Article Text

Download PDFPDF

The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of telephone counselling and the nicotine patch in a state tobacco quitline
Free
  1. Jack F Hollis1,
  2. Timothy A McAfee2,
  3. Jeffrey L Fellows1,
  4. Susan M Zbikowski2,
  5. Michael Stark3,
  6. Karen Riedlinger1
  1. 1
    Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
  2. 2
    Free & Clear, Inc, Seattle, WA, USA
  3. 3
    Oregon Department of Human Services, Portland, OR, USA
  1. Jack F Hollis, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA; Jack.Hollis{at}kpchr.org

Abstract

Objectives: State and national tobacco quitlines have expanded rapidly and offer a range of services. We examined the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of offering callers single session versus multisession counselling, with or without free nicotine patches.

Methods: This 3×2 randomised trial included 4614 Oregon tobacco quitline callers and compared brief (one 15-minute call), moderate (one 30-minute call and a follow-up call) and intensive (five proactive calls) intervention protocols, with or without offers of free nicotine patches (nicotine replacement therapy, NRT). Blinded staff assessed tobacco use by phone at 12 months.

Results: Abstinence odds ratios were significant for moderate (OR = 1.22, CI = 1.01 to 1.48) and intensive (OR = 1.29, CI = 1.07 to 1.56) intervention, and for NRT (OR = 1.58, CI = 1.35 to 1.85). Intent to treat quit rates were as follows: brief no NRT (12%); brief NRT (17%); moderate no NRT (14%); moderate NRT (20%); intensive no NRT (14%); and intensive NRT (21%). Relative to brief no NRT, the added costs for each additional quit was $2467 for brief NRT, $1912 for moderate no NRT, $2109 for moderate NRT, $2641 for intensive no NRT, and $2112 for intensive NRT.

Conclusion: Offering free NRT and multisession telephone support within a state tobacco quitline led to higher quit rates, and similar costs per incremental quit, than less intensive protocols.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: JFH, JLF and KR have no competing interests. TAMcA and SMZ are with Free & Clear, Inc, which is a for-profit company providing telephone counselling services.

  • Funding: This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute (grant R01 CA86242), and we want to thank GlaxoSmithKline for supplying the nicotine patches used in the study.

  • Abbreviations:
    ICER
    incremental cost effectiveness ratios
    NRT
    nicotine replacement therapy
    OTQL
    Oregon tobacco quitline

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.