You are here

  • Home
  • Online First
  • Reframing social media discourse following the FDA’s menthol ban announcement as industry agenda setting rather than public sentiment

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Short report
Reframing social media discourse following the FDA’s menthol ban announcement as industry agenda setting rather than public sentiment
  1. Nathan A Silver1,
  2. Elexis C Kierstead1,
  3. Sherry L Emery2,
  4. Steven Binns2,
  5. Mignonne C Guy3,4,
  6. Barbara Schillo1
  1. 1Truth Initiative Schroeder Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
  2. 2Public Health, NORC, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  3. 3African American Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
  4. 4Department of Psychology, Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
  1. Correspondence to Nathan A Silver, Truth Initiative Schroeder Institute, Washington, USA; nsilver{at}truthinitiative.org

Abstract

Background The tobacco industry has spent millions of dollars promoting racialised narratives against the US Food and Drug Administration’s recently announced ban on menthol as a characterising cigarette flavour. This research investigates racialised narratives in online discourse following the ban’s announcement.

Methods Tweets and users responding to the April 2022 menthol ban announcement were content analysed to examine the influence of tobacco industry affiliates and potentially organic African-American/Black (AA/B) users. Next we investigated the extent to which the menthol ban was discussed on AA/B subreddits and used Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modelling to provide an overview of the menthol ban discussion on Reddit.

Results Only 28 (13.9%) tweets by 22 users claimed that the menthol ban would lead to police violence and/or racial discrimination. Of users who tweeted about over-policing, eight (36.4%) had financial connections to the tobacco industry. There were only three tweets receiving a combined seven retweets from potentially organic AA/B users. On Reddit, only two posts with one comment discussed the menthol ban on subreddits dedicated to AA/B issues and culture. Topic modelling showed that the most common topic related to the menthol ban involved the social and political implications of the ban followed by illicit markets and protecting youth.

Conclusion Tweets claiming a menthol ban will lead to police violence are indicative of industry agenda-setting. The menthol ban was not a prominent topic of discussion in AA/B subreddits although users discussing news and politics expressed concern for how AA/B people would respond to a ban politically.

  • Tobacco industry
  • Disparities
  • Public policy

Data availability statement

Data used in this study is housed at NORC at the University of Chicago and is not publicly available. Any inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058719

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Data availability statement

    Data used in this study is housed at NORC at the University of Chicago and is not publicly available. Any inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • X @sherryemery

    • Contributors NS: conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft; EK and MG : writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; SE: conceptualisation, writing—review and editing; SB: conceptualisation, methodology; BS: conceptualisation, supervision, writing—review and editing.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests No, there are no competing interests.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.