Download PDFPDF

World's best practice in tobacco control
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    World's best taxation policy

    In Tobacco Control of June, 2000, you invited Michelle Scollo to write about world's best practice in tobacco taxation. In an otherwise elegant article she missed out what was, arguably, Australia's major contribution to tobacco tax policy. I refer to the idea of hypothecation (earmarking) of tobacco tax for health purposes, which was enshrined in the Victorian Tobacco Act of 1987 and copied by California, Massachusett...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.