid classifying themselves as smokers, social smoking as a tactic that ameliorates the risk of alienation, alcohol as a catalyst of social smoking and the difficulty participants experienced in reconciling their identity as non-smokers who smoke.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Although social smokers regret smoking, their retrospective remorse was insufficient to promote behaviour change, and environmental modifications appear more likely to promote smoke-free behaviours among social smokers. Participants strongly supported extending the smoke-free areas outside bars, a measure that would help decouple their alcohol-fuelled behaviours from the identity to which they aspire.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoek, J., Maubach, N., Stevenson, R., Gendall, P., Edwards, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-20T16:30:56-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050176</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050176</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social smokers' management of conflicted identities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050134v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free policy in Uruguay]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050134v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Stimulated by the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, many countries in Latin America adopted comprehensive smoke-free policies. In March 2006, Uruguay became the first Latin American country to adopt 100% smoke-free national legislation, which ended smoking in all indoor public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars. The objective of this study was to evaluate trends in hospital admissions for cardiovascular disease 2&nbsp;years before and 2&nbsp;years after the policy was implemented in Uruguay.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Reports of hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (International Classification of Disease-10 I21) from 37 hospitals (79% of all hospital admissions in the country), representing the period 2&nbsp;years before and 2&nbsp;years after the adoption of a nationwide smoke-free policy in Uruguay (between 1 March 2004 and 29 February 2008), were reviewed. A time series analysis was undertaken to compare the average monthly number of events of hospital admission for AMI before and after the smoke-free law.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 7949 hospital admissions for AMI were identified during the 4-year study period. Two years after the smoke-free policy was enacted, hospital admissions for AMI fell by 22%. The same pattern and roughly the same magnitude of reduction in AMI admissions were observed for patients seen in public and private hospitals, men, women and people aged 40&ndash;65&nbsp;years and older than 65&nbsp;years.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The national smoke-free policy implemented in Uruguay in 2006 was associated with a significant reduction in hospital admissions for AMI.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebrie, E. M., Sandoya, E., Hyland, A., Bianco, E., Glantz, S. A., Cummings, K. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-15T02:02:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050134</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050134</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free policy in Uruguay]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050231v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Towards smoke-free rental cars: an evaluation of voluntary smoking restrictions in California]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050231v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Some car rental companies in California and other states in the USA have established non-smoking policies for their vehicles. This study examined the effectiveness of these policies in maintaining smoke-free rental cars.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A stratified random sample of 250 cars (non-smoker, smoker and unknown designation) was examined in San Diego County, California, USA. Dust, surfaces and the air of each vehicle cabin were sampled and analysed for residual tobacco smoke pollutants (also known as thirdhand smoke (THS)), and each car was inspected for visual and olfactory signs of tobacco use. Customer service representatives were informally interviewed about smoking policies.</p></sec><sec><st>Findings</st><p>A majority of putative non-smoker cars had nicotine in dust, on surfaces, in air and other signs of tobacco use. Independent of a car's smoking status, older and higher mileage cars had higher levels of THS pollution in dust and on surfaces (p&lt;0.05), indicating that pollutants accumulated over time. Compared with smoker cars, non-smoker cars had lower levels of nicotine on surfaces (p&lt;0.01) and in dust (p&lt;0.05) and lower levels of nicotine (p&lt;0.05) and 3-ethynylpyridine (p&lt;0.05) in the air. Non-smoking signage in cars was associated with lower levels of THS pollutants in dust and air (p&lt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Existing policies and practices were successful in lowering THS pollution levels in non-smoker cars compared with smoker cars. However, policies failed in providing smoke-free rental cars; THS levels were not as low as those found in private cars of non-smokers with in-car smoking bans. Major obstacles include inconsistent communication with customers and the lack of routine monitoring and enforcement strategies. Strengthening policies and their implementation would allow car rental companies to reduce costs, better serve their customers and make a constructive contribution to tobacco control efforts.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt, G. E., Fortmann, A. L., Quintana, P. J. E., Zakarian, J. M., Romero, R. A., Chatfield, D. A., Hoh, E., Hovell, M. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-15T02:01:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050231</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050231</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Towards smoke-free rental cars: an evaluation of voluntary smoking restrictions in California]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050131v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of national smoke-free legislation on home smoking bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050131v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To measure changes in prevalence and predictors of home smoking bans (HSBs) among smokers in four European countries after the implementation of national smoke-free legislation.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Two waves of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys, which is a prospective panel study. Pre- and post-legislation data were used from Ireland, France, Germany and the Netherlands. Two pre-legislation waves from the UK were used as control.</p></sec><sec><st>Participants</st><p>4634 respondents from the intervention countries and 1080 from the control country completed both baseline and follow-up and were included in the present analyses.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Multiple logistic regression models to identify predictors of having or of adopting a total HSB, and Generalised Estimating Equation models to compare patterns of change after implementation of smoke-free legislation to a control country without such legislation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Most smokers had at least partial smoking restrictions in their home, but the proportions varied significantly between countries. After implementation of national smoke-free legislation, the proportion of smokers with a total HSB increased significantly in all four countries. Among continuing smokers, the number of cigarettes smoked per day either remained stable or decreased significantly. Multiple logistic regression models indicated that having a young child in the household and supporting smoking bans in bars were important correlates of having a pre-legislation HSB. Prospective predictors of imposing a HSB between survey waves were planning to quit smoking, supporting a total smoking ban in bars and the birth of a child. Generalised Estimating Equation models indicated that the change in total HSB in the intervention countries was greater than that in the control country.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The findings suggest that smoke-free legislation does not lead to more smoking in smokers' homes. On the contrary, our findings demonstrate that smoke-free legislation may stimulate smokers to establish total smoking bans in their homes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mons, U., Nagelhout, G. E., Allwright, S., Guignard, R., van den Putte, B., Willemsen, M. C., Fong, G. T., Brenner, H., Potschke-Langer, M., Breitling, L. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-13T16:31:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050131</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050131</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of national smoke-free legislation on home smoking bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050169v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The relationship between regular second-hand smoke exposure at home and indictors of lung function in healthy school boys in Khartoum]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050169v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke at home has been linked to many complications, including impaired lung ventilatory function; however, there is great variation in intensity of this complication between individuals of different countries. The aim of this study was to determine relationship between regular second-hand smoke exposure at home and the spirometric derived values forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV<SUB>1</SUB>), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow 50% and peak expiratory flow rate in healthy school boys in Khartoum.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A total of 135 male school pupils were selected randomly from three governmental primary schools for boys in Khartoum. Inclusion criteria were healthy school pupil, 9&ndash;14&nbsp;years old, not active smoker, either exposed regularly to cigarette smoke at home since birth or not exposed to cigarette smoke or any other type of smoke inside or outside the house. All spirometric measurements were performed using Clement Clarke All-flow Spirometer.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>69 school pupils were exposed regularly to second-hand smoke at home, whereas 66 pupils were not. Fathers were responsible for 67.5% of second-hand smoke at home; relatives for 30% and mothers for 2.5%. Mean FVC (&plusmn;SD) was 2.21 &plusmn;0.57 l for the exposed pupils and 2.41 &plusmn;0.35 l for the non-exposed, showing reduction by about 8%. Mean FEV<SUB>1</SUB> (mean &plusmn;SD) was 2.03 &plusmn;0.46 l for the exposed and 2.20 &plusmn;0.42 l for the non-exposed, indicating reduction by about 7%. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p&lt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Regular second-hand smoke exposure at home causes significant reduction in FVC and FEV<SUB>1</SUB> by about 7%&ndash;8% in school pupils in Khartoum.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Merghani, T. H., Saeed, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-10T02:06:06-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050169</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050169</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The relationship between regular second-hand smoke exposure at home and indictors of lung function in healthy school boys in Khartoum]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050203v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Secondhand tobacco smoke: an occupational hazard for smoking and non-smoking bar and nightclub employees]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050203v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In the absence of comprehensive smoking bans in public places, bars and nightclubs have the highest concentrations of secondhand tobacco smoke, posing a serious health risk for workers in these venues.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To assess exposure of bar and nightclub employees to secondhand smoke, including non-smoking and smoking employees.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Between 2007 and 2009, the authors recruited approximately 10 venues per city and up to five employees per venue in 24 cities in the Americas, Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa. Air nicotine concentrations were measured for 7&nbsp;days in 238 venues. To evaluate personal exposure to secondhand smoke, hair nicotine concentrations were also measured for 625 non-smoking and 311 smoking employees (N=936).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Median (IQR) air nicotine concentrations were 3.5 (1.5&ndash;8.5) &mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> and 0.2 (0.1&ndash;0.7) &mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> in smoking and smoke-free venues, respectively. Median (IQR) hair nicotine concentrations were 6.0 (1.6&ndash;16.0) ng/mg and 1.7 (0.5&ndash;5.5) ng/mg in smoking and non-smoking employees, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, education, living with a smoker, hair treatment and region, a twofold increase in air nicotine concentrations was associated with a 30% (95% CI 23% to 38%) increase in hair nicotine concentrations in non-smoking employees and with a 10% (2% to 19%) increase in smoking employees.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Occupational exposure to secondhand smoke, assessed by air nicotine, resulted in elevated concentrations of hair nicotine among non-smoking and smoking bar and nightclub employees. The high levels of airborne nicotine found in bars and nightclubs and the contribution of this exposure to employee hair nicotine concentrations support the need for legislation measures that ensure complete protection from secondhand smoke in these venues.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, M. R., Wipfli, H., Shahrir, S., Avila-Tang, E., Samet, J. M., Breysse, P. N., Navas-Acien, A., FAMRI Bar Study Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-24T00:01:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050203</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050203</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Secondhand tobacco smoke: an occupational hazard for smoking and non-smoking bar and nightclub employees]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050128v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of smoking on use of antibacterials: a 9-year follow-up study of 24 000 working-aged Finns]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050128v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Previous studies indicate an association between tobacco smoking and infectious diseases. However, large population-based follow-up studies including both accurate measurements of smoking behaviour and confounders and a reliable register-based follow-up of infections are lacking.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To examine the effect of smoking on use of antibacterials as an indicator of infections among working-aged population.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The participants of the population-based Health and Social Support Study (24 283 working-aged Finns) were followed up for 9&nbsp;years. Information on smoking behaviour and confounders was obtained from a questionnaire in 1998. Number of antibacterial purchases was obtained from the National-Drug-Prescription-Register. The association between smoking and use of antibacterials was analysed using multinomial regression models.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A graded association between lifetime smoking as measured by pack-years and use of antibacterials was found. Compared with never-smokers, the age-adjusted OR for multiple use of antibacterials among smokers with 12 or more pack-years was 2.32 (95% CI 1.91 to 2.82) in women and 1.45 (95% CI 1.23 to 1.71) in men. The associations remained after adjustment for the following confounding factors: use of alcohol, body mass index, physical activity, socioeconomic status, hard physical work, life satisfaction, disability pension and dyspnoea.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Smoking is associated with increased use of antibacterials. Infectious periods experienced by patients should be used as an opportunity to encourage smoking cessation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koskenvuo, K., Huunan-Seppala, A., Keistinen, T., Autti-Ramo, I., Laitinen, L. A., Koskenvuo, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-23T05:44:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050128</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050128</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of smoking on use of antibacterials: a 9-year follow-up study of 24 000 working-aged Finns]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050209v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How online sales and promotion of snus contravenes current European Union legislation]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050209v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Context</st><p>The European Union (EU) Tobacco Products Directive that bans sales of snus (a form of oral tobacco) in EU countries other than Sweden is currently under review. Major tobacco companies favour the ban being overturned. This study aims to explore compliance with the current ban on snus sales and examines the conduct of online snus vendors, including their compliance with two other EU Directives on excise and tobacco advertising and Swedish legislation banning sales of snus outside Sweden.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>To determine who is currently distributing snus via the internet in the EU, searches were carried out in Google, followed by searches in the WHOIS and Amadeus databases. Five online test purchases of snus were made in each of 10 EU Member States using a standardised protocol. Feedback from the test purchases and further analysis of the websites accessed for test purchases were used to critically examine snus retailers' conduct.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The majority of online vendors operate from Sweden and target non-Swedish EU citizens. Test purchases were successfully made in all 10 EU Member States; of 43 orders placed, only two failed. Age verification relied only on self-report. The majority of sales applied Swedish taxes, contrary to EU requirements. Copious sales promotion activities, many price based, are incorporated in these websites contravening the EU regulation, and three test purchases were delivered with gifts.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Snus is currently being sold on the single market via the internet in contravention of Swedish legislation and three EU Directives. The apparent willingness of the tobacco industry to contravene EU and Swedish legislation and profit from unlawful sales raises questions about their status as stakeholders in consultations on future policy developments. The findings highlight how national and regional tobacco control legislation can be undermined in an increasingly globalised world.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peeters, S., Gilmore, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-21T06:25:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050209</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050209</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How online sales and promotion of snus contravenes current European Union legislation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050130v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The impact of changes in tobacco control funding on healthcare expenditures in California, 2012-2016]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050130v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>This study presents estimates of the impact of changes in California tobacco control funding on healthcare expenditures for 2012&ndash;2016 under four funding scenarios.