Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Setting the agenda for a healthy retail environment: content analysis of US newspaper coverage of tobacco control policies affecting the point of sale, 2007–2014
  1. Allison E Myers1,
  2. Brian G Southwell1,2,
  3. Kurt M Ribisl1,3,
  4. Sarah Moreland-Russell4,
  5. Leslie A Lytle1
  1. 1Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  2. 2RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
  3. 3Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  4. 4Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  1. Correspondence to Allison E Myers, Department of Health Behavior, UNC-Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 302 Rosenau Hall, CB #7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7440, USA; aemyers{at}


Background Tobacco control policies affecting the point of sale (POS) are an emerging intervention, yet POS-related news media content has not been studied.

Purpose We describe news coverage of POS tobacco control efforts and assess relationships between article characteristics, including policy domains, frames, sources, localisation and evidence present, and slant towards tobacco control efforts.

Methods High circulation state (n=268) and national (n=5) newspapers comprised the sampling frame. We retrieved 917 relevant POS-focused articles in newspapers from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2014. 5 raters screened and coded articles, 10% of articles were double coded, and mean inter-rater reliability (IRR) was 0.74.

Results POS coverage emphasised tobacco retailer licensing (49.1% of articles) and the most common frame present was regulation (71.3%). Government officials (52.3%), followed by tobacco retailers (39.6%), were the most frequent sources. Half of articles (51.3%) had a mixed, neutral or antitobacco control slant. Articles presenting a health frame, a greater number of protobacco control sources, and statistical evidence were significantly more likely to also have a protobacco control slant. Articles presenting a political/rights or regulation frame, a greater number of antitobacco control sources, or government, tobacco industry, tobacco retailers, or tobacco users as sources were significantly less likely to also have a protobacco control slant.

Conclusions Stories that feature procontrol sources, research evidence and a health frame also tend to support tobacco control objectives. Future research should investigate how to use data, stories and localisation to encourage a protobacco control slant, and should test relationships between content characteristics and policy progression.

  • Advocacy
  • Media
  • Public policy
View Full Text

Statistics from


New policies that affect the sales and marketing of tobacco products in the retail environment, or the point of sale (POS), are emerging in tobacco control, moving beyond raising tobacco product excise taxes and strong clean indoor air laws.1 Given the relationships between exposure to retail tobacco marketing, youth tobacco use initiation and difficulty quitting, the Institute of Medicine has recommended reducing the number and density of tobacco retailers to curb tobacco consumption.1 Further, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Best Practices recommend policy and environmental interventions to promote tobacco use cessation and prevent tobacco use initiation.2 The implementation of POS tobacco control policies, such as requiring tobacco retailer licensing, restricting tobacco sales in pharmacies or prohibiting the redemption of coupons can help achieve public health goals.3 ,4

State-level or local-level POS policy implementation is a complex process that requires engaged support from health advocates, the general public and policymakers. The agenda setting function of mass media suggests that the amount and nature of media content—often generated by media advocacy activities—can contribute to public and policymaker attitudes and opinions,5 ,6 which then influence policy change. The mass media play a powerful role in establishing what issues are salient for policymakers;7 newspapers, especially, appear to have a primary agenda-setting role in tobacco policy change.8–10

Media content can vary in ways that shape public discourse in favour of or against policy implementation. A news frame is a central organising idea in an article that involves emphasising certain aspects of an issue over others—carefully packaging an issue to offer context for the reader.11 The framing of news content has implications for how the issue is interpreted,12 ,13 the extent to which an issue is supported by the public and decision-makers,12 and implied solutions.14 Often, public health advocates and the tobacco industry vie for shaping a discussion in hopes that audiences identify with the issue, and share their particular view of the argument. Relationships between frame and slant (the extent to which news content supports tobacco control objectives) were identified in news content about clean indoor air laws, such that health-framed articles were more likely to be slanted in favour of tobacco control,15–17 and rights, political or regulation-framed articles were more likely to be slanted against tobacco control.15–17

The presence of sources also shapes the news discourse.5 ,18 ,19 A source is a person or organisation who gives information to news reporters and is explicitly identified by quote or paraphrase.20 An important tool for promoting policy change is including public health advocates as news sources who contribute to a protobacco control slant.21–23

