TY - JOUR T1 - Policy options for endgame planning in tobacco control: a simulation modelling study JF - Tobacco Control JO - Tob Control DO - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055126 SP - tobaccocontrol-2019-055126 AU - Adam Skinner AU - Pippy Walker AU - Jo-An Atkinson AU - Rebecca Whitehead AU - Tim Roselli AU - Mark West AU - Margaret Bright AU - Mark Heffernan AU - Geoff McDonnell AU - Lennert Veerman AU - Ante Prodan AU - David P Thomas AU - Suzan Burton Y1 - 2019/12/19 UR - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2019/12/19/tobaccocontrol-2019-055126.abstract N2 - Objective To investigate the potential impacts of several tobacco control interventions on adult daily smoking prevalence in the Australian state of Queensland, using a system dynamics model codeveloped with local and national stakeholders.Methods Eight intervention scenarios were simulated and compared with a reference scenario (business as usual), in which all tobacco control measures currently in place are maintained unchanged until the end of the simulation period (31 December 2037).Findings Under the business as usual scenario, adult daily smoking prevalence is projected to decline from 11.8% in 2017 to 5.58% in 2037. A sustained 50% increase in antismoking advertising exposure from 2018 reduces projected prevalence in 2037 by 0.80 percentage points. Similar reductions are projected with the introduction of tobacco wholesaler and retailer licensing schemes that either permit or prohibit tobacco sales by alcohol-licensed venues (0.65 and 1.73 percentage points, respectively). Increasing the minimum age of legal supply of tobacco products substantially reduces adolescent initiation, but has minimal impact on smoking prevalence in the adult population over the simulation period. Sustained reductions in antismoking advertising exposure of 50% and 100% from 2018 increase projected adult daily smoking prevalence in 2037 by 0.88 and 1.98 percentage points, respectively.Conclusions These results suggest that any prudent approach to endgame planning should seek to build on rather than replace existing tobacco control measures that have proved effective to date. Additional interventions that can promote cessation are expected to be more successful in reducing smoking prevalence than interventions focussing exclusively on preventing initiation. ER -