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Smoking prevalence is projected using a cointegrated time series regression model. Smoking-attributable healthcare expenditures are estimated with econometric models that use a prevalence-based annual cost approach and an excess cost methodology.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>If tobacco control spending in California remains at the current level of 5 cents per pack (base case), smoking prevalence will increase from 12.2% in 2011 to 12.7% in 2016. If funding is cut in half, smoking prevalence will increase to 12.9% in 2016 and smoking-attributable healthcare expenditures will be $307 million higher over this time period than in the base case. If the tobacco tax is increased by $1.00 per pack with 20 cents per pack allocated to tobacco control, smoking prevalence will fall to 10.4% in 2016 and healthcare expenditures between 2012 and 2016 will be $3.3 billion less than in the base case. If funding is increased to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended level, smoking prevalence will fall to 10.6% in 2016 and there will be savings in healthcare expenditures of $4.7 billion compared to the base case due to the large reduction in heavy smoking prevalence.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>California's highly successful tobacco control program will become less effective over time because inflation is eroding the 5 cents per pack currently allocated to tobacco control activities. More aggressive action needs to be taken to reduce smoking prevalence and healthcare expenditures in the future.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max, W., Sung, H.-Y., Lightwood, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-17T11:46:17-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050130</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050130</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The impact of changes in tobacco control funding on healthcare expenditures in California, 2012-2016]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050144v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exposure to different sources of second-hand smoke during pregnancy and its effect on urinary cotinine and tobacco-specific nitrosamine (NNAL) concentrations]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050144v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>To date, no research exists on the role that different sources of exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) have on 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) and nicotine uptake, assessed via urinary 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) and cotinine concentrations of non-smoking pregnant women, nor the differences in NNAL concentrations among pregnant women who quit smoking in comparison to those who do not.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>As part of the &lsquo;Rhea&rsquo; mother childbirth cohort in Crete, Greece, 1317 mother&ndash;child pairs were followed-up until delivery, while among a subsample, maternal urine was assessed for its NNAL (n=117) and cotinine concentrations (n=377).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Pregnant women who continued to smoke during pregnancy were found to have geometric mean urinary NNAL concentrations of 0.612&nbsp;pmol/ml, in comparison to the 0.100&nbsp;pmol/ml of ex-smokers and 0.0795&nbsp;pmol/ml of non-smokers exposed to SHS. Exposure to SHS in the home was associated with a 4.40&nbsp;ng/ml increase in urinary cotinine levels, while reported exposure to SHS in cars was associated with an even higher (8.73&nbsp;ng/ml) increase in cotinine concentrations and was strongly related to NNAL concentrations. Exposure to SHS in the workplace and in public places was also shown to increase cotinine and NNAL concentrations. The NNAL:cotinine ratio was found to be higher among pregnant women who were exposed to SHS but did not smoke (p&lt;0.001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Using cotinine levels as an indicator of NNK, exposure due to SHS during pregnancy leads to an underestimation of exposure to NNK uptake. Moreover, each source of exposure contributed to the increase in cotinine levels, indicating the importance of avoiding SHS exposure from any source.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vardavas, C. I., Fthenou, E., Patelarou, E., Bagkeris, E., Murphy, S., Hecht, S. S., Connolly, G. N., Chatzi, L., Kogevinas, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-17T11:46:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050144</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050144</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exposure to different sources of second-hand smoke during pregnancy and its effect on urinary cotinine and tobacco-specific nitrosamine (NNAL) concentrations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050124v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Who receives prescriptions for smoking cessation medications? An association rule mining analysis using a large primary care database]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050124v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Aims</st><p>To use association rule mining methods to investigate prescribing of smoking cessation medication in the UK primary care and to identify the characteristics of numerically important groups of patients who typically do, or do not, receive cessation therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>An association rule mining study using The Health Improvement Network Database.</p></sec><sec><st>Settings and participants</st><p>282 433 patients aged 16&nbsp;years and over from 419 UK general practices, who were registered with the practice throughout 2008 and recorded as a current smoker during that year.</p></sec><sec><st>Outcome</st><p>Prescription for any type of smoking cessation medications in 2008 (nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion or varenicline).</p></sec><sec><st>Variables</st><p>Age, gender, lifestyle indicators and co-morbidity.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the current smokers, 37 731 (13.4%) were given prescriptions for smoking cessation treatment during 2008. Prescriptions were particularly likely to be given to women, those aged 31&ndash;60&nbsp;years, and people with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and depression. On the contrary, of patients with dementia, with alcohol intake over recommended levels, atrial fibrillation or chronic kidney disease was extremely unlikely to be prescribed a smoking cessation medication. However, the largest group of patients who did not receive therapy was young and otherwise healthy individuals.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This novel approach identified sizeable and easily definable groups of patients who are systematically failing to receive support for smoking cessation in primary care. Association rule mining can be used to identify key numerically important groups at high or low risk of receiving treatment and hence potentially to improve healthcare delivery.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huang, Y., Britton, J., Hubbard, R., Lewis, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-13T07:29:58-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050124</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050124</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Who receives prescriptions for smoking cessation medications? An association rule mining analysis using a large primary care database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050217v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between exposure to secondhand smoke and sleep bruxism in children: a randomised control study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050217v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) is a serious public health threat and represents a preventable cause of morbidity among children. Sleep bruxism is characterised by teeth grinding or clenching movements during sleep and may begin in adulthood as well as in childhood.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To investigate the association between SHS exposure and sleep bruxism in children.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Sleep bruxism was investigated in 498 children (mean age: 9.2&plusmn;1.9). Family members were interviewed and asked whether they smoked in the presence of their children. Children were classified according to their exposure to SHS into heavily, moderately, lightly and occasionally exposed. Children with sleep bruxism and exposed to SHS were randomly divided into two groups: children in group 1 were not exposed to SHS for 6&nbsp;months, whereas children in group 2 were.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-one per cent of the children under investigation suffered from bruxism. Among them, 116 children (76%) were exposed to SHS. Exposed children showed a higher risk of sleep bruxism (p&lt;0.05). After 6&nbsp;months, sleep bruxism was found in 38% and in 90% of children, in the first and in the second group, respectively, this difference was statistically significant (p&lt;0.05). In group 1, changes were statistically significant in those who were heavily and moderately exposed (p&lt;0.05) but not in those lightly and occasionally exposed (p&gt;0.05). In group 2, changes were not statistically significant (p&gt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The findings showed that high and moderate exposure to SHS is associated with sleep bruxism in children.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montaldo, L., Montaldo, P., Caredda, E., D'Arco, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-13T07:29:58-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050217</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050217</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between exposure to secondhand smoke and sleep bruxism in children: a randomised control study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050149v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Local Nordic tobacco interests collaborated with multinational companies to maintain a united front and undermine tobacco control policies]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050149v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To analyse how local tobacco companies in the Nordic countries, individually and through National Manufacturers' Associations, cooperated with British American Tobacco and Philip Morris in denying the health hazards of smoking and undermining tobacco control.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Analysis of tobacco control policies in the Nordic countries and tobacco industry documents.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Nordic countries were early adopters of tobacco control policies. The multinational tobacco companies recognised this fact and mobilised to oppose these policies, in part because of fear that they would set unfavourable precedents. Since at least 1972, the Nordic tobacco companies were well informed about and willing to participate in the multinational companies activities to obscure the health dangers of smoking and secondhand smoke and to oppose tobacco control policies. Cooperation between multinational companies, Nordic national manufacturer associations and local companies ensured a united front on smoking and health issues in the Nordic area that was consistent with the positions that the multinational companies were taking. This cooperation delayed smoke-free laws and undermined other tobacco control measures.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Local tobacco companies worked with multinational companies to undermine tobacco control in distant and small Nordic markets because of concern that pioneering policies initiated in Nordic countries would spread to bigger market areas. Claims by the local Nordic companies that they were not actively involved with the multinationals are not supported by the facts. These results also demonstrate that the industry appreciates the global importance of both positive and negative public health precedents in tobacco control.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hiilamo, H., Glantz, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-11T15:24:59-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050149</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050149</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Local Nordic tobacco interests collaborated with multinational companies to maintain a united front and undermine tobacco control policies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050197v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Secondhand smoke in cars: assessing children's potential exposure during typical journey conditions]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050197v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To measure levels of fine particulate matter in the rear passenger area of cars where smoking does and does not take place during typical real-life car journeys.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Fine particulate matter (PM<SUB>2.5</SUB>) was used as a marker of secondhand smoke and was measured and logged every minute of each car journey undertaken by smoking and non-smoking study participants. The monitoring instrument was located at breathing zone height in the rear seating area of each car. Participants were asked to carry out their normal driving and smoking behaviours over a 3-day period.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>17 subjects (14 smokers) completed a total of 104 journeys (63 smoking journeys). Journeys averaged 27&nbsp;min (range 5&ndash;70&nbsp;min). PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> levels averaged 85 and 7.4&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> during smoking and non-smoking car journeys, respectively. During smoking journeys, peak PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations averaged 385&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, with one journey measuring over 880&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>. PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations were strongly linked to rate of smoking (cigarettes per minute). Use of forced ventilation and opening of car windows were very common during smoking journeys, but PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations were still found to exceed WHO indoor air quality guidance (25&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>) at some point in the measurement period during all smoking journeys.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations in cars where smoking takes place are high and greatly exceed international indoor air quality guidance values. Children exposed to these levels of fine particulate are likely to suffer ill-health effects. There are increasing numbers of countries legislating against smoking in cars and such measures may be appropriate to prevent the exposure of children to these high levels of secondhand smoke.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semple, S., Apsley, A., Galea, K. S., MacCalman, L., Friel, B., Snelgrove, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-04T14:39:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050197</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050197</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Secondhand smoke in cars: assessing children's potential exposure during typical journey conditions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050139v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patterns of cognitive dissonance-reducing beliefs among smokers: a longitudinal analysis from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050139v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>The purpose of this paper is to assess whether smokers adjust their beliefs in a pattern that is consistent with Cognitive Dissonance Theory. This is accomplished by examining the longitudinal pattern of belief change among smokers as their smoking behaviours change.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A telephone survey was conducted of nationally representative samples of adult smokers from Canada, the USA, the UK and Australia from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. Smokers were followed across three waves (October 2002 to December 2004), during which they were asked to report on their smoking-related beliefs and their quitting behaviour.</p></sec><sec><st>Findings</st><p>Smokers with no history of quitting across the three waves exhibited the highest levels of rationalisations for smoking. When smokers quit smoking, they reported having fewer rationalisations for smoking compared with when they had previously been smoking. However, among those who attempted to quit but then relapsed, there was once again a renewed tendency to rationalise their smoking. This rebound in the use of rationalisations was higher for functional beliefs than for risk-minimising beliefs, as predicted by social psychological theory.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Smokers are motivated to rationalise their behaviour through the endorsement of more positive beliefs about smoking, and these beliefs change systematically with changes in smoking status. More work is needed to determine if this cognitive dissonance-reducing function has an inhibiting effect on any subsequent intentions to quit.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fotuhi, O., Fong, G. T., Zanna, M. P., Borland, R., Yong, H.-H., Cummings, K. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-03T21:38:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050139</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050139</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patterns of cognitive dissonance-reducing beliefs among smokers: a longitudinal analysis from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050070v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The emotional impact of European tobacco-warning images]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050070v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>The emotional impact of the tobacco-warning images proposed by the European Commission to reduce tobacco consumption is evaluated in the context of the International Affective Picture System, a well-established procedure for investigating appetitive (approach) and defensive (avoidance) motivational tendencies evoked by images.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In a cross-sectional study, 597 healthy male and female volunteers (from the University of Granada, the University of Balearic Islands and four different schools of Valencia and Balearic Islands) distributed in six age groups (13&ndash;14, 15&ndash;16, 17&ndash;18, 19&ndash;20, 21&ndash;22 and over 23&nbsp;years old) and four smoking status groups (non-smokers, one-time smokers, occasional smokers and heavy smokers) rated their emotional responses to 35 European tobacco-warning images together with 42 pleasant and 42 unpleasant International Affective Picture System pictures using the valence and arousal scales of the Self-Assessment Manikin.</p></sec><sec><st>Findings</st><p>The results of the study indicate that the majority of the tobacco-warning images (83%) were distributed within the unpleasant space and ranged from moderately unpleasant to very unpleasant. However, a small but significant number of images (17%) were also distributed within the pleasant space, ranging from moderately pleasant to very pleasant. Only four unpleasant pictures were rated as highly arousing (11.4%). Women, the older age groups (over 17&nbsp;years old), and occasional smokers evaluated these images as significantly more arousing than the other groups.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Findings suggest that the capability of the European tobacco-warning images to prompt negative attitudes to reduce tobacco consumption might not extend to the general population but would be limited to specific target groups.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munoz, M. A., Viedma-del-Jesus, M. I., Rossello, F., Sanchez-Nacher, N., Montoya, P., Vila, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-21T16:20:08-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050070</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050070</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The emotional impact of European tobacco-warning images]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050050v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High youth access to movies that contain smoking in Europe compared with the USA]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050050v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Based on evidence that exposure to smoking in movies is associated with adolescent smoking, the WHO has called on countries to assign a rating that restricts youth access to such movies.