Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Authors’ response to M R Pakko
  1. B Alamar,
  2. S Glantz
  1. University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 S Glantz

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Pakko1 takes issue with our paper “Smoke-free law did not affect revenue from gaming in Delaware,”2,3 arguing that our methods were not sufficient because we failed to control for serial correlation and used a method of controlling for heteroskedasticity that did not meet his approval. We found these concerns odd, since in his original analysis claiming that there were negative effects of the Delaware law (published on the internet as …

View Full Text