Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Economic costs of tobacco-related diseases in Hong Kong in 2021
  1. Carmen S Ng1,
  2. Coco Wing Sze Yu1,
  3. Lancelot Leung1,
  4. Eponine Kate Wong1,
  5. Sai Yin Ho1,
  6. Dennis K M Ip1,
  7. Yongda Wu2,3,
  8. Man Ping Wang2,
  9. Jianchao Quan1,4
  1. 1School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  2. 2School of Nursing, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  3. 3CHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  4. 4HKU Business School, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jianchao Quan; jquan{at}hku.hk

Abstract

Background Hong Kong has one of the lowest smoking prevalence both within China and among high-income economies. As tobacco use consistently declined over the past decades, we examine whether there are corresponding cost reductions.

Methods Data were sourced from diverse population-wide datasets including government reports and public hospital records. Costs were calculated using Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 risk estimates for active smoking. Direct costs encompassed public and private healthcare expenses, while indirect costs included the value of years of productive life lost, days off work due to active smoking or secondhand smoke exposure, and long-term care costs.

Findings Active smoking accounted for 26.3% of deaths in people aged 35 or over. Healthcare costs amounted to US$342 million and US$45 million for active and secondhand smoking. Annual tobacco-related diseases reached US$1.27 billion (0.3% of 2021 Hong Kong GDP). Compared with previous methods, the analysis using GBD 2019 risk estimates showed a twofold increase in lives lost due to active smoking but a 31.0% decrease for secondhand smoking.

Interpretation Past studies greatly underestimate the health burden of tobacco compared with more recent data on the wider risks. Despite a decline in smoking prevalence, the total costs associated with smoking have risen as utilisation shifts from primary care towards more expensive specialist care. The long-term health and economic impacts of tobacco use remain substantial even in regions of China that have now achieved low smoking prevalence.

  • Smoking Caused Disease
  • Economics
  • Health Services

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. All data relevant to the study are available from the Government of the Hong Kong SAR (Department of Health, Census and Statistics Department, Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau), Hospital Authority, and Hong Kong Council on Smoking and Health.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. All data relevant to the study are available from the Government of the Hong Kong SAR (Department of Health, Census and Statistics Department, Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau), Hospital Authority, and Hong Kong Council on Smoking and Health.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • CSN and CWSY contributed equally.

  • Contributors JQ and CSN conceptualised and designed the study. CSN and CWSY conducted the statistical analysis and data visualisation. LL, EKW, YW and MPW collected the data and searched the literature. JQ, CSN and CWSY interpreted the results, drafted the manuscript and compiled edits from other authors. JQ, SYH and DKMI obtained funding. JQ supervised the study. All authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version. JQ and CSN are the guarantors of this study.

  • Funding This study was supported by Department of Health, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.