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate youth access to movies that portray smoking in European countries and compare with that in the USA.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The authors identified the most commercially successful movies screened in six European countries (Germany, Iceland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and UK) and the USA between 2004 and 2009. The authors coded the 464 movies that were screened in both Europe and the USA according to whether or not they portrayed smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>87% of the movies were &lsquo;youth&rsquo; rated in Europe (ratings board classification as suitable for those younger than 16&nbsp;years) compared to only 67% in the USA (suitable for those younger than 17&nbsp;years). Smoking was portrayed in 319 (69%) movies. 85% of the movies that portrayed smoking were &lsquo;youth&rsquo; rated in Europe compared with only 59% in the USA (p&lt;0.001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Tobacco imagery is still common in popular films shown in European countries and the USA. None of the seven countries examined followed the WHO recommendations on restricting youth access to movies that portray smoking. Compared to the USA, European youths have access to substantially more movies in general, and this gives them access to more movies that portray smoking in particular.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hanewinkel, R., Sargent, J. D., Karlsdottir, S., Jonsson, S. H., Mathis, F., Faggiano, F., Poelen, E. A. P., Scholte, R., Florek, E., Sweeting, H., Hunt, K., Morgenstern, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-18T23:53:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050050</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050050</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High youth access to movies that contain smoking in Europe compared with the USA]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050133v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Second-hand smoke exposure and mitigation strategies among home visitation workers]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050133v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Protection of workers from second-hand smoke (SHS) in occupational settings is an important policy priority, yet little attention has been given to SHS protection for home visitation health workers, who number almost 2 million in the USA. Self-reported SHS exposure, SHS mitigation strategies and suggestions for further SHS exposure reduction approaches were obtained from home visitation health workers in Massachusetts.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Massachusetts Early Intervention workers (N=316) at their state-wide conference in April 2010.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Eighty-three per cent of respondents reported at least 1&nbsp;hour per month of SHS exposure, and 16% reported at least 11&nbsp;hours per month. Nevertheless, only 22% of workers counselled clients on maintaining a smoke-free home. Fewer than 30% of workers had ever voiced concerns to their employing agency, and just 12% had raised their concerns directly with clients. Only 14% stated that their agency had rules designed to protect workers from SHS.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>SHS exposure occurs frequently among home visitation health workers. The data point to a substantial population who are not protected from SHS exposure by formal policies.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keske, R. R., Rees, V. W., Behm, I., Wadler, B. M., Geller, A. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-18T23:53:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050133</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050133</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Second-hand smoke exposure and mitigation strategies among home visitation workers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050038v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Audit of tobacco retail outlets in Hangzhou, China]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050038v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To determine the prevalence of tobacco advertisements and warning messages at points of sale as well as to examine the density of tobacco retail outlets in neighbourhoods and around schools in Hangzhou, China.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Tobacco retail outlets (n=1639) in all food and tobacco specialty stores were observed objectively by trained students. Tobacco advertisements and warning messages were assessed with an audit, and stores' addresses were recorded with Global Positioning System coordinates. The distances (1) between all pairs of tobacco retail outlets (2) between each tobacco retail outlet and 15 middle schools were calculated to assess the density of tobacco retail outlets in neighbourhoods and around schools.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among the 1639 tobacco retail outlets, &lt;1% had &lsquo;no sales to minors&rsquo; signs, 1.5% had tobacco warning messages, 28% had signs indicating tobacco sale and 12.4% had tobacco advertisements. For 48.7% of tobacco retail outlets, the nearest distances to other tobacco retail outlets were &lt;50&nbsp;m. For 80% of schools, there was at least one tobacco retail outlets within a 100&nbsp;m radius.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Tobacco advertisement in retail outlets is prevalent and the density of tobacco retail outlets is high in Hangzhou, China. Signs indicating &lsquo;no sales to minors&rsquo; and tobacco warning signs are almost non-existent. These findings point to an urgent need for the enforcement of regulations on display of &lsquo;no sales to minors&rsquo; and a new density standard for tobacco retail outlets based on protecting the public's health.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gong, T., Lv, J., Liu, Q., Ren, Y., Li, L., Kawachi, I., on behalf of the Community Interventions for Health (CIH) Collaboration]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-16T02:57:59-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050038</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050038</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Audit of tobacco retail outlets in Hangzhou, China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050135v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A review of tobacco smoking and smoking cessation practices among physicians in China: 1987-2010]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050135v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Tobacco use by physicians represents a significant barrier in promoting smoking cessation through physician interventions. To assess the need for and nature of smoking cessation services among physicians in China, a detailed literature review was conducted.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A literature review of studies published, in Chinese or in English, between 1987 and 2010, was carried out. The Medline, PubMed and Wanfang Data (a Chinese literature search database) electronic databases were searched for published studies.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>It was found that the overall current smoking prevalence among Chinese physicians ranged from 14% to 64% (men: 26% to 61%; women: 0% to 19%). There were significant gender differences in the smoking prevalence across studies with men smoking more than women. Though inconsistent, there were variations in smoking rates by professional posts and medical specialty. The quit smoking rates ranged from 5% to 14% across studies, with a higher rate among female physicians. Asking about smoking status or advising patients to quit smoking was not common practice among the physicians.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The results of this review suggest that while smoking habits of Chinese physicians vary among studies and across physicians in different specialties; prevalence rates tend to be higher than in physicians in the developed countries. Quitting rates were low among Chinese physicians, and the delivery of advice on quitting smoking was not common across the studies. Strategies to improve Chinese physicians' engagement in smoking cessation should address multiple factors including tobacco use and quitting practices among the physicians, their training needs and awareness of their professional responsibility with a healthcare system change approach.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdullah, A. S., Qiming, F., Pun, V., Stillman, F. A., Samet, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-15T11:26:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050135</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050135</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A review of tobacco smoking and smoking cessation practices among physicians in China: 1987-2010]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050008v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Smoking behaviour and associated factors of illicit cigarette consumption in a border province of southern Thailand]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050008v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Illicit cigarette consumption has increased worldwide. It is important to understand this problem thoroughly.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To investigate behaviours and factors associated with illicit cigarette consumption in southern Thailand.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>A survey and qualitative study were conducted in a border province in southern Thailand next to Malaysia. A modified snowballing technique was used to recruit 300 illicit and 150 non-illicit cigarette smokers. A questionnaire was used to interview subjects. Illicit cigarette packs were obtained in order to identify their characteristics. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was used for data analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Smoking of illicit cigarettes has become accepted in the communities. They were available in supermarkets and vendor shops. Friends and other illicit smokers known by illicit cigarette smokers were an important source of information for access to illicit cigarette products. The main factors associated with smoking illicit cigarettes, compared with smoking non-illicit cigarettes, were younger age, higher education and higher average monthly expenditure on cigarettes (most illicit smokers smoked illicit cigarettes (average price per packet = 33 THB (US$1.1), while most non-illicit smokers smoked hand-rolled cigarettes (average price per packet = 7 THB (US$0.2)) and knowledge of other illicit cigarette smokers. The low price of illicit cigarettes was the main reason for their use. Selling strategies included sale of singles, sale in shops and direct sale through social networking.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Illicit cigarette consumption has become more acceptable especially among young adult smokers. Age and extent of social networks are important factors associated with smoking illicit cigarettes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ketchoo, C., Sangthong, R., Chongsuvivatwong, V., Geater, A., McNeil, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-15T11:26:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050008</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050008</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Smoking behaviour and associated factors of illicit cigarette consumption in a border province of southern Thailand]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050146v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Irish tobacco industry position on price increases on tobacco products]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050146v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To examine what the tobacco industry in Ireland says to government on tobacco price, and what it does.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The annual government budgetary and tobacco trade, tax/price increases on cigarettes (2000&ndash;2010) and pre-budget submissions from the tobacco industry were analysed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Price increased from 4.77 in 2000 to 8.55 at the end of 2010, 64.0% of the increase was government imposed and 36.0% was imposed by the tobacco trade. The tobacco industry consistently urged government not to increase taxes as this would increase smuggling and contraband tobacco products. However, the tobacco industry increased price every year.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>There is significant disparity in what the tobacco industry says to government and how it behaves with respect to tobacco price. It is important that tobacco control advocates have access to such data and underscores the importance of strong guidelines for Article 5.3 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Howell, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-14T11:26:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050146</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050146</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Irish tobacco industry position on price increases on tobacco products]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050106v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Smoking cessation and mortality among middle-aged and elderly Chinese in Singapore: the Singapore Chinese Health Study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050106v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>This study determines if recent smoking cessation, compared with long-term cessation, can reduce mortality risk associated with smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Data from the Singapore Chinese Health Study, a cohort study of middle-aged and elderly Chinese in Singapore, were analysed (n=48 251). Smoking status was evaluated at recruitment between 1993 and 1998 and reassessed between 1999 and 2004. Participants were classified as never-smokers, long-term quitters (quit before recruitment, mean 17.0&nbsp;years), new quitters (quit between recruitment and second interview, mean 4.3&nbsp;years) and current smokers. Mortality was ascertained by linkage with the nationwide death registry.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After a mean follow-up of 8.1&nbsp;years, 6003 deaths had occurred by 31 December 2009. Compared with current smokers, the adjusted HR (95% CI) for total mortality was 0.84 (0.76 to 0.94) for new quitters, 0.61 (0.56 to 0.67) for long-term quitters and 0.49 (0.46 to 0.53) for never-smokers. New quitters had 24% reduction in lung cancer mortality (HR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.00) and long-term quitters had 56% reduction (HR: 0.44, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.57). Risk for coronary heart disease mortality was reduced in new quitters (HR: 0.84, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.08) and long-term quitters (HR: 0.63, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.77), although the result for new quitters was of borderline significance due to relatively small number of cardiovascular deaths. Risk for chronic pulmonary disease mortality was reduced in long-term quitters but increased in new quitters.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Significant reduction in risk of total mortality, specifically for lung cancer mortality, can be achieved within 5&nbsp;years of smoking cessation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lim, S. H., Tai, B. C., Yuan, J.-M., Yu, M. C., Koh, W.-P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-14T11:26:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050106</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050106</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Smoking cessation and mortality among middle-aged and elderly Chinese in Singapore: the Singapore Chinese Health Study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050181v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A systematic review of the aetiology of tobacco disparities for sexual minorities]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050181v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To conduct a systematic review of the literature examining risk factors/correlates of cigarette smoking among lesbian, gay and bisexual (ie, sexual minority) populations.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Sets of terms relevant to sexual minority populations and cigarette smoking were used in a simultaneous search of 10 databases through EBSCOhost. The search was limited to the peer-reviewed literature up to January 2011, using no geographic or language limits. For inclusion, the paper was required to: (1) have been written in English, (2) have sexual minorities (defined by either attraction, behaviour, or identity) included in the study population and (3) have examined some form of magnitude of association for risk factors/correlates of any definition of cigarette smoking. A total of 386 abstracts were reviewed independently, with 26 papers meeting all inclusion criteria. Abstracts were reviewed and coded independently by authors JB and JGLL using nine codes derived from the inclusion/exclusion criteria.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Studies used various measures of sexual orientation and of smoking. Risk factors that could be considered unique to sexual minorities included internalised homophobia and reactions to disclosure of sexual orientation. Some studies also indicated common smoking risk factors experienced at higher rates among sexual minorities, including stress, depression, alcohol use and victimisation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This review identified risks that were associated with sexual minority status and common to the general population but experienced at potentially higher rates by sexual minorities. Government and foundation funds should be directed towards research on the origins of this disparity.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blosnich, J., Lee, J. G. L., Horn, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-14T11:26:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050181</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050181</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A systematic review of the aetiology of tobacco disparities for sexual minorities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050157v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between local indoor smoking ordinances in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking during pregnancy: a multilevel analysis]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050157v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To estimate the association between local clean indoor air ordinances and prenatal maternal smoking across 351 municipalities in Massachusetts before the 2004 statewide ban and to test the effect of time since ordinance adoption on the association.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The authors linked 2002 birth certificate data of women who gave birth in the state and reported a Massachusetts residence (n=67 584) to a database of indoor smoking ordinances in all municipalities. Multilevel regression models accounting for individual- and municipality-level variables estimate the associations between the presence of local smoking ordinances, strength of the ordinances, time since ordinance adoption and prenatal smoking.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Compared with those living in municipalities with no ordinances, women living in municipalities with a smoking ordinance had lower odds of prenatal smoking (OR=0.72, CI=0.53 to 0.98). No effect was found for 100% smoke-free ordinances. For the analyses testing the effect of time, pregnant women living in municipalities with ordinances enacted &gt;2&nbsp;years were less likely to smoke than those in municipalities with more recent (&lt;1&nbsp;year) ordinances.