TY - JOUR T1 - State variation in retail promotions and advertising for Marlboro cigarettes JF - Tobacco Control JO - Tob Control SP - 337 LP - 339 DO - 10.1136/tc.10.4.337 VL - 10 IS - 4 AU - Sandy Slater AU - Frank J Chaloupka AU - Melanie Wakefield Y1 - 2001/12/01 UR - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/10/4/337.abstract N2 - BACKGROUND There is some evidence that tobacco companies marketing efforts undermine the effects of comprehensive tobacco control programmes. OBJECTIVE To determine whether point-of-purchase advertising and promotions are more pervasive in states where comprehensive tobacco control programmes are underway. DESIGN Cross sectional survey using 1996 data, with merged records of the existence of local tobacco advertising restrictions. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING 581 tobacco retail stores located in close proximity to high schools in mainland USA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Existence of gift-with-purchase, number of interior advertisements, and exterior store advertisements for Marlboro cigarettes. RESULTS After controlling for store type and existence of advertising restrictions, offer of a gift-with-purchase for Marlboro cigarettes was significantly more likely in states with comprehensive tobacco control programmes than those without programmes (odds ratio 2.59, 95% confidence interval 1.57 to 4.26). Although not significant, results show an increase in the number of interior and exterior store advertisements for stores located in states with a comprehensive tobacco control programme than those in other states. CONCLUSION Results suggest some point-of-purchase tobacco promotions and advertising are more pervasive in states with comprehensive tobacco control programmes. These efforts are likely to act against the objectives of programmes and need to be accounted for in programme evaluations. ER -