PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Indrek Saar AU - Helle Koitla TI - Quantifying the social costs and benefits of tobacco in Estonia AID - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055419 DP - 2020 May 06 TA - Tobacco Control PG - tobaccocontrol-2019-055419 4099 - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2020/05/06/tobaccocontrol-2019-055419.short 4100 - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2020/05/06/tobaccocontrol-2019-055419.full AB - Background The tobacco cost literature has predominantly focused on estimating direct healthcare costs and productivity losses from morbidity and mortality. This study places a greater focus on the effects that arise through the fiscal system, illicit trade and fire accidents to estimate the social costs and benefits of tobacco use in Estonia in 2018.Methods A prevalence-based cost-of-illness approach was used, relying on data from the 2017–2018 period. Age-specific tobacco-attributable fractions were employed to estimate the costs and benefits of tobacco-related morbidity and mortality. Data on mortality, morbidity and healthcare costs were received from the National Institute of Health Development and the Estonian Health Insurance Fund. We used data for offences and fires from the Estonian Rescue Board and the Estonian Tax and Customs Board.Results It was estimated that the total social cost attributable to tobacco in Estonia in 2018 was €174 million, representing 0.67% of the nation’s GDP. If future benefits are also considered, the net social cost is €78 million. While the greatest cost components are productivity losses from mortality and morbidity, the level of tobacco-related law enforcement costs are comparable to direct healthcare costs, both of which exceed €10 million annually.Conclusions Despite the substantial social benefits arising through the fiscal system, tobacco-related costs outweighed these benefits in Estonia in 2018. In addition, a considerable portion of the economic burden of tobacco is associated with illicit trade. Therefore, the healthcare and law enforcement sectors would both benefit from effective tobacco control policies.