Table 6

Logistic regression analysis of association between social participation and the odds ratio of daily and intermittent smoking, respectively, compared to all non-smokers and presented as crude odds ratio (OR), adjusted OR, and confidence intervals (95 % CI): men. The Malmö diet and cancer study 1992-94.

Crude OR Model I Model II Model III Model IV Model V
Daily smokers
Social participation6-150 2.0 (1.8 to 2.3)2.1 (1.8 to 2.4)2.1 (1.8 to 2.4)2.1 (1.8 to 2.4)2.1 (1.8 to 2.4)1.9 (1.6 to 2.2)
Age6-151 0.9 (0.8 to 0.9)0.9 (0.8 to 0.9)0.9 (0.8 to 0.9)0.9 (0.8 to 1.0)0.9 (0.8 to 0.9)
Country of origin6-152 1.0 (0.8 to 1.2)1.0 (0.8 to 1.2)1.0 (0.8 to 1.2)0.9 (0.8 to 1.1)
Self reported diseases6-153 0.8 (0.7 to 1.0)0.8 (0.7 to 1.0)0.8 (0.7 to 0.9)
Marital status6-154 1.3 (1.2 to 1.4)1.3 (1.2 to 1.4)
Socioeconomic status6-160 1.1 (1.1 to 1.1)
Intermittent smokers
Social participation6-150 0.8 (0.6 to 1.1)0.9 (0.7 to 1.1)0.8 (0.6 to 1.1)0.8 (0.6 to 1.1)0.8 (0.6 to 1.1)0.8 (0.6 to 1.1)
Age6-151 0.9 (0.8 to 1.0)0.9 (0.8 to 1.0)0.9 (0.8 to 1.0)0.9 (0.8 to 1.0)0.9 (0.8 to 1.0)
Country of origin6-152 1.4 (1.0 to 1.9)1.4 (1.0 to 1.9)1.4 (1.0 to 1.9)1.4 (1.0 to 1.9)
Self reported diseases6-153 1.2 (0.9 to 1.6)1.2 (0.9 to 1.6)1.2 (0.9 to 1.6)
Marital status6-154 1.0 (0.9 to 1.2)1.0 (0.9 to 1.1)
Socioeconomic status6-160 1.0 (0.9 to 1.1)
  • 6-150 Low versus high.

  • 6-151 Per 5 year interval.

  • 6-152 Born in country other than Sweden versus born in Sweden.

  • 6-153 Disease versus no disease.

  • 6-154 Four marital status groups.

  • 6-160 Eight socioeconomic groups.