NOT PEER REVIEWED
We explicitly did not do a systematic review, which would have
included things such as assessing articles for quality and assessing for
presence of publication bias. Instead we opted for a narrative review.
This decision was made given the limited time available for the authors to
complete the supplement prior to the World Conference on Tobacco or Health
and the small number of available articles after ou...
NOT PEER REVIEWED
We explicitly did not do a systematic review, which would have
included things such as assessing articles for quality and assessing for
presence of publication bias. Instead we opted for a narrative review.
This decision was made given the limited time available for the authors to
complete the supplement prior to the World Conference on Tobacco or Health
and the small number of available articles after our literature search.
Our exclusion and inclusion criteria were also stated (see Figure 1).
Lastly, our search was up until September 9, 2014, therefore any articles
published afterwards were not included in the publication. We believe that
this paper represents a significant contribution concerning a newly
emerging threat to the health of the public.
Matt et al's demonstration that nicotine can be detected in house
dust, on surfaces and on fingers in homes formerly occupied by smokers[1]
is used as a springboard to promote concern about third hand
smoke(THS)[2]. Given the rudimentary nature of most domestic cleaning and
the common experience of the distinctive smell of stale tobacco smoke, few
will find it surprising that traces of nicotine can be found in smokers'...
Matt et al's demonstration that nicotine can be detected in house
dust, on surfaces and on fingers in homes formerly occupied by smokers[1]
is used as a springboard to promote concern about third hand
smoke(THS)[2]. Given the rudimentary nature of most domestic cleaning and
the common experience of the distinctive smell of stale tobacco smoke, few
will find it surprising that traces of nicotine can be found in smokers'
homes long after they have vacated them.
While Schick notes several times that the health consequences of this
level of exposure are unknown, the title of her editorial says that THS is
"here to stay"[2], presumably an intended pun suggesting that concerns
about the health implications of THS are now established. Schick notes
that nicotine "and all the other things that go along with it" can pollute
houses. But the soup of gases, fine and ultra-fine particles in tobacco
smoke that include irritants, toxins and carcinogens has much in common
with smoke emitted as pyrolisis products from the combustion of other
organic matter: when you breath wood smoke[3], cooking smoke[4] or
petroleum smoke[5], you are exposed to many of the very same irritants and
carcinogens that are also in tobacco smoke.
So why did Matt et al consider only nicotine? There is not a house
anywhere that is not finely carpeted with many of the very same pyrolysis
compounds "that go along with" nicotine but which originate from everyday
activities like heating, cooking, candles, electrical appliances, and
leaving windows and doors open to allow household exposure to motor
transport fumes. Had they done so, equally "alarming" information about
all our houses would have emerged to give their findings some important
perspective.
The evidence base that has supported indoor smoking restrictions is
concentrated around fine particle (PM2.5) concentrations emitted in
unhealthy abundance by smoking[6] and on the evidence of harm from
particularly chronic exposure to those particles and what they contain.
While nicotine is often used as a marker for secondhand smoke exposure and
not benign[7], nicotine is far from being the chief health concern.
Ott and Seigmann[8] and Wallace and Ott[9] provide data on fine and
ultra-fine particle emissions from different sources: "Controlled
experiments with 10 cigarettes averaged 0.15 ng mm-2 ... ambient wood
smoke averaged 0.29 ng mm-2 or about twice those of cigarettes and cigars
... In-vehicle exposures measured on 43 and 50 min drives on a California
arterial highway gave PC/DC ratios of 0.42 and 0.58 ng mm-2 ... Interstate
highways had PC/DC ratios of approximately 0.5 ng mm-2 with ratios above 1
ng mm-2 when driving behind diesel trucks. These PC/DC ratios were higher
than the ''signature'' value of the cigarette (0.11-0.19 ngmm-2)measured
in a large Indian gaming casino with smoking." [8]
Tobacco smoke also contains ultra-fine particles. Other sources of
ultra-fine particles (UFPs) include "laser printers, fax machines,
photocopiers, the peeling of citrus fruits, cooking, penetration of
contaminated outdoor air, chimney cracks and vacuum cleaners."[8] Wallace
and Ott's data on concentrations of UFPs in restaurants and cars found
"cooking on gas or electric stoves and electric toaster ovens was a major
source of UFP, with peak personal exposures often exceeding 100,000
particles/cm3 .... Other common sources of high UFP exposures [in
restaurants] were cigarettes, a vented gas clothes dryer, an air popcorn
popper, candles, an electric mixer, a toaster, a hair dryer, a curling
iron, and a steam iron."[9]
It is important that research documents residuals from tobacco smoke.