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Preventing smoking among women of reproductive age is a public health priority. This study suggests that indoor smoking ordinances were associated with lower prenatal smoking prevalence and the favourable effect increased over time. Findings highlight the public health benefit of tobacco control policies.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nguyen, K. H., Wright, R. J., Sorensen, G., Subramanian, S. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-13T09:44:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050157</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050157</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between local indoor smoking ordinances in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking during pregnancy: a multilevel analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050078v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The impact of structural packaging design on young adult smokers' perceptions of tobacco products]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050078v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To examine the extent that novel cigarette pack shapes and openings have on smokers' perceptions of those packs and the cigarettes contained within.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Using a web-based survey, 160 young adult ever-smokers (18&ndash;29&nbsp;years) were shown computer images of plain packaged cigarette packs in five different shapes. This was followed by packs illustrating five different methods of opening. Brand (prestige or budget) and size of the health warnings (30% or 70% warning size) were between-subject conditions. Respondents ranked packs on attractiveness, perceived quality of the cigarettes contained within and extent that the pack distracted from health warnings.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Ratings of attractiveness and perceived quality were significantly associated in both substudies, but tendency to distract from warnings was more independent. Significant differences were found between the pack shapes on attractiveness, perceived quality and distraction from warnings. Standard, 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10 and 4<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>5 packs were ranked less attractive than Bevelled and Rounded packs. 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10 and 4<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>5 packs were also perceived as lower quality than Bevelled and Rounded packs. The Standard pack was less distracting to health warnings than all other shapes except the 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10 pack. Pack openings were perceived as different on quality of cigarettes contained and extent of distraction to warnings. The Standard Flip-top was rated significantly lower in distracting from warnings than all other openings.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Pack shape and pack opening affect ever-smokers' perceptions of the packs and the cigarettes they contain. This means that they have the potential to create appeal and differentiate products and thus should be regulated.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borland, R., Savvas, S., Sharkie, F., Moore, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-13T09:44:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050078</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050078</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The impact of structural packaging design on young adult smokers' perceptions of tobacco products]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050010v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Did a local clean indoor air policy increase alcohol-related crime around bars and restaurants?]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050010v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate whether the adoption of a local clean indoor air (CIA) policy in St. Paul, Minnesota, was associated with changes in alcohol-related crimes outside on-premises alcohol-licensed businesses.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>The enactment of a comprehensive CIA policy on 31 March 2006 was used as the intervention time point in an interrupted time-series analysis to assess changes in weekly crime frequency prior to the policy enactment compared with the period after the policy was established (n=261&nbsp;weeks).</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.</p></sec><sec><st>Subjects</st><p>On-premise alcohol-licensed business addresses were collected from St. Paul, Minnesota, for the period of January 2003 to December 2007, and geocoded. A 500-foot (152.4&nbsp;m) buffer was drawn around each business.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>Alcohol-related crime (ie, arrest) data were obtained from the St. Paul Police Department; crimes had been geocoded by the police department. They were aggregated by week to include only those crimes that occurred within the drawn buffer. Relevant types of crimes included serious (eg, aggravated assaults, homicide, robbery, rape and theft) and less serious (eg, lesser assault, fighting, noise violations, public drunkenness/lewdness or other liquor law violations) crimes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Within a buffer of 500 foot of alcohol-licensed businesses, 23 978 serious alcohol-related crimes and 49 560 less serious alcohol-related crimes occurred over 5&nbsp;years. Using interrupted time-series analyses to compare the weekly alcohol-related crime frequency in proximity with the bars and restaurants, we found no significant change in either type of crime associated with the local comprehensive CIA policy (p=0.13) after adjustment for seasonal differences and overall crime frequencies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Evidence from this study suggests that alcohol-related crimes were not significantly affected by a local comprehensive CIA policy that banned smoking in public workplaces in St. Paul, Minnesota.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klein, E. G., Forster, J. L., Toomey, T. L., Broder-Oldach, B., Erickson, D. J., Collins, N. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-02T15:01:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050010</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050010</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Did a local clean indoor air policy increase alcohol-related crime around bars and restaurants?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050152v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cigarette butts near building entrances: what is the impact of smoke-free college campus policies?]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050152v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Indoor and outdoor tobacco-free campus policies for schools, hospitals and universities are increasingly being adopted. Yet, little direct evidence exists on the impact of tobacco-free campuses on tobacco outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To identify differences in cigarettes smoked at main campus building entrances by campus policy strength.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Researchers collected cigarette butts (n=3427) at main building entrances (n=67) at baseline and follow-up on 19 community college campuses stratified by strength of campus outdoor tobacco policy (none, perimeter/designated area, 100% tobacco free). Outcome measures included the number of butts per day at building entrances averaged to create a campus score. Analysis of variance techniques examined differences in scores by the strength of campuses' outdoor tobacco policy.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>One hundred per cent tobacco-free community college campuses had significantly fewer cigarette butts at doors than campuses with no outdoor restrictions. Butts on community college campuses with partial policies were not statistically different from campuses with no policy or campuses with a 100% tobacco-free policy but indicated that a dose&ndash;response relationship may exist.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This study provides some of the first evidence on the impact of 100% tobacco-free outdoor policies on college campuses using an objective and reproducible measure. Such policies likely provide a more healthful environment for students, staff, faculty and visitors.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, J. G. L., Ranney, L. M., Goldstein, A. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:02:17-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050152</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050152</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cigarette butts near building entrances: what is the impact of smoke-free college campus policies?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050119v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Objective measurement of area differences in 'private' smoking behaviour: observing smoking in vehicles]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050119v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>The objective is to (a) refine and use methods to measure the point prevalence of smoking and of secondhand smoke exposure in moving vehicles and (b) compare these prevalences (1) between two areas of contrasting socioeconomic status and (2) over time.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The authors developed and tested a single-observer method and observed the point prevalence of smoking in vehicles in Wellington, New Zealand. The two observation sites represented high and low areas of socioeconomic deprivation (based on a small area deprivation index).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 149 886 vehicles were observed. The mean point prevalence of smoking in vehicles at both sites combined was 3.2% (95% CI 3.1% to 3.3%). Of those vehicles with smoking, 4.1% had children present. Smoking point prevalence in vehicles was 3.9 times higher in the area of high deprivation than in the area of low deprivation (95% CI 3.6 to 4.2). The same pattern was seen for vehicles with only the driver at 3.6 times (95% CI 3.4 to 4.0), in vehicles with other adults at 4.0 times (95% CI 3.4 to 4.7) and in vehicles with children at 10.9 times (95% CI 6.8 to 21.3), with all results adjusted for vehicle occupancy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Observing smoking in vehicles using a single-observer method provides a feasible and objective indicator of the different smoking behaviours, especially around children, within an area. This study further supports the evidence from this country and internationally that adults and children from high-deprivation areas are much more likely to be exposed to secondhand smoke.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patel, V., Thomson, G., Wilson, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:02:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050119</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050119</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Objective measurement of area differences in 'private' smoking behaviour: observing smoking in vehicles]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050007v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between use of nicotine replacement therapy for harm reduction and smoking cessation: a prospective study of English smokers]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050007v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Aims</st><p>It is important to know how far smokers' attempts at using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for smoking &lsquo;harm reduction&rsquo; (reducing harm from continued smoking) promote or undermine cessation. To contribute to that goal, this study aimed to assess whether smokers' reports of smoking reduction (SR) and the use of NRT for SR and temporary abstinence (TA) predicted subsequent attempts to quit smoking and smoking status in a population sample. It also examined whether use of NRT for SR or TA was associated with reduced cigarette consumption compared with SR without NRT and non-use of NRT for TA.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Data were collected from 15 539 smokers involved in the Smoking Toolkit Study, a series of monthly household surveys of adults aged 16+; of whom 23% (n=3149) completed a 6-month follow-up questionnaire. At baseline, participants were asked whether they were currently using NRT for SR or TA. They were also asked for demographic information and daily cigarette consumption. At 6-month follow-up, data on attempts to quit smoking and smoking status were collected.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>NRT use for SR and TA prospectively predicted attempts to quit smoking (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.01 and OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.38 for SR and TA respectively) and abstinence (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.16 and OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.51 to 3.34 for SR and TA respectively) at 6-months follow-up. Use of NRT for SR or TA was associated with a small reduction in cigarette consumption (two cigarettes per day) compared with SR without NRT or non-use of NRT for TA.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The use of NRT for SR or TA appears to be positively associated with subsequent attempts to quit smoking and abstinence among smokers in England, despite very little apparent effect on daily cigarette consumption. With replication, these findings support the potential benefit of using NRT for harm reduction but primarily as a means of promoting cessation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beard, E., McNeill, A., Aveyard, P., Fidler, J., Michie, S., West, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-01T00:02:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050007</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050007</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between use of nicotine replacement therapy for harm reduction and smoking cessation: a prospective study of English smokers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050048v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of providing financial incentives to healthcare professionals for smoking cessation activities: systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050048v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Financial incentives are seen as one approach to encourage more systematic use of smoking cessation interventions by healthcare professionals. A systematic review was conducted to examine the evidence for this.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science and sources of grey literature were used as data sources. Studies were included if they reported the effects of any financial incentive provided to healthcare professionals to undertake smoking cessation-related activities. Data extraction and quality assessment for each study were conducted by one reviewer and checked by a second. A total of 18 studies were identified, consisting of 3 randomised controlled trials and 15 observational studies. All scored in the mid range for quality. In all, 8 studies examined smoking cessation activities alone and 10 studied the UK's Quality and Outcomes Framework targeting quality measures for chronic disease management including smoking recording or cessation activities. Five non-Quality and Outcomes Framework studies examined the effects of financial incentives on individual doctors and three examined effects on groups of healthcare professionals based in clinics and general practices. Most studies showed improvements in recording smoking status and smoking cessation advice. Five studies examined the impact of financial incentives on quit rates and longer-term abstinence and these showed mixed results.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Financial incentives appear to improve recording of smoking status, and increase the provision of cessation advice and referrals to stop smoking services. Currently there is not sufficient evidence to show that financial incentives lead to reductions in smoking rates.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton, F. L., Greaves, F., Majeed, A., Millett, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-11-28T16:17:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050048</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050048</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of providing financial incentives to healthcare professionals for smoking cessation activities: systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050044v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Electronic nicotine delivery systems: adult use and awareness of the 'e-cigarette' in the USA]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050044v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), also referred to as electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes, were introduced into the US market in 2007. Despite concerns regarding the long-term health impact of this product, there is little known about awareness and use of ENDS among adults in the USA.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A consumer-based mail-in survey (ConsumerStyles) was completed by 10 587 adults (&ge;18&nbsp;years) in 2009 and 10 328 adults in 2010. Data from these surveys were used to monitor awareness, ever use and past month use of ENDS from 2009 to 2010 and to assess demographic characteristics and tobacco use of ENDS users.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In this US sample, awareness of ENDS doubled from 16.4% in 2009 to 32.2% in 2010 and ever use more than quadrupled from 2009 (0.6%) to 2010 (2.7%). Ever use of ENDS was most common among women and those with lower education, although these were not the groups who had heard of ENDS most often. Current smokers and tobacco users were most likely to try ENDS. However, current smokers who had tried ENDS did not say they planned to quit smoking more often than smokers who had never tried them.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Given the large increase in awareness and ever use of ENDS during this 1-year period and the unknown impact of ENDS use on cigarette smoking behaviours and long-term health, continued monitoring of these products is needed.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Regan, A. K., Promoff, G., Dube, S. R., Arrazola, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-11-28T16:17:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050044</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050044</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Electronic nicotine delivery systems: adult use and awareness of the 'e-cigarette' in the USA]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050226v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mining data on usage of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) from YouTube videos]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050226v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>The objective was to analyse and compare puff and exhalation duration for individuals using electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and conventional cigarettes in YouTube videos.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Video data from YouTube videos were analysed to quantify puff duration and exhalation duration during use of conventional tobacco-containing cigarettes and ENDS. For ENDS, comparisons were also made between &lsquo;advertisers&rsquo; and &lsquo;non-advertisers&rsquo;, genders, brands of ENDS, and models of ENDS within one brand.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Puff duration (mean =2.4&nbsp;s) for conventional smokers in YouTube videos (N=9) agreed well with prior publications. Puff duration was significantly longer for ENDS users (mean =4.3&nbsp;s) (N = 64) than for conventional cigarette users, and puff duration varied significantly among ENDS brands. For ENDS users, puff duration and exhalation duration were not significantly affected by &lsquo;advertiser&rsquo; status, gender or variation in models within a brand. Men outnumbered women by about 5:1, and most users were between 19 and 35&nbsp;years of age.