Article Text

Download PDFPDF

A “Frank Statement” for the 21st Century?
  1. Ruth E Malone1,
  2. Simon Chapman2,
  3. Prakash C Gupta3,
  4. Rima Nakkash4,
  5. Tih Ntiabang5,
  6. Eduardo Bianco6,
  7. Yussuf Saloojee7,
  8. Prakit Vathesatogkit8,
  9. Laurent Huber9,
  10. Chris Bostic9,
  11. Pascal Diethelm10,
  12. Cynthia Callard11,
  13. Neil Collishaw11,
  14. Anna B Gilmore12
  1. 1 Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA
  2. 2 University of Sydney, School of Public Health, New South Wales, Australia
  3. 3 Healis - Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, Navi Mumbai, India
  4. 4 Health Promotion and Community Health Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
  5. 5 African Center for Advocacy, Yaounde, Cameroon
  6. 6 The Research Center of the Tobacco Epidemic, Montevideo, Uruguay
  7. 7 National Council Against Smoking, Johannesburg, South Africa
  8. 8 Executive Secretary of Action on Smoking and Health Foundation, Thailand
  9. 9 Action on Smoking and Health, Washington, DC, USA
  10. 10 OxyRomandie, Geneva, Switzerland
  11. 11 Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada, Ontario, Canada
  12. 12 Department for Health and UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Bath, Bath, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Ruth E Malone, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA; ruth.malone{at}ucsf.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

The surprise announcement by the former head of the WHO’s Tobacco Free Initiative, Derek Yach, that he would head a newly-established organisation called the ‘Foundation for a Smoke-free World’1 to ‘accelerate the end of smoking’ was met with gut-punched disappointment by those who have worked for decades to achieve that goal. Unmoved by a soft-focus video featuring Yach looking pensively off into the distance from a high-level balcony while smokers at ground level stubbed out Marlboros and discussed how hard it was to quit, leading tobacco control organisations were shocked to hear that the new organisation was funded with a $1 billion, twelve-year commitment from tobacco company Philip Morris International (PMI). PMI, which has been working for decades to rebrand itself as a ‘socially responsible’ company while continuing to promote sales of its top-branded Marlboro cigarettes and oppose policies that would genuinely reduce their use, clearly believes this investment will further its ‘harm reduction’ agenda, led by its new heat-not-burn product, IQOS. But don’t worry, the Foundation assures everyone that “PMI and the tobacco industry are precluded from having any influence over how the Foundation spends its funds or focuses its activities.’2

Except that is what a broad range of industry front groups, sometimes headed by respected and even well-intentioned …

View Full Text

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.