But it is equally important that consumers and policy makers are not led
to believe that the chemical compounds thus located are somehow unique to
tobacco smoke. Unless in the extremely unlikely event that residents burn
copious quantities of solanaceous vegetables (aubergine, tomato) which
contain small amounts of nicotine, tobacco is going to be the only source
of nicotine in homes. But it will not by any means be the only source of
many of the ingredients of "third hand smoke" that the unwitting or the
fumophobic may believe are attributable only to smoking. The omission of
this information in such reports risks harming the credibility of tobacco
control.
References
1. Matt, G.E., et al., When smokers move out and non-smokers move in:
residential thirdhand smoke pollution and exposure. Tob Control, 2011.
20(1): p. e1.
2. Schick, S., Thirdhand smoke: here to stay. Tob Control, 2011.
20(1): p. 1-3.
3. Naeher, L.P., et al., Woodsmoke health effects: a review. Inhal
Toxicol, 2007. 19(1): p. 67-106.
4. Lijinsky, W., The formation and occurrence of polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons associated with food. Mutat Res, 1991. 259(3-4): p. 251-61.
5. Mehlman, M.A., Dangerous properties of petroleum-refining
products: carcinogenicity of motor fuels (gasoline). Teratog Carcinog
Mutagen, 1990. 10(5): p. 399-408.
6. Hyland, A., et al., A 32-country comparison of tobacco smoke
derived particle levels in indoor public places. Tobacco Control, 2008.
17(3): p. 159-65.
7. Sleiman, M., et al., Formation of carcinogens indoors by surface-
mediated reactions of nicotine with nitrous acid, leading to potential
thirdhand smoke hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2010. 107(15): p. 6576-
81.
8. Ott, W. and M. Siegmann, Using multiple continuous fine particle
monitors to characterize tobacco, incense, candle, cooking, wood burning,
and vehicular sources in indoor, outdoor, and in-transit settings.
Atmospheric Environment, 2006. 40: p. 821-843.
9. Wallace, L. and W. Ott, Personal exposure to ultrafine particles.
Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 0, 2011. 21: p.
20-30.
This death-at-a-discount study has excellent timing; it may be that
the 110th Congress will approve an increase in commissary tobacco prices!
I suggest the pricing of tobacco products available to our soldiers be
added to the criteria for grading the federal government on tobacco
control [1].
[1] American Lung Association. State of Tobacco Control: 2006.
[cited 2/13/07]; Available from: http://lungaction.org/...
This death-at-a-discount study has excellent timing; it may be that
the 110th Congress will approve an increase in commissary tobacco prices!
I suggest the pricing of tobacco products available to our soldiers be
added to the criteria for grading the federal government on tobacco
control [1].
[1] American Lung Association. State of Tobacco Control: 2006.
[cited 2/13/07]; Available from: http://lungaction.org/reports/tobacco-
control06.html
NOT PEER REVIEWED
I read the research paper (other authors Ashvin, Emmanuel, Frank and
Prabhat) with interest.
Quite a few new points have been brought out. One of the important
political reasons for resistance is that hand made ones are done in rural
areas where alternate means of employment are hard to come by. This
results in the local political representative arguing against tax.
NOT PEER REVIEWED
I read the research paper (other authors Ashvin, Emmanuel, Frank and
Prabhat) with interest.
Quite a few new points have been brought out. One of the important
political reasons for resistance is that hand made ones are done in rural
areas where alternate means of employment are hard to come by. This
results in the local political representative arguing against tax.
Alternatives such as Agarbathi (insense stick) manufacturing, Coir
weaving or other rural handicrafts - must be suggested to make the
argument for higher taxation on Bidi. In all these cases the raw material
supply and picking up the finished products remains the responsibility of
the manufacturer (similar to the operation of making Bidi, but with no ill
effects on society).
Also, the higher probability of cancer in cigarette smoking must be
countered with the argument that larger number of Bidis are smoked per
person per day (since it is considerably cheaper).
Without such specific suggestions - this will remain a research paper
of analysis but not directive. Without a clear directive, no government
(much less the local politician) can act to change the situation. Also,
advertising of tobacco products is banned in India. So, that channel is
not an option.