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>YouTube videos provide a valuable resource for studying ENDS usage. Longer puff duration may help ENDS users compensate for the apparently poor delivery of nicotine from ENDS. As with conventional cigarette smoking, ENDS users showed a large variation in puff duration (range =1.9&ndash;8.3&nbsp;s). ENDS puff duration should be considered when designing laboratory and clinical trials and in developing a standard protocol for evaluating ENDS performance.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hua, M., Yip, H., Talbot, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-11-24T15:37:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050226</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050226</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mining data on usage of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) from YouTube videos]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050185v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The economic impact of state cigarette taxes and smoke-free air policies on convenience stores]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050185v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To investigate whether increasing state cigarette taxes and/or enacting stronger smoke-free air (SFA) policies have negative impact on convenience store density in a state, a proxy that is determined by store openings and closings, which reflects store profits.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>State-level business count estimates for convenience stores for 50 states and District of Columbia from 1997 to 2009 were analysed using two-way fixed effects regression techniques that control for state-specific and year-specific determinants of convenience store density. The impact of tax and SFA policies was examined using a quasi-experimental research design that exploits changes in cigarette taxes and SFA policies within a state over time.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Taxes are found to be uncorrelated with the density of combined convenience stores and gas stations in a state. Taxes are positively correlated with the density of convenience stores; however, the magnitude of this correlation is small, with a 10% increase in state cigarette taxes associated with a 0.19% (p&lt;0.05) increase in the number of convenience stores per million people in a state. State-level SFA policies do not correlate with convenience store density in a state, regardless whether gas stations were included. These results are robust across different model specifications. In addition, they are robust with regard to the inclusion/exclusion of other state-level tobacco control measures and gasoline prices.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Contrary to tobacco industry and related organisations' claims, higher cigarette taxes and stronger SFA policies do not negatively affect convenience stores.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huang, J., Chaloupka, F. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-11-01T12:30:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050185</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050185</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The economic impact of state cigarette taxes and smoke-free air policies on convenience stores]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050107v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Secondhand smoke levels in Scottish bars 5 years on from the introduction of smoke-free legislation]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050107v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To determine current secondhand smoke (SHS) concentrations in bars previously assessed as part of an evaluation of Scottish smoke-free legislation 5&nbsp;years ago.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Comparison between SHS levels measured in 2006 and 2011 in 39 pubs in 2 Scottish cities.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Fine particulate matter (PM<SUB>2.5</SUB>) was measured discreetly for 30&nbsp;min in each bar on one or two visits 5&nbsp;years after the previous visit in May/June 2006. These 5-year follow-up visits were undertaken on the same day of the week and at approximately the same time of day.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Average PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> levels measured in a total of 51 bar visits in 2011 were 12&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> (range 2&ndash;155&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>) compared to 20&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> (range 6&ndash;104&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>) in the period immediately after the ban in 2006. Fine particulate concentrations in all but two visits in 2011 were comparable to PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> levels measured in outside ambient air on the same day, with 92% of visits (n=47) providing 30-min average PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations less than 25&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>These results are one of the longest follow-up of any national smoke-free legislation and indicate that, 5&nbsp;years after introduction, compliance is high and that the legislation continues to provide bar workers and non-smoking customers protection from SHS.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apsley, A., Semple, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-10-20T06:52:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050107</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050107</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Secondhand smoke levels in Scottish bars 5 years on from the introduction of smoke-free legislation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050153v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Support for removal of point-of-purchase tobacco advertising and displays: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Canada survey]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050153v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Although most countries now have at least some restrictions on tobacco marketing, the tobacco industry meet these restrictions by re-allocating expenditure to unregulated channels, such as at point-of-purchase.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Longitudinal data from 10 Canadian provinces in the International Tobacco Control Survey was analysed to examine adult smokers' support for a ban on tobacco advertising and displays in stores and whether this support is associated with noticing either advertising or displays in stores, and quit intentions, over time. In total, there were 4580 respondents in wave 5 (October 2006 to February 2007), wave 6 (September 2007 to February 2008) and wave 7 (October 2008 to June 2009). The surveys were conducted before, during and in some cases after the implementation of display bans in most Canadian provinces and territories.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Smokers in all provinces showed strong support for a ban on tobacco displays over the study period. Levels of support for an advertising and display ban were comparable between Canadian provinces over time, irrespective of whether they had been banned or not. Noticing tobacco displays and signs in-store was demonstrably less likely to predict support for displays (OR=0.73, p=0.005) and advertising (OR=0.78, p=0.02) ban, respectively. Smokers intending to quit were more likely to support advertising and display bans over time.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This study serves as a timely reminder that the implementation of tobacco control measures, such as the removal of tobacco displays, appear to sustain support among smokers, those most likely to oppose such measures.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brown, A., Boudreau, C., Moodie, C., Fong, G. T., Li, G. Y., McNeill, A., Thompson, M. E., Hassan, L. M., Hyland, A., Thrasher, J. F., Yong, H.-H., Borland, R., Hastings, G., Hammond, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-10-15T08:44:08-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050153</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050153</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Support for removal of point-of-purchase tobacco advertising and displays: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Canada survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050079v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050079v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In the face of comprehensive bans on the marketing of tobacco products, packaging has become an increasingly important promotional tool for the tobacco industry. A ban on the use of branding on tobacco packaging, known as &lsquo;plain&rsquo; packaging, has emerged as a promising regulatory strategy. The current study sought to examine perceptions of cigarette packaging among adults in France.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Adult smokers and non-smokers (N=836) were surveyed using computer-assisted personal interviewing to assess perceptions of pack design by comparing &lsquo;regular&rsquo; branded packs and &lsquo;limited edition&rsquo; packs (with novel designs or innovations) with &lsquo;plain&rsquo; versions of these packs with all branding, including colour, removed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Plain packs (PP) were less likely than regular packs, and particularly limited edition packs, to be considered attractive, attention grabbing and likely to motivate youth purchase. PPs were also rated as the most effective in convincing non-smokers not to start and smokers to reduce consumption and quit. Logistic regression showed that smokers motivated to quit, in comparison to smokers not motivated to quit, were significantly more likely to consider the PPs as the packs most likely to motivate cessation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Novel cigarette packaging, in the form of limited edition packs, had the highest ratings of consumer appeal, ahead of regular branded packs and also PPs. Interestingly, PPs were perceived to be the packs most likely to promote cessation among those adults with quitting intentions. Plain packaging, therefore, may be a means of helping existing adult smokers motivated to quit to do so.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gallopel-Morvan, K., Moodie, C., Hammond, D., Eker, F., Beguinot, E., Martinet, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-10-13T01:07:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050079</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050079</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050171v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Smokers' responses to television advertisements about the serious harms of tobacco use: pre-testing results from 10 low- to middle-income countries]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050171v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>While television advertisements (ads) that communicate the serious harms of smoking are effective in prompting quitting-related thoughts and actions, little research has been conducted among smokers in low- to middle-income countries to guide public education efforts.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>2399 smokers aged 18&ndash;34&nbsp;years in 10 low- to middle-income countries (Bangladesh, China, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Philippines, Russia, Turkey and Vietnam) viewed and individually rated the same five anti-smoking ads on a standard questionnaire and then engaged in a structured group discussion about each ad. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, with robust SEs to account for the same individual rating multiple ads, was performed to compare outcomes (message acceptance, perceived personalised effectiveness, feel uncomfortable, likelihood of discussing the ad) across ads and countries, adjusting for covariates. Ads by country interactions were examined to assess consistency of ratings across countries.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Three ads with graphic imagery performed consistently highly across all countries. Two of these ads showed diseased human tissue or body parts, and a third used a disgust-provoking metaphor to demonstrate tar accumulation in smokers' lungs. A personal testimonial ad performed more variably, as many smokers did not appreciate that the featured woman's lung cancer was due to smoking or that her altered physical appearance was due to chemotherapy. An ad using a visual metaphor for lung disease was also more variable, mostly due to lack of understanding of the term &lsquo;emphysema&rsquo;.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Television ads that graphically communicate the serious harms of tobacco use are likely to be effective with smokers in low- to middle-income countries and can be readily translated and adapted for local use. Ads with complex medical terms or metaphors, or those that feature personal testimonials, are more variable and at least require more careful pre-testing and adaptation to maximise their potential.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wakefield, M., Bayly, M., Durkin, S., Cotter, T., Mullin, S., Warne, C., for the International Anti-Tobacco Advertisement Rating Study Team]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-10-12T09:20:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050171</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050171</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Smokers' responses to television advertisements about the serious harms of tobacco use: pre-testing results from 10 low- to middle-income countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050145v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Which interventions against the sale of tobacco to minors can be expected to reduce smoking?]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050145v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Signatories of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control have committed themselves to prohibiting the sale of tobacco to minors. The tobacco industry has a long history of legal challenges to such restrictions claiming that they cannot be expected to reduce youth smoking. The object of this study was to determine if disrupting the sale of tobacco to minors can be expected to reduce tobacco use by youths.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A comprehensive literature search was conducted for studies that evaluated the impact on youth tobacco use of efforts to disrupt the sale of tobacco to youths.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>There was little evidence that merely enacting a law without sufficient enforcement had any impact on youth tobacco use. There was no evidence that merchant education programmes had any impact on youth older than 12&nbsp;years of age. There was no evidence that enforcement efforts that failed to reduce the sale of tobacco to minors had any beneficial impact. All enforcement programmes that disrupted the sale of tobacco to minors reduced smoking among youth.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Government officials can expect that enforcement programmes that disrupt the sale of tobacco to minors will reduce adolescent smoking.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DiFranza, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-10-12T09:20:33-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050145</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050145</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Which interventions against the sale of tobacco to minors can be expected to reduce smoking?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050108v3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cigarette sales in pharmacies in the USA (2005-2009)]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050108v3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Several US jurisdictions have adopted policies prohibiting pharmacies from selling tobacco products. Little is known about how pharmacies contribute to total cigarette sales.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Pharmacy and total cigarette sales in the USA were tabulated from AC Nielsen and Euromonitor, respectively, for the years 2005&ndash;2009. Linear regression was used to characterise trends over time, with observed trends extrapolated to 2020.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Between 2005 and 2009, pharmacy cigarette sales increased 22.72% (p=0.004), while total cigarette sales decreased 17.43% (p=0.015). In 2005, pharmacy cigarette sales represented 3.05% of total cigarette sales, increasing to 4.54% by 2009. Extrapolation of these findings resulted in estimated pharmacy cigarette sales of 14.59% of total US cigarette sales by 2020.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Cigarette sales in American pharmacies have risen in recent years, while cigarette sales nationally have declined. If current trends continue, pharmacy cigarette market share will, by 2020, increase to more than four times the 2005 share.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seidenberg, A. B., Behm, I., Rees, V. W., Connolly, G. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-10-10T20:52:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050108</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050108</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cigarette sales in pharmacies in the USA (2005-2009)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050027v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can increases in the cigarette tax rate be linked to cigarette retail prices? Solving mysteries related to the cigarette pricing mechanism in China]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050027v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To explain China's cigarette pricing mechanism and the role of the Chinese State Tobacco Monopoly Administration (STMA) on cigarette pricing and taxation.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Published government tobacco tax documentation and statistics published by the Chinese STMA are used to analyse the interrelations among industry profits, taxes and retail price of cigarettes in China.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The 2009 excise tax increase on cigarettes in China has not translated into higher retail prices because the Chinese STMA used its policy authority to ensure that retail cigarette prices did not change. The government tax increase is being collected at both the producer and wholesale levels. As a result, the 2009 excise tax increase in China has resulted in higher tax revenue for the government and lower profits for the tobacco industry, with no increase in the retail price of cigarettes for consumers.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Numerous studies have found that taxation is one of the most effective policy instruments for tobacco control. However, these findings come from countries that have market economies where market forces determine prices and influence how cigarette taxes are passed to the consumers in retail prices. China's tobacco industry is not a market economy; therefore, non-market forces and the current Chinese tobacco monopoly system determine cigarette prices. The result is that tax increases do not necessarily get passed on to the retail price.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gao, S., Zheng, R., Hu, T.-w.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-10-07T11:39:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050027</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050027</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can increases in the cigarette tax rate be linked to cigarette retail prices? Solving mysteries related to the cigarette pricing mechanism in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050022v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is snus the same as dip? Smokers' perceptions of new smokeless tobacco advertising]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050022v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Since 2006, leading US cigarette companies have been promoting new snus products as line extensions of popular cigarette brands. These promotional efforts include direct mail marketing to consumers on cigarette company mailing lists. This study examines smokers' reactions to this advertising and perceptions of the new snus products.