Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Invited commentary
  1. Hom L Shrestha
  1. Correspondence to Mr Hom L Shrestha, Nepal; nosmoran2002{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The article by Daynard and LeGresley1 highlights the achievements of product liability on tobacco litigation in the USA. The concept of product liability for tobacco is still a new issue in many low- and middle-income countries. In Nepal, litigation is an indispensable part of the tobacco control bill becoming law. Product liability litigation is now becoming popular in Nepal and similar low- and middle-income countries.

In Nepal, product liability litigation against multinational tobacco companies was started in 2003 by the non-governmental organisation Non-Smokers' Rights Association of Nepal. This organisation pursued two lawsuits in 2007 and achieved the historical landmark victory against multinational tobacco companies in 2009 to ban advertisement, promotion and sponsorships; a contempt of court action in 2010 against giant multinational tobacco companies; and an international petition against derailing and delaying the tobacco control law. As a result, the tobacco control bill was passed and become a law in April 2011 and the enforcement of the ban on smoking in public places came into effect from August 2011, both of which are significant steps towards the tobacco control initiative in Nepal.

But the journey of tobacco litigation is still continuing in Nepal to implement the 75% pictorial health warning on tobacco products. The litigation process and related efforts have drawn new attention to the public health hazards of tobacco.

The tobacco industry's vulnerability to product liability has not yet been seriously taken into account in tobacco control laws in middle- and low-income countries like Nepal. Thus, tobacco control advocates and litigation practitioners must be supported in pursuing such litigation. The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and tobacco control laws must provide that governments or states take steps to pursue tobacco product liability settlement agreements with multinational tobacco companies similar to that of the Master Settlement Agreement in the USA. International funding agencies such as the Bloomberg and Gates Foundations should prioritise product liability litigation in low- and middle-income countries. The article shows some reluctance to adequately discuss disparity issues between the USA and global product liability on tobacco control policies.



  • Linked article 050227.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Strategic directions and emerging issues in tobacco control
    Richard A Daynard Eric LeGresley