Responses

Download PDFPDF
Letter
Smoker support for increased (if dedicated) tobacco tax by individual deprivation level: national survey data
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Earmarking part of cigarette tax revenues for tobacco control programs has public support, but will it lead to more spending for tobacco control?

    Correspondence Earmarking part of cigarette tax revenues for tobacco control programs has public support, but will it lead to more spending for tobacco control? Anthony P. Polednak Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford, Connecticut USA (Retired)

    Re: Smoker support for increased (if dedicated) tobacco tax by individual deprivation level: national survey data. Wilson et al., Tob Control 2009;18:512....

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.