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Eight focus groups (n=65 participants) were conducted in San Francisco and Los Angeles in 2010 with smokers who received tobacco direct mail advertising. The focus group discussions assessed smokers' perceptions of the new snus products. Focus group videos were transcribed and coded using Transana software to identify common themes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Most participants were aware of snus advertising and many had tried free samples. Most were aware that snus was supposed to be &lsquo;different&rsquo; from traditional chewing tobacco but consistently did not know why. Participants willing to try snus still identified strongly as smokers, and for some participants, trying snus reinforced their preference for smoking. Snus' major benefits were use in smoke-free environments and avoiding social stigma related to secondhand smoke. Participants were sceptical of the idea that snus was safer than cigarettes and did not see it as an acceptable substitute for cigarettes or as a cessation aid.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Smokers repeated some messages featured in early snus advertising. Snus was not seen as an acceptable substitute for smoking or way to quit cigarettes. Current smoker responses to snus advertising are not consistent with harm reduction.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bahreinifar, S., Sheon, N. M., Ling, P. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-10-04T17:22:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050022</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050022</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is snus the same as dip? Smokers' perceptions of new smokeless tobacco advertising]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050012v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hidden female smokers in Asia: a comparison of self-reported with cotinine-verified smoking prevalence rates in representative national data from an Asian population]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050012v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The low smoking prevalence in Asian women may be due to under-reporting. We therefore investigated gender difference in self-reported and cotinine-verified smoking prevalence rates in Korea</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We analysed data from 5455 individuals (2387 men and 3068 women) in the 2008 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. A urniary cotinine concentration of 50 ng/ml was the cut-off distinguishing smokers from non-smokers. Sensitivity analysis was done using different cut-offs of 25, 75 and 100 ng/ml.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Cotinine-verified smoking rates were 50.0% for men and 13.9% for women, or 5.3% point and 8.0% point higher in absoulte terms, respectively, than the self-reported rates for men and women. Ratios of cotinine-verified to self-reported smoking rates were 2.36 for women and 1.12 for men. Of the 1620 cotinine-verified smokers, 12.1% of men and 58.9% of women classified themselves as non-smokers. Women who live with a spouse or parents tend to under-report their smoking more than those who live alone or with others.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Since the number of self-reported female smokers was less than half of cotinine-verified smokers, current anti-smoking policies based on self-reported smoking prevalence rates in Korea should be further directed towards hidden female smokers. Also, biochemical verification needs to be considered with national tobacco surveys in Asian countries.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jung-Choi, K.-H., Khang, Y.-H., Cho, H.-J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-10-04T17:22:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050012</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050012</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hidden female smokers in Asia: a comparison of self-reported with cotinine-verified smoking prevalence rates in representative national data from an Asian population]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050208v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of tobacco-related media campaigns on smoking among 20-30-year-old adults: longitudinal data from the USA]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050208v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Young adults in the USA have one of the highest smoking prevalence rates of any age group, and young adulthood is a critical time period of targeting by the tobacco industry. The authors examined relationships between potential exposure to tobacco-related media campaigns from a variety of sponsors and 2-year smoking change measures among a longitudinal sample of US adults aged 20&ndash;30&nbsp;years from 2001 to 2008.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Self-report data were collected from a longitudinal sample of 12 931 US young adults from age 20 to 30. These data were merged with tobacco-related advertising exposure data from Nielsen Media Research. Two-year measures of change in smoking were regressed on advertising exposures.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Two-year smoking uptake was unrelated to advertising exposure. The odds of quitting among all smokers and reduction among daily smokers in the 2&nbsp;years between the prior and current survey were positively related to anti-tobacco advertising, especially potential exposure levels of 104&ndash;155 ads over the past 24&nbsp;months. Tobacco company advertising (including corporate image and anti-smoking) and pharmaceutical industry advertising were unrelated to quitting or reduction.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Continued support for sustained, public health-based well-funded anti-tobacco media campaigns may help reduce tobacco use among young adults.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry-McElrath, Y. M., Emery, S., Wakefield, M. A., O'Malley, P. M., Szczypka, G., Johnston, L. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-10-04T17:22:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050208</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050208</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of tobacco-related media campaigns on smoking among 20-30-year-old adults: longitudinal data from the USA]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050040v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Secondhand smoke levels in public building main entrances: outdoor and indoor PM2.5 assessment]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050040v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background/Objectives</st><p>To describe secondhand smoke (SHS) levels in halls and main entrances (outdoors) in different buildings by measurement of PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> and airborne nicotine.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Cross-sectional study in a sample of 47 public buildings. The authors studied SHS levels derived from PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> (micrograms per cubic metre) using TSI SidePak Personal Aerosol Monitors. The authors tested four locations within buildings: hall, main entrance (outdoor), control (indoor) and control (outdoor). The authors also measured airborne nicotine concentration (micrograms per cubic metre) in main entrances (outdoor). The authors computed medians and IQRs to describe the data. Spearman correlation coefficient (rsp) was used to explore the association between PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations simultaneously measured in halls and main entrances as well as between PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> and nicotine concentrations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The authors obtained an overall median PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentration of hall 18.20&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> (IQR: 10.92&ndash;23.92&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>), main entrance (outdoor) 17.16&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> (IQR: 10.92&ndash;24.96&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>), control (indoor) 10.40&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> (IQR: 6.76&ndash;15.60&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>) and control (outdoor) 13.00&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> (IQR: 8.32&ndash;18.72&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>). The PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentration in halls was more correlated with concentration in the main entrances (outdoors) (rsp=0.518, 95% CI 0.271 to 0.701) than with the control indoor (rsp=0.316, 95% CI 0.032 to 0.553). The Spearman correlation coefficient between nicotine and PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentration was 0.365 (95% CI &ndash;0.009 to 0.650).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Indoor locations where smoking is banned are not completely free from SHS with levels similar to those obtained in the immediate entrances (outdoors) where smoking is allowed, indicating that SHS from outdoors settings drifts to adjacent indoors. These results warrant a revision of current smoke-free policies in particular outdoor settings.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sureda, X., Martinez-Sanchez, J. M., Lopez, M. J., Fu, M., Aguero, F., Salto, E., Nebot, M., Fernandez, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-28T21:14:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050040</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050040</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Secondhand smoke levels in public building main entrances: outdoor and indoor PM2.5 assessment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050087v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring the effect of cigarette plain packaging on transaction times and selection errors in a simulation experiment]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050087v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Australia has introduced legislation to force all cigarette packaging to be generic from 2012 onwards. The tobacco retail industry estimates this will result in transaction times increasing by 15&ndash;45&nbsp;s per pack and is spending at least $A10 million of tobacco industry funds on an advertising campaigns claiming that the increased time and errors associated with plain packaging will ultimately cost small businesses $A461 million per annum and endanger 15 000 jobs. We undertook an objective experiment to test these claims.</p></sec><sec><st>Methodology</st><p>Participants (n=52) were randomly assigned to stand in front of a display of either 50 plain or coloured cigarette packets and then were read a randomly ordered list of cigarette brands. The time participants took to locate each packet was recorded and all selection errors were noted. After 50 &lsquo;transactions&rsquo;, participants repeated the entire experiment with the alternative plain/coloured packs. Afterwards, participants were asked in an open-ended manner whether plain or coloured packaging was easier to locate and why.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The average transaction was significantly quicker for plain compared with coloured packs (2.92 vs 3.17&nbsp;s; p=0.040). One or more mistakes were made by 40.4% of participants when selecting coloured packaging compared with only 17.3% for plain packaging (p=0.011). Qualitative results suggested that the colours and inconsistent location of brand names often served to distract when participants scanned for brands.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Rather than plain packaging requiring an additional 45&nbsp;s per transaction, our results suggest that it will, if anything, modestly decrease transaction times and selection errors.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carter, O. B. J., Mills, B. W., Phan, T., Bremner, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-26T16:21:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050087</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050087</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring the effect of cigarette plain packaging on transaction times and selection errors in a simulation experiment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050023v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Movies with smoking make less money]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050023v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To determine the relationship between presence of smoking in films and total box office receipts.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Regression analysis of box office receipts as a function of film rating, production budget, year of release and presence of smoking for 1232 films released in the USA between 2002 and 2010.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>R-rated films made, on average, 87% (95% CI 83% to 90%) of what PG-13 films of similar smoking status made and smoking films made 87% (95% CI 79% to 96%) of what comparably rated smoke-free films made. Larger budget films made more money. There was no significant effect of release year or G/PG rating compared with PG-13-rated movies.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Because PG-13 films <I>without</I> smoking (median $48.6 million) already make 41% more money at the box office than R-rated movies <I>with</I> smoking (median $34.4 million), implementing an R rating for smoking to remove it from youth-rated films will not conflict with the economic self-interest of producer-distributors.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glantz, S. A., Polansky, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-26T16:21:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050023</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050023</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Movies with smoking make less money]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050029v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Smoke-free policies in psychiatric services: identification of unmet needs]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tobaccocontrol-2011-050029v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Smoke-free policies have been extended to enclosed workplaces in many countries; however, smoking continues to be commonly allowed on psychiatric premises. The aim of this study was to describe tobacco control strategies undertaken in psychiatric inpatient services and day centres in Spain.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This cross-sectional survey included all psychiatric service centres that offered public services in Catalonia, Spain (n=192). Managers responded to a questionnaire of 24 items that covered four dimensions, including clinical intervention, staff training and commitment, smoking area management and communication of smoke-free policies.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 186 managers (96.9%) completed the questionnaire. Results showed low tobacco control in psychiatric services: 41.0% usually intervened in patient tobacco use, 34.1% had interventional pharmacotherapy available and 38.9% had indoor smoking areas. Day centres showed the lowest implementation of tobacco control measures. Out of 186 managers, 47.3% stated that the staff had insufficient knowledge on smoking cessation interventions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The former Spanish partial law has not been sufficiently successful in promoting tobacco control in psychiatric services. There is room for improvement in tobacco control policies, specifically in smoking interventions, staff training and resource availability.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ballbe, M., Nieva, G., Mondon, S., Pinet, C., Bruguera, E., Salto, E., Fernandez, E., Gual, A., the Smoking and Mental Health Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-09-20T08:39:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050029</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tobaccocontrol-2011-050029</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Smoke-free policies in psychiatric services: identification of unmet needs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043687v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tobacco retail displays: a comparison of industry arguments and retailers' experiences]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043687v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Tobacco companies have opposed the removal of tobacco retail displays, arguing this would compromise retailers' safety, increase retail crime, reduce retailers' income, impose additional costs and be inconvenient. These arguments have successfully delayed policy development in several jurisdictions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In-depth interviews conducted with New Zealand retailers who had voluntarily removed tobacco from open display in their stores.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Retailers who had removed tobacco displays did so primarily to reduce their security risk and found their stores had become less vulnerable to retail crime. They did not find removing displays costly or inconvenient nor had this decision significantly reduced their revenue.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Removing in-store tobacco displays may increase rather than decrease store safety. Our findings reveal that retailers' experiences differed in many ways from tobacco companies' predictions and suggest that industry arguments against display removal lack objective support and are self-serving.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoek, J., Vaudrey, R., Gendall, P., Edwards, R., Thomson, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-08-17T13:30:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2011.043687</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2011.043687</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tobacco retail displays: a comparison of industry arguments and retailers' experiences]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043356v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exposure to tobacco smoke before and after a partial smoking ban in prison: indoors air quality measures]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043356v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Although exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) is reportedly high in prison, few studies have measured this in the prison environment, and none have done so in Europe. We measured two indicators of SHS exposure (particulate matter PM10 and nicotine) in fixed locations before (2009) and after (2010) introduction of a partial smoking ban in a Swiss prison. Access to smoking cessation support was available to detainees throughout the study.</p>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To measure SHS before and after the introduction of a partial smoking ban.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Assessment of particulate matter PM10 (suspended microparticles of 10&nbsp;&mu;m) and nicotine in ambient air, collected by real-time aerosol monitor and nicotine monitoring devices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The authors observed a significant improvement of nicotine concentrations in the air after the introduction of the smoking ban (before: 7.0&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, after: 2.1&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, difference 4.9&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>, 95% CI for difference: 0.52 to 9.8, p=0.03) but not in particulate matter PM10 (before: 0.11&nbsp;mg/m<sup>3</sup>, after: 0.06&nbsp;mg/m<sup>3</sup>, difference 0.06 mg/m<sup>3</sup>, 95% CI for difference of means: &ndash;0.07 to 0.19, p=0.30).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The partial smoking ban was followed by a decrease in nicotine concentrations in ambient air. These improvements can be attributed to the introduction of the smoking ban since no other policy change occurred during this period. Although this shows that concentrations of SHS decreased significantly, protection was still incomplete and further action is necessary to improve indoor air quality.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ritter, C., Huynh, C. K., Etter, J.