Article Text

Trends and socioeconomic differences in roll-your-own tobacco use: findings from the ITC Europe Surveys
  1. Abraham K Brown1,
  2. Gera E Nagelhout2,3,
  3. Bas van den Putte4,5,
  4. Marc C Willemsen2,3,
  5. Ute Mons6,7,
  6. Romain Guignard8,
  7. Mary E Thompson9
  1. 1Division of Marketing, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
  2. 2Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands
  3. 3Dutch Alliance for a Smokefree Society, The Hague, The Netherlands
  4. 4Department of Communication, University of Amsterdam (ASCoR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  5. 5Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute for Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  6. 6Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  7. 7Unit Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  8. 8French Institute for Health Promotion and Health Education (INPES), Saint-Denis, France
  9. 9Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Abraham K Brown, Division of Marketing, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG1 4BU, UK; abraham.brown{at}


Objectives To examine if exclusive Roll-Your-Own (RYO) tobacco use relative to factory-made (FM) cigarette use has been rising over time, to determine the extent to which economic motives and perceptions that RYO cigarettes are less harmful act as primary motivations for use, and to examine the association of income and education with the level of RYO tobacco use among smokers in four European countries.

Methods Data were obtained from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe Surveys, and a cohort sample of 7070 smokers from the Netherlands, Germany, France and UK were interviewed between June 2006 and December 2012. Generalised estimating equations (GEE) were used to assess trends in RYO use, and whether RYO consumption varied by socioeconomic variables.

Results Exclusive RYO use over the study period has increased significantly in the UK from 26.4% in 2007 to 32.7% in 2010 (p<0.001); France from 12.2% in 2006 to 19.1% in 2012 (p<0.001); and Germany from 12.7% in 2007 to 18.6% in 2011 (p=0.031), with increased borderline significantly in the Netherlands (31.7% to 34.3%, p=0.052), from 2008 to 2010. Over three-quarters of users in each of the study countries indicated that lower price was a reason why they smoked RYO. Just over a fourth of smokers in the UK, less than a fifth in France, and around a tenth in Germany and the Netherlands believed that RYO is healthier. Compared with exclusive FM users, exclusive RYO users were more likely to have lower incomes and lower education.

Conclusions Effective tobacco tax regulation is needed in the European Union and elsewhere to eliminate or reduce the price advantage of RYO tobacco. Additional health messages are also required to correct the misperception that RYO tobacco is healthier than FM cigarettes.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.