PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Shalini Bassi AU - Rob Ralston AU - Monika Arora AU - Aastha Chugh AU - Gaurang P Nazar AU - Jeff Collin TI - Understanding the dynamics of notification and implementation of Article 5.3 across India’s states and union territories AID - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057119 DP - 2022 Jun 01 TA - Tobacco Control PG - s18--s25 VI - 31 IP - Suppl 1 4099 - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/31/Suppl_1/s18.short 4100 - http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/31/Suppl_1/s18.full SO - Tob Control2022 Jun 01; 31 AB - Introduction In federal systems, state and local governments may offer opportunities for innovation in implementing the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). This paper explores the implementation of WHO FCTC Article 5.3 within India’s federal system, examining how its guidelines have been operationalised across states and union territories.Methods Interviews with officials from government and civil society organisations across key states, and a document review of state government and district administration notifications adopting Article 5.3 guidelines between 2015 and 2019.Results The data reveal subnational leadership in formulating intersectoral committees, which are designed to limit interactions with the tobacco industry, and corresponding measures to reject partnership and conflicts of interest for government officials. There are notable omissions across states and union territories in adoption of key Article 5.3 guidelines; only four districts and state governments refer to regulating aspects of ‘socially responsible’ industry activities, and no notifications include measures to prevent the tobacco industry receiving preferential treatment or requiring that information provided by industry actors be transparent and accountable. Interview data indicate that dynamics of notification across states have been shaped by lesson drawing and the catalytic role of civil society. The adoption of protocols is impacting on the practices of health officials, but there are concerns about engagement by other departments and the regulatory capacity of empowered committees.Conclusion The spread of state- and district-level policies illustrates opportunities federal structures can provide for accelerating tobacco control. Given significant omissions and policy tensions, there remains a need for national action to build on these innovations, including in revisions to India’s tobacco control legislation.No data are available.