-F., Elger, B. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-08-11T15:46:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2011.043356</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2011.043356</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exposure to tobacco smoke before and after a partial smoking ban in prison: indoors air quality measures]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.044099v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The reciprocal relationships between changes in adolescent perceived prevalence of smoking in movies and progression of smoking status]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.044099v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Smoking in movies is associated with adolescent smoking worldwide. To date, studies of the association mostly are restricted to the exposure to smoking images viewed by 9&ndash;15-year-olds. The association among older adolescents is rarely examined. In addition, the reciprocal effect of smoking behaviour on subsequent reported exposure to smoking in movies has not been reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data were from the Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort Study collected every 6&nbsp;months from 2000 to 2007 when participants were between the ages of 12 and 18 (n=4745). We estimated the prospective effect of the perceived prevalence of smoking in movies (four levels, from never to most of the time) on smoking stage (SS) measured 6&nbsp;months later (six stages, from never-smoker to established smoker) and the reciprocal prospective association between the two factors. Estimates were adjusted for demographic factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The perceived prevalence of smoking in movies measured between ages 131/2 and 151/2 consistently predicted subsequent SS. The association was inconsistent after the age of 151/2. SS did not consistently predict subsequent perception of the prevalence of smoking in movies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Perceived exposure to movie smoking primarily influenced teenagers' smoking behaviour at younger ages. If future studies confirm this finding, developing and evaluating interventions to improve young teenagers' resistance to these images may complement policies to reduce smoking in movies to reduce prevalence of adolescent smoking.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choi, K., Forster, J., Erickson, D., Lazovich, D., Southwell, B. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-08-09T08:23:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2011.044099</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2011.044099</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The reciprocal relationships between changes in adolescent perceived prevalence of smoking in movies and progression of smoking status]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043448v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Motor racing, tobacco company sponsorship, barcodes and alibi marketing]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043448v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Sponsorship of Formula One (F1) motor racing, which has been used as an indirect medium of tobacco advertising for several decades, was prohibited by the 2005 European Union Tobacco Advertising Directive. Most F1 tobacco sponsorship of motor racing in the EU has since ceased, with the exception of the Scuderia Ferrari team, which continues to be funded by Philip Morris. In 2007, the Marlboro logo on Ferrari cars and other race regalia was replaced by an evolving &lsquo;barcode&rsquo; design, which Ferrari later claimed was part of the livery of the car, and not a Marlboro advertisement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine whether the &lsquo;barcode&rsquo; graphics used by Ferrari represent &lsquo;alibi&rsquo; Marlboro advertising.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Academic and grey literature, and online tobacco industry document archives, were searched using terms relevant to tobacco marketing and motorsport.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Tobacco sponsorship of F1 motor racing began in 1968, and Philip Morris has sponsored F1 teams since 1972. Phillip Morris first used a &lsquo;barcode&rsquo; design, comprising red vertical parallel lines below the word <I>Marlboro</I> on the British Racing Motors F1 car in 1972. Vertical or horizontal &lsquo;barcode&rsquo; designs have been used in this way, latterly without the word <I>Marlboro</I>, ever since. The modern &lsquo;barcode&rsquo; logos occupied the same position on cars and drivers' clothing as conventional Marlboro logos in the past. The shared use of red colour by Marlboro and Ferrari is also recognised by Philip Morris as a means of promoting brand association between Marlboro and Ferrari.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The Ferrari &lsquo;barcode&rsquo; designs are alibi Marlboro logos and hence constitute advertising prohibited by the 2005 EU Tobacco Advertising Directive.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant-Braham, B., Britton, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-08-05T12:37:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2011.043448</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2011.043448</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Unlocked]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Motor racing, tobacco company sponsorship, barcodes and alibi marketing]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043539v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tobacco use in Bollywood movies, tobacco promotional activities and their association with tobacco use among Indian adolescents]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043539v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Smoking in Hollywood movies is a known risk factor for teen smoking in the USA and Europe, but little is known about the association between exposure to tobacco use in Bollywood movies and teen tobacco use in India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A cross-sectional sample of 3956 adolescents (eighth and ninth grades, ages 12&ndash;16&nbsp;years) from 12 randomly selected New Delhi schools was surveyed in 2009, assessing tobacco use status, receptivity to tobacco promotions (based on owning or being willing to wear tobacco-branded merchandise) and exposure to tobacco use in movies. Quartiles of exposure to tobacco use in popular Bollywood movies released from 2006 to 2008 (n=59) were determined by content coding them for tobacco use and querying the adolescents whether they had seen each one. Logistic regression was used to control for covariates including age, gender, parent education, school performance, sensation-seeking propensity, family and peer tobacco use, and authoritative parenting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Altogether, the 59 movies contained 412 tobacco use occurrences. The prevalence of <I>ever tobacco use</I> among adolescents was 5.3%. Compared with low-exposure adolescents (quartile 1), the adjusted odds of ever tobacco use among high-exposure adolescents (quartile 4) was 2.3 (95% CI 1.3 to 3.9). Being receptive to tobacco promotions was also associated with higher adjusted odds of ever tobacco use, 2.0 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.0).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Watching tobacco use in Bollywood movies and receptivity to tobacco promotional activities were both independently associated with ever tobacco use among adolescents in India, with ORs being similar to the studies of adolescents elsewhere.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arora, M., Mathur, N., Gupta, V. K., Nazar, G. P., Reddy, K. S., Sargent, J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-07-05T16:08:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2011.043539</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2011.043539</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Unlocked]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tobacco use in Bollywood movies, tobacco promotional activities and their association with tobacco use among Indian adolescents]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-07-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042507v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Twitter=quitter? An analysis of Twitter quit smoking social networks]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042507v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Widely popular, Twitter, a free social networking and micro-blogging service, offers potential for health promotion. This study examined the activity of Twitter quit smoking social network accounts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional analysis identified 153 activated Twitter quit smoking accounts dating back to 2007 and examined recent account activity for the month of August 2010.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The accounts had a median of 155 followers and 82 total tweets per account; 49% of accounts had &gt;100 tweets. Posted content was largely inconsistent with clinical guidelines; 48% linked to commercial sites for quitting smoking and 43% had tweets on e-cigarettes. In August 2010, 81 of the accounts (53%) were still active.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Though popular for building quit smoking social networks, many of the Twitter accounts were no longer active, and tweet content was largely inconsistent with clinical guidelines. Future research is needed to examine the effectiveness of Twitter for supporting smoking cessation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prochaska, J. J., Pechmann, C., Kim, R., Leonhardt, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-07-05T09:04:00-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2010.042507</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2010.042507</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Twitter=quitter? An analysis of Twitter quit smoking social networks]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-07-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.044040v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Smoking cessation medications and cigarettes in Guatemala pharmacies]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.044040v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Guatemala, a party to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), is obliged to promote the wider availability of smoking cessation treatment and to restrict tobacco advertising. Pharmacies are fundamental in providing smoking cessation medications but also might increase the availability of cigarettes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To assess availability of cessation medications and cigarettes and their corresponding advertising in Guatemala pharmacies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In Guatemala City a representative sample was selected from a list of registered pharmacies classified by type (non-profit, chain, independent). In addition, all pharmacies in the neighbouring town of Antigua were included for comparison. Trained surveyors used a checklist to characterise each pharmacy with respect to availability and advertising of cessation medications and cigarettes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 505 pharmacies were evaluated. Cessation medications were available in 115 (22.8%), while cigarettes were available in 29 (5.7%) pharmacies. When available, medications were advertised in 1.7% (2) and cigarettes in 72.4% (21) of pharmacies. Chain pharmacies were significantly more likely to sell cessation medications and cigarettes, and to advertise cigarettes than were non-profit and independent pharmacies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Most pharmacies in Guatemala do not stock cessation medications or cigarettes. Cigarette advertising was more prevalent than advertising for cessation medications. FCTC provisions have not been implemented in Guatemala pharmacies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Viteri, E., Barnoya, J., Hudmon, K. S., Solorzano, P. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-30T05:41:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2011.044040</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2011.044040</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Smoking cessation medications and cigarettes in Guatemala pharmacies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043810v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The assessment of tobacco dependence in young users of smokeless tobacco]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043810v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>As all published measures of dependence for users of smokeless tobacco (dippers) have poor reliability, in the present work the Hooked on Nicotine Checklist (HONC) and the Autonomy Over Smoking Scale (AUTOS) were evaluated for use with this population. Dippers and smokers were also compared in relation to dependence, the pleasure derived from using tobacco and the latency to the onset of withdrawal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In 2010, an anonymous self-completed paper survey was administered to 1541 students of mixed race and ethnicity in grades 9&ndash;12 (mean age 15.9&nbsp;years) in a Florida high school where students used cigarettes and smokeless tobacco.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The reliability (Cronbach's &alpha;) for the HONC was 0.90 for smokers (n=139) and 0.91 for dippers (n=85), and for the AUTOS was 0.94 for smokers and dippers. Dippers and smokers did not differ significantly in relation to scores on the HONC, AUTOS, latency to withdrawal onset or pleasure derived from smoking. One or more symptoms on the HONC were reported by 56% of dippers and 57% of smokers with &lt;100 lifetime uses of their favoured tobacco product, and by 91% of dippers and 91% of smokers with &ge;100 lifetime uses (not significant). Greater lifetime use was associated with a significantly shorter latency to withdrawal for smokers and dippers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The HONC and AUTOS are highly reliable measures of dependence for adolescent users of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. Using these measures and other indicators, no meaningful differences in dependence were found between dippers and smokers at comparable levels of lifetime use.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DiFranza, J. R., Sweet, M., Savageau, J. A., Ursprung, W. W. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-28T06:24:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2011.043810</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2011.043810</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The assessment of tobacco dependence in young users of smokeless tobacco]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042309v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social and cultural influences on tobacco-related health disparities among South Asians in the USA]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042309v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore and understand key cultural contexts of tobacco use among South Asian communities in the USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Focus groups, with homogeneous compositions of gender, generational status and length of time in the USA, were conducted in two distinct South Asian ethnic enclaves. Focus group findings were triangulated with observational data regarding the availability of culturally specific tobacco from commercial ethnic outlets and cultural events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Subjects</st>
<p>Respondents included 88 men and women of South Asian descent, aged 18&ndash;65&nbsp;years, immigrant and native born, representing diversity of religion, socioeconomic status and region of origin, with the use of at least one culturally specific tobacco product in previous 24&nbsp;months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A large number of culturally specific products were commonly used by community members. Knowledge of product-specific health risks was lacking or inaccurate. Many culturally specific tobacco products were considered to have beneficial properties. South Asian tobacco items were used to preserve cultural traditions and express ethnic identity in a new dominant culture. The social and cultural values ascribed to use helped distinguish community members from mainstream society and from other minority populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Many cultural factors govern tobacco use among diverse global populations. Especially for migrants with a common regional origin, the role of ethnic identity may strongly influence culturally specific tobacco patterns. Qualitative inquiry helps elucidate such culturally framed behaviour in culturally diverse populations. These cultural contexts should be integrated into research and practice. Understanding multidimensional factors influencing non-traditional tobacco use is essential to ensure that comprehensive tobacco control strategies address tobacco-related disparities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mukherjea, A., Morgan, P. A., Snowden, L. R., Ling, P. M., Ivey, S. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-27T01:26:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2010.042309</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2010.042309</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social and cultural influences on tobacco-related health disparities among South Asians in the USA]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043190v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Indoor air pollution (PM2.5) due to secondhand smoke in selected hospitality and entertainment venues of Karachi, Pakistan]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043190v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine particulate matter smaller than 2.5&nbsp;&mu;m (PM<SUB>2.5</SUB>) levels at various hospitality and entertainment venues of Karachi, Pakistan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted at various locations in Karachi, during July 2009. Sampling was performed at 20 enclosed public places, including hospitality (restaurants and caf&eacute;s) and entertainment (snooker/billiard clubs and gaming zones) venues. PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> levels were measured using an aerosol monitor.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>All entertainment venues had higher indoor PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> levels as compared to the immediate outdoors. The indoor PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> levels ranged from 25 to 390&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> and the outdoor PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> levels ranged from 18 to 96&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup>. The overall mean indoor PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> level was 138.8&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> (&plusmn;112.8). Among the four types of venues, the highest mean indoor PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> level was reported from snooker/billiard clubs: 264.7&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> (&plusmn;85.4) and the lowest from restaurants: 66.4&nbsp;&mu;g/m<sup>3</sup> (&plusmn;57.6) while the indoor/outdoor ratio ranged from 0.97 to 10.2, highest being at the snooker/billiard clubs. The smoking density ranged from 0.21 to 0.57, highest being at gaming zones. The indoor PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentration and smoking density were not significantly correlated (Spearman's correlation coefficient=0.113; p=0.636).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study demonstrates unacceptably high levels of PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> exposure associated with secondhand smoke (SHS) at various entertainment venues of Karachi even after 8&nbsp;years since the promulgation of smoke-free ordinance (2002) in Pakistan; however, better compliance may be evident at hospitality venues. The results of this study call for effective implementation and enforcement of smoke-free environment at public places in the country.