Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Outdoor smoking bans: more than meets the eye
  1. MICHELLE BLOCH
  1. Medical Officer
  2. Tobacco Control Research Branch
  3. National Cancer Institute
  4. Rockville, MD 20852, USA
  5. Coordinator, Smoking and
  6. Tobacco Control Program
  7. National Cancer Institute
  8. Rockville, MD 20852, USA
    1. DONALD R SHOPLAND
    1. Medical Officer
    2. Tobacco Control Research Branch
    3. National Cancer Institute
    4. Rockville, MD 20852, USA
    5. Coordinator, Smoking and
    6. Tobacco Control Program
    7. National Cancer Institute
    8. Rockville, MD 20852, USA

      Statistics from Altmetric.com

      Request Permissions

      If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

      Simon Chapman argues that outdoor smoking bans are seldom justified because they can rarely be supported from a health standpoint, and they invite backlash from the community. We disagree. Rather, we believe that outdoor smoking bans are reasonable in a number of instances and that such bans can be justified for reasons other than health.

      All should agree that, while indoor smoking bans are a higher priority, smoking bans are justified for health reasons in those outdoor environments which are similar to indoor environments in terms of their exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Besides the crowded stadia example cited by Chapman, we would add outdoor entertainment facilities with assigned seating and other outdoor areas where smokers and non-smokers may have sustained, close contact. However, …

      View Full Text