The use of narrative or statistical evidence can support the diffusion of health policies24 by helping to persuasively characterise the problem and solutions,16 and by educating the public about the rationale for the policy.25 For example, the presentation of relevant research evidence can properly identify a problem, aid in evidence-based solution development, and improve policymaker knowledge and support.26–28 The extent to which articles are developed with local quotes and local story angles (localisation) also shapes public and policymaker support by making the issue more salient to the reader.26 ,27

Frames, the presence of sources, the use of narrative and data-driven evidence, and the degree of localisation may impact the slant of the article29 ,30 or subsequent public and decision-maker support for policies.31–34 For example, two communities in Missouri with different exposure to media slant were compared with regard to their ability to pass tobacco control legislation. The community that was exposed to more antitobacco control articles, more articles with a ‘rights’ frame and more articles presenting little to no evidence was less likely to pass tobacco control policy legislation as compared with its counterpoint community with lower exposures on the same variables.16 One area for further research is to clarify the relationship between article slant and other article characteristics (eg, frame, presence and type of sources, evidence structure, and degree of localisation), as an important step in understanding the role of media coverage in influencing policymaking.20

The goal of this study is to describe 8 years of mass media coverage of POS tobacco control efforts in a sample of high circulation US national-level and state-level newspapers. This POS-focused study fills a distinct gap in the literature; past work has focused largely on general tobacco issues in the USA,10 ,35 smoke-free laws15 ,16 ,36 ,37 and tobacco taxes.17 ,38 In addition, we test hypotheses about the relationships between article content characteristics and overall article slant for tobacco control. We hypothesised that articles with a health frame, greater amounts of protobacco control sources, both data and narrative evidence, or a local angle or quote are more likely to have an overall protobacco control slant than an antitobacco control slant.


Newspaper sampling frame

We used a content analysis method to test our hypotheses by first selecting the five highest circulating national US newspapers.39 Second, for each state, the top two highest circulating state-level newspapers were included, and additional available newspapers were added by descending circulation rate until a summed state-level circulation rate was ≥5% of the 2010 Census state population. This sampling method is beneficial because it ensures sufficient population reach to have meaningful associations with public opinion.40

Article search terms

We used search terms to identify POS-related newspaper articles published in sampled newspapers between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2014. The 1 January 2007 time point was 2.5 years prior to the passage of the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA). As has been done previously by Lee et al,41 in a POS-related systematic review, search terms were structured to capture articles with a tobacco-related word in the headline and a POS-related or retail-related word in the body of the article.

Data collection and coding procedures

Articles were downloaded from America's News and ProQuest databases. Coding procedures followed a structured codebook developed iteratively through four rounds of double coding on all measures. In round 1, two study authors (LAL and SM-R) coded six pilot articles, and in round 2, two data collectors coded the same six pilot articles; after each round, inter-rater reliability (IRR) was calculated, and the codebook was revised for variables with low IRR (κ<0.60). In rounds 3 and 4, cumulative IRR was calculated for all double-coded articles in the database, including the pilot articles. The structured codebook with variables and response categories was informed by past content analyses in tobacco15–17 ,23 ,42 ,43 and health promotion,26 and a preliminary review of POS-related content. IRR was measured with Cohen's κ.44 Five coders were involved in the study: four data collectors and the lead author coded, all of whom remained in daily email communication throughout the data collection period. The lead author independently double-screened and double-coded 10% of articles and resolved coding disagreements. IRR was calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics V.23 (Armonk, New York, USA).

Article inclusion criteria

Articles retrieved via search terms were screened for study inclusion according to four variables. First, included articles had the words smoke, smoking or tobacco; cigar, little cigar or cigarillo; cigarette, electronic cigarette, e-cigarette or vaping device; snus, snuff, dip, chewing tobacco; or other tobacco product in the headline. Second, included articles had at least one paragraph (≥4 sentences) of tobacco-related content. Third, included articles contained a main POS theme (see table 1), defined as 1 of 29 individual policy solutions within 6 overarching domains, or the FSPTCA, which contained POS provisions and acted as a focusing event opening new legal pathways towards state-level and local-level POS policy change.45

Table 1

POS themes: overarching policy domains and individual policy solutions

The POS theme screening measure (not shown) was created by merging a commonly used46 tobacco theme coding scheme42 with a list of POS policy options;47 articles without a main POS-related theme were excluded. Fourth, news articles, letters to the editor (LTE) and opinion/editorials written by the newspaper were included; duplicate articles, photos without text and cartoons were excluded.