How could the top manufacturer "Mangalore Ganesha Bidi" regain market
share in a matter of 1-2 years? They continue to supply 3.5 million small
packets every day (25 bidi in each packet). They have been the biggest
manufacturer for over five decades now. Their industry was
built on the fact that it is all hand made and provides employment in
rural areas.
Therefore, alternatives that provide credible means of livelihood in the
rural area, are essential in order to make any progress.
Dr Gupta’s letter suggests that the reduction in lung cancer in both
Sweden and Connecticut is highly likely to be due to a reduction in
smoking in both places. This is entirely unsurprising, and as far as
Sweden is concerned is precisely what we suggested in the original paper
he referred to:
“There has been a larger drop in male daily smoking (from 40% in 1976
to 15% in 2002) than female daily smoking (34% in...
Dr Gupta’s letter suggests that the reduction in lung cancer in both
Sweden and Connecticut is highly likely to be due to a reduction in
smoking in both places. This is entirely unsurprising, and as far as
Sweden is concerned is precisely what we suggested in the original paper
he referred to:
“There has been a larger drop in male daily smoking (from 40% in 1976
to 15% in 2002) than female daily smoking (34% in 1976 to 20% in 2002) in
Sweden, with a substantial proportion (around 30%) of male ex-smokers
using snus when quitting smoking. Over the same time period, rates of lung
cancer and myocardial infarction have dropped significantly faster among
Swedish men than women and remain at low levels as compared with other
developed countries with a long history of tobacco use.” (p349,
abstract)1.
The idea that smoking and lung cancer rates may fall to a similar or
greater degree in other places is entirely irrelevant to whether or not
snus played a role in smoking reduction in Swedish men. Indeed, in the
original paper we stated clearly that:
“Both within and outside Sweden, smoking is primarily influenced by
factors other than availability of smokeless tobacco (for example, real
price of cigarettes, health education, smoke-free air policies, industry
marketing, etc).” (p357)1
It is therefore entirely unsurprising that these types of factors
will have influenced smoking and lung cancer rates in the United States
and every other country, regardless of whether or not snus is available. A
key point in our original paper that distinguished Sweden from other
countries was that smoking rates WITHIN that country have fallen
significantly faster in men than women, and that this appeared to be
related to the fact that men in Sweden use snus much more than women. So
although these comparisons between one country in Europe and a state in
the US are almost entirely irrelevant to the question of the effect of
snus use on lung cancer rates in Sweden, the more appropriate comparison
(if one wanted to make one) would be of the difference in decline of lung
cancer rates between men and women in Sweden as compared to changes in
that difference in the US. It is not clear whether the data presented in
Dr Gupta’s letter was for men, women or both.
Since the publication of our original paper there have been
subsequent publications that have confirmed that in Sweden, men who start
using snus are less likely to become daily smokers, that men who smoke and
then start using snus are more likely to stop smoking, and that a higher
proportion of men than women in Sweden have quit smoking, with the
difference largely attributable to snus use2,3. It had previously been
suggested that the men who quit smoking in Sweden are not the same ones
who start using snus (and that snus use is therefore not involved in men
quitting smoking)4. However, studies have now verified that in fact a
sizeable proportion (26-29%) of Swedish men who quit smoking use snus as a
smoking cessation aid2,5.
It is now crystal clear that their transfer of nicotine dependence
onto snus has accelerated the rate of decline of smoking among Swedish men
in substantial numbers. That transfer from an extremely harmful form of
tobacco use (cigarette smoking) to a much less harmful form (snus) has
contributed to a reduction in the rate of smoking-caused diseases in
Swedish men.
1. Foulds J, Ramstrom L, Burke M, Fagerstrom K. The effect of
smokeless tobacco (snus) on public health in Sweden. Tobacco Control 2003;
12:349-59.
2. Ramström LM, Foulds J. The role of snus (smokeless tobacco) in
initiation and cessation of tobacco smoking in Sweden. Tobacco Control
2006 Jun;15(3):210-4.Pdf available at:
http://www.tobaccoprogram.org/staffarticles.htm
3. Furberg Furberg H, Bulik C, Lerman C, et al. Is Swedish snus associated
with smoking initiation or smoking cessation? Tob Control.2005; 14:422-
424.
4. Tomar SL, Connolly GN, Wilkenfeld J, Henningfield JE. Declining smoking
in Sweden: Is Swedish Match getting the credit for Swedish tobacco
control’s efforts? Tobacco Control2003; 12:368-59
5. Gilljam H, Galanti MR. Role of snus (oral moist snuff) in smoking
cessation and smoking reduction in Sweden. Addiction 2003;98:1183-9.
