Responses

Download PDFPDF

Science in regulatory policy making: case studies in the development of workplace smoking restrictions
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Missing argument

    In all of the arguments I see in many articles, both pro and con, concerning smoking bans, I note arguments tend to concentrate on "smoker's rights" and "non-smoker's rights", when neither are relevant to the real issue. That is, whether or not a proprietor has the right to operate a business as he sees fit, allowing those who seek and enjoy the business he offers to freely do so or freely decline it. That speaks more t...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.