Article content measures

Each article was coded for the presence or absence of 30 unique POS policy options (see table 1) and these variables: (1) frames, (2) sources, (3) evidence structure, (4) degree of localisation and (5) slant (see box 1). Frames could be positive, negative or neutral for tobacco control objectives, and more than one frame could be present in each article; however, at least two sentences of content were required for the frame to be considered ‘present’. Frame values were adapted from previous research15–17 ,48 and a preliminary inductive review of sampled POS content. Sources included any individual or organisation that was directly quoted in an article, without regard to whether they explicitly mentioned tobacco. Evidence structure was adapted from two previous studies;16 ,26 evidence was defined as data (statistics/numbers) or personal anecdotes (authentic stories or narratives) within the article. In state-level newspapers, localisation included the presence or absence of local quotes or local angles. In national newspapers, articles were deemed to have a local angle if the article focused on a particular region, state or city; quotes were deemed ‘local’ if they were attributed to a person or organisation from the locality that was the focus of the article. Finally, articles were coded for overall slant according to previously used measures.15 ,16 ,23 ,35 ,42 We required clear statements of support for or against tobacco control to be present to justify any slant code; articles with statements both for and against tobacco control objectives were coded as ‘mixed’, and articles with no opinion were coded as ‘neutral’.

Box 1

Article content characteristics measures and response options

Frames present15–17 ,48

  • Health: emphasis on health issues or effects of tobacco on individuals and society, general behaviours and health consequences of tobacco use, and addictive nature of products.

  • Economic: emphasis on monetary reasons for or against tobacco control policies/interventions, for example, impacts on economy, retailers or business profits or healthcare costs.

  • Political/rights: emphasis on political stories with emphasis on political actors and lobbying, or ideological reasons for or against tobacco control, elucidating democratic rights and civil liberties such as the right to smoke, the right to sell tobacco or the right to be protected from smoke, smoking or tobacco marketing.

  • Regulation: emphasis on the process or creation of bylaws, regulation, ordinances or policy implementation, as a way to solve or not solve a problem.

  • No clear frame.

  • Other frame (write in).

Source type and number present16

  • Public health advocacy or outreach/non-profit group/coalition (eg, Tobacco-Free Missouri, American Lung Association, Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids).

  • Health department officials/staff (city, county, state, national).

  • Hospital/healthcare provider staff/representative/attorney/consultant/spokesperson (eg, MD, Dr, hospital staff, healthcare analyst).

  • Educational institutions staff/faculty/spokesperson (eg, PhD at university, research institute, school district).

  • Government or law enforcement (eg, County Council, State Legislature, City Commissioner, Police Chief, except health department).

  • Community member/concerned citizen (eg, local person or labour group or business analyst/person).

  • Tobacco industry or their representative/spokesperson.

  • Tobacco retailer or retailer association (eg, convenience store owner or National Association of Tobacco Outlets (NATO)) or their representative/spokesperson.

  • Smoker/vaper/tobacco user (individual).

  • Tobacco users association/smokers’ rights advocacy group (eg, vaper's association) or their representative/spokesperson.

Evidence structure present16 ,26

  • No evidence present. Evidence was defined as data, statistics and numbers, or personal anecdotes, real-life, authentic stories or narratives, within the article.

  • Only data or statistics present.

  • Only stories present.

  • Both data and story present.

Degree of localisation

  • Local quotes: presence or absence of quotes attributed to a specific, local person who is identified by name and/or position and from the state in which the newspaper is published, or representing an organisation based in the state.

  • Local angle: presence or absence of a local angle, meaning information from or about a local (to the state) individual or organisation, such as local data, local people, local stories, local problems or other issue of importance to local community.

Slant15 ,16 ,23 ,35 ,42

  • Positive for tobacco control (protobacco control): articles that supported further education, regulation or restriction were coded ‘positive’ slant, in favour of tobacco control.

  • Neutral: articles with no opinion specified.

  • Mixed for tobacco control: mixed articles included both protobacco and antitobacco control statements.

  • Negative for tobacco control (antitobacco control): articles where the tobacco or e-cigarette/vaping industry was supported, or public health regulations were overturned, were coded as ‘negative’ slant or antitobacco control.

