Article Text
Abstract
Background While much is known about the influence of tobacco control spending on the demand for conventional cigarettes, little is known about the effects of tobacco control spending on the demand for electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). This study provides the first evidence on the association between state tobacco control spending and high school student vaping in the USA.
Methods We used data from the 2015 through 2019 National Youth Risk Behavior Surveys to estimate vaping prevalence and vaping intensity demand equations. We employed logistic regressions to estimate the vaping prevalence equations and generalised linear models with log-link and gamma distribution to estimate the vaping intensity equations.
Results We found evidence that funding for state tobacco control programmes had a significant negative association with both vaping prevalence and vaping intensity among high school students in the USA. Our results indicate that a 50% increase in state spending on tobacco control during the time of the surveys would have been associated with a 7.46% lower high school student vaping prevalence rate than what was observed.
Conclusions There has been a dramatic increase in e-cigarette use by adolescents and young adults in the USA. The rapid rise in e-cigarette use has been a significant source of public policy concern for many states. The results of this study strongly suggest that increased spending on tobacco control programmes will reduce the number of high school students who vape and will decrease the number of days vaping products are used by high school students. These findings should be extremely valuable to policymakers interested in curbing the youth vaping epidemic in the USA.
- electronic nicotine delivery devices
- prevention
- public policy
- economics
Data availability statement
The data used in this study are available upon request.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
The data used in this study are available upon request.
Footnotes
Twitter @MeganCDiaz
Contributors JT and MCD were the primary writers of the article and participated in the study design, statistical analysis and interpretation of data. BS and DV participated in the study design, helped to interpret findings and reviewed drafts of the article. JT is responsible for the overall content and acts the as guarantor of the paper.
Funding Support for this research was provided by Truth Initiative.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.