NOT PEER REVIEWED This paper, although the authors may well have found evidence in line
with their intent, could also open our eyes to another distinct and
obvious perspective. One which may well be glossed over, in our
determination to find the target perspective many seek. What if a smoke
free environment could substantially increase population mortality and
morbidity health risks? Is it too late to rethink our positi...
NOT PEER REVIEWED This paper, although the authors may well have found evidence in line
with their intent, could also open our eyes to another distinct and
obvious perspective. One which may well be glossed over, in our
determination to find the target perspective many seek. What if a smoke
free environment could substantially increase population mortality and
morbidity health risks? Is it too late to rethink our position, or to
mitigate that risk? The idea is most often met with immediate dismissal.
However there is indeed biological plausibility and physical routes by
which the argument could be made and made quite convincingly.
The sediment studied in this paper adds significantly to that
argument, by the measures of physical evidence which were found, although
viral matter or sub micron toxic particulate from ambient air sources was
not thoroughly investigated. It is a perspective we have been neglecting
by lack of investigation. When people congregate, if one in the room
carries a contagious disease and he coughs or sneezes, emitting into the
room a virus that would then be inhaled by others within the room, the
virus spreads infecting others exponentially. Cigarette smoke acts by its
physical properties as a sticky mask that hangs in the air, collecting sub
micron particulate and biological toxins. Which even if inhaled could be
rendered to the larger extent, ineffective in promoting harms.
Fine particulate cigarette smoke is sticky in nature, in the 2-3
micron range with a capacity to collect large amounts of sub micron
particles, with unique velocities and trajectories swirling around within
that space. Considering the increased mass by combining the virus or sub
micron particulate with tobacco smoke; viral and ultra fine particulate
matter in the majority is either excavated from the room by increased
ventilation potentials or earned filtering potentials. Within systems
which otherwise would have no effect, or even a contributing effect to the
toxic particle volumes contained in that space. Traditionally ventilation
rates have been increased to limit the tobacco smoke odors and are in turn
decreased when it is less pervasive or not noticeable. The viral or sub
micron particulate is either evacuated more efficiently in a smoking
allowed environment, or is attached firmly to any solid object in the
room, as demonstrated by the authors herein. As the study indicates that
adhesion will last for months after smoking has ceased which is well
beyond the lifespan of the hardiest of viruses.
Thus we see a large degree of mitigation, of both harm and risk. With
smoke in the room the chances are much less that someone in that room will
become infected by contagions, or poisoned by the most dangerous of non
ETS ambient air contaminants, compared to the substantial increased risk
without the smoke. The same arguments could be made in relation to any sub
micron particulate, with a large array of carcinogens and toxins found in
ambient air which have no proper risk assessment to date, which will only
increase the potential for adverse effects. The limited evidence of
increased risk by Environmental Tobacco Smoke [ETS] is based primarily in
"lifetime exposure" estimates. Most within the precautionary principle of
assessment, or "worst case", with few of the immediate variety of health
risks, demonstrating any substantial or significant numeric effect, which
could be remotely comparable to a larger effect by pollen or Diesel
exhaust, which are for the most part unavoidable.
According to the American CDC; the common Flu alone kills more than
35,000 annually within the American population, a risk that is immediate
and sees its effect within hours or a few days. Can we simply dismiss that
immediate risk as implausible? Were the numeric value increased, by what
ever means, the mortality impact among the millions at risk would be
substantial. The actual population risks understandably carry a potential
to provide a much more devastating risk than anything surmised by the most
aggressive estimate of mortality and morbidity, which could possibly be
caused by tobacco smoke or its sediments.
Unintended consequence is an argument in need of discussion and
investigation, evolved by the warning; "be careful what you wish for,
because you just might get it".
NOT PEER REVIEWED
Cavazos-Rehg et al. compared the results of Google Trends relative
search volume (RSV) data for non-cigarette tobacco use with data from
state- and national-level youth surveys.[1] Given the authors' findings of
positive correlations with Google Trends and survey data, we agree with
the conclusion that Google Trends may be a potential tool to provide real-
time monitoring for non-cigarette tobacco use. T...
