Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK
  1. Nathan Critchlow1,
  2. Martine Stead1,
  3. Crawford Moodie1,2,
  4. Kathryn Angus1,
  5. Douglas Eadie1,
  6. Anne-Marie MacKintosh1,2
  1. 1 Institute for Social Marketing, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
  2. 2 Centre for Tobacco Control Research, Institute for Social Marketing, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Nathan Critchlow, Institute for Social Marketing, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK; nathan.critchlow{at}stir.ac.uk

Footnotes

  • Contributors NC conceived the manuscript and was responsible for data management, statistical design and analysis, with support from A-MM. All authors contributed to interpretation of the results and KA identified contextual information from the retail trade press. NC drafted the article, with support from MS, CM and KA. All authors provided feedback and approved the final version. MS, A-MM and DE directed study design and data acquisition.

  • Funding This work was funded by Cancer Research UK (C24178/A22568).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors NC conceived the manuscript and was responsible for data management, statistical design and analysis, with support from A-MM. All authors contributed to interpretation of the results and KA identified contextual information from the retail trade press. NC drafted the article, with support from MS, CM and KA. All authors provided feedback and approved the final version. MS, A-MM and DE directed study design and data acquisition.

  • Funding This work was funded by Cancer Research UK (C24178/A22568).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.