Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Systematic review of health and behavioural outcomes of smoking cessation interventions in prisons
  1. Dominique de Andrade1,
  2. Stuart A Kinner1,2,3,4,5
  1. 1 Griffith Criminology Institute and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  2. 2 Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3 Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  4. 4 School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  5. 5 Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Dominique de Andrade, Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University Mt Gravatt Campus, 176 Messines Ridge Road, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122, Australia; d.deandrade{at}


Objective We conducted a systematic review to examine the impact of smoking cessation interventions, including smoking bans, on prisoners and prison staff.

Data sources We systematically searched health and criminal justice databases for relevant studies. Search strings were used to combine terms related to smoking cessation interventions with terms related to incarceration. We used forward and backward snowballing to capture additional studies.

Study selection Studies were included if: they were published between 1 January 1994 and 23 May 2016; the population was incarcerated adults and/or prison staff; they had a quantitative component; they were published in English; and they reported outcomes of a smoking cessation programme/ban with regard to reported change in smoking behaviour and/or behavioural outcomes.

Data extraction Studies were reviewed for methodological rigour using the Effective Public Health Practice Project's Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Data were independently reviewed for methodological quality by 1 author and a research assistant.

Data synthesis Cessation programmes, including free nicotine replacement therapy and/or behavioural counselling can significantly increase the likelihood of quitting in prison and increase abstinence postrelease. Indoor bans have little impact on prisoner smoking behaviour. Prisoners who experience a complete smoking ban typically resume smoking shortly after release from prison. Bans may result in adverse behavioural outcomes, but these are generally minimal and short-lived.

Conclusions While there is limited evidence to inform tobacco control policies in custodial settings, outcomes of this review suggest that cessation programmes/bans can be an effective mechanism to interrupt prisoner smoking behaviour when properly enforced.

  • Cessation
  • Priority/special populations
  • Secondhand smoke
  • Health Services
  • Addiction

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Contributors DdeA conducted the article search and coding, and drafted the manuscript. SK provided input into the interpretation and discussion of the results, and edited manuscript drafts.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.