NOT PEER REVIEWED
Cavazos-Rehg et al. compared the results of Google Trends relative
search volume (RSV) data for non-cigarette tobacco use with data from
state- and national-level youth surveys.[1] Given the authors' findings of
positive correlations with Google Trends and survey data, we agree with
the conclusion that Google Trends may be a potential tool to provide real-
time monitoring for non-cigarette tobacco use. The 2014 National Youth
Tobacco Survey indicates that electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS)
use has tripled by middle and high school students from 2013-2014.[2] We
have conducted a preliminary review of Google Trends RSV data for ENDS to
detect if there were trends that may mirror acquisition patterns of ENDS
within and outside of the US.
The methods we used were similar to Ayers et al., who conducted a
data analysis from Google search engines from January 2008 through
September 2010.[3] We compiled a list of search terms in singular and
plural forms that reflected the most commonly used search terms for ENDS
including "e cig," "e cigarette," "electronic cigarette," and popular name
brands. To continue building the list, we added popular "related terms" as
indicated by Google Trends searches. When search terms exceeded the 30-
word limit, we compared RSV for individual terms and removed those with
the lowest RSV. Irrelevant (non-ENDS) results were excluded.[1] Results
were limited to October 2011 to May 2015 and included all countries.
Search queries range from 0-100 in volume, with the highest RSV assigned a
100.[4]
Similar to prior work,[3] ENDS emerged in all markets and RSV trends
have slowly increased since 2011, peaking in January each year. This
suggests that interest in information on ENDS is growing, and that there
has been a recent shift in interest by country compared to prior
findings.[3] The greatest RSV of ENDS is in the United Kingdom (100),
followed by the United States (84), Ireland (63), Cyprus (46), Malta (42),
Canada (41), Trinidad and Tobago (35), Australia (33), Philippines (29),
and New Zealand (29).
Web search data can help fill gaps by providing a timely
understanding of real-world activity and good temporal and spatial
resolution.[5] It is unclear how these search patterns reflect use
patterns in youth. Future investigations with comparisons to youth
surveillance datasets and population-level efforts using real-time
monitoring of youth interest,[6] and tracking of use patterns may help to
inform timely prevention programs and policies for ENDS, other non-
tobacco, and tobacco products.
References
1. Cavazos-Rehg PA, Krauss MJ, Spitznagel EL, et al. Monitoring of
non-cigarette tobacco use using Google trends. Tob Control. 2015;24(3):249
-255.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. E-cigarette use
triples among middle and high school students in just one year. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention Newsroom. 2015.
http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2015/p0416-e-cigarette-use.html
(accessed 01 Jun 2015).
3. Ayers JW, Ribisl KM, Brownstein JS. Tracking the rise in
popularity of electronic nicotine delivery systems (electronic cigarettes)
using search query surveillance. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(4):448-453.
4. Google Trends. About Google Trends. Google. 2015.
https://support.google.com/trends/answer/4355164?hl=en&ref_topic=4365531
(accessed 05 Jun 2015).
5. Mohebbi M, Dan Vanderkam JK, Kodysh J, et al. Google correlate
whitepaper. Google. 2011:1-6.
https://www.google.com/trends/correlate/whitepaper.pdf (accessed 01 Jun
2015).
6. Goel S, Hofman JM, Lahaie S, et al. Predicting consumer behavior
with web search. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(41):17486-17490.
The longstanding tradition of the U.S. military and tobacco industry
leaders 'smoking in the good ol' boys room' is well documented by the
Smith, Blackmon, Malone "Death at a Discount" research paper!
It is time that the military and other federal politicos become
concerned about the health of our military, and drop the montra of tobacco
use being a 'right'. Obviously, the lobby of the tobacco industry even
infi...
The longstanding tradition of the U.S. military and tobacco industry
leaders 'smoking in the good ol' boys room' is well documented by the
Smith, Blackmon, Malone "Death at a Discount" research paper!
It is time that the military and other federal politicos become
concerned about the health of our military, and drop the montra of tobacco
use being a 'right'. Obviously, the lobby of the tobacco industry even
infiltrates the Department of Defense offices, too.
While military personnel can buy tobacco products cheaply in base
commissaries, they also are readily hooked on snuff and cigarettes whil
deployed overseas (a known tactic of the industry since WWI). This
acciction to tobacco products spells profits to the industry when our
soldiers return, plus significant future health care costs to all.
West Virginia has a documented high prevalence of tobacco addiction
in our reserve and active military families.
We have made tobacco cessation quitline services available free-of-charge
to resident military personnel and their immediate family members through
a statewide program called AboutFace. The Federal government and
Department of Defense need to do an 'about face' on their view of tobacco
use and the military.
