PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Harry A Lando AU - Mark E Michaud AU - Walker S C Poston AU - Sara A Jahnke AU - Larry Williams AU - Christopher K Haddock TI - Banning cigarette smoking on US Navy submarines: a case study AID - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051624 DP - 2015 Oct 01 TA - Tobacco Control PG - e188--e192 VI - 24 IP - e3 4099 - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/24/e3/e188.short 4100 - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/24/e3/e188.full SO - Tob Control2015 Oct 01; 24 AB - Background The military has had a long pro-tobacco tradition. Despite official policy discouraging smoking, tobacco still is widely seen as part of military culture. While active smoking has presented a particular challenge for the military, in recent years there also has been increasing concern with secondhand smoke. This is especially true in closed environments and submarines may be deployed for months at a time. The current case study describes the successful implementation by the Navy of a comprehensive ban on smoking aboard submarines.Methods The authors searched documents on the internet, popular media, military-based news outlets and the scientific literature. We also conducted interviews with Navy officers who were instrumental in policy implementation.Findings Data demonstrating substantial exposure of non-smokers to tobacco smoke aboard submarines had major impact on successful adoption of the policy. A systematic and extended roll out of the ban included establishing a working group, soliciting input and active engagement from submarine personnel, and offering cessation assistance. Support was enlisted from Chief Petty Officers who could have been strongly opposed but who became strong proponents. Fewer problems were encountered than had been expected. In contrast to a previous unsuccessful attempt by a Navy captain to ban smoking on his ship, the ban was adopted without apparent tobacco industry interference.Conclusions Lessons learned included the importance of strong empirical support, effective framing of the issue, setting a realistic timeline, soliciting support from key personnel and providing appropriate resources. These lessons have implications for those considering further tobacco policy changes in the military and elsewhere.