PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Adrienne B Mejia
AU  - Pamela M Ling
AU  - Stanton A Glantz
TI  - Quantifying the effects of promoting smokeless tobacco as a harm reduction strategy in the USA
AID  - 10.1136/tc.2009.031427
DP  - 2010 Aug 01
TA  - Tobacco Control
PG  - 297--305
VI  - 19
IP  - 4
4099  - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/19/4/297.short
4100  - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/19/4/297.full
SO  - Tob Control2010 Aug 01; 19
AB  - Background Snus (a form of smokeless tobacco) is less dangerous than cigarettes. Some health professionals argue that snus should be promoted as a component of a harm reduction strategy, while others oppose this approach. Major US tobacco companies (RJ Reynolds and Philip Morris) are marketing snus products as cigarette brand line extensions. The population effects of smokeless tobacco promotion will depend on the combined effects of changes in individual risk with population changes in tobacco use patterns.Objective To quantitatively evaluate the health impact of smokeless tobacco promotion as part of a harm reduction strategy in the US.Methods A Monte Carlo simulation of a decision tree model of tobacco initiation and use was used to estimate the health effects associated with five different patterns of increased smokeless tobacco use.Results With cigarette smoking having a health effect of 100, the base case scenario (based on current US prevalence rates) yields a total health effect of 24.2 (5% to 95% interval 21.7 to 26.5) and the aggressive smokeless promotion (less cigarette use and increased smokeless, health-concerned smokers switching to snus, smokers in smokefree environments switching to snus) was associated with a health effect of 30.4 (5% to 95% interval 25.9 to 35.2). The anticipated health effects for additional scenarios with lower rates of smokeless uptake also overlapped with the base case.Conclusions Promoting smokeless tobacco as a safer alternative to cigarettes is unlikely to result in substantial health benefits at a population level.