Data analysis

Since articles cluster within newspapers, we used generalised estimating equations (GEEs).49 ,50 Outcome variables in hypothesis testing were modelled as binary categorical variables (eg, protobacco control slant vs all other). GEE model specifications included an exchangeable correlation matrix, which assumes a constant newspaper effect where within-participant observations are equally correlated and there is no ordering; a logit link function to linearise the data, standard for binary dependent variables; and a binomial distribution of the dependent variable.51 Regression coefficients produced by GEE models were exponentiated to calculate ORs. Mean estimates were also produced for ease of interpretation. IBM SPSS Statistics V.23 (Armonk, New York, USA) was used to analyse the data.


Newspaper sampling frame

A total of five national-level (The Wall Street Journal, USA Today, New York Times, Los Angeles Times and NY Daily News) and 268 state-level newspapers comprised the sampling frame. We achieved 5% population coverage for 48 of 50 states. The mean number of newspapers sampled for each state was 5.36 (range=1 in Delaware to 24 in California) and mean circulation level was 5.86% (range=1.4% in Delaware to 12.6% in Hawaii). Owing to database subscription concerns, we secured only 2.0% (n=7 newspapers) and 1.4% (n=1 newspaper) coverage in Arizona and Delaware, respectively.

Sampled articles

Search terms identified 4600 articles for inclusion screening. Inclusion criteria led to removal of 3683 articles: 27 articles did not meet headline criteria, 908 articles did not contain at least one paragraph of tobacco content; 2714 did not have a main POS theme; and 34 were duplicates, photos without text or cartoons. A total of 917 articles were included in the study: 711 news articles were included in descriptive analyses and hypothesis testing; 109 LTE and 97 opinion/editorials were included in descriptive analyses only based on a priori study aims. Mean IRR for coded variables was κ=0.74 indicating significant agreement.

Description of POS content

The total volume of articles published across the 8 years was 917, with an average of 114 articles per year (range 62–304) and 9 articles per month (range 0–130; figure 1). The highest peaks in monthly coverage corresponded with the June 2009 passage of the FSPTCA (79 articles), the February 2014 decision by CVS Health to end tobacco sales in all pharmacy locations (130 articles) and the September 2014 removal of tobacco products from CVS pharmacies (45 articles).

Figure 1

Frequencies of POS tobacco control articles (n=917) published in sampled newspapers (k=273), monthly, from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2014. The highest peaks in monthly coverage corresponded with the June 2009 passage of the FSPTCA (79 articles), the February 2014 decision by CVS Health to end tobacco sales in all pharmacy locations (130 articles) and the September 2014 removal of tobacco products from CVS pharmacies (45 articles). Minor peaks covered the emergence of local POS policy innovations, such as the September 2009 graphic health-warning requirement in NYC. FSPTCA, Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; NYC, New York City; POS, point of sale.

Table 2 presents the characteristics of articles by year. News was the most frequent article type (77.5%). The top three POS policy domains discussed were tobacco retailer licensing, locations and density (49.1% of articles); other POS policies (eg, eliminating flavours, minimum legal sale age of 21; 29.3%); and the FSPTCA (26.8%). This distribution of POS domains covered differed across years. For example, in 2009, three-quarters of articles (75.2%) contained information about the FSPTCA, and in 2014, 80.3% of articles were categorised within the tobacco retailer licensing, locations and density domain.

Table 2

Characteristics of POS tobacco control-related newspaper content, by year, 2007–2014

Across the entire study period, the two most common frames present were regulation (eg, headline: ‘Round Four Revised tobacco-license law merits adoption’, ‘City eyes new tobacco shop rules’; 71.3%), and health (eg, headline: ‘Health group wants to snuff out tobacco in pharmacies’, ‘Preventing death tobacco regulation will be welcome reality’; 45.3%).

Multiple frames were often present in the same article. For example, 14.2% (n=130) of all articles contained both health and economic frames, and 22.9% (n=210) of all articles contained both a health and regulation frame. Nearly 80% of articles included a source (data not shown). Government or law enforcement was the most frequently cited source, present in 52.3% of articles, followed by tobacco retailers (39.6%) and public health advocacy groups (35.8%). The presence of the tobacco industry as sources in articles waned over time during the study period, whereas the presence of tobacco retailers as sources in articles increased over time. With regard to the use and structure of evidence in POS articles, nearly one-third of articles (31.4%) contained no evidence at all; this pattern remained fairly consistent across the 8 years (data not shown). Another one-third of articles (35.1%) contained only data with a source, and <10% contained both data and narrative (9.2%). The degree of localisation in POS articles was mixed: 40.5% contained neither a local quote, nor a local angle; 41.8% contained both a local quote and a local angle. About half of POS-related content was slanted in favour of tobacco control and prevention activities (49.7%), nearly one-third (32.7%) reported mixed points of view, and only 6.5% of articles had an antitobacco control slant. Slant varied by article type, such that 40.7% (n=288 of 708) of news articles had a protobacco control slant, compared with 84.5% (n=82 of 97) of editorials and 77.1% (n=84 of 109) of LTE.

