Objective To explore and understand key cultural contexts of tobacco use among South Asian communities in the USA.
Design Focus groups, with homogeneous compositions of gender, generational status and length of time in the USA, were conducted in two distinct South Asian ethnic enclaves. Focus group findings were triangulated with observational data regarding the availability of culturally specific tobacco from commercial ethnic outlets and cultural events.
Subjects Respondents included 88 men and women of South Asian descent, aged 18–65 years, immigrant and native born, representing diversity of religion, socioeconomic status and region of origin, with the use of at least one culturally specific tobacco product in previous 24 months.
Results A large number of culturally specific products were commonly used by community members. Knowledge of product-specific health risks was lacking or inaccurate. Many culturally specific tobacco products were considered to have beneficial properties. South Asian tobacco items were used to preserve cultural traditions and express ethnic identity in a new dominant culture. The social and cultural values ascribed to use helped distinguish community members from mainstream society and from other minority populations.
Conclusions Many cultural factors govern tobacco use among diverse global populations. Especially for migrants with a common regional origin, the role of ethnic identity may strongly influence culturally specific tobacco patterns. Qualitative inquiry helps elucidate such culturally framed behaviour in culturally diverse populations. These cultural contexts should be integrated into research and practice. Understanding multidimensional factors influencing non-traditional tobacco use is essential to ensure that comprehensive tobacco control strategies address tobacco-related disparities.
- Qualitative study
- smokeless tobacco products
- tobacco products
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Funding This study was supported by a Research Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research under National Cancer Institute (NCI) grant U01 CA 114640 (Chen, PI) and the State of California's Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (TRDRP), Post-doctoral Fellowship Award #19FT-0175 (AM, PI). Other funders: NIH.
Competing interests All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf(available on request from the corresponding author) and they declare no support from any organisation for the submitted work, no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Committee for Protection of Human Subjects (Institutional Review Board) at the University of California, Berkeley.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.