Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Vaping industry-funded academic scholarships
  1. Guido Baler,
  2. Karina Paci,
  3. Sarah Dorothy Kowitt,
  4. Adam O Goldstein
  1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Adam O Goldstein, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; adam_goldstein{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


While the benefits versus the risks of increased e-cigarette use among adults remains unsettled, the fact that 21% of high school students in 2018 have used e-cigarettes in the last month is concerning to almost all policymakers and clinicians.1 A recent e-cigarette marketing technique involves the promotion of scholarships for students. Given the novelty of these promotions, we undertook an analysis to understand how widespread this practice is in the USA, along with characteristics of such scholarships.


We conducted Web-based searches from June to August 2018 for publicly accessible documents related to scholarship opportunities by e-cigarette companies to youth or young adults. Words used to search for opportunities included combinations of ‘vaping’/‘e-cigarette’/‘electronic cigarette’/‘ENDS’ and ‘manufacturer’/‘company’/‘industry’/‘trade association’/‘distributor’ and ‘scholarship’/‘university’/‘college’/‘education’/‘essay’/‘award’/‘fellowship’. We omitted duplicate entities and secondary reports. We then extracted data from each website that described a scholarship opportunity related to e-cigarettes.


We discovered 21 entities that were offering 40 scholarships to youth and/or young adults (table 1). These scholarships originated from diverse segments within the vaping industry, including e-cigarette manufacturers, e-cigarette distributors, e-cigarette review websites and e-liquid manufacturers. Ranging from USD$300 to $5000, most of the highlighted scholarships required an essay submission, with most listing prompts related to e-cigarettes or eliciting information about the benefits of vaping. For instance, one scholarship allowed students to write an essay in response to the following prompt: ‘What are the different types of e-cigarettes and what would you recommend?’ and another asked applicants to discuss: ‘Why do you think vaping is a safer alternative [to smoking cigarettes]? (online supplementary tables A and B)’. Furthermore, 11 out of the 21 entities expressed either interest or legal right to publish submissions on their websites (online supplementary table B). A substantial minority of the 40 scholarships either had no age restrictions or required only that the applicant be a high school student (28%, n=11). Parents of students were also encouraged to submit an essay in favour of vaping for one scholarship.

Table 1

Details of vaping scholarships*


E-cigarette scholarships to youth and young adults are a concern for several reasons. These scholarships come at a dangerous time—when e-cigarette use by youth has become an epidemic. Policymakers around the USA are developing many approaches to decreasing youth e-cigarette use. Our research suggests that prohibitions on e-cigarette scholarships to youth are also needed, as many of these scholarships require youth under the age of 18 years (for whom use of e-cigarettes are illegal) to write positive essays about vaping. That the essay topics are not neutral introduces a strong positive bias for e-cigarettes, one that does not seem justified for youth given the known adverse health consequences.2

The scholarships are also likely designed to be a inexpensive way of increasing marketing and awareness of e-cigarette brands and devices, as they are listed not only on e-cigarette companies’ websites but also on many university or college web sites for students on financial aid information pages.3 As these scholarships may also be used to obtain personally identifiable information for advertising, list building, retargeting, ‘look-alike’ digital marketing, and other purposes, colleges that list such scholarships should reexamine their inclusion.

The effects of industry-funded education, scholarship and sponsorship can be seen in a variety of industries.4 5 As regulation of e-cigarettes becomes a growing priority for the FDA and other state agencies, attention should be dedicated to the promotion of e-cigarette scholarships as a tactic that contributes to promoting youth e-cigarette use.



  • Contributors AOG was responsible for helping to create the original research questions and analysis plan. GB wrote the first draft and conducted the analysis. KP and SDK contributed to the discussion and implications of the work. All authors contributed ideas, discussed the results and wrote the manuscript. All authors also approved the final version of the manuscript. AOG is the guarantor of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.