Article info

Download PDFPDF
Fiscal versus social responsibility: how Philip Morris shaped the public funds divestment debate
  1. Correspondence to:
 Nathaniel Wander
 PhD, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences/Center for Tobacco Control Research & Education, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California Street, Suite 455, Box 0612, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0612, USA; nathaniel.wander{at}ucsf.edu
View Full Text

Citation

Wander N, Malone RE
Fiscal versus social responsibility: how Philip Morris shaped the public funds divestment debate

Publication history

  • Received December 2, 2005
  • Accepted December 16, 2005
  • First published May 25, 2006.
Online issue publication 
May 25, 2006

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.