Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Impact of tax increases on illicit cigarette trade in Mongolia
  1. Hana Ross1,
  2. Nicole Vellios1,
  3. Tsetsegsaikhan Batmunkh2,
  4. Myadagmaa Enkhtsogt2,
  5. Laura Rossouw1
  1. 1Economics of Tobacco Control Project, School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  2. 2National Cancer Council of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  1. Correspondence to Nicole Vellios, Economics of Tobacco Control Project, School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7700, South Africa; nicole.vellios{at}uct.ac.za

Abstract

Background The Mongolian government increased import tobacco tax by 30% in May 2017 and excise tobacco tax by 10% in January 2018. To assess the impact of these tax increases on illicit cigarette trade, we estimate illicit trade before and after tax increases.

Methods Discarded cigarette packs were collected in the capital city and in two provinces near China, the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan. Tax increases occurred between all three rounds (April 2017, August/September 2017, May/June 2018). Cigarette packs are identified as illicit if there is evidence that tax was not paid. This is deduced from the absence of the Mongolian excise tax stamp, or the absence of traces of a tax stamp (glue residue). Data are weighted to represent the areas sampled.

Results In round 1, 15.4% (95% CI 14.6% to 16.2%) of the 7494 collected packs were illicit. This estimate decreased to 13.6% (95% CI 12.7% to 14.5%) in round 2 (5852 collected packs) and to 6.3% (95% CI 5.7% to 6.9%) in round 3 (6258 collected packs). Illicit cigarettes originated primarily from the Republic of Korea and Ukraine, but some were manufactured in Mongolia. While the majority of illicit products are supplied by global companies (Korea Tobacco & Ginseng, Imperial Tobacco and Philip Morris Kazakhstan), one local company, Mongol Tobacco SO, is also implicated.

Conclusions The share of illicit cigarettes declined between rounds 1 and 2 despite the import tax increase, and this trend continued in round 3 despite the excise tax increase.

  • illegal tobacco products
  • low/middle income country
  • packaging and labelling
  • taxation
  • advocacy
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors HR developed the idea for this research and wrote the first draft of the paper. NV assisted with data cleaning, data analysis and writing the paper. TB managed data collection. ME entered and cleaned the data. LR calculated the weights and conducted the data analysis.

  • Funding Cancer Research UK (IRMA 25171).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Data are available in a public, open access repository.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.