Relationships between content characteristics

Our results testing relationships between content characteristics and slant indicate partial support for our hypotheses (table 3). News articles with a health frame present were more likely to have a protobacco control slant than any other slant (antitobacco control, mixed or neutral). News articles with a political/rights or regulation frame present were less likely to have a protobacco control slant than any other slant.

Table 3

Adjusted ORs produced via GEE for the association of article content characteristic with protobacco control slant among news articles, 2007–2014

Second, articles with a greater number of protobacco control sources (than antitobacco control sources) were more likely to have a protobacco control slant. Surprisingly, the presence of a public health advocacy group or source was not associated with a protobacco control slant. The presence of government or law enforcement, a concerned citizen, the tobacco industry, tobacco retailers, or an individual tobacco user was negatively associated with a protobacco control slant.

Third, articles with data or statistics present (with or without a source) were more likely to have a protobacco control slant than any other slant. No difference between proslant or other slant was found for news articles with both data and narrative evidence present. Further, in separate analyses, we found that evidence (either data or story) was more likely to be present in certain POS themes (eg, POS health warnings (χ=8.398, df=1, p=0.004), advertising (χ=4.017, df=1, p=0.045) and non-tax approaches to raising price (χ=4.679, df=1, p=0.031)), compared with others.

Finally, degree of localisation was not associated with slant, even when national newspapers were excluded from the analysis (data not shown). In this sample, news articles with or without a local quote or angle were no more or less likely to have a protobacco control slant.


In our newspaper sample, average overall volume of POS-related content, from 2007 to 2014, was just nine unique articles per month. However, major peaks in coverage captured national POS events such as the June 2009 passage of the FSPTCA or CVS ending tobacco sales, and minor peaks covered the emergence of local POS policy innovations, such as the September 2009 graphic health warning requirement in New York City (NYC). This average volume may be related to the newness of POS work for many state and local tobacco control practitioners.52

We also examined the characteristics of POS-related content. Covered POS policy domains waxed and waned according to national and local POS activities. At the national level, two major events occurred: the FSPTCA, which contained many POS provisions (eg, prohibition of candy or fruit flavoured cigarettes; minimum package size for cigarettes; proposed graphic health warnings; permitting local-level and state-level restrictions on the time, place and manner of tobacco advertising), and the CVS voluntary decision to end tobacco sales, which was coded in this study as the removal of tobacco sales in pharmacies within the tobacco retailer licensing, locations and density domain. The POS advertising and POS health warning domains were common in 2009 due to FSPTCA provisions, but dropped off significantly through the remainder of the study period as activity in this domain declined due to legal restrictions and feasibility. The non-tax price approaches domain was frequent in 2013 based on the NYC Sensible Tobacco Enforcement Policies (STEP), which included provisions that prohibited retailers from redeeming coupons and offering price discounts, and established a minimum price for cigarettes and little cigars. Ultimately, national policy was the main driver of total content volume and local policy drove the differentiation in POS domain coverage over time.

The regulation frame was most frequently present throughout the study period, except in 2014 during the CVS transition when the health frame was most present. Frame has been measured in many tobacco-related news content analyses, particularly in coverage of smoke-free laws and tax initiatives,14 ,17 ,37 ,48 ,53–55 and the heavy presence of the regulation frame in POS-related content may be unique from past work. In this study, the regulation frame was present in 71.3% of articles; it was a main theme in 22.1% of articles retrieved from a national surveillance system between 2004 and 2010.10 This is likely due to variation in how researchers define and measure frames (eg, as themes or arguments). However, it is also possible that since 2007, the news media has become more focused on the role and impact of government regulations on health and business.