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nafees, A. A., Taj, T., Kadir, M. M., Fatmi, Z., Lee, K., Sathiakumar, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-15T23:56:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2011.043190</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2011.043190</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Indoor air pollution (PM2.5) due to secondhand smoke in selected hospitality and entertainment venues of Karachi, Pakistan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043380v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development assistance for global tobacco control]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2011.043380v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>By 2030, the tobacco epidemic will be responsible for over eight million deaths worldwide per year, with 80% of those deaths occurring in low-resource countries. Despite the magnitude of the problem, little is known about the funding for global tobacco control.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>To estimate the amount of tobacco control funding, we created an integrated database based on information provided by tobacco control donors. We focus on resources available to low-income and middle-income countries provided as Development Assistance to Control Tobacco (DACT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Global DACT grew from US$1.2 million in 2000 to US$44.2 million in 2009, primarily due to contributions from private philanthropies. Average annual 2000&ndash;2009 funding amounted to about US$0.003 per adult (US$0.0003 per adult in 2000 and US$0.011 per adult in 2009). DACT has been supplemented by domestic public funding that reached US$0.009 per adult in 2008. 28% of emerging and developing countries received zero DACT and 15% of those countries reported no funding at all. Out of US$21.8 billion disbursed in 2007 for health-related development assistance, DACT represented only US$0.02 billion, or 0.09%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Since the funding for both infectious and non-communicable diseases in low-resourced countries is inadequate, the solution for global tobacco control is not to shift resources from other public health priorities, but rather to generate additional tobacco control funding. Several mechanisms to achieve this goal are proposed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross, H., Stoklosa, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-15T23:56:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2011.043380</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2011.043380</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development assistance for global tobacco control]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.041327v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Conflict of interest and FCTC implementation in China]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.041327v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To critically review the structure of tobacco control policy making in China, examine conflicts of interest within this structure, and consider how these affected the introduction of on-pack warnings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Government policy documents and warning labels were obtained and critically reviewed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Few differences exist between the on-pack warnings formerly used in China and those introduced ostensibly to meet Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) obligations. Comparison with tobacco manufactured for export or overseas consumption shows the new Chinese domestic on-pack warnings are demonstrably inferior to those required internationally. The inherent conflict of interest in the Chinese tobacco control agency structure, which must meet commercial and public health objectives, undermined the introduction of new health warnings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>To promote more effective tobacco control policies, the conflict of interest inhibiting the public health function of the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration (STMA) must be removed. Specifically, the public health function must be separated from oversight of commercial production, and packaging must be redesigned with pictorial warnings and messages compliant with Article 11 of the FCTC.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wan, X., Ma, S., Hoek, J., Yang, J., Wu, L., Zhou, J., Yang, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-14T23:15:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2010.041327</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2010.041327</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Conflict of interest and FCTC implementation in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.040071v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Economic and public health impact of 2007-2010 tobacco tax increases in Ukraine]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.040071v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the impact of the dynamic 2007&ndash;2010 tobacco tax policy in Ukraine on cigarette prices, cigarette consumption, tobacco tax revenue and the tobacco industry's price strategy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using data on cigarette sales, cigarette prices, income and tobacco control policies, price elasticities of cigarette demand in Ukraine were estimated using two methods. Annual data were used to generate point price elasticity estimates, while monthly data were used in a two-step Engle&ndash;Granger procedure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The point price elasticity estimate is data sensitive and ranges from &ndash;0.11 to &ndash;0.62, centring around &ndash;0.32. The regression model estimates a long-run price elasticity of &ndash;0.28. Cigarette consumption fell by 13% in 2009 and 15% in 2010 while the tax revenue increased by US$700 million and by US$500 million in 2009 and 2010, respectively, compared to the previous year. Tax increases have changed the tobacco industry's price strategy from one of shielding consumers from the impact of smaller tax hikes in 2007&ndash;2008, to one of increasing industry net-of-tax prices, after recent, larger tax increases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The higher real tobacco excise taxes of 2009 and 2010 have significantly reduced tobacco consumption in Ukraine, resulting in encouraging public health and fiscal gains. It will be important for cigarette prices/taxes to keep pace with inflation and income growth for this impact to be sustained.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross, H., Stoklosa, M., Krasovsky, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-14T23:15:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2010.040071</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2010.040071</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Economic and public health impact of 2007-2010 tobacco tax increases in Ukraine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042630v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of potential toxicity of a smokeless tobacco product (naswar) available on the Pakistani market]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042630v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>&lsquo;Naswar&rsquo; is a smokeless tobacco product (STP) widely used in Pakistan. It has been correlated with oral and oesophageal cancer in recent clinical studies. The toxic effects associated with STPs have been associated with trace level contaminants present in these products. The toxin levels of Pakistani naswar are reported for the first time in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A total of 30 Pakistani brands of naswar were tested for a variety of toxic constituents and carcinogens such as cadmium, arsenic, lead and other carcinogenic metals, nitrite and nitrate, and nicotine and pH.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The average values of all the toxins studied were well above their allowable limits, making the product a health risk for consumers. Calculated lifetime cancer risk from cadmium and lead was 1 lac (100000) to 10 lac (1000000) times higher than the minimum 10E-4 (0.00001) to 10E-6 (0.000001), which is the &lsquo;target range&rsquo; for potentially hazardous substances, according to the US Environmental Protection Agency. Similarly, the level of arsenic was in the range of 0.15 to 14.04&nbsp;&mu;g/g, the average being 1.25&nbsp;&mu;g/g. The estimated average bioavailable concentration of arsenic is 0.125&ndash;0.25&nbsp;&mu;g/g, which is higher than the allowable standard of 0.01&nbsp;&mu;g/g. Similarly, the average minimum daily intake of chromium and nickel was 126.97&nbsp;&mu;g and 122.01&nbsp;&mu;g, as compared to allowable 30&ndash;35&nbsp;&mu;g and 35&nbsp;&mu;g, respectively; a 4&ndash;5 times higher exposure. However, beryllium was not detected in any of the brands studied. The pH was highly basic, averaging 8.56, which favours the formation of tobacco specific amines thus making the product potentially toxic. This study validates clinical studies correlating incidence of cancer with naswar use in Pakistan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study shows that the production, packaging, sale and consumption of naswar should be regulated so as to protect the public from the health hazards associated with its consumption.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakiullah,  , Saeed, M., Muhammad, N., Khan, S. A., Gul, F., Khuda, F., Humayun, M., Khan, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-10T07:54:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2010.042630</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2010.042630</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of potential toxicity of a smokeless tobacco product (naswar) available on the Pakistani market]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042275v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Two-year impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to secondhand smoke: evidence of the failure of the 'Spanish model']]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042275v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Studies evaluating the long-term impact of smoking laws on secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure using airborne markers are scarce. This study aimed to assess the long-term impact of the Spanish smoking law on SHS levels, using a specific and objective marker.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Follow-up study, measuring vapour-phase nicotine levels before the implementation of the law and 6, 12 and 24&nbsp;months after the initial assessment. A total of 443 samples were taken at baseline in eight different regions in offices in the public administration, private sector, universities and hospitality venues.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Two years after the law was implemented, the nicotine concentration decreased by a minimum of 60% in public administration, university and private sector offices, as well as in venues where smoking was totally banned. However, nicotine levels significantly increased by 40% in hospitality venues allowing smoking. No significant differences were found in hospitality venues with areas for smokers and non-smokers or in pubs and discotheques.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Two years after the smoking law came into force, levels of SHS exposure in the workplace were significantly lower than before the law was implemented. Importantly, however, SHS levels were even higher than before the law was implemented in venues still allowing smoking. The data obtained in this study clearly show that the &lsquo;Spanish model&rsquo; is not protecting the health of hospitality workers and that a complete ban is required. Furthermore, this study highlights the importance of long-term monitoring of compliance with smoking laws over time.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopez, M. J., Nebot, M., Schiaffino, A., Perez-Rios, M., Fu, M., Ariza, C., Munoz, G., Fernandez, E., on behalf of the Spanish Smoking Law Evaluation Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-09T07:13:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2010.042275</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2010.042275</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Two-year impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to secondhand smoke: evidence of the failure of the 'Spanish model']]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.039362v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Smoking cessation improves mortality in Japanese men: the Hisayama study]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.039362v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Although the smoking rate among Japanese men has been the highest in developed countries, the epidemiological evidence about whether smoking cessation can extend their lifespan is not well established.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A total of 1083 Japanese men aged &ge;40&nbsp;years were classified by their smoking status and followed up prospectively for 18&nbsp;years (1988&ndash;2006).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Current smoking was a significant risk factor for all-cause death: the multivariate-adjusted HRs of all-cause death for current smokers of 1&ndash;19, 20&ndash;39 and &ge;40 cigarettes per day were 1.61 (95% CI 1.16 to 2.22), 1.56 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.23) and 3.15 (95% CI 1.59 to 6.24), respectively. Former smokers did not have an increased risk of all-cause death compared with never smokers. The excess risk of all-cause death for current smokers tended to decrease within 5&nbsp;years after smoking cessation, eventually reaching a level almost equivalent to that of never smokers. The risk of cancer death decreased by 53% in subjects who had quit smoking for &ge;10&nbsp;years, while the risk of cardiovascular death decreased by 56% in subjects with the cessation period of &lt;10&nbsp;years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our findings suggest that even a modest smoking habit significantly increases the risk of death among Japanese men, and the risk of death diminishes soon after cessation of smoking. These results imply the importance of smoking cessation to extend life in Japanese men.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ikeda, F., Ninomiya, T., Doi, Y., Hata, J., Fukuhara, M., Matsumoto, T., Kiyohara, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-09T07:13:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2010.039362</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2010.039362</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Smoking cessation improves mortality in Japanese men: the Hisayama study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.041657v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Through tobacco industry eyes: civil society and the FCTC process from Philip Morris and British American Tobacco's perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.041657v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To analyse the models Philip Morris (PM) and British American Tobacco (BAT) used internally to understand tobacco control non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and their relationship to the global tobacco control policy-making process that resulted in the Framework Convention for Tobacco Control (FCTC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Analysis of internal tobacco industry documents in the Legacy Tobacco Document Library.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>PM contracted with Mongoven, Biscoe, and Duchin, Inc. (MBD, a consulting firm specialising in NGO surveillance) as advisors. MBD argued that because NGOs are increasingly linked to epistemic communities, NGOs could insert themselves into the global policy-making process and influence the discourse surrounding the treaty-making process. MBD advised PM to insert itself into the policy-making process, mimicking NGO behaviour. BAT's Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (CORA) department argued that global regulation emerged from the perception (by NGOs and governments) that the industry could not regulate itself, leading to BAT advocating social alignment and self-regulation to minimise the impact of the FCTC. Most efforts to block or redirect the FCTC failed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PM and BAT articulated a global policy-making environment in which NGOs are key, non-state stakeholders, and as a result, internationalised some of their previous national-level strategies. After both companies failed to prevent the FCTC, their strategies began to align. Multinational corporations have continued to successfully employ some of the strategies outlined in this paper at the local and national level while being formally excluded from ongoing FCTC negotiations at the global level.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalez, M., Green, L. W., Glantz, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-06-08T06:21:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2010.041657</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2010.041657</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Through tobacco industry eyes: civil society and the FCTC process from Philip Morris and British American Tobacco's perspectives]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042325v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reduction in hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome after the successful implementation of 100% smoke-free legislation in Argentina: a comparison with partial smoking restrictions]]></title>
<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/tc.2010.042325v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Several studies have shown a decrease in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admissions after the implementation of 100% smoke-free legislation. However, no studies have been conducted in developing countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a time series analysis of ACS hospital admissions in Santa Fe province and Buenos Aires city, Argentina. In 2006, Santa Fe implemented a 100% smoke-free law and Buenos Aires implemented a partial law with designated smoking areas and exceptions. Age-standardised ACS admissions rates were compared before and after the implementation of the laws in each district. Smoking prevalence, compliance with legislation and exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) was also assessed in both districts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In Santa Fe an immediate decrease in ACS admissions was observed after implementation (&ndash;2.5 admissions per 100 000, p=0.03; 13% reduction), compared with no change in Buenos Aires city (rate ratio Santa Fe vs Buenos Aires: 0.74, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.86, p&le;0.001). In Santa Fe, the immediate effect was followed by a persistent decrease in admissions due to ACS (&ndash;0.26 admissions per 100 000 per month). Smoking prevalence did not change significantly in either district during the same period. In both districts, there was a reduction in self-reported SHS exposure, with a trend towards lower exposure in Santa Fe province. No other comprehensive tobacco control interventions were implemented during the study period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A 100% smoke-free law was more effective than a partial restriction law in reducing ACS admissions. An immediate effect was followed by a sustained decrease in ACS admissions. Smoke-free initiatives can be also effective in decreasing acute coronary events in developing countries.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferrante, D., Linetzky, B., Virgolini, M., Schoj, V., Apelberg, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-05-20T15:58:02-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/tc.2010.042325</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:tobaccocontrol;tc.2010.042325</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reduction in hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome after the successful implementation of 100% smoke-free legislation in Argentina: a comparison with partial smoking restrictions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research paper</prism:section>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
