Table 3

 Logistic regression predicting support for total ban* in restaurants by reported venue restrictions (n = 7508)

VariablesAttitudes to total ban (OR, 95% CI)
Total sampleWhere total bans in venue reportedWhere no total bans reported
n = 7508n = 2133n = 5375
*Limited to those who reported having attended restaurants in last 6 months.
†Based on normalised data using a square root transformation.
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Reported bans
    Total bans4.19 (3.66 to 4.79)
    Other1.00
Documented bans
    Extensive bans2.26 (1.85 to 2.76)1.55 (1.16 to 2.07)2.73 (2.02 to 3.69)
    No/limited bans1.001.001.00
Age (years)
    18–240.47 (0.38 to 0.57)0.63 (0.43 to 0.92)0.43 (0.34 to 0.54)
    25–390.63 (0.53 to 0.74)0.84 (0.61 to 1.15)0.57 (0.47 to 0.69)
    40–540.74 (0.62 to 0.87)1.01 (0.74 to 1.38)0.67 (0.55 to 0.81)
    55+1.001.001.00
Sex
    Male1.001.001.00
    Female0.76 (0.68 to 0.85)0.93 (0.75 to 1.14)0.70 (0.61 to 0.79)
Daily cigarette consumption†0.81 (0.78 to 0.85)0.82 (0.76 to 0.89)0.81 (0.77 to 0.86)
Think about harm to others1.20 (1.15 to 1.25)1.13 (1.05 to 1.22)1.23 (1.17 to 1.30)
Believe smoking causes lung cancer in non-smokers2.06 (1.77 to 2.40)2.01 (1.58 to 2.57)2.11 (1.74 to 2.57)
Country
    Canada0.36 (0.29 to 0.45)0.33 (0.24 to 0.45)0.35 (0.25 to 0.48)
    USA0.39 (0.31 to 0.49)0.56 (0.41 to 0.75)0.33 (0.24 to 0.47)
    UK0.46 (0.36 to 0.59)0.99 (0.57 to 1.73)0.41 (0.29 to 0.59)
    Australia1.001.001.00
    Nagelkerke’s R20.340.130.18