PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Jidong Huang
AU  - John Tauras
AU  - Frank J Chaloupka
TI  - The impact of price and tobacco control policies on the demand for electronic nicotine delivery systems
AID  - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051515
DP  - 2014 Jul 01
TA  - Tobacco Control
PG  - iii41--iii47
VI  - 23
IP  - suppl 3
4099  - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/23/suppl_3/iii41.short
4100  - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/23/suppl_3/iii41.full
SO  - Tob Control2014 Jul 01; 23
AB  - Background While much is known about the demand for conventional cigarettes, little is known about the determinants of demand for electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS or e-cigarettes). The goal of this study is to estimate the own and cross-price elasticity of demand for e-cigarettes and to examine the impact of cigarette prices and smoke-free policies on e-cigarette sales. Methods Quarterly e-cigarette prices and sales and conventional cigarette prices from 2009 to 2012 were constructed from commercial retail store scanner data from 52 US markets, for food, drug and mass stores, and from 25 markets, for convenience stores. Fixed-effects models were used to estimate the own and cross-price elasticity of demand for e-cigarettes and associations between e-cigarette sales and cigarette prices and smoke-free policies. Results Estimated own price elasticities for disposable e-cigarettes centred around −1.2, while those for reusable e-cigarettes were approximately −1.9. Disposable e-cigarette sales were higher in markets where reusable e-cigarette prices were higher and where less of the population was covered by a comprehensive smoke-free policy. There were no consistent and statistically significant relationships between cigarette prices and e-cigarette sales. Conclusions E-cigarette sales are very responsive to own price changes. Disposable e-cigarettes appear to be substitutes for reusable e-cigarettes. Policies increasing e-cigarette retail prices, such as limiting rebates, discounts and coupons and imposing a tax on e-cigarettes, could potentially lead to significant reductions in e-cigarette sales. Differential tax policies based on product type could lead to substitution between different types of e-cigarettes.