Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 13 May 2016
- Published on: 13 May 2016
- Published on: 13 May 2016Reply to Dr. Rose
Dr. Rose responds that the offer of confidentiality was made in accordance with standard institutional review board procedure for human subjects research. However, the email to which the editorial refers offered me $1000 to act as an “expert consultant,” not as a research subject. If its intention was to recruit me as a research subject, the email was even less transparent than I gave it credit for.
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 13 May 2016TOBACCO COMPANY FUNDED RESEARCH: A REASONED APPROACHShow More
Innovative opportunities and strategies should be considered for reducing the harm of tobacco in the 21st century. Since the mid 20th century, governmental approaches have evolved from a laissez-faire attitude to active NIH funding for tobacco research, aggressive promotion of nonsmoking environments and, now, congressionally mandated regulation of the tobacco industry. The tobacco industry itself has also evolved fro...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.