NOT PEER REVIEWED
Perhaps inflaming social confrontation has become so common that
people no longer care what they say to each other any longer. Many feel
it is all temporary posturing in order to stake out a claim in the
impersonal electronic landscape. It is a reflection of unbridled identity
rather than thought. In the electronic communications environment,
opinionated commentators have started to believe they are...
NOT PEER REVIEWED
Perhaps inflaming social confrontation has become so common that
people no longer care what they say to each other any longer. Many feel
it is all temporary posturing in order to stake out a claim in the
impersonal electronic landscape. It is a reflection of unbridled identity
rather than thought. In the electronic communications environment,
opinionated commentators have started to believe they are speaking truths
to the uninitiated. Thus, social change is not difficult; it is just
continuing to live out perceptions of self. It takes only being, not
commitment, courage or camaraderie.
In contrast, there are those who take hatred personally. Given that
the tobacco industry has proven itself untruthful, unethical and criminal,
one would hope that some would want to do their personal utmost to rid the
earth of the corrupting influence of tobacco and those who represent it.
As reflected in the recent financial prognosis by Citigroup (See News
Analysis, March 2011), I see it is a social change that even economists
don't feel improbable. I urge countering hatred with mindful action.
Even now, the cacophony of controversy subsides.
It would be useful to know if international brands contain pig hemoglobin -- could DNA analysis be helpful?
Also, did Muslim and Jewish smokers quit after hearing the story?
Conflict of Interest:
None declared
NOT PEER REVIEWED We explicitly did not do a systematic review, which would have included things such as assessing articles for quality and assessing for presence of publication bias. Instead we opted for a narrative review. This decision was made given the limited time available for the authors to complete the supplement prior to the World Conference on Tobacco or Health and the small number of available articles after ou...
Matt et al's demonstration that nicotine can be detected in house dust, on surfaces and on fingers in homes formerly occupied by smokers[1] is used as a springboard to promote concern about third hand smoke(THS)[2]. Given the rudimentary nature of most domestic cleaning and the common experience of the distinctive smell of stale tobacco smoke, few will find it surprising that traces of nicotine can be found in smokers'...
This death-at-a-discount study has excellent timing; it may be that the 110th Congress will approve an increase in commissary tobacco prices! I suggest the pricing of tobacco products available to our soldiers be added to the criteria for grading the federal government on tobacco control [1].
[1] American Lung Association. State of Tobacco Control: 2006. [cited 2/13/07]; Available from: http://lungaction.org/...
NOT PEER REVIEWED I read the research paper (other authors Ashvin, Emmanuel, Frank and Prabhat) with interest.
Quite a few new points have been brought out. One of the important political reasons for resistance is that hand made ones are done in rural areas where alternate means of employment are hard to come by. This results in the local political representative arguing against tax.
Alternatives such...
Dr Gupta’s letter suggests that the reduction in lung cancer in both Sweden and Connecticut is highly likely to be due to a reduction in smoking in both places. This is entirely unsurprising, and as far as Sweden is concerned is precisely what we suggested in the original paper he referred to:
“There has been a larger drop in male daily smoking (from 40% in 1976 to 15% in 2002) than female daily smoking (34% in...
NOT PEER REVIEWED This paper, although the authors may well have found evidence in line with their intent, could also open our eyes to another distinct and obvious perspective. One which may well be glossed over, in our determination to find the target perspective many seek. What if a smoke free environment could substantially increase population mortality and morbidity health risks? Is it too late to rethink our positi...
NOT PEER REVIEWED Cavazos-Rehg et al. compared the results of Google Trends relative search volume (RSV) data for non-cigarette tobacco use with data from state- and national-level youth surveys.[1] Given the authors' findings of positive correlations with Google Trends and survey data, we agree with the conclusion that Google Trends may be a potential tool to provide real- time monitoring for non-cigarette tobacco use. T...
The longstanding tradition of the U.S. military and tobacco industry leaders 'smoking in the good ol' boys room' is well documented by the Smith, Blackmon, Malone "Death at a Discount" research paper!
It is time that the military and other federal politicos become concerned about the health of our military, and drop the montra of tobacco use being a 'right'. Obviously, the lobby of the tobacco industry even infi...
NOT PEER REVIEWED Perhaps inflaming social confrontation has become so common that people no longer care what they say to each other any longer. Many feel it is all temporary posturing in order to stake out a claim in the impersonal electronic landscape. It is a reflection of unbridled identity rather than thought. In the electronic communications environment, opinionated commentators have started to believe they are...
Pages