Responses

Download PDFPDF

Exposure to smoking in movies among British adolescents 2001–2006
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    More junk science

    Any paper which has Professor Stanton Glantz's paw prints on it should be treated with caution. However let me critique it, he says:

    "Because there is a dose-response relation between the amount of on- screen exposure to smoking and the likelihood that adolescents will begin smoking..."

    So in plain English the more adolescents see adults smoking, the more likely they are to smoke. So Glantz et al must b...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.