Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Impact of e-cigarette and cigarette prices on youth and young adult e-cigarette and cigarette behaviour: evidence from a national longitudinal cohort
  1. Jennifer Cantrell1,2,
  2. Jidong Huang3,
  3. Marisa S Greenberg4,
  4. Haijuan Xiao5,
  5. Elizabeth C Hair2,4,
  6. Donna Vallone1,5
  1. 1 Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York City, New York, USA
  2. 2 Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  3. 3 Department of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, New York City, New York, USA
  4. 4 Schroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, New York City, New York, USA
  5. 5 Schroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jennifer Cantrell, Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA; jennifer.cantrell{at}nyu.edu

Abstract

Introduction Understanding the impact of prices for tobacco and nicotine products is critical for creating policies to prevent use among young people. This study examines the impact of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) and cigarette prices on current e-cigarette and cigarette use among youth and young adults.

Methods Data were from a national probability-based sample aged 15–21 collected in 2014 and followed every 6 months for 2.5 years through 2016. We conducted separate conditional likelihood logistic regression models with past 30-day e-cigarette use and past 30-day cigarette use outcomes on the sample of individuals who participated in at least two survey waves (n=11 578) with linked Nielsen market-level price data for rechargeable e-cigarettes and cigarettes. Models controlled for time-varying variables at the individual and state policy levels, and fixed effects at the individual, wave and market levels.

Results Higher cigarette prices were associated with increased past 30-day e-cigarette use, indicating e-cigarettes may serve as a substitute for cigarettes. We did not find a statistically significant relationship between rechargeable e-cigarette prices and past 30-day e-cigarette use; neither did we find a significant relationship between rechargeable e-cigarette prices and past 30-day cigarette smoking.

Conclusion This is the first study to examine e-cigarette and cigarette prices on e-cigarette and cigarette behaviour longitudinally among young people. Findings suggest the need for better measuring the costs associated with e-cigarette use among this population, as well as a careful assessment of price and tax policies that takes into account cross-product impact to sufficiently discourage e-cigarette and cigarette use among young people.

  • electronic nicotine delivery devices
  • non-cigarette tobacco products
  • price
  • public policy
  • taxation

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors JC conceptualised the study and analyses and wrote the paper. JH contributed to the analyses and revisions. HX conducted the analyses. MSG, ECH and DV contributed to revisions.

  • Funding This study was funded by Truth Initiative.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.