Article Text

Download PDFPDF

On the gains of seeding tobacco research in developing countries
Free
  1. W Maziak1,
  2. M Arora2,
  3. K S Reddy3,
  4. Z Mao4,
  5. on behalf of researchers from developing countries participating in the Fogarty International Center's “International Tobacco Research and Capacity Building Program”
  1. 1Syrian Center for Tobacco Studies, Syria
  2. 2Health Related Information Dissemination Amongst Youth, India
  3. 3All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India
  4. 4Sichuan University, China
  1. Correspondence to:
 Wasim Maziak
 PO Box 16542, Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic; maziak{at}scts-sy.org

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

A question central to the theme of this supplement to Tobacco Control is “why seed tobacco research in developing countries?” Arguably, research done in advanced institutions can provide answers to most questions regarding the hazards of smoking and ways to combat its spread. Indeed, do we need to repeat in developing countries expensive and lengthy cohort studies about the link between smoking and cancer? Or should we investigate addiction neurobiology in every population to better understand and treat it? Obviously, there may be differences in cancer risk or addiction neurobiology between populations, but are these of a sufficient magnitude and relevance to tobacco control to justify establishing such costly research programmes in developing countries. These are justified arguments, yet the question at hand is of much broader nature.

LOCAL DATA ESSENTIAL

We have learned through the years that the smoking epidemic follows a predictable course in most populations, thus requiring fairly similar intervention strategies. Yet when we begin planning tobacco control interventions in a developing country setting, we immediately face basic questions for which few answers exist, and for which data from developed countries are inadequate, and sometimes even misleading. More so, when threatened by the potential adoption of anti-tobacco policies promoted by governments and public health advocates in developing countries, the tobacco industry often responds by highlighting the potential negative economic impact of these policies and the inadequacy of local data justifying their implementation. Examples of local …

View Full Text