PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Debra Efroymson AU - Saifuddin Ahmed AU - Joy Townsend AU - Syed Mahbubul Alam AU - Amit Ranjan Dey AU - Ranjit Saha AU - Biplob Dhar AU - Aminul Islam Sujon AU - Kayum Uddin Ahmed AU - Oliur Rahman TI - Hungry for tobacco: an analysis of the economic impact of tobacco consumption on the poor in Bangladesh AID - 10.1136/tc.10.3.212 DP - 2001 Sep 01 TA - Tobacco Control PG - 212--217 VI - 10 IP - 3 4099 - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/10/3/212.short 4100 - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/10/3/212.full SO - Tob Control2001 Sep 01; 10 AB - OBJECTIVE To investigate the extent of tobacco expenditures in Bangladesh and to compare those costs with potential investment in food and other essential items. DESIGN Review of available statistics and calculations based thereon. RESULTS Expenditure on tobacco, particularly cigarettes, represents a major burden for impoverished Bangladeshis. The poorest (household income of less than $24/month) are twice as likely to smoke as the wealthiest (household income of more than $118/month). Average male cigarette smokers spend more than twice as much on cigarettes as per capita expenditure on clothing, housing, health and education combined. The typical poor smoker could easily add over 500 calories to the diet of one or two children with his or her daily tobacco expenditure. An estimated 10.5 million people currently malnourished could have an adequate diet if money on tobacco were spent on food instead. The lives of 350 children could be saved each day. CONCLUSION Tobacco expenditures exacerbate the effects of poverty and cause significant deterioration in living standards among the poor. This aspect of tobacco use has been largely neglected by those working in poverty and tobacco control. Strong tobacco control measures could have immediate impact on the health of the poor by decreasing tobacco expenditures and thus significantly increasing the resources of the poor. Addressing the issue of tobacco and poverty together could make tobacco control a higher priority for poor countries.