RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Impact of modified risk tobacco product claims on beliefs of US adults and adolescents
JF Tobacco Control
JO Tob Control
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
SP s62
OP s69
DO 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054315
VO 27
IS Suppl 1
A1 El-Toukhy, Sherine
A1 Baig, Sabeeh A
A1 Jeong, Michelle
A1 Byron, M Justin
A1 Ribisl, Kurt M
A1 Brewer, Noel T
YR 2018
UL http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/27/Suppl_1/s62.abstract
AB Objective Under US law, tobacco product marketing may claim lower exposure to chemicals, or lower risk of health harms, only if these claims do not mislead the public. We sought to examine the impact of such marketing claims about potential modified risk tobacco products (MRTPs).Methods Participants were national samples of 4797 adults and 969 adolescent US smokers and non-smokers. We provided information about a potential MRTP (heated tobacco product, electronic cigarette or snus). Experiment 1 stated that the MRTP was as harmful as cigarettes or less harmful (lower risk claim). Experiment 2 stated that the MRTP exposed users to a similar quantity of harmful chemicals as cigarettes or to fewer chemicals (lower exposure claim).Results Claiming lower risk led to lower perceived quantity of chemicals and lower perceived risk among adults and adolescents (all p<0.05, Experiment 1). Among adults, this claim led to higher susceptibility to using the MRTP (p<0.05). Claiming lower exposure led to lower perceived chemical quantity and lower perceived risk (all p<0.05), but had no effect on use susceptibility (Experiment 2). Participants thought that snus exposed users to more chemicals and was less safe to use than heated tobacco products or electronic cigarette MRTPs (Experiments 1 and 2).Discussion Risk and exposure claims acted similarly on MRTP beliefs. Lower exposure claims misled the public to perceive lower perceived risk even though no lower risk claim was explicitly made, which is impermissible under US law.