Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Hiding the tobacco power wall reduces cigarette smoking risk in adolescents: using an experimental convenience store to assess tobacco regulatory options at retail point-of-sale
Free
  1. William G Shadel,
  2. Steven C Martino,
  3. Claude M Setodji,
  4. Deborah M Scharf,
  5. Daniela Kusuke,
  6. Angela Sicker,
  7. Min Gong
  1. RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr William G Shadel, RAND Corporation 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665, USA; shadel{at}rand.org

Abstract

Objectives This experiment tested whether changing the location or visibility of the tobacco power wall in a life sized replica of a convenience store had any effect on adolescents’ susceptibility to future cigarette smoking.

Methods The study was conducted in the RAND StoreLab (RSL), a life sized replica of a convenience store that was developed to experimentally evaluate how changing aspects of tobacco advertising displays in retail point-of-sale environments influences tobacco use risk and behaviour. A randomised, between-subjects experimental design with three conditions that varied the location or visibility of the tobacco power wall within the RSL was used. The conditions were: cashier (the tobacco power wall was located in its typical position behind the cash register counter); sidewall (the tobacco power wall was located on a sidewall away from the cash register); or hidden (the tobacco power wall was located behind the cashier but was hidden behind an opaque wall). The sample included 241 adolescents.

Results Hiding the tobacco power wall significantly reduced adolescents’ susceptibility to future cigarette smoking compared to leaving it exposed (ie, the cashier condition; p=0.02). Locating the tobacco power wall on a sidewall away from the cashier had no effect on future cigarette smoking susceptibility compared to the cashier condition (p=0.80).

Conclusions Hiding the tobacco power wall at retail point-of-sale locations is a strong regulatory option for reducing the impact of the retail environment on cigarette smoking risk in adolescents.

  • Advertising and Promotion
  • Prevention
  • Denormalization

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors WGS, SCM, CMS, DMS, and DK conceptualised and designed the study and developed the analytic plan. AS provided key input on the conduct of the study and MG contributed to the analytic plan. All of the listed authors wrote sections of the paper, and approved its submission to the journal.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval RAND Corportation: Human Subjects Protection Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.