Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Smoking among workers from small companies in the Paris area 10 years after the French tobacco law
  1. J Alcouffe,
  2. P Fau-Prudhomot,
  3. P Manillier,
  4. E Lidove,
  5. P-Y Monteleon
  1. Association interprosssionnelle des centres médicaux et sociaux de la région Île-de-France
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Jacques Alcouffe, 55 Rue Rouget de Lisle, 92158 Suresnes cedex, France; 

Statistics from

Since the introduction of a tobacco law in 1991, smoking in enclosed public areas, including the workplace, has been forbidden in France. At the time this law was introduced we conducted several studies concerning smoking behaviour and the implementation of smoking regulations in the workplace.1 We believed that it was interesting to repeat this study 10 years later: (1) to assess the prevalence of active smokers in small companies in the Paris area; (2) to assess the prevalence of passive smokers in these companies; (3) to describe the impact of the French tobacco ban in these places of work.

In the French occupational health system, every worker undergoes a medical examination at least once a year regardless of whether they are exposed to occupational hazards. The occupational physician is required to spend one third of their time studying each worker’s work station. The data were collected among a population of 900 000 workers employed in all job categories in the Paris area. These workers belonged to companies employing between one and 3500 workers. The mean number of employees was nine, indicating that most of these companies were very small. We choose a double observation method: one in the physician’s office and the other in the workplace. During September 2001, 173 physicians interviewed 3065 workers selected at random. A total of 3044 questionnaires were suitable for analysis. The sample consisted of 1654 men (54.3%) and 1390 women (45.7%). The mean (SD) age was 36 (11) years (range 15–77 years).

In the whole sample, the prevalence of regular smokers was 36.9%, the prevalence of workers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke at work was 14.6%, and the prevalence of workers who were disturbed by environmental tobacco smoke at work was 18.3%. Nearly all regular smokers smoked cigarettes (98%) and the mean (SD) consumption was 15 (8) cigarettes per day (range 1–60 cigarettes). The 296 non-smoking workers (9.7%) who were exposed to a tobacco smoke environment at work were considered to be passive smokers. Over two thirds (68.4%) of the workers were banned from smoking at their work station, with the highest rate among clerks (72.2%). About three quarters (76%) of workers worked in a public room. Thirty eight per cent of workers stated that their direct supervisor was a smoker.

During the same period, 160 occupational physicians completed 690 questionnaires in workplaces selected at random, 678 of which could be analysed. The physician noted whether smoking was banned in every workplace (company or agency). Several questionnaires were completed for a single workplace if it included several departments (offices, workshops, etc). Smoking was banned in 68% of workplaces (n = 461). Bans were most prevalent in shops, workshops, and warehouses. Smokers and non-smokers worked together in 66% of the workplaces visited (n = 447). Smoking was banned in the whole company for 51% of them, and more often in those employing more than 300 workers (76.2%).

The results allowed us to address our three objectives:

  1. The prevalence of smokers (37%) in small companies in the Paris area has decreased with time. The prevalence was 44% in 1979, 42% in 1987, and 43% in 1991.1 During this 12 year period the prevalence remained stable; however, it seemed to fall by about 6% between 1991 and 2001.

  2. The prevalence of passive smokers in these small companies was 9.7%, according to our restrictive definition of passive smoking. This restrictive definition did not make it possible to compare our data with those published in the literature. Several factors were significantly associated with passive smoking: being male, being a blue collar worker, being 25–34 years old, and having a supervisor who smoked.

  3. The ban on smoking at the work station was mentioned by 68% of the workers and smoking was banned in 68% of the workplaces visited. This percentage is higher than that reported by Grizeau and Baudier in 1995 (59%).2 This difference may represent progress in the last six years since the application of the French tobacco law.

The 1991 French tobacco law, the initial purpose of which was to protect non-smokers, seems to have led to a decrease in the prevalence of smoking and to a decrease in cigarette consumption, as shown by other studies on smoking policies.3 The prevalence of regular smokers decreased by 6% in accordance with the conclusions of Farrelly et al that “the ban on smoking in all workplaces should reduce the prevalence of smokers by 10%”.4 In the Paris area, real progress in the fight against smoking in the workplace was only made after the introduction of a national smokefree legislation, as in Finland.5 This situation could probably be enhanced further if the authorities boosted the French tobacco ban by introducing new stronger national smoking legislation.

Embedded Image

One suggestion for Philip Morris . . .err, sorry, Altria’s new logo . . .


Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.