Tobacco retailers and the tobacco industry were much more present as sources in POS content than public health advocacy groups, health departments or healthcare providers. Public health sources were present in only about one-third of articles (35%), suggesting an opportunity to enhance the visibility of public health advocates in the media. Whereas the tobacco industry and organisations such as the National Association of Tobacco Outlets (NATO) or National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS) maintain a sophisticated public relations engine to remain profitable, public health practitioners may (1) not have the resources to devote to public relations; (2) not share that priority; (3) lack capacity as spokespeople or media advocates; or (4) feel constrained by antilobbying guidelines required by funders or government agencies. It was surprising to find very few POS articles that contained both statistical evidence and narrative stories, particularly with a local angle, since these are considered powerful tools to facilitate public and policymaker support for policy implementation.26 ,27 ,56 The need for greater use of data, stories and localisation in POS offers an opportunity for stronger relationships between newspaper staff, journalists and public health practitioners.

Although presence of a health frame was positively associated with a protobacco control slant, political/rights and regulation frames were negatively associated with a protobacco control slant in our data. However, fewer than half of articles (45.3%) contained a health frame, and nearly three-quarters of POS articles (71.3%) contained a regulation frame. Not surprisingly, source is also related to slant, such that the common presence of government officials (52.3% of articles), tobacco retailers (39.6%) or the tobacco industry (22.0%) as sources make a purely protobacco control slant less likely, as compared with a mixed, neutral or antitobacco control slant. POS content appears to credit tobacco retailers as important members of the local business community, rather than as contributors to the continued tobacco epidemic through targeted marketing. When statistical evidence is present, the chance of protobacco control slant is greater; however, data with or without a source appeared only about one-third of the time. It may be that POS policies are perceived by stakeholders to threaten business rather than promote health. This is important information for practitioners working to advance POS policies, as they have significant potential to shape future media coverage by working to uncouple the assumed association between more POS policies and a negative effect on business.

This study is limited in that results are only generalisable to the current sample of 273 newspapers; however, the newspaper sample is large enough, with sufficient population reach, that it provides a helpful first look at POS content. Further, human coding of qualitative content is subject to error, but data collectors were well trained and IRR measures were well within acceptable ranges.44 Sufficient data may not have been available to properly test relationships between localisation, evidence structure and slant: this is an area for future work. Given that content related to POS policy implementation brings together politics, business and health, future research should track changes in the volume and characteristics of POS content over time, and should identify communication strategies that support POS policy progression.

Describing the national media agenda as it relates to POS tobacco control efforts is an important step in policy change processes. This is one of few tobacco-related content analysis studies to test a priori hypotheses describing the relationships between content characteristics22 ,46 ,57 ,58 and slant. This study is important because, in practice, public health workers partner with the media to serve as news sources, work with concerned citizen coalitions to define issues and solutions, and employ persuasive communication strategies to package issues in meaningful ways.7 However, practitioners working on POS efforts report a lack of communication tools as a barrier to further progress.52 Findings from this study may assist with communication tool development or offer important lessons for public health advocates as they partner with the media and work independently to generate media coverage that supports tobacco control policies.

What this paper adds

  • This paper describes, for the first time, newspaper coverage of point-of-sale (POS) tobacco control efforts in the USA from a robust sample of national-level and state-level newspapers beginning 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2014. In this study, we also assess relationships between article characteristics (eg, frames, sources, localisation and evidence present, and slant towards tobacco control efforts).


The authors would like to acknowledge Stephanie Bangel, Maryka Lier, Shauna Rust, and Rachel Wilbur who coded point-of-sale (POS) news content for the study, and J Michael Bowling who offered valuable feedback on the study methods.


View Abstract


  • Twitter Follow Allison Myers at @aem_forhealth

  • Contributors AEM conceptualised the study, led the data collection team, analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. BGS, KMR, SM-R and LAL gave feedback on all aspects of the study and contributed to the manuscript.

  • Funding Funding for this study was provided by a grant from the National Cancer Institute to KMR (Multi-PI)—‘Maximizing state and local policies to restrict tobacco marketing at point of sale’, 1U01CA154281.

  • Competing interests AEMis Co-Founder/Executive Director and KMR serves as Chair of the Board of Directors of the 501(c)(3) non-profit organisation, Counter Tools (, from which they receive compensation. Counter Tools provides technical assistance on POS tobacco control issues and distributes store mapping and store audit tools. KMR and AEM have a royalty interest in a store audit and mapping system owned by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.