Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Affordability of cigarettes in ten Southeastern European countries between 2008 and 2019
  1. Jovan Zubović,
  2. Aleksandar Zdravković,
  3. Olivera Jovanović,
  4. Mihajlo Djukić,
  5. Marko Vladisavljević
  1. Institute of Economic Sciences, Beograd, Serbia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jovan Zubović, Institute of Economic Sciences, Beograd 11000, Serbia; jovan.zubovic{at}ien.bg.ac.rs

Abstract

Background The empirical evidence shows that tobacco consumption is strongly associated with its affordability. The nominal growth in tobacco prices imposed by taxation should exceed or at least keep pace with nominal income growth, ensuring that tobacco products become less affordable over time. No analysis covering affordability issues in the Southeastern European (SEE) region has been conducted prior to this research.

Objectives The study aims to examine trends in cigarette affordability in ten selected SEE countries over the period 2008–2019 and the impact of affordability on the consumption of cigarettes. On the policy side, it aims to support conducting of more effective evidence-based policy of tobacco taxation.

Methods The relative income price of cigarettes and the tobacco affordability index are used as affordability measures. The panel regression was run to estimate the impact of affordability measures and other covariates on cigarette consumption.

Results The affordability of cigarettes in the selected SEE countries has decreased on average but showed different patterns over the observed period. A decline in affordability has been more dynamic in Western Balkan (non-EU members) countries and low-and-middle-income countries within the SEE region. Econometric estimation confirms affordability as the main determinant of tobacco consumption, indicating that a decline in affordability considerably reduces tobacco consumption.

Conclusions Despite the evidence, affordability is still widely ignored by SEE policymakers when designing national tobacco taxation policies. Policymakers should be aware of the risk that future increases in cigarette prices could lag behind real income growth, making tax policy less effective at reducing consumption. Reducing affordability should be the paramount consideration in designing effective tobacco taxation policies.

  • price
  • economics
  • taxation

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • X @IEN_Beograd

  • Contributors Conceptualisation—JZ; methodology—AZ and MV; validation—AZ; resources—JZ and OJ; writing (original draft preparation)—JZ, MD, AZ, MV and OJ; writing (review and editing)—JZ, OJ and AZ; project administration—JZ; funding acquisition—JZ. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. JZ is the guarantor.

  • Funding This research was funded by the University of Illinois at Chicago’s Institute for Health Research and Policy through its partnership with the Bloomberg Philanthropies (grant number 16809). Research of the authors from the Institute of Economic Sciences in Serbia has been additionally supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.