Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Is a statewide tobacco quitline an appropriate service for specific populations?
Free
  1. Julie E Maher1,
  2. Kristen Rohde1,
  3. Clyde W Dent1,
  4. Michael J Stark1,
  5. Barbara Pizacani1,
  6. Michael J Boysun2,
  7. Julia A Dilley1,
  8. Patricia L Yepassis-Zembrou3
  1. 1
    Program Design and Evaluation Services, Multnomah County Health Department and Oregon Department of Human Services, Portland, OR, USA
  2. 2
    Tobacco Prevention and Control Program, Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, Washington, USA
  3. 3
    Free and Clear, Inc, Seattle, Washington, USA
  1. Dr Julie Maher, 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 550, Portland, OR, 97232, USA; julie.e.maher{at}state.or.us

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether smoking quit rates and satisfaction with the Washington State tobacco quitline (QL) services varied by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, area of residence (that is, urban versus non-urban), or sex of Washington QL callers.

Methods: From October 2004 into October 2005, we conducted telephone surveys of Washington QL callers about three months after their initial call to the QL. Analyses compared 7-day quit rates and satisfaction measures by race/ethnicity, education level, area of residence and sex (using α = 0.05).

Results: We surveyed half (n = 1312) of the 2638 adult smokers we attempted to contact. The 7-day quit rate among survey participants at the 3-month follow-up was 31% (CI: 27.1% to 34.2%), 92% (CI: 89.9% to 94.1%) were somewhat/very satisfied overall with the QL programme, 97% (CI: 95.5% to 98.2%) indicated that they would probably/for sure suggest the QL to others and 95% (CI: 92.9% to 96.4%) were somewhat/very satisfied with the QL specialist. Quit rate did not vary significantly by race/ethnicity, education level, area of residence or sex. Satisfaction levels were high across subpopulations. Almost all participants (99%) agreed that they were always treated respectfully during interactions with QL staff.

Conclusions: The Washington QL appeared effective and well received by callers from the specific populations studied. States choosing to promote their QL more aggressively should feel confident that a tobacco QL can be an effective and well received cessation service for smokers who call from a broad range of communities.

  • smoking cessation
  • hotline
  • ethnic groups
  • educational status
  • rural population

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Ethics committee approval: The Washington State Institutional Review Board (IRB) determined that this study was programme evaluation, not research, and therefore IRB review and approval were not required.

  • Competing interests: none.

  • Funding: This work was funded by the Washington State Tobacco Prevention and Control Program.

  • Abbreviations:
    API
    Asian or Pacific Islander
    BRFSS
    Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System
    NRT
    nicotine replacement therapy
    QL
    quitline
    RUCA
    rural urban commuting area

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.